Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Case Based Reasoning"
  1. Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2009) 0.02
    0.022393432 = product of:
      0.06718029 = sum of:
        0.057286415 = weight(_text_:forschung in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057286415 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17763087 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.32250258 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
        0.009893879 = product of:
          0.029681636 = sum of:
            0.029681636 = weight(_text_:22 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029681636 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036512498 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Klassifikation von bibliografischen Einheiten ist für einen systematischen Zugang zu den Beständen einer Bibliothek und deren Aufstellung unumgänglich. Bislang wurde diese Aufgabe von Fachexperten manuell erledigt, sei es individuell nach einer selbst entwickelten Systematik oder kooperativ nach einer gemeinsamen Systematik. In dieser Arbeit wird ein Verfahren zur Automatisierung des Klassifikationsvorgangs vorgestellt. Dabei kommt das Verfahren des fallbasierten Schließens zum Einsatz, das im Kontext der Forschung zur künstlichen Intelligenz entwickelt wurde. Das Verfahren liefert für jedes Werk, für das bibliografische Daten vorliegen, eine oder mehrere mögliche Klassifikationen. In Experimenten werden die Ergebnisse der automatischen Klassifikation mit der durch Fachexperten verglichen. Diese Experimente belegen die hohe Qualität der automatischen Klassifikation und dass das Verfahren geeignet ist, Fachexperten bei der Klassifikationsarbeit signifikant zu entlasten. Auch die nahezu vollständige Resystematisierung eines Bibliothekskataloges ist - mit gewissen Abstrichen - möglich.
    Date
    22. 8.2009 19:51:28
  2. Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen anhand von bibliografischen Daten mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2007) 0.01
    0.0095477365 = product of:
      0.057286415 = sum of:
        0.057286415 = weight(_text_:forschung in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057286415 = score(doc=558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17763087 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036512498 = queryNorm
            0.32250258 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Klassifikation von bibliografischen Einheiten ist für einen systematischen Zugang zu den Beständen einer Bibliothek und deren Aufstellung unumgänglich. Bislang wurde diese Aufgabe von Fachexperten manuell erledigt, sei es individuell nach einer selbst entwickelten Systematik oder kooperativ nach einer gemeinsamen Systematik. In dieser Arbeit wird ein Verfahren zur Automatisierung des Klassifikationsvorgangs vorgestellt. Dabei kommt das Verfahren des fallbasierten Schließens zum Einsatz, das im Kontext der Forschung zur künstlichen Intelligenz entwickelt wurde. Das Verfahren liefert für jedes Werk, für das bibliografische Daten vorliegen, eine oder mehrere mögliche Klassifikationen. In Experimenten werden die Ergebnisse der automatischen Klassifikation mit der durch Fachexperten verglichen. Diese Experimente belegen die hohe Qualität der automatischen Klassifikation und dass das Verfahren geeignet ist, Fachexperten bei der Klassifikationsarbeit signifikant zu entlasten. Auch die nahezu vollständige Resystematisierung eines Bibliothekskataloges ist - mit gewissen Abstrichen - möglich.
  3. Mazzucchelli, A.; Sartori , F.: String similarity in CBR platforms : a preliminary study (2014) 0.01
    0.009338368 = product of:
      0.056030206 = sum of:
        0.056030206 = product of:
          0.084045306 = sum of:
            0.049416736 = weight(_text_:29 in 1568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049416736 = score(doc=1568,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036512498 = queryNorm
                0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 1568, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1568)
            0.034628574 = weight(_text_:22 in 1568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034628574 = score(doc=1568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036512498 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1568)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Pages
    S.22-29
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
  4. Chen, Z.: ¬A conceptual model for storage and retrieval of short scientific texts (1993) 0.00
    0.0027732472 = product of:
      0.016639482 = sum of:
        0.016639482 = product of:
          0.049918443 = sum of:
            0.049918443 = weight(_text_:29 in 2715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049918443 = score(doc=2715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036512498 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2715)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.2, S.209-214
  5. Mataras, R.L.D.; Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning : an overview (1997) 0.00
    0.0027732472 = product of:
      0.016639482 = sum of:
        0.016639482 = product of:
          0.049918443 = sum of:
            0.049918443 = weight(_text_:29 in 436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049918443 = score(doc=436,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036512498 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 436, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=436)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    AI communications. 10(1997) no.1, S.21-29
  6. Mahapatra, R.; Sen, A.: Case base management systems : providing database support to case-based reasoners (1994) 0.00
    0.0022185976 = product of:
      0.013311585 = sum of:
        0.013311585 = product of:
          0.039934754 = sum of:
            0.039934754 = weight(_text_:29 in 525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039934754 = score(doc=525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12843955 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036512498 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=525)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of database management. 5(1994) no.2, S.19-29
  7. Golding, A.R.; Rosenbloom, P.S.: Improving accuracy by combining rule-based and case-based reasoning (1996) 0.00
    0.0021986398 = product of:
      0.013191838 = sum of:
        0.013191838 = product of:
          0.039575513 = sum of:
            0.039575513 = weight(_text_:22 in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039575513 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036512498 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  8. Ram, A.; Santamaria, J.C.: Continuous case-based reasoning (1997) 0.00
    0.0021986398 = product of:
      0.013191838 = sum of:
        0.013191838 = product of:
          0.039575513 = sum of:
            0.039575513 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039575513 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036512498 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  9. Kohno, T.: Error repair and knowledge acquisition via case-based reasoning (1997) 0.00
    0.0021986398 = product of:
      0.013191838 = sum of:
        0.013191838 = product of:
          0.039575513 = sum of:
            0.039575513 = weight(_text_:22 in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039575513 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036512498 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  10. Akerele, O.; David, A.; Osofisan, A.: Using the concepts of Case Based Reasoning and Basic Categories for enhancing adaptation to the user's level of knowledge in Decision Support System (2014) 0.00
    0.00164898 = product of:
      0.009893879 = sum of:
        0.009893879 = product of:
          0.029681636 = sum of:
            0.029681636 = weight(_text_:22 in 1449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029681636 = score(doc=1449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12786055 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036512498 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1449)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik