Search (1283 results, page 1 of 65)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.26 
    0.25678554 = product of:
  0.5135711 = sum of:
    0.12839277 = product of:
      0.3851783 = sum of:
        0.3851783 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3851783 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.3851783 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3851783 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.21 
    0.21398795 = product of:
  0.4279759 = sum of:
    0.10699397 = product of:
      0.32098192 = sum of:
        0.32098192 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32098192 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.32098192 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32098192 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.17 
    0.16827928 = product of:
  0.33655855 = sum of:
    0.064196385 = product of:
      0.19258915 = sum of:
        0.19258915 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19258915 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.27236217 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27236217 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.15 
    0.14979157 = product of:
  0.29958314 = sum of:
    0.074895784 = product of:
      0.22468735 = sum of:
        0.22468735 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22468735 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22468735 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22468735 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  5. Dengel, A.: Denken und Denken lassen : KI für den Menschen (2018) 0.14 
    0.13709053 = product of:
  0.27418107 = sum of:
    0.25207725 = weight(_text_:denken in 5242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25207725 = score(doc=5242,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        1.0813684 = fieldWeight in 5242, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5242)
    0.022103807 = product of:
      0.06631142 = sum of:
        0.06631142 = weight(_text_:29 in 5242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06631142 = score(doc=5242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5242)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    12. 5.2019 14:12:29
  6. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.13 
    0.12839277 = product of:
  0.25678554 = sum of:
    0.064196385 = product of:
      0.19258915 = sum of:
        0.19258915 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19258915 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.19258915 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19258915 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  7. Vosgerau, G.: Sprache und Denken (2011) 0.11 
    0.11415926 = product of:
  0.22831853 = sum of:
    0.21006438 = weight(_text_:denken in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21006438 = score(doc=3823,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.90114033 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
    0.01825414 = product of:
      0.05476242 = sum of:
        0.05476242 = weight(_text_:22 in 3823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05476242 = score(doc=3823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3823)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Wie eng sind beide verknüpft? Vollzieht sich Denken immer als innerer Monolog? Oder kommt es auch ohne Wörter aus?
    Date
    23. 7.2011 13:13:22
  8. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.11 
    0.11218619 = product of:
  0.22437239 = sum of:
    0.04279759 = product of:
      0.12839277 = sum of:
        0.12839277 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12839277 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18157479 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18157479 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  9. Raichle, M.E.: Im Kopf herrscht niemals Ruhe (2010) 0.11 
    0.110942945 = product of:
  0.22188589 = sum of:
    0.14853793 = weight(_text_:denken in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14853793 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.6372024 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
    0.073347956 = product of:
      0.110021934 = sum of:
        0.05525952 = weight(_text_:29 in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05525952 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
        0.05476242 = weight(_text_:22 in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05476242 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Wenn wir versuchen, Denken und bewusstes Wahrnehmen auszublenden, wird ein besonderes System aktiv. Dieses Netz scheint bei manchen Hirnstörungen von der Norm abzuweichen. Vielleicht liefert seine Erforschung auch einen neuen Zugang zum Bewusstsein.
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    20. 6.2010 9:22:04
  10. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.11 
    0.10699397 = product of:
  0.21398795 = sum of:
    0.053496987 = product of:
      0.16049096 = sum of:
        0.16049096 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16049096 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16049096 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16049096 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  11. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.11 
    0.10699397 = product of:
  0.21398795 = sum of:
    0.053496987 = product of:
      0.16049096 = sum of:
        0.16049096 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16049096 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16049096 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16049096 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  12. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.11 
    0.10699397 = product of:
  0.21398795 = sum of:
    0.053496987 = product of:
      0.16049096 = sum of:
        0.16049096 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16049096 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16049096 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16049096 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  13. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.10 
    0.10177082 = product of:
  0.20354164 = sum of:
    0.19258915 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19258915 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.010952484 = product of:
      0.03285745 = sum of:
        0.03285745 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03285745 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  14. Blatz, W.: Unter Druck (2017) 0.07 
    0.066716835 = product of:
  0.13343367 = sum of:
    0.11883035 = weight(_text_:denken in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11883035 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.5097619 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
    0.014603312 = product of:
      0.043809935 = sum of:
        0.043809935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043809935 = score(doc=3814,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3814, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3814)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Darin befindet sich als Schlusssatz: "Es ist wirklich paradox: In einer Welt, die so technisiert ist wie noch nie, müssen 'Wissenschaftler für freies Denken und die Anerkennung ihrer Leistung für die Gesellschaft auf die Straße gehen.".
    Date
    22. 7.2004 9:42:33
  15. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.06 
    0.064196385 = product of:
  0.25678554 = sum of:
    0.25678554 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25678554 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34267431 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  16. Molor-Erdene, B.: Was denken Chinesen selbst über das Sozialkreditsystem? (2019) 0.06 
    0.06301931 = product of:
  0.25207725 = sum of:
    0.25207725 = weight(_text_:denken in 3191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25207725 = score(doc=3191,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        1.0813684 = fieldWeight in 3191, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3191)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Was-denken-Chinesen-selbst-ueber-das-Sozialkreditsystem-4621716.html?wt_mc=nl.tp-aktuell.woechentlich
  17. Feustel, R: "Am Anfang war die Information" : Digitalisierung als Religion (2018) 0.06 
    0.05837723 = product of:
  0.11675446 = sum of:
    0.10397656 = weight(_text_:denken in 4522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10397656 = score(doc=4522,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.4460417 = fieldWeight in 4522, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4522)
    0.0127778975 = product of:
      0.03833369 = sum of:
        0.03833369 = weight(_text_:22 in 4522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03833369 = score(doc=4522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4522)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Alternative Fakten? Wie konnte es passieren, dass Gerücht, Lüge, Fakt und Wahrheit ununterscheidbar wurden? Robert Feustel untersucht die Wissensgeschichte von der Industrialisierung bis zur Digitalisierung und zeigt, wie im sogenannten Informationszeitalter ebenjene "Information" zum Heiligen Geist mutierte und den Unterschied zwischen Wahrheit und Lüge einebnet: Hauptsache sie zirkulieren möglichst reibungslos und in Echtzeit. Schließlich gerät auch das Bild des Menschen in den Sog der Digitalisierung. Was unterscheidet das menschliche Denken vom prozessierenden Computer?
    Date
    1. 1.2019 11:22:34
  18. Kojakeva, K.J.: Bibliographien: Einsichten eines ihrer möglichen Leser - ein Rundgang (2016) 0.05 
    0.050087333 = product of:
  0.100174665 = sum of:
    0.089122765 = weight(_text_:denken in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089122765 = score(doc=3062,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.38232145 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
    0.0110519035 = product of:
      0.03315571 = sum of:
        0.03315571 = weight(_text_:29 in 3062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03315571 = score(doc=3062,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3062, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3062)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Wenn ein Begriff im Beginn sein Einiges erkennen und aus sich selbst das Viele sehen, beleuchten und verstehen will, in diesem Prozess zur Zweiheit, ja eigentlich zum Vielen und Vielfachen fortschreiten möchte und zunächst auf sich selber stößt, mag zunächst befremdlich wirken, den Gedanken der Bibliographie direkt an den Begriff des Rekursiven, des Selbstreferenziellen zu binden. Dies kann dem Denken geschehen, indem es annimmt, nur ein Text (im Sinne einer Darlegung von schriftlich niedergelegten und logisch geführten Gedankengängen in der Form sich bedingender und fortlaufender Zeichen) könne sich auf Quellen beziehen und diese Form des Textes (der damit in Sinne einer wie auch immer gearteten mathematischem Menge als jene der "Nicht-Quellen" erscheint) im Wege stehen würde, gedanklich unmittelbar eine Rekursion beziehungsweise eine Selbstzuwendung zu ermöglichen Beziehungsweise diese auf sich selbst bezogene Hinwendung überhaupt erkennbar werden zu lassen, da die Zitate und/oder ihre verschiedenen Formen der Benennung ihrer Quellen (etwa im Chicago Citation Style, Fuß- und Endnoten) sich immer auf "Außentexte" beziehen und spontan eine Art Beziehung meinen, des "entre-deux" (zwischen Zweien).
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.29, 2016 [urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-100238139]
  19. Rötzer, F.: Bindestriche in Titeln von Artikeln schaden der wissenschaftlichen Reputation (2019) 0.05 
    0.050087333 = product of:
  0.100174665 = sum of:
    0.089122765 = weight(_text_:denken in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089122765 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.38232145 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
    0.0110519035 = product of:
      0.03315571 = sum of:
        0.03315571 = weight(_text_:29 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03315571 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14218207 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftler wollen herausgefunden haben, dass das wichtige Ranking nach Zitierhäufigkeit und dem Journal Impact Factor fehlerhaft ist. Man sollte ja denken, dass Programme, seien sie nun KI-gestützt oder nicht, vorurteilslos nach bestimmten Kriterien etwa ein Ranking erstellen können. Aber es kommen immer wieder unbedachte Einflüsse ins Spiel, die lange Zeit unbemerkt bleiben können. Bei KI-Programmen ist in letzter Zeit klar geworden, dass die Datenauswahl eine verzerrende Rolle spielen kann, die zu seltsamen Ergebnissen führt.
    Date
    29. 6.2019 17:46:17
  20. Schlicht, T.: Soziale Kognition (2011) 0.05 
    0.050037622 = product of:
  0.100075245 = sum of:
    0.089122765 = weight(_text_:denken in 4583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089122765 = score(doc=4583,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2331095 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.040419187 = queryNorm
        0.38232145 = fieldWeight in 4583, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.767298 = idf(docFreq=375, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4583)
    0.010952484 = product of:
      0.03285745 = sum of:
        0.03285745 = weight(_text_:22 in 4583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03285745 = score(doc=4583,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14154111 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040419187 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4583, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4583)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Der Mensch ist ein soziales Wesen, und im Alltag gehen wir unhinterfragt davon aus, dass andere Menschen wie wir selbst geistbegabt sind und somit Gefühle, Gedanken und Absichten haben, und wir geben diese Annahme nur in den äußersten Ausnahmefällen auf. Aber auf welche Weise gelangen wir überhaupt zu berechtigten Überzeugungen darüber, was genau andere in einer bestimmten Situation fühlen, denken oder beabsichtigen, wo uns doch ein direkter Zugang zu deren Psyche verwehrt zu sein scheint? Welche Strategie(n) verwenden wir, um Zugang zu der Psyche eines Anderen zu erhalten und welche Art(en) von Wissen sind dabei involviert? Orientieren wir uns eher an unserem eigenen Vorbild und projizieren unsere Vorstellungen in die andere Person hinein oder ähnelt unsere Fähigkeit zur sozialen Kognition eher unserem theoretischen Verständnis anderer 'Objekte'? Beruht unser Wissen über die Psyche eines Anderen auf unserem vorhergehenden Selbstverständnis oder sind intentionaler Selbst- und Frem dbezug systematisch gleichberechtigt? Diese und andere Fragen bewegen nicht nur Philosophen seit alters her, sondern gleichermaßen auch Psychologen sowie jüngst auch Neurowissenschaftler, die solchen Fähigkeiten zugrunde liegende psychologische Prozesse und neuronale Mechanismen im Gehirn untersuchen.
    Source
    Information Philosophie. 2014/2 (2014), S.22-27

Authors

Languages

  • e 917
  • d 353
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1119
  • el 118
  • m 102
  • s 32
  • x 19
  • r 10
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • p 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications