Search (196 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.13 
    0.12786393 = product of:
  0.25572786 = sum of:
    0.063931964 = product of:
      0.19179589 = sum of:
        0.19179589 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19179589 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34126288 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.19179589 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19179589 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34126288 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040252704 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.11 
    0.10655328 = product of:
  0.21310656 = sum of:
    0.05327664 = product of:
      0.15982991 = sum of:
        0.15982991 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15982991 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34126288 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15982991 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15982991 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34126288 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040252704 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Bedford, D.: Knowledge architectures : structures and semantics (2021) 0.05 
    0.051857725 = product of:
  0.10371545 = sum of:
    0.09644387 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09644387 = score(doc=566,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24922685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040252704 = queryNorm
        0.38697222 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
    0.0072715813 = product of:
      0.021814743 = sum of:
        0.021814743 = weight(_text_:22 in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021814743 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Section 1 Context and purpose of knowledge architecture -- 1 Making the case for knowledge architecture -- 2 The landscape of knowledge assets -- 3 Knowledge architecture and design -- 4 Knowledge architecture reference model -- 5 Knowledge architecture segments -- Section 2 Designing for availability -- 6 Knowledge object modeling -- 7 Knowledge structures for encoding, formatting, and packaging -- 8 Functional architecture for identification and distinction -- 9 Functional architectures for knowledge asset disposition and destruction -- 10 Functional architecture designs for knowledge preservation and conservation -- Section 3 Designing for accessibility -- 11 Functional architectures for knowledge seeking and discovery -- 12 Functional architecture for knowledge search -- 13 Functional architecture for knowledge categorization -- 14 Functional architectures for indexing and keywording -- 15 Functional architecture for knowledge semantics -- 16 Functional architecture for knowledge abstraction and surrogation -- Section 4 Functional architectures to support knowledge consumption -- 17 Functional architecture for knowledge augmentation, derivation, and synthesis -- 18 Functional architecture to manage risk and harm -- 19 Functional architectures for knowledge authentication and provenance -- 20 Functional architectures for securing knowledge assets -- 21 Functional architectures for authorization and asset management -- Section 5 Pulling it all together - the big picture knowledge architecture -- 22 Functional architecture for knowledge metadata and metainformation -- 23 The whole knowledge architecture - pulling it all together
    RSWK
    Informationsmanagement
    Subject
    Informationsmanagement
  4. Gartner, R.: Metadata in the digital library : building an integrated strategy with XML (2021) 0.04 
    0.03891805 = product of:
  0.0778361 = sum of:
    0.072332904 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.072332904 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24922685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040252704 = queryNorm
        0.29022917 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
    0.00550319 = product of:
      0.01650957 = sum of:
        0.01650957 = weight(_text_:29 in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01650957 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    BK
    06.35 Informationsmanagement
    Classification
    06.35 Informationsmanagement
    Date
    29. 9.2022 17:57:57
  5. Semar, W.: Informations- und Wissensmanagement (2023) 0.04 
    0.03691223 = product of:
  0.14764892 = sum of:
    0.14764892 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14764892 = score(doc=817,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24922685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040252704 = queryNorm
        0.5924278 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In der Literatur wird Informations- und Wissensmanagement oft zusammen und in dieser Reihenfolge betitelt. In der Tat handelt es sich aber um zwei eigenständige Themenbereiche, die sich ergänzen. Ausgangspunkt muss jedoch zunächst das Wissen von Menschen sein, damit man ihnen anschließend die für sie relevante Information zukommen lassen kann. Hierdurch sind bereits die Aufgaben der beiden Bereiche festgelegt. Im Wissensmanagement geht es um das gezielte Organisieren von Wissen, das in den Köpfen der Menschen vorhanden ist. Dadurch, dass Wissen in der Zwischenzeit unbestritten eine der wichtigsten Ressourcen eines Unternehmens bzw. jeglicher Formen einer Organisation ist, steht das Managen des Wissens aller Mitarbeitenden im Vordergrund. Beim Informationsmanagement geht es um das gezielte Organisieren von Information, damit die Mitarbeitenden jederzeit über das relevante Wissen verfügen, um ihre Aufgabe erfüllen zu können. Wissen ist somit etwas Internes, im Kopf der Menschen, während Information von außen kommt, also etwas Externes ist. Die Kulturaspekte und die Fokussierung auf die Mitarbeitenden als Wissensträger stehen im Vordergrund des Wissensmanagements, während beim Informationsmanagement die Informationsversorgung und die dafür notwendige technische Infrastruktur im Vordergrund stehen. Gemäß diesem Konzept gehen wir im Folgenden zunächst auf das Wissensmanagement und anschließend auf das Informationsmanagement ein.
  6. Rösch, H.: Informationsethik und Bibliotheksethik : Grundlagen und Praxis (2021) 0.04 
    0.036166452 = product of:
  0.14466581 = sum of:
    0.14466581 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14466581 = score(doc=222,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24922685 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040252704 = queryNorm
        0.58045834 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    BK
    06.35 Informationsmanagement
    Classification
    06.35 Informationsmanagement
  7. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.03 
    0.031224312 = product of:
  0.062448625 = sum of:
    0.05327664 = product of:
      0.15982991 = sum of:
        0.15982991 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15982991 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34126288 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.009171985 = product of:
      0.027515953 = sum of:
        0.027515953 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027515953 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  8. Bärnreuther, K.: Informationskompetenz-Vermittlung für Schulklassen mit Wikipedia und dem Framework Informationskompetenz in der Hochschulbildung (2021) 0.01 
    0.010956876 = product of:
  0.043827504 = sum of:
    0.043827504 = product of:
      0.065741256 = sum of:
        0.03301914 = weight(_text_:29 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03301914 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
        0.032722116 = weight(_text_:22 in 299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032722116 = score(doc=299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=299)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 6.2021 16:29:52
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 8(2021) Nr.2, S.1-22
  9. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.01 
    0.010956876 = product of:
  0.043827504 = sum of:
    0.043827504 = product of:
      0.065741256 = sum of:
        0.03301914 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03301914 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
        0.032722116 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032722116 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
  10. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01 
    0.009130731 = product of:
  0.036522925 = sum of:
    0.036522925 = product of:
      0.054784384 = sum of:
        0.027515953 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027515953 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.02726843 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02726843 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  11. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01 
    0.009130731 = product of:
  0.036522925 = sum of:
    0.036522925 = product of:
      0.054784384 = sum of:
        0.027515953 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027515953 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.02726843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02726843 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  12. Barthel, J.; Ciesielski, R.: Regeln zu ChatGPT an Unis oft unklar : KI in der Bildung (2023) 0.01 
    0.007943172 = product of:
  0.031772688 = sum of:
    0.031772688 = product of:
      0.09531806 = sum of:
        0.09531806 = weight(_text_:29 in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09531806 = score(doc=925,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.6731671 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 3.2023 13:23:26
    29. 3.2023 13:29:19
  13. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.01 
    0.0063626333 = product of:
  0.025450533 = sum of:
    0.025450533 = product of:
      0.0763516 = sum of:
        0.0763516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0763516 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  14. Hobohm, H.-C.: Zensur in der Digitalität - eine Überwindung der Moderne? : Die Rolle der Bibliotheken (2020) 0.01 
    0.00550319 = product of:
  0.02201276 = sum of:
    0.02201276 = product of:
      0.06603828 = sum of:
        0.06603828 = weight(_text_:29 in 5371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06603828 = score(doc=5371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5371)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Beitrag zur Tagung: "Nationalsozialismus Digital. Die Verantwortung von Bibliotheken, Archiven und Museen sowie Forschungseinrichtungen und Medien im Umgang mit der NSZeit im Netz." Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Universität Wien, 27. - 29. November 2019
  15. Springer, M.: Ewiges Wachstum (2020) 0.01 
    0.00550319 = product of:
  0.02201276 = sum of:
    0.02201276 = product of:
      0.06603828 = sum of:
        0.06603828 = weight(_text_:29 in 5742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06603828 = score(doc=5742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5742)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.3, S.29
  16. Springer, M.: Schwarzer Schwan im Internet (2020) 0.01 
    0.00550319 = product of:
  0.02201276 = sum of:
    0.02201276 = product of:
      0.06603828 = sum of:
        0.06603828 = weight(_text_:29 in 5903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06603828 = score(doc=5903,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5903, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5903)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2020, H.7, S.29
  17. Müller, P.: Text-Automat mit Tücken (2023) 0.01 
    0.00550319 = product of:
  0.02201276 = sum of:
    0.02201276 = product of:
      0.06603828 = sum of:
        0.06603828 = weight(_text_:29 in 481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06603828 = score(doc=481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=481)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Pirmasenser Zeitung. Nr. 29 vom 03.02.2023, S.2
  18. Jaeger, L.: Wissenschaftler versus Wissenschaft (2020) 0.01 
    0.005453686 = product of:
  0.021814745 = sum of:
    0.021814745 = product of:
      0.06544423 = sum of:
        0.06544423 = weight(_text_:22 in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06544423 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    2. 3.2020 14:08:22
  19. Ibrahim, G.M.; Taylor, M.: Krebszellen manipulieren Neurone : Gliome (2023) 0.01 
    0.005453686 = product of:
  0.021814745 = sum of:
    0.021814745 = product of:
      0.06544423 = sum of:
        0.06544423 = weight(_text_:22 in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06544423 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14095812 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2023, H.10, S.22-24
  20. Lauck, D.: Daran hakt es bei der Corona-App : Kampf gegen Pandemie (2020) 0.00 
    0.0045859925 = product of:
  0.01834397 = sum of:
    0.01834397 = product of:
      0.055031907 = sum of:
        0.055031907 = weight(_text_:29 in 5139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055031907 = score(doc=5139,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14159642 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040252704 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5139, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5139)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 4.2020 18:30:27

Authors

Languages

  • e 125
  • d 69
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 176
  • el 40
  • m 8
  • p 4
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications