Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Helbig, H.: Wissensverarbeitung und die Semantik der natürlichen Sprache : Wissensrepräsentation mit MultiNet (2008) 0.01
    0.00651085 = product of:
      0.0390651 = sum of:
        0.0390651 = weight(_text_:wissen in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0390651 = score(doc=2731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1639626 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038016807 = queryNorm
            0.23825617 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3128977 = idf(docFreq=1609, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Das Buch gibt eine umfassende Darstellung einer Methodik zur Interpretation und Bedeutungsrepräsentation natürlichsprachlicher Ausdrücke. Diese Methodik der "Mehrschichtigen Erweiterten Semantischen Netze", das sogenannte MultiNet-Paradigma, ist sowohl für theoretische Untersuchungen als auch für die automatische Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache auf dem Rechner geeignet. Im ersten Teil des zweiteiligen Buches werden grundlegende Probleme der semantischen Repräsentation von Wissen bzw. der semantischen Interpretation natürlichsprachlicher Phänomene behandelt. Der zweite Teil enthält eine systematische Zusammenstellung des gesamten Repertoires von Darstellungsmitteln, die jeweils nach einem einheitlichen Schema beschrieben werden. Er dient als Kompendium der im Buch verwendeten formalen Beschreibungsmittel von MultiNet. Die vorgestellten Ergebnisse sind eingebettet in ein System von Software-Werkzeugen, die eine praktische Nutzung der MultiNet-Darstellungsmittel als Formalismus zur Bedeutungsrepräsentation im Rahmen der automatischen Sprachverarbeitung sichern. Hierzu gehören: eine Werkbank für den Wissensingenieur, ein Übersetzungssystem zur automatischen Gewinnung von Bedeutungsdarstellungen natürlichsprachlicher Sätze und eine Werkbank für den Computerlexikographen. Der Inhalt des Buches beruht auf jahrzehntelanger Forschung auf dem Gebiet der automatischen Sprachverarbeitung und wurde mit Vorlesungen zur Künstlichen Intelligenz und Wissensverarbeitung an der TU Dresden und der FernUniversität Hagen wiederholt in der Hochschullehre eingesetzt. Als Vorkenntnisse werden beim Leser lediglich Grundlagen der traditionellen Grammatik und elementare Kenntnisse der Prädikatenlogik vorausgesetzt.
  2. Griffiths, T.L.; Steyvers, M.: ¬A probabilistic approach to semantic representation (2002) 0.00
    0.0032668384 = product of:
      0.01960103 = sum of:
        0.01960103 = product of:
          0.05880309 = sum of:
            0.05880309 = weight(_text_:29 in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05880309 = score(doc=3671,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 6.2015 14:55:01
    29. 6.2015 16:09:05
  3. Clark, M.; Kim, Y.; Kruschwitz, U.; Song, D.; Albakour, D.; Dignum, S.; Beresi, U.C.; Fasli, M.; Roeck, A De: Automatically structuring domain knowledge from text : an overview of current research (2012) 0.00
    0.002450129 = product of:
      0.014700773 = sum of:
        0.014700773 = product of:
          0.04410232 = sum of:
            0.04410232 = weight(_text_:29 in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04410232 = score(doc=2738,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2016 18:29:51
  4. Mustafa El Hadi, W.: Terminologies, ontologies and information access (2006) 0.00
    0.0023100036 = product of:
      0.013860021 = sum of:
        0.013860021 = product of:
          0.041580062 = sum of:
            0.041580062 = weight(_text_:29 in 1488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041580062 = score(doc=1488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1488)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 2.2008 16:25:23
  5. Rindflesch, T.C.; Aronson, A.R.: Semantic processing in information retrieval (1993) 0.00
    0.002021253 = product of:
      0.012127518 = sum of:
        0.012127518 = product of:
          0.036382552 = sum of:
            0.036382552 = weight(_text_:29 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036382552 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 6.2015 14:51:28
  6. Pepper, S.; Arnaud, P.J.L.: Absolutely PHAB : toward a general model of associative relations (2020) 0.00
    0.0014437523 = product of:
      0.008662513 = sum of:
        0.008662513 = product of:
          0.02598754 = sum of:
            0.02598754 = weight(_text_:29 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02598754 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    There have been many attempts at classifying the semantic modification relations (R) of N + N compounds but this work has not led to the acceptance of a definitive scheme, so that devising a reusable classification is a worthwhile aim. The scope of this undertaking is extended to other binominal lexemes, i.e. units that contain two thing-morphemes without explicitly stating R, like prepositional units, N + relational adjective units, etc. The 25-relation taxonomy of Bourque (2014) was tested against over 15,000 binominal lexemes from 106 languages and extended to a 29-relation scheme ("Bourque2") through the introduction of two new reversible relations. Bourque2 is then mapped onto Hatcher's (1960) four-relation scheme (extended by the addition of a fifth relation, similarity , as "Hatcher2"). This results in a two-tier system usable at different degrees of granularities. On account of its semantic proximity to compounding, metonymy is then taken into account, following Janda's (2011) suggestion that it plays a role in word formation; Peirsman and Geeraerts' (2006) inventory of 23 metonymic patterns is mapped onto Bourque2, confirming the identity of metonymic and binominal modification relations. Finally, Blank's (2003) and Koch's (2001) work on lexical semantics justifies the addition to the scheme of a third, superordinate level which comprises the three Aristotelean principles of similarity, contiguity and contrast.
  7. Vlachidis, A.; Binding, C.; Tudhope, D.; May, K.: Excavating grey literature : a case study on the rich indexing of archaeological documents via natural language-processing techniques and knowledge-based resources (2010) 0.00
    0.0011550018 = product of:
      0.0069300104 = sum of:
        0.0069300104 = product of:
          0.020790031 = sum of:
            0.020790031 = weight(_text_:29 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020790031 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13373125 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038016807 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:03:40