Search (93 results, page 1 of 5)

0.03938161 = product of:
  0.18378083 = sum of:
    0.07114068 = weight(_text_:open in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07114068 = score(doc=604,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14443703 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.49253768 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
    0.08622031 = weight(_text_:source in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08622031 = score(doc=604,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15900996 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.5422321 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
    0.026419844 = weight(_text_:web in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026419844 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10467481 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)

Abstract

iQvoc is a new open source SKOS-XL vocabulary management tool developed by the Federal Environment Agency, Germany, and innoQ Deutschland GmbH. Its immediate purpose is maintaining and publishing reference vocabularies in the upcoming Linked Data cloud of environmental information, but it may be easily adapted to host any SKOS- XL compliant vocabulary. iQvoc is implemented as a Ruby on Rails application running on top of JRuby - the Java implementation of the Ruby Programming Language. To increase the user experience when editing content, iQvoc uses heavily the JavaScript library jQuery.

Source

Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Scripting and Development for the Semantic Web, Crete, Greece, May 31, 2010, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, SFSW - http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-699/Paper2.pdf

0.021075131 = product of:
  0.098350614 = sum of:
    0.035931468 = weight(_text_:open in 2583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035931468 = score(doc=2583,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14443703 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.24876907 = fieldWeight in 2583, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2583)
    0.04354783 = weight(_text_:source in 2583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04354783 = score(doc=2583,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15900996 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.27386856 = fieldWeight in 2583, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2583)
    0.018871317 = weight(_text_:web in 2583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018871317 = score(doc=2583,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10467481 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2583, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2583)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)

Abstract

Purpose - Seeks to share with digital library practitioners the development process of an online image collection that integrates the syndetic structure of a controlled vocabulary to improve end-user search and browse functionality. Design/methodology/approach - Surveys controlled vocabulary structures and their utility for catalogers and end-users. Reviews research literature and usability findings that informed the specifications for integration of the controlled vocabulary structure into search and browse functionality. Discusses database functions facilitating query expansion using a controlled vocabulary structure, and web application handling of user queries and results display. Concludes with a discussion of open-source alternatives and reuse of database and application components in other environments. Findings - Affirms that structured forms of browse and search can be successfully integrated into digital collections to significantly improve the user's discovery experience. Establishes ways in which the technologies used in implementing enhanced search and browse functionality can be abstracted to work in other digital collection environments. Originality/value - Significant amounts of research on integrating thesauri structures into search and browse functionalities exist, but examples of online resources that have implemented this approach are few in comparison. The online image collection surveyed in this paper can serve as a model to other designers of digital library resources for integrating controlled vocabularies and metadata structures into more dynamic search and browse functionality for end-users.

0.013286201 = product of:
  0.09300341 = sum of:
    0.060977723 = weight(_text_:open in 2912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060977723 = score(doc=2912,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14443703 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.42217514 = fieldWeight in 2912, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2912)
    0.032025687 = weight(_text_:web in 2912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032025687 = score(doc=2912,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10467481 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2912, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2912)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

This paper illustrates the changing role of thesauri interlinked with overall changes of modern information infrastructure services, referring to "STW Thesaurus for Economics" as a case study. It starts with an overview of the history and development of the STW and describes the far-reaching changes brought about by its publication on the Web, with regard to subject indexing, retrieval and new uses for Linked Open Data. It argues that only the most recent technological developments help thesauri to exploit their full potential which is why they more than ever have a place in current information retrieval and infrastructure.

0.011763009 = product of:
  0.08234106 = sum of:
    0.043117758 = weight(_text_:open in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043117758 = score(doc=1322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14443703 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
    0.0392233 = weight(_text_:web in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0392233 = score(doc=1322,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.10467481 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Powering search offers a clear and comprehensive treatment of the role of thesauri in search user interfaces across a range of information search and retrieval systems - from bibliographic and full-text databases to digital libraries, portals, open archives, and content management systems.

Content

Thesauri : introduction and recent developments -- Thesauri in interactive information retrieval -- User-centered approach to the evaluation of thesauri : query formulation and expansion -- Thesauri in web-based search systems -- Thesaurus-based search and browsing functionalities in new thesaurus construction standards -- Design of search user interfaces for thesauri -- Design of user interfaces for multilingual and meta-thesauri -- User-centered evaluation of thesaurus-enhanced search user interfaces -- Guidelines for the design of thesaurus-enhanced search user interfaces -- Current trends and developments.

LCSH

World Wide Web

Subject

World Wide Web

0.011586635 = product of:
  0.08110645 = sum of:
    0.06223513 = weight(_text_:open in 2916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06223513 = score(doc=2916,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14443703 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.43088073 = fieldWeight in 2916, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2916)
    0.018871317 = weight(_text_:web in 2916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018871317 = score(doc=2916,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10467481 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2916, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2916)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Thesauri have triumphed in many domains that require precise and exhaustive information because of their representational power, their capability to integrate the concept-based and alphabetical approaches to organizing information, and their standardization and, more recently, formalization. Nevertheless, there is room to improve their relevance in the digital age by embracing the open linked data initiatives and by taking advantage of their structural and functional proximity to some of the big collaborative knowledge repositories in the Internet, notably the Wikipedia environment. With a focus on its implications for enhanced interoperability, this structural proximity is analysed, and the benefits of such collaboration for the different potential stakeholders are considered. It is proposed that better devices for ensuring semantic browsing are provided when necessary, and that an open hub for thesauri interconnection is developed, perhaps using existing big open Internet semantic facilities, such as Wikipedia.

0.009786714 = product of:
  0.06850699 = sum of:
    0.05547012 = weight(_text_:web in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05547012 = score(doc=3197,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.10467481 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
    0.013036874 = product of:
      0.026073748 = sum of:
        0.026073748 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026073748 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11231873 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0320743 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Indexing consists of both novel and more traditional techniques. Cutting-edge indexing techniques, such as automatic indexing, ontologies, and topic maps, were developed independently of older techniques such as thesauri, but it is now recognized that these older methods also hold expertise. Indexing describes various traditional and novel indexing techniques, giving information professionals and students of library and information sciences a broad and comprehensible introduction to indexing. This title consists of twelve chapters: an Introduction to subject readings and theasauri; Automatic indexing versus manual indexing; Techniques applied in automatic indexing of text material; Automatic indexing of images; The black art of indexing moving images; Automatic indexing of music; Taxonomies and ontologies; Metadata formats and indexing; Tagging; Topic maps; Indexing the web; and The Semantic Web.

Date

24. 8.2016 14:03:22

RSWK

Semantic Web

Subject

Semantic Web

Theme

Semantic Web

0.009394763 = product of:
  0.06576334 = sum of:
    0.043117758 = weight(_text_:open in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043117758 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14443703 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
    0.02264558 = weight(_text_:web in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02264558 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10467481 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

This paper gives an overview of the history, development, and structure of the electronic thesauri produced and maintained by the Getty Research Institute (GRI). We describe the evolution of the Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT®), the Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN®), and the Union List of Artist Names (ULAN®) as multilingual, cross-cultural knowledge organization systems (KOS); the factors that make them unique; and their potential, when expressed as Linked Open Data (LOD) to play a key role in the Semantic Web.

0.008709566 = product of:
  0.121933915 = sum of:
    0.121933915 = weight(_text_:source in 7141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121933915 = score(doc=7141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15900996 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.76683193 = fieldWeight in 7141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7141)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Source

Guide for source indexing and abstracting engineering literature. Ed.: F.Y. Speight

