Search (112 results, page 1 of 6)

0.087168805 = product of:
  0.17433761 = sum of:
    0.043584403 = product of:
      0.1307532 = sum of:
        0.1307532 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1307532 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1307532 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1307532 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.028554104 = product of:
  0.05710821 = sum of:
    0.025574377 = weight(_text_:management in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025574377 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.18433036 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
    0.031533834 = product of:
      0.04730075 = sum of:
        0.019696401 = weight(_text_:29 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019696401 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
        0.027604345 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027604345 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The MTSR 2013 program and the contents of these proceedings show a rich diversity of research and practices, drawing on problems from metadata and semantically focused tools and technologies, linked data, cross-language semantics, ontologies, metadata models, and semantic system and metadata standards. The general session of the conference included 18 papers covering a broad spectrum of topics, proving the interdisciplinary field of metadata, and was divided into three main themes: platforms for research data sets, system architecture and data management; metadata and ontology validation, evaluation, mapping and interoperability; and content management. Metadata as a research topic is maturing, and the conference also supported the following five tracks: Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures; Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications; Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment; Big Data and Digital Libraries in Health, Science and Technology; and European and National Projects, and Project Networking. Each track had a rich selection of papers, giving broader diversity to MTSR, and enabling deeper exploration of significant topics.
All the papers underwent a thorough and rigorous peer-review process. The review and selection this year was highly competitive and only papers containing significant research results, innovative methods, or novel and best practices were accepted for publication. Only 29 of 89 submissions were accepted as full papers, representing 32.5% of the total number of submissions. Additional contributions covering noteworthy and important results in special tracks or project reports were accepted, totaling 42 accepted contributions. This year's conference included two outstanding keynote speakers. Dr. Stefan Gradmann, a professor arts department of KU Leuven (Belgium) and director of university library, addressed semantic research drawing from his work with Europeana. The title of his presentation was, "Towards a Semantic Research Library: Digital Humanities Research, Europeana and the Linked Data Paradigm". Dr. Michail Salampasis, associate professor from our conference host institution, the Department of Informatics of the Alexander TEI of Thessaloniki, presented new potential, intersecting search and linked data. The title of his talk was, "Rethinking the Search Experience: What Could Professional Search Systems Do Better?"

Date

17.12.2013 12:51:22

0.02817061 = product of:
  0.05634122 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
    0.015006783 = product of:
      0.04502035 = sum of:
        0.04502035 = weight(_text_:29 in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04502035 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper describes a conceptual framework and methodology for managing scheme versioning for the Semantic Web. The first part of the paper introduces the concept of vocabulary encoding schemes, distinguished from metadata schemas, and discusses the characteristics of changes in schemes. The paper then presents a proposal to use a value record-similar to a term record in thesaurus management techniques-to manage scheme versioning challenges for the Semantic Web. The conclusion identifies future research directions.

Date

23.12.2007 10:14:29

0.02295703 = product of:
  0.04591406 = sum of:
    0.036534823 = weight(_text_:management in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036534823 = score(doc=3084,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
    0.00937924 = product of:
      0.02813772 = sum of:
        0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02813772 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Ontologies have moved beyond the domains of library science, philosophy, and knowledge representation. They are now the concerns of marketing departments, CEOs, and mainstream business. Research analyst companies such as Forrester Research report on the critical roles of ontologies in support of browsing and search for e-commerce and in support of interoperability for facilitation of knowledge management and configuration. One now sees ontologies used as central controlled vocabularies that are integrated into catalogues, databases, web publications, knowledge management applications, etc. Large ontologies are essential components in many online applications including search (such as Yahoo and Lycos), e-commerce (such as Amazon and eBay), configuration (such as Dell and PC-Order), etc. One also sees ontologies that have long life spans, sometimes in multiple projects (such as UMLS, SIC codes, etc.). Such diverse usage generates many implications for ontology environments. In this paper, we will discuss ontologies and requirements in their current instantiations on the web today. We will describe some desirable properties of ontologies. We will also discuss how both simple and complex ontologies are being and may be used to support varied applications. We will conclude with a discussion of emerging trends in ontologies and their environments and briefly mention our evolving ontology evolution environment.

