Search (228 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.06
    0.0637974 = product of:
      0.2551896 = sum of:
        0.2551896 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2551896 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34054458 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. Small, H.: Paradigms, citations, and maps of science : a personal history (2003) 0.06
    0.0600011 = product of:
      0.1200022 = sum of:
        0.10901899 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 1456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10901899 = score(doc=1456,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.42416927 = fieldWeight in 1456, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1456)
        0.010983216 = product of:
          0.032949645 = sum of:
            0.032949645 = weight(_text_:29 in 1456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032949645 = score(doc=1456,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1412984 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1456, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1456)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:33:36
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
  3. Campanario, J.M.; Acedo, E.: Rejecting highly cited papers : the views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists (2007) 0.06
    0.0600011 = product of:
      0.1200022 = sum of:
        0.10901899 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10901899 = score(doc=273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.42416927 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
        0.010983216 = product of:
          0.032949645 = sum of:
            0.032949645 = weight(_text_:29 in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032949645 = score(doc=273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1412984 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    29. 4.2007 20:18:05
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
  4. Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001) 0.05
    0.050000917 = product of:
      0.100001834 = sum of:
        0.09084915 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09084915 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.35347438 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
        0.00915268 = product of:
          0.027458038 = sum of:
            0.027458038 = weight(_text_:29 in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027458038 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1412984 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die empirische Wissenschaftsforschung arbeitet bei den Indikatoren wissenschaftlicher Leistung und wissenschaftlicher Wirkung mit Publikations- und Zitationsraten. Die vorliegende Arbeit befaßt sich mit dabei auftretenden methodischen Problemen. Was ist überhaupt eine Publikation? Was heißt Zitation? Zentral ist auch die Zählbasis, d.h. die Einheitenbildung: Was ist 1 Publikation? und: Was ist 1 Zitation? Bei Printpublikationen gibt es eine Reihe von beachtenswerten Faktoren (u.a. Mehrautorenwerke, Gewichtungsfaktoren wie den Impact Factor, Dokumenttypen). Bei elektronischen Publikationen im Internet mit ihrem dynamischen Charakter ist die Einheitenbildung noch weitaus problematischer. Zitationen, verstanden als zitierte Publikationen, werfen alle methodischen Probleme der Publikationseinheiten auf, hinzu kommen weitere, spezifische Probleme. Lösungsmöglichkeiten im syntaktischen Bereich (Relativierung auf Textseiten oder Zeichen) ändern am grundlegenden Problem nur wenig, Lösungsversuche im semantischen Bereich (etwa im Rahmen der semantischen Informationstheorie) sind im Rahmen der Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen nicht durchführbar und verweisen sowohl auf themenanalytische Methoden als auch auf die Wissenschaftstheorie. Mit diesem Working Paper wollen wir vor allem auf offene Probleme hinweisen; "endgültige" Lösungen wird der Leser nicht finden, wohl aber Lösungsvorschläge, die meist durchaus noch diskussionswürdig sind. In der Informationswissenschaft wie in der Wissenschaftsforschung sind wir bisher viel zu sicher davon ausgegangen, daß wir wissen, was Publikationen und Zitationen sind
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.29
  5. Hauffe, H.: ¬The role of citation analysis in the history and evaluation of science : Bericht über einen Vortrag von Eugene Garfield (Wien, 26. Mai 2004) (2004) 0.05
    0.045424577 = product of:
      0.1816983 = sum of:
        0.1816983 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1816983 = score(doc=2492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.70694876 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
  6. Wettlauf der Wissenschaft (2004) 0.04
    0.0399678 = product of:
      0.0799356 = sum of:
        0.072679326 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072679326 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.2827795 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
        0.007256276 = product of:
          0.021768827 = sum of:
            0.021768827 = weight(_text_:22 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021768827 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14066142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.22-23 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
  7. Chen, C.; Kuljis, J.: ¬The rising landscape : a visual exploration of superstring revolutions in physics (2003) 0.03
    0.031797204 = product of:
      0.12718882 = sum of:
        0.12718882 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 1469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12718882 = score(doc=1469,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.49486417 = fieldWeight in 1469, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1469)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
  8. Chen, C.; Cribbin, T.; Macredie, R.; Morar, S.: Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms : two case studies (2002) 0.03
    0.027254747 = product of:
      0.10901899 = sum of:
        0.10901899 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10901899 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.42416927 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
  9. Jin, B.; Li, L.; Rousseau, R.: Long-term influences of interventions in the normal development of science : China and the cultural revolution (2004) 0.03
    0.027254747 = product of:
      0.10901899 = sum of:
        0.10901899 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 2232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10901899 = score(doc=2232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.42416927 = fieldWeight in 2232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2232)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.03
    0.025512233 = product of:
      0.10204893 = sum of:
        0.10204893 = product of:
          0.1530734 = sum of:
            0.076882504 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076882504 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1412984 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
            0.07619089 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07619089 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14066142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  11. Zhou, H.; Dong, K.; Xia, Y.: Knowledge inheritance in disciplines : quantifying the successive and distant reuse of references (2023) 0.02
    0.022712288 = product of:
      0.09084915 = sum of:
        0.09084915 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09084915 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.35347438 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
  12. Chen, C.: Mapping scientific frontiers : the quest for knowledge visualization (2003) 0.02
    0.018169831 = product of:
      0.072679326 = sum of:
        0.072679326 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 2213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072679326 = score(doc=2213,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.2827795 = fieldWeight in 2213, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2213)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
  13. Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.02
    0.018169831 = product of:
      0.072679326 = sum of:
        0.072679326 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072679326 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.2827795 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
  14. Tüür-Fröhlich, T.: ¬The non-trivial effects of trivial errors in scientific communication and evaluation (2016) 0.02
    0.018169831 = product of:
      0.072679326 = sum of:
        0.072679326 = weight(_text_:wissenschaftstheorie in 3137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072679326 = score(doc=3137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25701764 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04016798 = queryNorm
            0.2827795 = fieldWeight in 3137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.39857 = idf(docFreq=199, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3137)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Field
    Wissenschaftstheorie
  15. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.01
    0.01457842 = product of:
      0.05831368 = sum of:
        0.05831368 = product of:
          0.08747052 = sum of:
            0.04393286 = weight(_text_:29 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04393286 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1412984 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
            0.043537654 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043537654 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14066142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  16. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.012756117 = product of:
      0.051024467 = sum of:
        0.051024467 = product of:
          0.0765367 = sum of:
            0.038441252 = weight(_text_:29 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038441252 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1412984 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
            0.038095444 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038095444 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14066142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
    Source
    Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
  17. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.01
    0.012756117 = product of:
      0.051024467 = sum of:
        0.051024467 = product of:
          0.0765367 = sum of:
            0.038441252 = weight(_text_:29 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038441252 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1412984 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
            0.038095444 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038095444 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14066142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  18. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.01
    0.010933815 = product of:
      0.04373526 = sum of:
        0.04373526 = product of:
          0.06560288 = sum of:
            0.032949645 = weight(_text_:29 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032949645 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1412984 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
            0.03265324 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03265324 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14066142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    17.12.2006 19:44:29
  19. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.01
    0.010933815 = product of:
      0.04373526 = sum of:
        0.04373526 = product of:
          0.06560288 = sum of:
            0.032949645 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032949645 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1412984 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
            0.03265324 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03265324 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14066142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  20. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01
    0.009111512 = product of:
      0.03644605 = sum of:
        0.03644605 = product of:
          0.05466907 = sum of:
            0.027458038 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027458038 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1412984 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.027211033 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027211033 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14066142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04016798 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Years

Languages

  • e 204
  • d 22
  • ro 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 221
  • m 5
  • el 3
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…