Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  • × year_i:[1960 TO 1970}
  1. Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965) 0.01
    0.0122028245 = product of:
      0.056946512 = sum of:
        0.030421399 = weight(_text_:system in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030421399 = score(doc=834,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07727166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
        0.006682779 = weight(_text_:information in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006682779 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
        0.019842334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019842334 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Index language (the system of symbols for representing subject content after analysis) is considered as a separate component and a variable in an information retrieval system. It is suggested that for purposes of testing, comparing and evaluating index language, the techniques of structural linguistics may provide a descriptive methodology by which all such languages (hierarchical and faceted classification, analytico-synthetic indexing, traditional subject indexing, indexes and classifications based on automatic text analysis, etc.) could be described in term of a linguistic model, and compared on a common basis
  2. Farradane, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval (1967) 0.01
    0.009378044 = product of:
      0.065646306 = sum of:
        0.016539034 = weight(_text_:information in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016539034 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
        0.04910727 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04910727 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967) S.297-314
  3. Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967) 0.00
    0.0047366275 = product of:
      0.03315639 = sum of:
        0.008353474 = weight(_text_:information in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008353474 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04306919 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
        0.024802918 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024802918 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07421378 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02453417 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.