Search (401 results, page 1 of 21)

0.21792202 = product of:
  0.43584403 = sum of:
    0.10896101 = product of:
      0.32688302 = sum of:
        0.32688302 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32688302 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.32688302 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32688302 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.17433761 = product of:
  0.34867522 = sum of:
    0.087168805 = product of:
      0.2615064 = sum of:
        0.2615064 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2615064 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2615064 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2615064 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

0.10896101 = product of:
  0.21792202 = sum of:
    0.054480504 = product of:
      0.16344151 = sum of:
        0.16344151 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16344151 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16344151 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16344151 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.035128888 = product of:
  0.070257775 = sum of:
    0.051668044 = weight(_text_:management in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051668044 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
    0.018589733 = product of:
      0.055769198 = sum of:
        0.055769198 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055769198 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".

0.031929873 = product of:
  0.063859746 = sum of:
    0.054480504 = product of:
      0.16344151 = sum of:
        0.16344151 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16344151 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34897423 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.00937924 = product of:
      0.02813772 = sum of:
        0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02813772 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

"Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."

0.02817061 = product of:
  0.05634122 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
    0.015006783 = product of:
      0.04502035 = sum of:
        0.04502035 = weight(_text_:29 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04502035 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

29. 9.2015 18:56:44

Source

Open journal of knowledge management. 2013, Ausgabe VII = http://www.community-of-knowledge.de/beitrag/semantische-filterung-ein-werkzeug-zur-steigerung-der-effizienz-im-wissensmanagement/

0.028103111 = product of:
  0.056206223 = sum of:
    0.041334435 = weight(_text_:management in 4261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041334435 = score(doc=4261,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4261, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4261)
    0.014871786 = product of:
      0.044615358 = sum of:
        0.044615358 = weight(_text_:22 in 4261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044615358 = score(doc=4261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4261)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

17. 7.2002 19:22:06

Theme

Information Resources Management

0.023458961 = product of:
  0.046917923 = sum of:
    0.031000827 = weight(_text_:management in 4912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031000827 = score(doc=4912,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 4912, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4912)
    0.015917098 = product of:
      0.047751293 = sum of:
        0.047751293 = weight(_text_:29 in 4912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047751293 = score(doc=4912,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 4912, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4912)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

29. 9.2015 18:56:44
29. 9.2015 19:03:30

Source

Open journal of knowledge management. 2013, Ausgabe VII = http://www.community-of-knowledge.de/beitrag/wissenstransfer-und-medienerschliessung-werkzeuge-fuer-die-integration-von-multimedia-inhalten-in-d/

0.02295703 = product of:
  0.04591406 = sum of:
    0.036534823 = weight(_text_:management in 1154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036534823 = score(doc=1154,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 1154, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1154)
    0.00937924 = product of:
      0.02813772 = sum of:
        0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 1154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02813772 = score(doc=1154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1154)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Metasearch - also called parallel search, federated search, broadcast search, and cross-database search - has become commonplace in the information community's vocabulary. All speak to a common theme of searching and retrieving from multiple databases, sources, platforms, protocols, and vendors at the point of the user's request. Metasearch services rely on a variety of approaches including open standards (such as NISO's Z39.50 and SRU/SRW), proprietary programming interfaces, and "screen scraping." However, the absence of widely supported standards, best practices, and tools makes the metasearch environment less efficient for the metasearch provider, the content provider, and ultimately the end-user. To spur the development of widely supported standards and best practices, the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) sponsored a Metasearch Initiative in 2003 to enable: * metasearch service providers to offer more effective and responsive services, * content providers to deliver enhanced content and protect their intellectual property, and * libraries to deliver a simple search (a.k.a. "Google") that covers the breadth of their vetted commercial and free resources. The Access Management Task Group was one of three groups chartered by NISO as part of the Metasearch Initiative. The focus of the group was on gathering requirements for Metasearch authentication and access needs, inventorying existing processes, developing a series of formal use cases describing the access needs, recommending best practices given today's processes, and recommending and pursing changes to current solutions to better support metasearch applications. In September 2005, the group issued their final report and recommendation. This article summarizes the group's work and final recommendation.

Date

26.12.2011 16:29:10

0.021077333 = product of:
  0.042154666 = sum of:
    0.031000827 = weight(_text_:management in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031000827 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
    0.0111538395 = product of:
      0.03346152 = sum of:
        0.03346152 = weight(_text_:22 in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03346152 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Anthropological inquiry suggests that all societies classify animals and plants in similar ways. Paradoxically, in the same cultures that have seen large advances in biological science, citizenry's practical knowledge of nature has dramatically diminished. Here we describe historical, cross-cultural and developmental research on how people ordinarily conceptualize organic nature (folkbiology), concentrating on cognitive consequences associated with knowledge devolution. We show that results on psychological studies of categorization and reasoning from "standard populations" fail to generalize to humanity at large. Usual populations (Euro-American college students) have impoverished experience with nature, which yields misleading results about knowledge acquisition and the ontogenetic relationship between folkbiology and folkpsychology. We also show that groups living in the same habitat can manifest strikingly distinct behaviors, cognitions and social relations relative to it. This has novel implications for environmental decision making and management, including commons problems.

Date

23. 1.2022 10:22:18

0.018267412 = product of:
  0.07306965 = sum of:
    0.07306965 = weight(_text_:management in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07306965 = score(doc=2653,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

An explanation of faceted classification meant for people working in knowledge management. An example given for a high-technology company has the fundamental categories Products, Applications, Organizations, People, Domain objects ("technologies applied in the marketplace in which the organization participates"), Events (i.e. time), and Publications.

Editor

Knowledge Management Connection

0.018083815 = product of:
  0.07233526 = sum of:
    0.07233526 = weight(_text_:management in 2373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07233526 = score(doc=2373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.521365 = fieldWeight in 2373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2373)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.018083815 = product of:
  0.07233526 = sum of:
    0.07233526 = weight(_text_:management in 4111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07233526 = score(doc=4111,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4111, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4111)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.017898336 = product of:
  0.071593344 = sum of:
    0.071593344 = weight(_text_:management in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071593344 = score(doc=1125,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der Thesaurus Technik und Management ist die umfangreichste strukturierte Sammlung des aktuellen Fachwortschatzes zur Technik und dem produktionsorientierten Management. Für 48.000 deutsche und 32.000 englische Fachwörter werden die synonymen, hierarchischen und verwandten Beziehungen aufgezeigt und in 34.000 Begriffsfamilien zusammengefaßt. Alle Begriffssätze sind alphabetisch aufgelistet. Die zum Begriffssatz gehörenden Vorzugsbenennungen, Synonyme, Unter-, Ober- und verwandte Relationen und Rückverweise sind gekennzeichnet

0.017898336 = product of:
  0.071593344 = sum of:
    0.071593344 = weight(_text_:management in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071593344 = score(doc=1770,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der Thesaurus Technik und Management ist die umfangreichste strukturierte Sammlung des aktuellen Fachwortschatzes zur Technik und dem produktionsorientierten Management. Alle Begriffssätze sind alphabetisch aufgelistet. Die zum Begriffssatz gehörenden Vorzugsbenennungen, Synonyme, Unter-, Ober- und verwandte Relationen und Rückverweise sind gekennzeichnet

0.01760663 = product of:
  0.03521326 = sum of:
    0.025834022 = weight(_text_:management in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025834022 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
    0.00937924 = product of:
      0.02813772 = sum of:
        0.02813772 = weight(_text_:29 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02813772 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14479601 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041162275 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

A band of archivists and IT professionals at Harvard took on a project to convert nearly two million descriptions of archival collection components from marked-up text into the ArchivesSpace archival metadata management system. Starting in the mid-1990s, Harvard was an alpha implementer of EAD, an SGML (later XML) text markup language for electronic inventories, indexes, and finding aids that archivists use to wend their way through the sometimes quirky filing systems that bureaucracies establish for their records or the utter chaos in which some individuals keep their personal archives. These pathfinder documents, designed to cope with messy reality, can themselves be difficult to classify. Portions of them are rigorously structured, while other parts are narrative. Early documents predate the establishment of the standard; many feature idiosyncratic encoding that had been through several machine conversions, while others were freshly encoded and fairly consistent. In this paper, we will cover the practical and technical challenges involved in preparing a large (900MiB) corpus of XML for ingest into an open-source archival information system (ArchivesSpace). This case study will give an overview of the project, discuss problem discovery and problem solving, and address the technical challenges, analysis, solutions, and decisions and provide information on the tools produced and lessons learned. The authors of this piece are Kate Bowers, Collections Services Archivist for Metadata, Systems, and Standards at the Harvard University Archive, and Dave Mayo, a Digital Library Software Engineer for Harvard's Library and Technology Services. Kate was heavily involved in both metadata analysis and later problem solving, while Dave was the sole full-time developer assigned to the migration project.

Date

31. 1.2017 13:29:56

0.015661046 = product of:
  0.06264418 = sum of:
    0.06264418 = weight(_text_:management in 3735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06264418 = score(doc=3735,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 3735, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3735)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der Thesaurus Technik und Management ist die umfangreichste strukturierte Sammlung des aktuellen Fachwortschatzes zur Technik und dem produktionsorientierten Management. Alle Begriffssätze sind alphabetisch aufgelistet. Die zum Begriffssatz gehörenden Vorzugsbenennungen, Synonyme, Unter-, Ober- und verwandte Relationen und Rückverweise sind gekennzeichnet. Enthält 41.200 Begriffsfamilien mit 58.300 deutschen und 63.500 englischen Fachwörtern zur Technik und aus dem techniknahen Managementvokabular. Alle deutschen Fachwörter haben ein englisches Synonym.

0.015661046 = product of:
  0.06264418 = sum of:
    0.06264418 = weight(_text_:management in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06264418 = score(doc=4696,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der Thesaurus Technik und Management ist die umfangreichste strukturierte Sammlung des aktuellen Fachwortschatzes zur Technik und dem produktionsorientierten Management. Alle Begriffssätze sind alphabetisch aufgelistet. Die zum Begriffssatz gehörenden Vorzugsbenennungen, Synonyme, Unter-, Ober- und verwandte Relationen und Rückverweise sind gekennzeichnet. Enthält 34.900 Begriffsfamilien mit 47.500 deutschen und 50.300 englischen Fachwörtern zur Technik und aus dem techniknahen Managementvokabular. Alle deutschen Fachwörter haben ein englisches Synonym.

0.015661046 = product of:
  0.06264418 = sum of:
    0.06264418 = weight(_text_:management in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06264418 = score(doc=2474,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Cloudbasierte Bibliothekssysteme stellen die neue Generation der Bibliothekssysteme dar. Sie ermöglichen ein gemeinsames Management von Print- und elektronischen Medien. Da in der Hochschulbibliothek der Fachhochschule Münster die elektronischen Ressourcen entscheidend zur Literaturversorgung von Lehrenden und Studierenden beitragen, beschäftigt sich ein Projektteam seit Ende 2014 mit der Evaluation des Systems WorldShare Management Services (WMS) der Firma OCLC. Die ersten Ergebnisse und einige weitere Überlegungen zur Migration des Systems werden in diesem Beitrag vorgestellt.

Object

WorldShare Management Services

0.015500413 = product of:
  0.062001653 = sum of:
    0.062001653 = weight(_text_:management in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062001653 = score(doc=4343,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13874207 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041162275 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Viele auch kleinere Unternehmen, Verwaltungen und Organisationen sind angesichts eines wachsenden Berges von digitalen Informationen mit dem Ordnen und Strukturieren ihrer Ablagen beschäftigt. In den meisten Organisationen besteht ein Konzept der Dokumentenlenkung. Records Management verfolgt vor allem in zwei Punkten einen weiterführenden Ansatz. Zum einen stellt es über den Geschäftsalltag hinaus den Kontext und den Entstehungszusammenhang ins Zentrum und zum anderen gibt es Regeln vor, wie mit ungenutzten oder inaktiven Dokumenten zu verfahren ist. Mit den «Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records» - MoReq - wurde von der europäischen Kommission ein Standard geschaffen, der alle Kernbereiche des Records Managements und damit den gesamten Entstehungs-, Nutzungs-, Archivierungsund Aussonderungsbereich von Dokumenten abdeckt. In der «Anleitung zur Umsetzung» wird die umfangreiche Anforderungsliste von MoReq2 (August 2008) zusammengefasst und durch erklärende Abschnitte ergänzt, mit dem Ziel, als griffiges Instrument bei der Einführung eines Record Management Systems zu dienen.