0.008232459 = product of:
  0.11525443 = sum of:
    0.11525443 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 1368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11525443 = score(doc=1368,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.18291734 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.63009024 = fieldWeight in 1368, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1368)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Fortschrittliche Informationssysteme stellen ihren Benutzern 2 wichtige Suchmethoden zur Verfügung: die gezielte (Volltext-) Suche und das Navigieren im Objektbestand mit Hilfe von Hypertext-Links. Der Grund, warum diese beiden Konzepte aber auf breiter Basis noch nicht in jedem Informationssystem Anwendung gefunden haben, ist darin zu sehen, daß der manuelle Aufbau von umfassenden Hypertext-Strukturen auf der einen Seite und von großen Thesauri, die den Erfolg von Volltextsuchen wesentlich steigern, auf der anderen Seite bislang enormen Aufwand und damit hohe Kosten verursachte. Langfristig werden Informationssysteme aber nur dann große Akzeptanz bei der Benutzerschaft erzielen, wenn sie ihre Benutzer mit diesen beiden Techniken unterstützen und wenn sie dynamisch neuen Informationsbedürfnissen anpassen können, also lernfähig sind. Für den einzelnen Benutzer ergibt sich daraus der wesentliche Vorteil, daß er von den Recherche-Erfahrungen anderer Benutzer profitieren kann. In diesem Papier stellen wir eine Lernkomponente vor, die für das Hypertextsystem 'HyperMan' an der TU München entwickelt und implementiert wurde. Wir zeigen beispielhaft, wie Volltext-Suchanfragen der HyperMan-Benutzer von der Lernkomponente untersucht werden, um Thesauruseinträge zu gewinnen. Bei der Entwicklung dieser Lerntechniken zum (automatischen) Thesaurusaufbau konnte auf Erfahrungen mit dem lernfähigen Information Retrieval System 'Tegen' zurückgegriffen werden. In dem HyperMan System werden aber nicht nur Beziehungen (Relationen) zwischen Begriffen erlernt, sondern auch zwischen Textstücken. Wir gehen daher auch darauf ein, wie aufgrund einer Analyse des Benutzerverhaltens sowohl neue Hypertext-Links erlernt als auch vorhandene Links, die zuvor von HyperMans Generierungskomponente automatisch erzeugt wurden, modifiziert werden

0.00802209 = product of:
  0.05615463 = sum of:
    0.043117758 = weight(_text_:open in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043117758 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14443703 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
    0.013036874 = product of:
      0.026073748 = sum of:
        0.026073748 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026073748 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11231873 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0320743 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.

Date

26.11.2023 18:59:22

0.006967754 = product of:
  0.048774276 = sum of:
    0.026128696 = weight(_text_:source in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026128696 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15900996 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.16432112 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
    0.02264558 = weight(_text_:web in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02264558 = score(doc=3243,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.10467481 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Content

Enthält u.a. folgende Aussage von J. Aitchison u. S. Dextre Clarke: "We face a paradox. Ostensibly, the need and the opportunity to apply thesauri to information retrieval are greater than ever before. On the other hand, users resist most efforts to persuade them to apply one. The drive for interoperability of systems means we must design our vocabularies for easy integration into downstream applications such as content management systems, indexing/metatagging interfaces, search engines, and portals. Summarizing the search for vocabularies that work more intuitively, we see that there are trends working in opposite directions. In the hugely popular taxonomies an the one hand, relationships between terms are more loosely defined than in thesauri. In the ontologies that will support computer-to-computer communications in AI applications such as the Semantic Web, we see the need for much more precisely defined term relationships."
Enthält die Beiträge: Spiteri, L.F.: Word association testing and thesaurus construction: a pilot study. Aitchison, J., S.G. Dextre-Clarke: The Thesaurus: a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future. Thomas, A.R.: Teach yourself thesaurus: exercises, reading, resources. Shearer, J.R.: A practical exercise in building a thesaurus. Nielsen, M.L.: Thesaurus construction: key issues and selected readings. Riesland, M.A.: Tools of the trade: vocabulary management software. Will, L.: Thesaurus consultancy. Owens, L.A., P.A. Cochrane: Thesaurus evaluation. Greenberg, J.: User comprehension and application of information retrieval thesauri. Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services. Thomas, A.R., S.K. Roe: An interview with Dr. Amy J. Warner. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access: the linking approach of MACS.

