Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Kousha, K."
  1. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? (2015) 0.00 
    0.0027629759 = product of:
  0.0110519035 = sum of:
    0.0110519035 = product of:
      0.03315571 = sum of:
        0.03315571 = weight(_text_:29 in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03315571 = score(doc=1813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:29:49
  2. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Disseminating research with web CV hyperlinks (2014) 0.00 
    0.00230248 = product of:
  0.00920992 = sum of:
    0.00920992 = product of:
      0.02762976 = sum of:
        0.02762976 = weight(_text_:29 in 1331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02762976 = score(doc=1331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1331)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Some curricula vitae (web CVs) of academics on the web, including homepages and publication lists, link to open-access (OA) articles, resources, abstracts in publishers' websites, or academic discussions, helping to disseminate research. To assess how common such practices are and whether they vary by discipline, gender, and country, the authors conducted a large-scale e-mail survey of astronomy and astrophysics, public health, environmental engineering, and philosophy across 15 European countries and analyzed hyperlinks from web CVs of academics. About 60% of the 2,154 survey responses reported having a web CV or something similar, and there were differences between disciplines, genders, and countries. A follow-up outlink analysis of 2,700 web CVs found that a third had at least one outlink to an OA target, typically a public eprint archive or an individual self-archived file. This proportion was considerably higher in astronomy (48%) and philosophy (37%) than in environmental engineering (29%) and public health (21%). There were also differences in linking to publishers' websites, resources, and discussions. Perhaps most important, however, the amount of linking to OA publications seems to be much lower than allowed by publishers and journals, suggesting that many opportunities for disseminating full-text research online are being missed, especially in disciplines without established repositories. Moreover, few academics seem to be exploiting their CVs to link to discussions, resources, or article abstracts, which seems to be another missed opportunity for publicizing research.
  3. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2017) 0.00 
    0.00230248 = product of:
  0.00920992 = sum of:
    0.00920992 = product of:
      0.02762976 = sum of:
        0.02762976 = weight(_text_:29 in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02762976 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:29:45
  4. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007) 0.00 
    0.0022817675 = product of:
  0.00912707 = sum of:
    0.00912707 = product of:
      0.02738121 = sum of:
        0.02738121 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02738121 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
  5. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.00 
    0.0022817675 = product of:
  0.00912707 = sum of:
    0.00912707 = product of:
      0.02738121 = sum of:
        0.02738121 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02738121 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.00 
    0.0022817675 = product of:
  0.00912707 = sum of:
    0.00912707 = product of:
      0.02738121 = sum of:
        0.02738121 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02738121 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:11:50

Authors

Years

Themes