Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Ackermann, A.: Zur Rolle der Inhaltsanalyse bei der Sacherschließung : theoretischer Anspruch und praktische Wirklichkeit in der RSWK (2001) 0.01
    0.007426897 = product of:
      0.029707588 = sum of:
        0.029707588 = weight(_text_:denken in 2061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029707588 = score(doc=2061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.12744048 = fieldWeight in 2061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2061)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Bei der Diskussion über Zielgruppen und Weltanschauungen waren es ebenfalls inhaltliche Argumente, die Anlaß zur Kritik an deren mangelhafter Repräsentation in den Schlagwortketten lieferten. Die fehlende Verschlagwortung von Klassikern hingegen machte noch auf ein ganz anderes Problem aufmerksam: die kanonisierende Funktion von Bibliothekskatalogen. Gerade weil die Vorstellung einer Universalbibliothek längst verabschiedet ist, tragen Bibliotheken mit ihren beschränkten Beständen und deren inhaltlicher Erschließung mehr denn je zu einer Kanonisierung des Wissens bei. Daß nun gerade die Klassiker mit Hinweis auf ihre Bekanntheit aus diesem Kanon des Sachkatalogs herausgenommen werden, ist vor allem aus inhaltsanalytischer Sicht absurd. Langridge's Befund einer generell unzureichenden Berücksichtigung von inhaltsanalytischen Gesichtspunkten in gängigen angelsächsischen Klassifikationen wie auch seiner häufig konstatierten Inkompetenz von Indexierem kann ich mit Blick auf die RSWK nur zum Teil zustimmen. Das Problem des "engen Schlagworts" und die Behandlung von Klassikern sollten tatsächlich ganz neu überdacht werden, während gerade die Diskussion über Zielgruppen deutlich machte, daß etwas mehr Kulanz bei der Anwendung schon vorhandener Mittel eine erhebliche Verbesserung für das Regelwerk mit sich brächte. Auch die dritte Auflage der RSWK ist meines Erachtens noch deutlich Problemen und Anforderungen traditioneller, physisch verkörperter Kataloge verpflichtet. Die immer noch fakultativ eingeräumte Permutation von Schlagwortketten verdankt sich einem Denken, das sich in Listenkatalogen, aber gewiß nicht in einer Datenbank bewegt. Ebenso scheint das enge Schlagwort und die oft zu knappe Vergabe beispielsweise von Formschlagwörtern (vgl. die Diskussion zu "Einführung" in 4.3.2.3) zumindest zu einem Teil einer Arbeitsökonomie verpflichtet, die noch bei der aufwendigen Pflege von Zettelkatalogen Sinn machte, wo jeder zusätzliche Eintrag ein zeitraubendes Einlegen von mehr Zetteln erforderte. Angesichts der immer größeren Kapazität von Datenbanken, stellt sich die Frage, ob diese immens erweiterten technischen Möglichkeiten nicht auch Konsequenzen für die künftige intellektuelle Erschließung von Dokumenten haben werden. Inzwischen ist es kein Problem mehr, umfangreiche Eintragungen wie etwa Abstracts auch in Bibliothekskatalogen vollständig zu indexieren, wie dies professionelle Datenbankanbieter längst tun oder gar Inhaltsverzeichnisse und Resümees von Arbeiten vollständig einzuscannen. Inwieweit diese Möglichkeiten die traditionelle intellektuelle Erschließung in Form von Schlagwörtern bzw. Notationen von Klassifikationen obsolet machen oder eben nicht, darüber sollten sich die betroffenen Indexierer verständigen."
  2. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.0036673981 = product of:
      0.0146695925 = sum of:
        0.0146695925 = product of:
          0.022004388 = sum of:
            0.0110519035 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0110519035 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
            0.010952484 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010952484 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
  3. Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001) 0.00
    0.0032234718 = product of:
      0.012893887 = sum of:
        0.012893887 = product of:
          0.03868166 = sum of:
            0.03868166 = weight(_text_:29 in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03868166 = score(doc=6032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:03:14
  4. Chen, H.: ¬An analysis of image queries in the field of art history (2001) 0.00
    0.0032234718 = product of:
      0.012893887 = sum of:
        0.012893887 = product of:
          0.03868166 = sum of:
            0.03868166 = weight(_text_:29 in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03868166 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Chen arranged with an Art History instructor to require 20 medieval art images in papers received from 29 students. Participants completed a self administered presearch and postsearch questionnaire, and were interviewed after questionnaire analysis, in order to collect both the keywords and phrases they planned to use, and those actually used. Three MLIS student reviewers then mapped the queries to Enser and McGregor's four categories, Jorgensen's 12 classes, and Fidel's 12 feature data and object poles providing a degree of match on a seven point scale (one not at all to 7 exact). The reviewers give highest scores to Enser and McGregor;'s categories. Modifications to both the Enser and McGregor and Jorgensen schemes are suggested
  5. Marshall, L.: Specific and generic subject headings : increasing subject access to library materials (2003) 0.00
    0.0032234718 = product of:
      0.012893887 = sum of:
        0.012893887 = product of:
          0.03868166 = sum of:
            0.03868166 = weight(_text_:29 in 5497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03868166 = score(doc=5497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5497)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2006 14:29:04
  6. Früh, W.: Inhaltsanalyse (2001) 0.00
    0.0027629759 = product of:
      0.0110519035 = sum of:
        0.0110519035 = product of:
          0.03315571 = sum of:
            0.03315571 = weight(_text_:29 in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03315571 = score(doc=1751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    24. 3.2008 12:29:34
  7. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Modelling what users see when they look at images : a cognitive viewpoint (2002) 0.00
    0.0027629759 = product of:
      0.0110519035 = sum of:
        0.0110519035 = product of:
          0.03315571 = sum of:
            0.03315571 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03315571 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.1, S.6-29
  8. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.00
    0.002738121 = product of:
      0.010952484 = sum of:
        0.010952484 = product of:
          0.03285745 = sum of:
            0.03285745 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03285745 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  9. Garcia Jiménez, A.; Valle Gastaminza, F. del: From thesauri to ontologies: a case study in a digital visual context (2004) 0.00
    0.00230248 = product of:
      0.00920992 = sum of:
        0.00920992 = product of:
          0.02762976 = sum of:
            0.02762976 = weight(_text_:29 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02762976 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 16:20:55
  10. Hoover, L.: ¬A beginners' guide for subject analysis of theses and dissertations in the hard sciences (2005) 0.00
    0.00230248 = product of:
      0.00920992 = sum of:
        0.00920992 = product of:
          0.02762976 = sum of:
            0.02762976 = weight(_text_:29 in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02762976 = score(doc=5740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2008 19:08:38
  11. Jens-Erik Mai, J.-E.: ¬The role of documents, domains and decisions in indexing (2004) 0.00
    0.001841984 = product of:
      0.007367936 = sum of:
        0.007367936 = product of:
          0.022103807 = sum of:
            0.022103807 = weight(_text_:29 in 2653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022103807 = score(doc=2653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2653)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 15:13:08
  12. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.00
    0.0013690605 = product of:
      0.005476242 = sum of:
        0.005476242 = product of:
          0.016428726 = sum of:
            0.016428726 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016428726 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19