Footnote

Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.2, S.95-97 (A. Gilchrist):"It might be thought unfortunate that the word thesaurus is assonant with prehistoric beasts but as this book clearly demonstrates, the thesaurus is undergoing a notable revival, and we can remind ourselves that the word comes from the Greek thesaurus, meaning a treasury. This is a useful and timely source book, bringing together ten chapters, following an Editorial introduction and culminating in an interview with a member of the team responsible for revising the NISO Standard Guidelines for the construction, format and management of monolingual thesauri; formal proof of the thesaural renaissance. Though predominantly an American publication, it is good to see four English authors as well as one from Canada and one from Denmark; and with a good balance of academics and practitioners. This has helped to widen the net in the citing of useful references. While the techniques of thesaurus construction are still basically sound, the Editors, in their introduction, point out that the thesaurus, in its sense of an information retrieval tool is almost exactly 50 years old, and that the information environment of today is radically different. They claim three purposes for the compilation: "to acquaint or remind the Library and Information Science community of the history of the development of the thesaurus and standards for thesaurus construction. to provide bibliographies and tutorials from which any reader can become more grounded in her or his understanding of thesaurus construction, use and evaluation. to address topics related to thesauri but that are unique to the current digital environment, or network of networks." This last purpose, understandably, tends to be the slightly more tentative part of the book, but as Rosenfeld and Morville said in their book Information architecture for the World Wide Web "thesauri [will] become a key tool for dealing with the growing size and importance of web sites and intranets". The evidence supporting their belief has been growing steadily in the seven years since the first edition was published.

0.0065859677 = product of:
  0.09220354 = sum of:
    0.09220354 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 5590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09220354 = score(doc=5590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18291734 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.5040722 = fieldWeight in 5590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5590)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Im folgenden wird ein Ansatz für die Verbesserung von dokumentbasierten Informationssystemen unter Verwendung von Methoden der Künstlichen Intelligenz vorgestellt. Dabei wird ein dynamischer Thesaurus verwendet, der speziell an den jeweiligen Dokumentenbestand angepaßt ist. Erzeugung und Pflege dieses Thesaurus werden (teil-) automatisiert durch eine Wissensakquisitionskomponente durchgeführt; dies geschieht unter Ausnutzung von Benutzerwissen und durch Analyse des Dokumentenbestandes. Hierzu ist ein erweiterter Thesaurusbegriff notwendig, bei dem dieser als Wissensrepräsentationsstruktur gesehen wird. Die Verwendung einer graphischen Oberfläche (GUI) macht den Thesaurus dem Benutzer direkt zugänglich

0.0062631755 = product of:
  0.043842226 = sum of:
    0.028745173 = weight(_text_:open in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028745173 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14443703 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.19901526 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
    0.015097054 = weight(_text_:web in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015097054 = score(doc=1206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10467481 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

The Alexandria Digital Library Project announces the online publication of two protocols to support querying and response interactions using distributed services: one for gazetteers and one for thesauri. These protocols have been developed for our own purposes and also to support the general interoperability of gazetteers and thesauri on the web. See <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~gjanee/gazetteer/> and <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/~gjanee/thesaurus/>. For the gazetteer protocol, we have provided a page of test forms that can be used to experiment with the operational functions of the protocol in accessing two gazetteers: the ADL Gazetteer and the ESRI Gazetteer (ESRI has participated in the development of the gazetteer protocol). We are in the process of developing a thesaurus server and a simple client to demonstrate the use of the thesaurus protocol. We are soliciting comments on both protocols. Please remember that we are seeking protocols that are essentially "simple" and easy to implement and that support basic operations - they should not duplicate all of the functions of specialized gazetteer and thesaurus interfaces. We continue to discuss ways of handling various issues and to further develop the protocols. For the thesaurus protocol, outstanding issues include the treatment of multilingual thesauri and the degree to which the language attribute should be supported; whether the Scope Note element should be changed to a repeatable Note element; the best way to handle the hierarchical report for multi-hierarchies where portions of the hierarchy are repeated; and whether support for searching by term identifiers is redundant and unnecessary given that the terms themselves are unique within a thesaurus. For the gazetteer protocol, we continue to work on validation of query and report XML documents and on implementing the part of the protocol designed to support the submission of new entries to a gazetteer. We would like to encourage open discussion of these protocols through the NKOS discussion list (see the NKOS webpage at <http://nkos.slis.kent.edu/>) and the CGGR-L discussion list that focuses on gazetteer development (see ADL Gazetteer Development page at <http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/gazetteer>).

0.0062375567 = product of:
  0.08732579 = sum of:
    0.08732579 = weight(_text_:log in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08732579 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.205552 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.42483553 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Content

The objective of this research was to investigate the extent to which thesauri have the potential to support the search behaviour of nanoscience and technology researchers while interacting with an electronic book digital library. Transaction log data was obtained from a nanoscience and technology digital library to investigate the nature, type and characteristics of users' queries and search terms. The specific objectives was to assess the extent to which users' search terms matched with those found in two well-established thesauri attached o the INSPEC and Compendex databases.

0.006147625 = product of:
  0.086066745 = sum of:
    0.086066745 = product of:
      0.17213349 = sum of:
        0.17213349 = weight(_text_:wiki in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17213349 = score(doc=2824,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22354181 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9694996 = idf(docFreq=112, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0320743 = queryNorm
            0.7700282 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.9694996 = idf(docFreq=112, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Mit dieser Arbeit wird untersucht, welche Möglichkeiten und Vorteile ein Wiki bei der Pflege und Weiterentwicklung eines Thesaurus bietet. Als Basis für diese Arbeit wird ein entsprechendes Wiki, der Standard-Thesaurus Wirtschaft (STW) und Einrichtungen an verschiedenen Standorten, die mit dem STW arbeiten (das sog. STW-Konsortium) herangezogen. Um die Untersuchungsergebnisse zu präsentieren und zu belegen, wird parallel dazu der Prototyp "Wikisaurus oeconomicus" entwickelt; er ist die praktische Umsetzung der hier beschriebenen Möglichkeiten und wird im Internet zur Verfügung gestellt. Die Arbeit gliedert sich in zwei wesentliche Bereiche. Zuerst wird in einem kurzen Abriss die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Dokumentationssprachen, insbesondere von Thesauri, im 20. Jhd. beschrieben. Darauf aufbauend folgt die Darstellung der Genese und der Struktur des STW sowie dessen Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Der zweite Teil widmet sich dann dem eigentlichen Untersuchungsgegenstand: Um diesen sinnvoll vor- und darstellen zu können, erfolgt eine Einführung in die, zugegebenermaßen kurze Geschichte der WikiWelt. Dazu wird noch die Software MediaWiki, deren Möglichkeiten sowie die Theorie der Zusammenarbeit in Wikis beschrieben. Danach wird ein möglicher Einsatz von Wikitechnik bei der Pflege und Weiterentwicklung des STW beschrieben. Wie oben schon erwähnt, wird zur Präsentation der Ergebnisse im Inter-net, der Prototyp "Wikisaurus oeconomicus" entwickelt. Neben der reinen Präsentation soll so auch ein (exemplarischer) Eindruck über die Praktikabilität und Anwendbarkeit der Wiki-technik vermittelt werden.

Object

Wiki

0.0049768947 = product of:
  0.069676526 = sum of:
    0.069676526 = weight(_text_:source in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069676526 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15900996 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.4381897 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Describes a deductive data model based on 3 abstraction levels for representing vocabularies for information retrieval: conceptual level; expression level; and occurrence level. The proposed data model can be used for the representation and navigation of indexing and retrieval thesauri and as a vocabulary source for concept based query expansion in heterogeneous retrieval environments

0.004354783 = product of:
  0.060966957 = sum of:
    0.060966957 = weight(_text_:source in 1872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060966957 = score(doc=1872,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15900996 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.38341597 = fieldWeight in 1872, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1872)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

