Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Rötzer, F.: Bindestriche in Titeln von Artikeln schaden der wissenschaftlichen Reputation (2019) 0.05
    0.050087333 = product of:
      0.100174665 = sum of:
        0.089122765 = weight(_text_:denken in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089122765 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.38232145 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
        0.0110519035 = product of:
          0.03315571 = sum of:
            0.03315571 = weight(_text_:29 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03315571 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftler wollen herausgefunden haben, dass das wichtige Ranking nach Zitierhäufigkeit und dem Journal Impact Factor fehlerhaft ist. Man sollte ja denken, dass Programme, seien sie nun KI-gestützt oder nicht, vorurteilslos nach bestimmten Kriterien etwa ein Ranking erstellen können. Aber es kommen immer wieder unbedachte Einflüsse ins Spiel, die lange Zeit unbemerkt bleiben können. Bei KI-Programmen ist in letzter Zeit klar geworden, dass die Datenauswahl eine verzerrende Rolle spielen kann, die zu seltsamen Ergebnissen führt.
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
  2. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01
    0.006453813 = product of:
      0.025815252 = sum of:
        0.025815252 = product of:
          0.07744575 = sum of:
            0.07744575 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07744575 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  3. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.01
    0.0063808197 = product of:
      0.025523279 = sum of:
        0.025523279 = product of:
          0.07656983 = sum of:
            0.07656983 = weight(_text_:29 in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07656983 = score(doc=5624,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040419187 = queryNorm
                0.5385337 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
    4. 8.2019 19:52:29
    Issue
    [29. Juli 2019].