Hyams, P.: Who's winning out in text retrieval? (1996)
0.01
0.00798273 = product of:
0.05587911 = sum of:
0.021511177 = weight(_text_:system in 4975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021511177 = score(doc=4975,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 4975, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4975)
0.03436793 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03436793 = score(doc=4975,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 4975, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4975)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Reports on the current state of the text retrieval system market, noting the comparative sales of 4 companies producing text retrieval systems: Fulcrum (sales: 13,1 million dollars, net income: 2,65 million dollars); Dataware (sales: 10,5 million dollars, net income: 133.000 dollars loss); Verity (sales: 8,0 million dollars, net income: 112.000 dollars); Excalibur (sales: 5,77 million dollars, net income: 110.000 dollars). Concludes that Fulcrum looks to be best placed in the market
