Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  1. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Topological aspects of information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.014522794 = product of:
      0.06777304 = sum of:
        0.018822279 = weight(_text_:system in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018822279 = score(doc=2157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
        0.010128049 = weight(_text_:information in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010128049 = score(doc=2157,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
        0.038822707 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038822707 = score(doc=2157,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Let (DS, DQ, sim) be a retrieval system consisting of a document space DS, a query space QS, and a function sim, expressing the similarity between a document and a query. Following D.M. Everett and S.C. Cater (1992), we introduce topologies on the document space. These topologies are generated by the similarity function sim and the query space QS. 3 topologies will be studied: the retrieval topology, the similarity topology and the (pseudo-)metric one. It is shown that the retrieval topology is the coarsest of the three, while the (pseudo-)metric is the strongest. These 3 topologies are generally different, reflecting distinct topological aspects of information retrieval. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for these topological aspects to be equal
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.13, S.1144-1160
  2. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A theoretical study of recall and precision using a topological approach to information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.0073227976 = product of:
      0.05125958 = sum of:
        0.011574914 = weight(_text_:information in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011574914 = score(doc=3267,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
        0.03968467 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03968467 = score(doc=3267,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Topologies for information retrieval systems are generated by certain subsets, called retrievals. Shows how recall and precision can be expressed using only retrievals. Investigates different types of retrieval systems: both threshold systems and close match systems and both optimal and non optimal retrieval. Highlights the relation with the hypergeometric and some non-standard distributions
    Source
    Information processing and management. 34(1998) nos.2/3, S.191-218
  3. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997) 0.01
    0.0053588827 = product of:
      0.037512176 = sum of:
        0.009450877 = weight(_text_:information in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009450877 = score(doc=647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
        0.028061297 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028061297 = score(doc=647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Asserts that duality is an important topic in informetrics, especially in connection with the classical informetric laws. Yet this concept is less studied in information retrieval. It deals with the unification or symmetry between queries and documents, search formulation versus indexing, and relevant versus retrieved documents. Elaborates these ideas and highlights the connection with the hypergeometric distribution
  4. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.00
    0.0042720297 = product of:
      0.029904205 = sum of:
        0.022816047 = weight(_text_:system in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022816047 = score(doc=4384,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
        0.0070881573 = weight(_text_:information in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070881573 = score(doc=4384,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    One aim of science evaluation studies is to determine quantitatively the contribution of different players (authors, departments, countries) to the whole system. This information is then used to study the evolution of the system, for instance to gauge the results of special national or international programs. Taking articles as our basic data, we want to determine the exact relative contribution of each coauthor or each country. These numbers are brought together to obtain country scores, or department scores, etc. It turns out, as we will show in this article, that different scoring methods can yield totally different rankings. Conseqeuntly, a ranking between countries, universities, research groups or authors, based on one particular accrediting methods does not contain an absolute truth about their relative importance
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.145-157
  5. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.00
    0.0035676688 = product of:
      0.024973681 = sum of:
        0.008353474 = weight(_text_:information in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008353474 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.016620208 = product of:
          0.033240415 = sum of:
            0.033240415 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033240415 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02453417 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429
  6. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.00
    0.0021406014 = product of:
      0.014984209 = sum of:
        0.0050120843 = weight(_text_:information in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050120843 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
        0.009972124 = product of:
          0.019944249 = sum of:
            0.019944249 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019944249 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02453417 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  7. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.00
    9.339468E-4 = product of:
      0.013075255 = sum of:
        0.013075255 = weight(_text_:information in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013075255 = score(doc=1515,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    COMPASS
    Information science / Statistical mathematics
    LCSH
    Information science / Statistical methods
    Subject
    Information science / Statistical mathematics
    Information science / Statistical methods
  8. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.00
    5.06297E-4 = product of:
      0.0070881573 = sum of:
        0.0070881573 = weight(_text_:information in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070881573 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
  9. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000) 0.00
    4.7734138E-4 = product of:
      0.006682779 = sum of:
        0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006682779 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.158-165
  10. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009) 0.00
    4.7734138E-4 = product of:
      0.006682779 = sum of:
        0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006682779 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2362-2365
  11. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬An h-index weighted by citation impact (2008) 0.00
    4.7734138E-4 = product of:
      0.006682779 = sum of:
        0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006682779 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.770-780
  12. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007) 0.00
    4.176737E-4 = product of:
      0.0058474317 = sum of:
        0.0058474317 = weight(_text_:information in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058474317 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.6, S.777-785
  13. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008) 0.00
    4.176737E-4 = product of:
      0.0058474317 = sum of:
        0.0058474317 = weight(_text_:information in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058474317 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1469-1478
  14. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012) 0.00
    4.176737E-4 = product of:
      0.0058474317 = sum of:
        0.0058474317 = weight(_text_:information in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058474317 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.1048-1053
  15. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization : definitions and relations (2000) 0.00
    3.5800604E-4 = product of:
      0.0050120843 = sum of:
        0.0050120843 = weight(_text_:information in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050120843 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.11, S.1004-1017
  16. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A measure for the cohesion of weighted networks (2003) 0.00
    2.9833836E-4 = product of:
      0.004176737 = sum of:
        0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004176737 = score(doc=5157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.3, S.193-202