Date

29. 3.1996 18:16:49

0.02295703 = product of:
  0.04591406 = sum of:
    0.036534823 = weight(_text_:management in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036534823 = score(doc=2192,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
    0.00937924 = product of:
      0.02813772 = sum of:
        0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02813772 = score(doc=2192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Database management

Subject

Database management

0.021650031 = product of:
  0.043300062 = sum of:
    0.035796672 = weight(_text_:management in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035796672 = score(doc=2477,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.25800878 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
    0.0075033917 = product of:
      0.022510175 = sum of:
        0.022510175 = weight(_text_:29 in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022510175 = score(doc=2477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the joint 6th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007, and the 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ASWC 2007, held in Busan, Korea, in November 2007. The 50 revised full academic papers and 12 revised application papers presented together with 5 Semantic Web Challenge papers and 12 selected doctoral consortium articles were carefully reviewed and selected from a total of 257 submitted papers to the academic track and 29 to the applications track. The papers address all current issues in the field of the semantic Web, ranging from theoretical and foundational aspects to various applied topics such as management of semantic Web data, ontologies, semantic Web architecture, social semantic Web, as well as applications of the semantic Web. Short descriptions of the top five winning applications submitted to the Semantic Web Challenge competition conclude the volume.

LCSH

Knowledge management / Congresses

Subject

Knowledge management / Congresses

0.021616282 = product of:
  0.043232564 = sum of:
    0.035796672 = weight(_text_:management in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035796672 = score(doc=320,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.25800878 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
    0.007435893 = product of:
      0.022307679 = sum of:
        0.022307679 = weight(_text_:22 in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022307679 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

22. 5.2007 10:37:38

LCSH

Knowledge management

Subject

Knowledge management

0.020667218 = product of:
  0.08266887 = sum of:
    0.08266887 = weight(_text_:management in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08266887 = score(doc=4407,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The global economy is rapidly becoming more and more knowledge intensive. Knowledge is now widely recognized as the fourth production factor, on an equal footing with the traditional production factors of labour, capital and materials. Managing knowledge is as important as the traditional management of labour, capital and materials. In this book, we have shown how Semantic Web technology can make an important contribution to knowledge management.

Source

Towards the semantic Web: ontology-driven knowledge management. Eds.: J. Davies, u.a

0.018083815 = product of:
  0.07233526 = sum of:
    0.07233526 = weight(_text_:management in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07233526 = score(doc=2262,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.521365 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Over the past few years, we have seen a growing interest in the potential of both peer-to-peer (P2P) computing and the use of more formal approaches to knowledge management, involving the development of ontologies. This penultimate chapter discusses possibilities that both approaches may offer for more effective and efficient knowledge management. In particular, we investigate how the two paradigms may be combined. In this chapter, we describe our vision in terms of a set of future steps that need to be taken to bring the results described in earlier chapters to their full potential.

Source

Towards the semantic Web: ontology-driven knowledge management. Eds.: J. Davies, u.a

0.015820043 = product of:
  0.06328017 = sum of:
    0.06328017 = weight(_text_:management in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06328017 = score(doc=5204,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Introduction.- Ontology Development.- Compliance using Metadata.- Variety Management for Big Data.- Text Mining in Economics.- Generation of Natural Language Texts.- Sentiment Analysis.- Building Concise Text Corpora from Web Contents.- Ontology-Based Modelling of Web Content.- Personalized Clinical Decision Support for Cancer Care.- Applications of Temporal Conceptual Semantic Systems.- Context-Aware Documentation in the Smart Factory.- Knowledge-Based Production Planning for Industry 4.0.- Information Exchange in Jurisdiction.- Supporting Automated License Clearing.- Managing cultural assets: Implementing typical cultural heritage archive's usage scenarios via Semantic Web technologies.- Semantic Applications for Process Management.- Domain-Specific Semantic Search Applications.

LCSH

Management information systems
Management of Computing and Information Systems

Subject

Management information systems
Management of Computing and Information Systems

0.014051556 = product of:
  0.028103111 = sum of:
    0.020667218 = weight(_text_:management in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020667218 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
    0.007435893 = product of:
      0.022307679 = sum of:
        0.022307679 = weight(_text_:22 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022307679 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The basic goal of education within a discipline is to transform a novice into an expert. This entails moving the novice toward the "semantic space" that the expert inhabits-the space of concepts, meanings, vocabularies, and other intellectual constructs that comprise the discipline. Metadata is significant to this goal in digitally mediated education environments. Encoding the experts' semantic space not only enables the sharing of semantics among discipline scientists, but also creates an environment that bridges the semantic gap between the common vocabulary of the novice and the granular descriptive language of the seasoned scientist (Greenberg, et al, 2005). Developments underlying the Semantic Web, where vocabularies are formalized in the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and Web 2.0 approaches of user-generated folksonomies provide an infrastructure for linking vocabulary systems and promoting group learning via metadata literacy. Group learning is a pedagogical approach to teaching that harnesses the phenomenon of "collective intelligence" to increase learning by means of collaboration. Learning a new semantic system can be daunting for a novice, and yet it is integral to advance one's knowledge in a discipline and retain interest. These ideas are key to the "BOT 2.0: Botany through Web 2.0, the Memex and Social Learning" project (Bot 2.0).72 Bot 2.0 is a collaboration involving the North Carolina Botanical Garden, the UNC SILS Metadata Research center, and the Renaissance Computing Institute (RENCI). Bot 2.0 presents a curriculum utilizing a memex as a way for students to link and share digital information, working asynchronously in an environment beyond the traditional classroom. Our conception of a memex is not a centralized black box but rather a flexible, distributed framework that uses the most salient and easiest-to-use collaborative platforms (e.g., Facebook, Flickr, wiki and blog technology) for personal information management. By meeting students "where they live" digitally, we hope to attract students to the study of botanical science. A key aspect is to teach students scientific terminology and about the value of metadata, an inherent function in several of the technologies and in the instructional approach we are utilizing. This poster will report on a study examining the value of both folksonomies and taxonomies for post-secondary college students learning plant identification. Our data is drawn from a curriculum involving a virtual independent learning portion and a "BotCamp" weekend at UNC, where students work with digital plan specimens that they have captured. Results provide some insight into the importance of collaboration and shared vocabulary for gaining confidence and for student progression from novice to expert in botany.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.014051556 = product of:
  0.028103111 = sum of:
    0.020667218 = weight(_text_:management in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020667218 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
    0.007435893 = product of:
      0.022307679 = sum of:
        0.022307679 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022307679 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.5, S.519-536

0.014051556 = product of:
  0.028103111 = sum of:
    0.020667218 = weight(_text_:management in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020667218 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
    0.007435893 = product of:
      0.022307679 = sum of:
        0.022307679 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022307679 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.5, S.494-518

0.013423752 = product of:
  0.05369501 = sum of:
    0.05369501 = weight(_text_:management in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05369501 = score(doc=229,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

While much of a company's knowledge can be found in text repositories, current content management systems have limited capabilities for structuring and interpreting documents. In the emerging Semantic Web, search, interpretation and aggregation can be addressed by ontology-based semantic mark-up. In this paper, we examine semantic annotation, identify a number of requirements, and review the current generation of semantic annotation systems. This analysis shows that, while there is still some way to go before semantic annotation tools will be able to address fully all the knowledge management needs, research in the area is active and making good progress.

0.013071874 = product of:
  0.052287497 = sum of:
    0.052287497 = product of:
      0.07843124 = sum of:
        0.039392803 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039392803 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
        0.03903844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03903844 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

20. 2.2009 10:29:39

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.012852265 = product of:
  0.05140906 = sum of:
    0.05140906 = weight(_text_:management in 4401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05140906 = score(doc=4401,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.3705369 = fieldWeight in 4401, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4401)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

With the current changes driven by the expansion of the World Wide Web, this book uses a different approach from other books on the market: it applies ontologies to electronically available information to improve the quality of knowledge management in large and distributed organizations. Ontologies are formal theories supporting knowledge sharing and reuse. They can be used to explicitly represent semantics of semi-structured information. These enable sophisticated automatic support for acquiring, maintaining and accessing information. Methodology and tools are developed for intelligent access to large volumes of semi-structured and textual information sources in intra- and extra-, and internet-based environments to employ the full power of ontologies in supporting knowledge management from the information client perspective and the information provider. The aim of the book is to support efficient and effective knowledge management and focuses on weakly-structured online information sources. It is aimed primarily at researchers in the area of knowledge management and information retrieval and will also be a useful reference for students in computer science at the postgraduate level and for business managers who are aiming to increase the corporations' information infrastructure. The Semantic Web is a very important initiative affecting the future of the WWW that is currently generating huge interest. The book covers several highly significant contributions to the semantic web research effort, including a new language for defining ontologies, several novel software tools and a coherent methodology for the application of the tools for business advantage. It also provides 3 case studies which give examples of the real benefits to be derived from the adoption of semantic-web based ontologies in "real world" situations. As such, the book is an excellent mixture of theory, tools and applications in an important area of WWW research. * Provides guidelines for introducing knowledge management concepts and tools into enterprises, to help knowledge providers present their knowledge efficiently and effectively. * Introduces an intelligent search tool that supports users in accessing information and a tool environment for maintenance, conversion and acquisition of information sources. * Discusses three large case studies which will help to develop the technology according to the actual needs of large and or virtual organisations and will provide a testbed for evaluating tools and methods. The book is aimed at people with at least a good understanding of existing WWW technology and some level of technical understanding of the underpinning technologies (XML/RDF). It will be of interest to graduate students, academic and industrial researchers in the field, and the many industrial personnel who are tracking WWW technology developments in order to understand the business implications. It could also be used to support undergraduate courses in the area but is not itself an introductory text.

Content

Inhalt: OIL and DAML + OIL: Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web (pages 11-31) / Dieter Fensel, Frank van Harmelen and Ian Horrocks A Methodology for Ontology-Based Knowledge Management (pages 33-46) / York Sure and Rudi Studer Ontology Management: Storing, Aligning and Maintaining Ontologies (pages 47-69) / Michel Klein, Ying Ding, Dieter Fensel and Borys Omelayenko Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema (pages 71-89) / Jeen Broekstra, Arjohn Kampman and Frank van Harmelen Generating Ontologies for the Semantic Web: OntoBuilder (pages 91-115) / R. H. P. Engels and T. Ch. Lech OntoEdit: Collaborative Engineering of Ontologies (pages 117-132) / York Sure, Michael Erdmann and Rudi Studer QuizRDF: Search Technology for the Semantic Web (pages 133-144) / John Davies, Richard Weeks and Uwe Krohn Spectacle (pages 145-159) / Christiaan Fluit, Herko ter Horst, Jos van der Meer, Marta Sabou and Peter Mika OntoShare: Evolving Ontologies in a Knowledge Sharing System (pages 161-177) / John Davies, Alistair Duke and Audrius Stonkus Ontology Middleware and Reasoning (pages 179-196) / Atanas Kiryakov, Kiril Simov and Damyan Ognyanov Ontology-Based Knowledge Management at Work: The Swiss Life Case Studies (pages 197-218) / Ulrich Reimer, Peter Brockhausen, Thorsten Lau and Jacqueline R. Reich Field Experimenting with Semantic Web Tools in a Virtual Organization (pages 219-244) / Victor Iosif, Peter Mika, Rikard Larsson and Hans Akkermans A Future Perspective: Exploiting Peer-To-Peer and the Semantic Web for Knowledge Management (pages 245-264) / Dieter Fensel, Steffen Staab, Rudi Studer, Frank van Harmelen and John Davies Conclusions: Ontology-driven Knowledge Management - Towards the Semantic Web? (pages 265-266) / John Davies, Dieter Fensel and Frank van Harmelen

0.0119613195 = product of:
  0.047845278 = sum of:
    0.047845278 = weight(_text_:management in 4409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047845278 = score(doc=4409,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.34485054 = fieldWeight in 4409, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4409)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

We saw in the introduction how the Semantic Web makes possible a new generation of knowledge management tools. We now turn our attention more specifically to Semantic Web based support for virtual communities of practice. The notion of communities of practice has attracted much attention in the field of knowledge management. Communities of practice are groups within (or sometimes across) organizations who share a common set of information needs or problems. They are typically not a formal organizational unit but an informal network, each sharing in part a common agenda and shared interests or issues. In one example it was found that a lot of knowledge sharing among copier engineers took place through informal exchanges, often around a water cooler. As well as local, geographically based communities, trends towards flexible working and globalisation have led to interest in supporting dispersed communities using Internet technology. The challenge for organizations is to support such communities and make them effective. Provided with an ontology meeting the needs of a particular community of practice, knowledge management tools can arrange knowledge assets into the predefined conceptual classes of the ontology, allowing more natural and intuitive access to knowledge. Knowledge management tools must give users the ability to organize information into a controllable asset. Building an intranet-based store of information is not sufficient for knowledge management; the relationships within the stored information are vital. These relationships cover such diverse issues as relative importance, context, sequence, significance, causality and association. The potential for knowledge management tools is vast; not only can they make better use of the raw information already available, but they can sift, abstract and help to share new information, and present it to users in new and compelling ways.

Source

Towards the semantic Web: ontology-driven knowledge management. Eds.: J. Davies, u.a

0.011204464 = product of:
  0.044817857 = sum of:
    0.044817857 = product of:
      0.06722678 = sum of:
        0.03376526 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03376526 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
        0.03346152 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03346152 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

29. 7.2011 14:44:56
26.12.2011 13:40:22

0.011204464 = product of:
  0.044817857 = sum of:
    0.044817857 = product of:
      0.06722678 = sum of:
        0.03376526 = weight(_text_:29 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03376526 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
        0.03346152 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03346152 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 3.2013 19:29:20

0.01118646 = product of:
  0.04474584 = sum of:
    0.04474584 = weight(_text_:management in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04474584 = score(doc=3934,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This volume contains the lecture notes of the 13th Reasoning Web Summer School, RW 2017, held in London, UK, in July 2017. In 2017, the theme of the school was "Semantic Interoperability on the Web", which encompasses subjects such as data integration, open data management, reasoning over linked data, database to ontology mapping, query answering over ontologies, hybrid reasoning with rules and ontologies, and ontology-based dynamic systems. The papers of this volume focus on these topics and also address foundational reasoning techniques used in answer set programming and ontologies.

LCSH

Database management

Subject

Database management