The Unified Medical Language System knowledge source provide detailed information about biomedical naming systems and databases. The Metathesaurus contains biomedical terminology from an increasing number of biomedical thesauri, and the Semantic Netowrk provides a structure that encompasses and unifies the thesauri that are included in the Metathesaurus. Addresses some fundamental principles underlying the design and development of the Metathesaurus and Semantic Network. Describes the formal properties of the semantic network. Considers the principle of semantic locality and how this is reflected in the UMLS knowledge sources. Discusses the issues involved in attempting to reuse knowledge and the potential for reuse of the UMLS knowledge sources

0.004354783 = product of:
  0.060966957 = sum of:
    0.060966957 = weight(_text_:source in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060966957 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15900996 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.38341597 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9575505 = idf(docFreq=844, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Discusses the concept of descriptor equivalence, with its 2 subcomponents of dictionary equivalence and indexing equivalence, in the context of the compatibility of differnt thesauri used in bilingual indexing. In multilingual indexing and searching, the equivalence relationship between terms means either that all equal terms are descriptors or that only one of the terms is selected for the descriptor and users are directed with USE refrences to use it instead of the other potential terms. Discusses these issues with particular reference to the LUASPORT study: a study of the compatibility of the Finnish language sports thesaurus (LUAS) with the Canadian Sport Thesauri (SPORT) in terms of compatibility of subject descriptors. In LUASPORT, LUAS was the source thesaurus and SPORT was the target thesaurus

0.0041162297 = product of:
  0.057627216 = sum of:
    0.057627216 = weight(_text_:benutzer in 4009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057627216 = score(doc=4009,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18291734 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.31504512 = fieldWeight in 4009, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7029257 = idf(docFreq=400, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4009)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Das GOS Thesaurus-Handbuch wurde für die Teilnehmer an dem von der ROBERTBOSCH-STIFTUNG geförderten Projekt "Sammlungsmanagement für kulturgeschichtliche Museen in den neuen Bundesländern" (Spitzname: "Knorr-Projekt") geschrieben. Es basiert auf den bereits Mitte der 80er Jahre vom Institut für Museumskunde in Zusammenarbeit mit dem heutigen Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik Berlin (ZIB) durchgeführten und 1988 publizierten Arbeiten im Projekt "Kleine Museen".' Schon damals war zu erkennen, daß die international gültige Thesaurusnorm auch in den Museen auf dem Siegeszug war. Heute ist sie die Grundlage aller wichtigen Projekte zur internationalen Zusammenarbeit bei der Museumsdokumentation. GOS-Benutzer, die sich noch nie mit solchen Dingen befaßt haben, können dieses Handbuch als eine allgemeine Einführung in die Thesaurusarbeit benutzen, denn es behandelt alle Grundfunktionen eines Thesaurus nach DIN 1463. Es besteht aus einem "Lesebuch", in dem es mehr um die Zusammenhänge und etwas Hintergrundwissen geht sowie einem "Datenkatalog" mit der Beschreibung der Datenfelder des Thesaurus, gedruckt aus einer kleinen GOS-Datenbank, aus der auch die "H i l f e t e x t e " im GOS-Menü geholt werden. Wir haben uns - mit einiger Mühe allerdings - jeden Hinweis auf "gerade in Entwicklung befindliche" und "in wenigen Monaten freizugebende" Leistungen von GOS verkniffen und uns auschließlich auf Dinge beschränkt, die in den am Projekt direkt beteiligten Museen vor März 1997 routinemäßig angewendet wurden.

0.0041064536 = product of:
  0.057490345 = sum of:
    0.057490345 = weight(_text_:open in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057490345 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14443703 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0320743 = queryNorm
        0.39803052 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Abstract

Open system protocols for search and retrieval have not provided explicit ways in which to implement thesaurus-aided searching. A number of different approaches within the existing protocols, as well as a proposed service, are evaluated. A general approach to implementing thesaurus-aided searching, particularly during consultation of a thesaurus, requires an entirely new service, whose main features are described