Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Ackermann, A.: Zur Rolle der Inhaltsanalyse bei der Sacherschließung : theoretischer Anspruch und praktische Wirklichkeit in der RSWK (2001) 0.00 
    0.0026043402 = product of:
  0.015626041 = sum of:
    0.015626041 = weight(_text_:wissen in 2061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015626041 = score(doc=2061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1639626 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038016807 = queryNorm
        0.09530247 = fieldWeight in 2061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2061)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    "Resümee: Zum Abschluß möchte ich noch einmal wesentliche Ergebnisse der Arbeit in Kürze Revue passieren lassen. Während ihr erster Teil auf die theoretische Klärung des Begriffs der Inhaltsanalyse abzielte, war der zweite der praktischen Frage gewidmet, ob die "Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung" ein Konzept der Inhaltsanalyse zu bieten haben und inwieweit Forderungen der Inhaltsanalyse in den RSWK Berücksichtigung finden. Der erste Teil ist, durch seinen Gegenstand bedingt, immer wieder von grundsätzlichen philosophischen Überlegungen geprägt gewesen und bildete die begriffliche Folie, vor deren Hintergrund der gesamte zweite Teil zu sehen ist. Mit Langridge's Entwurf wurde das bislang differenzierteste Modell zur Inhaltsanalyse vorgestellt und im einzelnen diskutiert. Dabei wurden vorab die besonderen methodischen Probleme benannt, mit der jedes Konzept einer Inhaltsanalyse konfrontiert ist. Sie hängen mit dem aus analytischer Sicht schwierigen strukturellen oder auch hermeneutischen Status von Texten ganz allgemein zusammen, der ein generelles Problem besonders in den Geisteswissenschaften darstellt. Dem Umstand, daß der Inhaltsanalyse gerade angesichts der immer stärker ausufernden Informationsflut im Internet als Grundlage für eine qualitative Sichtung und Ordnung von relevanten Informationen eine neue wichtige Aufgabe zuteil geworden ist, wurde ebenfalls Rechnung getragen. Neben seinem ausgeprägten pädagogischen Selbstverständnis ist es vor allem der epistemologische Anspruch einer Neuordnung des gesamten menschlichen Wissens, der Langridge's Entwurf ausgesprochen ambitioniert erscheinen läßt. Sein Begriff der Wissensformen, verstanden als Art der Wahrnehmung der Phänomene in der Welt, ordnet auch die klassischen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen neu, während sein Begriff des Themas die Phänomene selbst faßt. Der dritte zentrale Begriff seiner Konzeption, die Dokumentenform, zielt auf die ideologische Perspektive eines Dokuments, sofern sie für dessen Struktur relevant ist. Langridge's selbst formulierter Anspruch ist es, mit seinem Begriff der Wissensform auf der Ebene von Wissensdisziplinen und menschlichen Aktivitäten das zu leisten, was Ranganathans berühmte Universalklassifikation auf der thematischen Ebene geleistet hat. Die Stärke von Ranganathans Modell liegt jedoch im Unterschied zu dem seines Nachfolgers meines Erachtens darin, daß gerade nicht apriorisch verstandene, unveränderliche Formen des Wissens postuliert werden. Die zu ziehende Lehre aus dem Umstand sich ständig wandelnder Wissenschaftsdisziplinen sollte eine pragmatisch agierende, bibliothekarische Selbstbescheidung sein und nicht eine Selbstüberhebung über den Wissenschaftsbetreib. Langridge kann, so gesehen, seinem universalen Anspruch gar nicht gerecht werden, weil es die von ihm vermutete göttliche Ordnung des Wissens, die von einem immer in praktischen Zweckzusammenhängen agierenden Wissenschaftsbetrieb unabhängig wäre, in einem ontologischen Sinne wohl kaum gibt. Unstrittig scheint mir hingegen seine wohlbegründete Überlegung, daß ein Indexierer schon bei der Ermittlung zentraler Begriffe eines Dokuments notwendig - in einem rein analytischen, noch nicht bibliothekstechnischen Sinn - Wissen klassifiziert. Die Stärke von Langridge's Modell liegt nun gerade darin, diese klassifikatorische Tätigkeit so transparent wie möglich zu machen. Die genauere Betrachtung der Grundregeln der RSWK hat ergeben, daß sie kein schlüssiges Konzept für die Inhaltsanalyse zu bieten haben. Auch die von Langridge wie der DIN-Norm 31623 geforderte Unabhängigkeit der Inhaltsanalyse von der sich an sie anschließenden Übersetzung ihrer Ergebnisse in eine Dokumentationssprache wird schon im Konzept der RSWK unterlaufen. Die Inhaltsanalyse ist hier ganz entgegen theoretischer Postulate eng verwoben mit der streng geregelten Bildung von Schlagwörtern, was in einigen Fällen eine aus inhaltsanalytischer Sicht angemessene Kurzbeschreibung eines Dokuments fraglich macht.
  2. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00 
    0.0022996136 = product of:
  0.013797681 = sum of:
    0.013797681 = product of:
      0.02069652 = sum of:
        0.010395016 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010395016 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
        0.010301504 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010301504 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
  3. Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001) 0.00 
    0.002021253 = product of:
  0.012127518 = sum of:
    0.012127518 = product of:
      0.036382552 = sum of:
        0.036382552 = weight(_text_:29 in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036382552 = score(doc=6032,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:03:14
  4. Chen, H.: ¬An analysis of image queries in the field of art history (2001) 0.00 
    0.002021253 = product of:
  0.012127518 = sum of:
    0.012127518 = product of:
      0.036382552 = sum of:
        0.036382552 = weight(_text_:29 in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036382552 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Chen arranged with an Art History instructor to require 20 medieval art images in papers received from 29 students. Participants completed a self administered presearch and postsearch questionnaire, and were interviewed after questionnaire analysis, in order to collect both the keywords and phrases they planned to use, and those actually used. Three MLIS student reviewers then mapped the queries to Enser and McGregor's four categories, Jorgensen's 12 classes, and Fidel's 12 feature data and object poles providing a degree of match on a seven point scale (one not at all to 7 exact). The reviewers give highest scores to Enser and McGregor;'s categories. Modifications to both the Enser and McGregor and Jorgensen schemes are suggested
  5. Marshall, L.: Specific and generic subject headings : increasing subject access to library materials (2003) 0.00 
    0.002021253 = product of:
  0.012127518 = sum of:
    0.012127518 = product of:
      0.036382552 = sum of:
        0.036382552 = weight(_text_:29 in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036382552 = score(doc=5497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    30. 7.2006 14:29:04
  6. Früh, W.: Inhaltsanalyse (2001) 0.00 
    0.0017325026 = product of:
  0.010395016 = sum of:
    0.010395016 = product of:
      0.031185046 = sum of:
        0.031185046 = weight(_text_:29 in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031185046 = score(doc=1751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    24. 3.2008 12:29:34
  7. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Modelling what users see when they look at images : a cognitive viewpoint (2002) 0.00 
    0.0017325026 = product of:
  0.010395016 = sum of:
    0.010395016 = product of:
      0.031185046 = sum of:
        0.031185046 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031185046 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.6-29
  8. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.00 
    0.0017169174 = product of:
  0.010301504 = sum of:
    0.010301504 = product of:
      0.030904513 = sum of:
        0.030904513 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030904513 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  9. Garcia Jiménez, A.; Valle Gastaminza, F. del: From thesauri to ontologies: a case study in a digital visual context (2004) 0.00 
    0.0014437523 = product of:
  0.008662513 = sum of:
    0.008662513 = product of:
      0.02598754 = sum of:
        0.02598754 = weight(_text_:29 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02598754 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 16:20:55
  10. Hoover, L.: ¬A beginners' guide for subject analysis of theses and dissertations in the hard sciences (2005) 0.00 
    0.0014437523 = product of:
  0.008662513 = sum of:
    0.008662513 = product of:
      0.02598754 = sum of:
        0.02598754 = weight(_text_:29 in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02598754 = score(doc=5740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 9.2008 19:08:38
  11. Jens-Erik Mai, J.-E.: ¬The role of documents, domains and decisions in indexing (2004) 0.00 
    0.0011550018 = product of:
  0.0069300104 = sum of:
    0.0069300104 = product of:
      0.020790031 = sum of:
        0.020790031 = weight(_text_:29 in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020790031 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    29. 8.2004 15:13:08
  12. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.00 
    8.584587E-4 = product of:
  0.005150752 = sum of:
    0.005150752 = product of:
      0.015452256 = sum of:
        0.015452256 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015452256 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13312837 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19

Authors

Languages

  • e 10
  • d 2

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications