-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: ¬The impact factor's Matthew Effect : a natural experiment in bibliometrics (2010)
0.00
3.5800604E-4 = product of:
0.0050120843 = sum of:
0.0050120843 = weight(_text_:information in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050120843 = score(doc=3338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.424-427
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Tsou, A.: Team size matters : collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 (2015)
0.00
3.5800604E-4 = product of:
0.0050120843 = sum of:
0.0050120843 = weight(_text_:information in 2035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050120843 = score(doc=2035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2035)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1323-1332
-
Bertin, M.; Atanassova, I.; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V.: ¬The invariant distribution of references in scientific articles (2016)
0.00
3.5800604E-4 = product of:
0.0050120843 = sum of:
0.0050120843 = weight(_text_:information in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050120843 = score(doc=2497,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.1, S.164-177
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980-2007) (2010)
0.00
2.9833836E-4 = product of:
0.004176737 = sum of:
0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004176737 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The issue of duplicate publications has received a lot of attention in the medical literature, but much less in the information science community. This paper aims to analyze the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications across all fields of research between 1980 and 2007. Design/methodology/approach - The approach is a bibliometric analysis of duplicate papers based on their metadata. Duplicate papers are defined as papers published in two different journals having: the exact same title; the same first author; and the same number of cited references. Findings - In all fields combined, the prevalence of duplicates is one out of 2,000 papers, but is higher in the natural and medical sciences than in the social sciences and humanities. A very high proportion (>85 percent) of these papers are published the same year or one year apart, which suggest that most duplicate papers were submitted simultaneously. Furthermore, duplicate papers are generally published in journals with impact factors below the average of their field and obtain lower citations. Originality/value - The paper provides clear evidence that the prevalence of duplicate papers is low and, more importantly, that the scientific impact of such papers is below average.
-
Kirchik, O.; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V.: Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of Russian science (1993-2010) (2012)
0.00
2.9833836E-4 = product of:
0.004176737 = sum of:
0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004176737 = score(doc=284,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1411-1419
-
Lozano, G.A.; Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: ¬The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012)
0.00
2.9833836E-4 = product of:
0.004176737 = sum of:
0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004176737 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.11, S.2140-2145
-
Larivière, V.; Lozano, G.A.; Gingras, Y.: Are elite journals declining? (2014)
0.00
2.9833836E-4 = product of:
0.004176737 = sum of:
0.004176737 = weight(_text_:information in 1228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004176737 = score(doc=1228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1228)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.649-655
-
Gingras, Y.: Bibliometrics and research evaluation : uses and abuses (2016)
0.00
2.3867069E-4 = product of:
0.0033413896 = sum of:
0.0033413896 = weight(_text_:information in 3805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033413896 = score(doc=3805,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3805, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3805)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Series
- History and foundations of information science
