-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.36
0.36063033 = product of:
0.63110304 = sum of:
0.023380058 = product of:
0.11690029 = sum of:
0.11690029 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11690029 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.016133383 = weight(_text_:system in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016133383 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.11690029 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11690029 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.11690029 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11690029 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.11690029 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11690029 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.11690029 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11690029 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.0070881573 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070881573 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.11690029 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11690029 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20800096 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.5714286 = coord(8/14)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
- Source
- System Sciences, 2009. HICSS '09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference
-
Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997)
0.03
0.026894525 = product of:
0.09413083 = sum of:
0.037644558 = weight(_text_:system in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037644558 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
0.010128049 = weight(_text_:information in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010128049 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
0.034724083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034724083 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
0.011634145 = product of:
0.02326829 = sum of:
0.02326829 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02326829 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
-
Celentano, A.; Fugini, M.G.; Pozzi, S.: Knowledge-based document retrieval in office environments : the Kabiria system (1995)
0.02
0.020243121 = product of:
0.0944679 = sum of:
0.048100453 = weight(_text_:system in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048100453 = score(doc=3224,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.62248504 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006682779 = score(doc=3224,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
0.03968467 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03968467 = score(doc=3224,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Proposes a document retrieval model and system on the representation of knowledge describing the semantic contents of dicuments, the way in which the documents are managed by producers and by people in the office, and the application domain where the office operates. Discusses the knowledge representation issues needed for the document retrieval system and presents a document retrieval model that captures these issues. Describes such a system named Kabiria. Covers the querying and browsing environments and the architecture of the system
- Source
- ACM transactions on information systems. 13(1995) no.3, S.237-268
-
Merve, N. v.d.: ¬The integration of document image processing and text retrieval principles (1993)
0.02
0.018365951 = product of:
0.08570777 = sum of:
0.030421399 = weight(_text_:system in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030421399 = score(doc=6564,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006682779 = score(doc=6564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
0.04860359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04860359 = score(doc=6564,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Only 10% of information used by an organisation is in electronic form hence the need to examine ways of processing and loading paper documents automatically in an electronic database. Discusses the principles of a document image processing (DIP) system; the difference between text retrieval and DIP; text retrieval systems and concept retrieval. Describes the TOPIC intelligent text retrieval system based on concept retrieval. Covers the TYPO operator developed for mispellings, character transpositions and 'dirty' text retrieved as output form OCR processes. Refers to an electronic news clipping service application
-
Boeri, R.J.; Hensel, M.: Set up a winning text retrieval system : carefully (1995)
0.02
0.015908616 = product of:
0.07424021 = sum of:
0.030421399 = weight(_text_:system in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030421399 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
0.009450877 = weight(_text_:information in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009450877 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
0.03436793 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03436793 = score(doc=2809,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Considers some of the practical issues involved when a company plans to develop an in house computerized document management system: conversion of paper to electronic form via optical character recognition (OCR) or rekeying; coding of document elements using SGML; indexing for information searching and retrieval (including proximity searching); and hybrid CD-ROM and online information retrieval systems
-
Vasudevan, M.C.; Mohan, M.; Kapoor, A.: Information system for knowledge management in the specialized division of a hospital (2006)
0.01
0.014856391 = product of:
0.06932982 = sum of:
0.037644558 = weight(_text_:system in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037644558 = score(doc=1499,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
0.014323224 = weight(_text_:information in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014323224 = score(doc=1499,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
0.017362041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017362041 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Information systems are essential support for knowledge management in all types of enterprises. This paper describes the evolution and development of a specialized hospital information system. The system is designed to integrate for access and retrieval from databases of patients' case records, and related images - CATSCAN, MRI, X-Ray - and to enable online access to full text of relevant papers on the Internet/WWW. The generation of information products and services from the system is briefly described.
- Source
- Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995)
0.01
0.01454542 = product of:
0.06787863 = sum of:
0.021511177 = weight(_text_:system in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021511177 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006682779 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.03968467 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03968467 = score(doc=2054,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
- Source
- Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32
-
Pritchard, J.A.T.: Integrated text and image management (1991)
0.01
0.014177256 = product of:
0.06616053 = sum of:
0.02688897 = weight(_text_:system in 3145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02688897 = score(doc=3145,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 3145, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3145)
0.014468643 = weight(_text_:information in 3145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014468643 = score(doc=3145,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 3145, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3145)
0.024802918 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024802918 = score(doc=3145,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3145, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3145)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- An important recent development in information retrieval is the integration of several technologies (images, text, graphical data) into powerful, user friendly, text and image multimedia information systems. Provides examples of selected commercial developments such as the Topic System (by Verity, California)
- Source
- Information management report. 1991, Dec., S.14-16
-
Black, K.: ELISE: an online image retrieval system (1993)
0.01
0.013964031 = product of:
0.065165475 = sum of:
0.030421399 = weight(_text_:system in 6631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030421399 = score(doc=6631,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 6631, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6631)
0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 6631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006682779 = score(doc=6631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6631)
0.028061297 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028061297 = score(doc=6631,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 6631, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6631)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Research at De Montfort Univ., Division of Learning Development, in Leicester, is focused on promoting the idea of the electronic library. Describes the Electronic Library Image Service for Europe (ELISE) project funded by the Commission for the European Communities, its overall aim and lists the 5 main challenges for the project team which include: identifying image bank technical requirements; exploring storage and retrieval mechanisms; exploring client needs and design user interfaces; the production of a pilot system; and devising a model for the international interconnection of systems
- Source
- Aslib information. 21(1993) nos.7/8, S.293-295
-
Masiero, P.C.: Authoring and searching in dynamically growing hypertext databases (1994)
0.01
0.013964031 = product of:
0.065165475 = sum of:
0.030421399 = weight(_text_:system in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030421399 = score(doc=1575,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006682779 = score(doc=1575,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
0.028061297 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028061297 = score(doc=1575,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Shows how an application in office information systems can be modelled so that a dynamically growing database of hypertext documents is created and automatically extended, as well as easily searched. Proposes a method for analyzing office applications which relies on a model based on statecharts to record the flow of documents within the system. A prototype implementation is described of a hypertext system to support the creation, storage and retrieval of documents associated with formal face to face meetings. Special features to be incorporated into hypertext systems aimed at supporting the storage and retrieval of office documents are also identified
-
Koulopoulos, T.M.; Frappaolo, C.: Electronic document management systems : where are they today? (1993)
0.01
0.013605518 = product of:
0.06349242 = sum of:
0.018822279 = weight(_text_:system in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018822279 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
0.0058474317 = weight(_text_:information in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058474317 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
0.038822707 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038822707 = score(doc=982,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a market study to determine the changes that have taken place in text retrieval and imaging systems: the 2 dominant components of electronic document management systems (EDMS). Organizations are focusing on integrated technologies, a sign that imaging and text retrieval are making their way towards the mainstream of information management. Reports data for: text retrieval market revenue by customer segment (industry, government and library); components of an integrated image based EDMS; component platforms of the text retreival system (PC, Macintosh atc.); areas of improvement for current imaging systems; importance of key benefits to implementing text retrieval within the organization; and areas of improvement for current text retrieval systems
-
Rosman, G.; Meer, K.v.d.; Sol, H.G.: ¬The design of document information systems (1996)
0.01
0.012903456 = product of:
0.060216125 = sum of:
0.02688897 = weight(_text_:system in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02688897 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
0.016706947 = weight(_text_:information in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016706947 = score(doc=7750,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
0.016620208 = product of:
0.033240415 = sum of:
0.033240415 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033240415 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses the costs and benefits of documents information systems (involving text and images) and some design methodological aspects that arise from the documentary nature of the data. Reports details of a case study involving a specific document information system introduced at Press Ltd, a company in the Netherlands
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297
-
Alexander, J.: Customs and excise process 2.5 million documents (1997)
0.01
0.0122028245 = product of:
0.056946512 = sum of:
0.030421399 = weight(_text_:system in 2427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030421399 = score(doc=2427,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 2427, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2427)
0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 2427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006682779 = score(doc=2427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2427)
0.019842334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019842334 = score(doc=2427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2427)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The HM Customs and Excise operation in Salford, Manchster, UK, has installed an electronic document management system from Graphic Data to streamline handling of import entries. It aims was to reduce filing and storage and improve access to documentation. The system involves scanning documents and CD storage and retrieval. Because of legal admissibility issues, documentation is retained in its paper format in deep storage
- Source
- Information management and technology. 30(1997) no.6, s.280-281
-
Lam-Adesina, A.M.; Jones, G.J.F.: Examining and improving the effectiveness of relevance feedback for retrieval of scanned text documents (2006)
0.01
0.011462139 = product of:
0.053489983 = sum of:
0.013444485 = weight(_text_:system in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013444485 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
0.0072343214 = weight(_text_:information in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072343214 = score(doc=977,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
0.032811176 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032811176 = score(doc=977,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.442117 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Important legacy paper documents are digitized and collected in online accessible archives. This enables the preservation, sharing, and significantly the searching of these documents. The text contents of these document images can be transcribed automatically using OCR systems and then stored in an information retrieval system. However, OCR systems make errors in character recognition which have previously been shown to impact on document retrieval behaviour. In particular relevance feedback query-expansion methods, which are often effective for improving electronic text retrieval, are observed to be less reliable for retrieval of scanned document images. Our experimental examination of the effects of character recognition errors on an ad hoc OCR retrieval task demonstrates that, while baseline information retrieval can remain relatively unaffected by transcription errors, relevance feedback via query expansion becomes highly unstable. This paper examines the reason for this behaviour, and introduces novel modifications to standard relevance feedback methods. These methods are shown experimentally to improve the effectiveness of relevance feedback for errorful OCR transcriptions. The new methods combine similar recognised character strings based on term collection frequency and a string edit-distance measure. The techniques are domain independent and make no use of external resources such as dictionaries or training data.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.3, S.633-649
-
Dale, T.: Selecting an indexing scheme (1996)
0.01
0.010886654 = product of:
0.050804388 = sum of:
0.021511177 = weight(_text_:system in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021511177 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
0.009450877 = weight(_text_:information in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009450877 = score(doc=3347,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
0.019842334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019842334 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Discusses issues underlying indexing for records management. Examines: how terms that will be used to retrieve a document are selected; how many index terms should be used to ensure retrieval, the unit of information to be indexed; whether or not the system shoul be able to retrieve tha page that contains the information requested or whether it is sufficient to be able to retrieve the document that includes that page; and how to deal with long documents
-
Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997)
0.01
0.009924821 = product of:
0.04631583 = sum of:
0.010128049 = weight(_text_:information in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010128049 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
0.024553634 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024553634 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
0.011634145 = product of:
0.02326829 = sum of:
0.02326829 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02326829 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
0.085914485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
- Source
- Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
-
Sugimoto, M.: ¬A document retrieval system for assisting creative research (1995)
0.01
0.008861467 = product of:
0.062030267 = sum of:
0.032266766 = weight(_text_:system in 3143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032266766 = score(doc=3143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 3143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3143)
0.029763501 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029763501 = score(doc=3143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3143)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Bondarenko, O.; Janssen, R.; Driessen, S.: Requirements for the design of a personal document-management system (2010)
0.01
0.006559154 = product of:
0.045914076 = sum of:
0.037644558 = weight(_text_:system in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037644558 = score(doc=3430,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
0.008269517 = weight(_text_:information in 3430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008269517 = score(doc=3430,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3430, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3430)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- In this article a set of requirements for the design of a personal document management system is presented, based on the results of three research studies (Bondarenko, [2006]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2005]; Bondarenko & Janssen, [2009]). We propose a framework, based on layers of task decomposition, that helps to understand the needs of information workers with regard to personal document and task management. Relevant user processes are described and requirements for a document-management system are derived for each layer. The derived requirements are compared to related studies, and implications for system design are discussed.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.3, S.468-482
-
McLean, S.; Spring, M.B.; Rasmussen, E.; Williams, J.G.: Online image databases : usabiblity and performance (1995)
0.01
0.006282966 = product of:
0.043980762 = sum of:
0.026618723 = weight(_text_:system in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026618723 = score(doc=1192,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.017362041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017362041 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- The Promenade image retrieval system us described in terms of its design, development and architecture. Design, development and implementation issues are discussed in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. A preliminary usability study is presented and the data resulting from the preliminary study are analysed and discussed. Efficiency in terms of response time due to network delays, database processing, application processing and image characteristcs and display is discussed. Response time results frome 40 queries made to the image database are presented and discussed. The results of theses studies demonstrate where improvements in the system need to be made in order ro improve usability and response time
-
Falk, H.: Computer-based vertical files (1996)
0.01
0.006282966 = product of:
0.043980762 = sum of:
0.026618723 = weight(_text_:system in 5733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026618723 = score(doc=5733,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 5733, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5733)
0.017362041 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017362041 = score(doc=5733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02453417 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5733)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Considers practical methods that could be used to convert a vertical file to a computerized file. In a computerized vertical file system, documents such as pages of books, booklets, newspaper clippings and photographs are stored in files that can be accessed by computer. A scanner is used to convert paper documents and enter them into the system. The documents are indexed by manual indexing, automatic full text indexing or both, and they are stored on disk. Document management software is used for indexing and document retrieval. Vertical file users can view stored documents on a computer screen, copy page images to a floppy disk, or print the images
