-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.43
0.43478474 = product of:
0.6086986 = sum of:
0.059350993 = product of:
0.17805298 = sum of:
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.015188723 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030377446 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.34
0.33914855 = product of:
0.5935099 = sum of:
0.059350993 = product of:
0.17805298 = sum of:
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.31
0.31391296 = product of:
0.54934764 = sum of:
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.015188723 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030377446 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.10
0.09698563 = product of:
0.3394497 = sum of:
0.16256407 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16256407 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.7594565 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.17688565 = sum of:
0.116130754 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.116130754 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Sharada, B.A.: Identification and interpretation of metaphors in document titles (1999)
0.03
0.027094012 = product of:
0.18965808 = sum of:
0.18965808 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 6792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18965808 = score(doc=6792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.8860326 = fieldWeight in 6792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6792)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Vossen, P.; Bloksma, L.; Alonge, A.; Marinai, E.; Peters, C.; Catellon, I.; Marti, M.A.; Rigau, G.: Compatibility in interpretation of relations in EuroWordNet (1998)
0.02
0.02322344 = product of:
0.16256407 = sum of:
0.16256407 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 6442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16256407 = score(doc=6442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.7594565 = fieldWeight in 6442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6442)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Varma, V.; Reddy, A.S.: Knowledge based metaphor interpretation (1996)
0.02
0.019352864 = product of:
0.13547005 = sum of:
0.13547005 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 7250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13547005 = score(doc=7250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.6328804 = fieldWeight in 7250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7250)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Rindflesch, T.C.; Fizsman, M.: The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing : interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text (2003)
0.02
0.019352864 = product of:
0.13547005 = sum of:
0.13547005 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13547005 = score(doc=2097,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.6328804 = fieldWeight in 2097, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2097)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Interpretation of semantic propositions in free-text documents such as MEDLINE citations would provide valuable support for biomedical applications, and several approaches to semantic interpretation are being pursued in the biomedical informatics community. In this paper, we describe a methodology for interpreting linguistic structures that encode hypernymic propositions, in which a more specific concept is in a taxonomic relationship with a more general concept. In order to effectively process these constructions, we exploit underspecified syntactic analysis and structured domain knowledge from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). After introducing the syntactic processing on which our system depends, we focus on the UMLS knowledge that supports interpretation of hypernymic propositions. We first use semantic groups from the Semantic Network to ensure that the two concepts involved are compatible; hierarchical information in the Metathesaurus then determines which concept is more general and which more specific. A preliminary evaluation of a sample based on the semantic group Chemicals and Drugs provides 83% precision. An error analysis was conducted and potential solutions to the problems encountered are presented. The research discussed here serves as a paradigm for investigating the interaction between domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing, and could also make a contribution to research on automatic processing of discourse structure. Additional implications of the system we present include its integration in advanced semantic interpretation processors for biomedical text and its use for information extraction in specific domains. The approach has the potential to support a range of applications, including information retrieval and ontology engineering.
-
Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: ¬A bibliometric-based semiautomatic approach to identification of candidate thesaurus terms : parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts (2005)
0.01
0.014740471 = product of:
0.10318329 = sum of:
0.10318329 = sum of:
0.06774294 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06774294 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 8. 3.2007 19:55:22
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Helbig, H.: Wissensverarbeitung und die Semantik der natürlichen Sprache : Wissensrepräsentation mit MultiNet (2008)
0.01
0.013684542 = product of:
0.09579179 = sum of:
0.09579179 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09579179 = score(doc=2731,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.44751403 = fieldWeight in 2731, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2731)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Das Buch gibt eine umfassende Darstellung einer Methodik zur Interpretation und Bedeutungsrepräsentation natürlichsprachlicher Ausdrücke. Diese Methodik der "Mehrschichtigen Erweiterten Semantischen Netze", das sogenannte MultiNet-Paradigma, ist sowohl für theoretische Untersuchungen als auch für die automatische Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache auf dem Rechner geeignet. Im ersten Teil des zweiteiligen Buches werden grundlegende Probleme der semantischen Repräsentation von Wissen bzw. der semantischen Interpretation natürlichsprachlicher Phänomene behandelt. Der zweite Teil enthält eine systematische Zusammenstellung des gesamten Repertoires von Darstellungsmitteln, die jeweils nach einem einheitlichen Schema beschrieben werden. Er dient als Kompendium der im Buch verwendeten formalen Beschreibungsmittel von MultiNet. Die vorgestellten Ergebnisse sind eingebettet in ein System von Software-Werkzeugen, die eine praktische Nutzung der MultiNet-Darstellungsmittel als Formalismus zur Bedeutungsrepräsentation im Rahmen der automatischen Sprachverarbeitung sichern. Hierzu gehören: eine Werkbank für den Wissensingenieur, ein Übersetzungssystem zur automatischen Gewinnung von Bedeutungsdarstellungen natürlichsprachlicher Sätze und eine Werkbank für den Computerlexikographen. Der Inhalt des Buches beruht auf jahrzehntelanger Forschung auf dem Gebiet der automatischen Sprachverarbeitung und wurde mit Vorlesungen zur Künstlichen Intelligenz und Wissensverarbeitung an der TU Dresden und der FernUniversität Hagen wiederholt in der Hochschullehre eingesetzt. Als Vorkenntnisse werden beim Leser lediglich Grundlagen der traditionellen Grammatik und elementare Kenntnisse der Prädikatenlogik vorausgesetzt.
-
Bacchin, M.; Ferro, N.; Melucci, M.: ¬A probabilistic model for stemmer generation (2005)
0.01
0.013547006 = product of:
0.09482904 = sum of:
0.09482904 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09482904 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.4430163 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- In this paper we will present a language-independent probabilistic model which can automatically generate stemmers. Stemmers can improve the retrieval effectiveness of information retrieval systems, however the designing and the implementation of stemmers requires a laborious amount of effort due to the fact that documents and queries are often written or spoken in several different languages. The probabilistic model proposed in this paper aims at the development of stemmers used for several languages. The proposed model describes the mutual reinforcement relationship between stems and derivations and then provides a probabilistic interpretation. A series of experiments shows that the stemmers generated by the probabilistic model are as effective as the ones based on linguistic knowledge.
-
Rayson, P.; Piao, S.; Sharoff, S.; Evert, S.; Moiron, B.V.: Multiword expressions : hard going or plain sailing? (2015)
0.01
0.013547006 = product of:
0.09482904 = sum of:
0.09482904 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09482904 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.4430163 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Over the past two decades or so, Multi-Word Expressions (MWEs; also called Multi-word Units) have been an increasingly important concern for Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing (NLP). The term MWE has been used to refer to various types of linguistic units and expressions, including idioms, noun compounds, phrasal verbs, light verbs and other habitual collocations. However, while there is no universally agreed definition for MWE as yet, most researchers use the term to refer to those frequently occurring phrasal units which are subject to certain level of semantic opaqueness, or non-compositionality. Non-compositional MWEs pose tough challenges for automatic analysis because their interpretation cannot be achieved by directly combining the semantics of their constituents, thereby causing the "pain in the neck of NLP".
-
Al-Khatib, K.; Ghosa, T.; Hou, Y.; Waard, A. de; Freitag, D.: Argument mining for scholarly document processing : taking stock and looking ahead (2021)
0.01
0.013547006 = product of:
0.09482904 = sum of:
0.09482904 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09482904 = score(doc=568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.4430163 = fieldWeight in 568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=568)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Argument mining targets structures in natural language related to interpretation and persuasion. Most scholarly discourse involves interpreting experimental evidence and attempting to persuade other scientists to adopt the same conclusions, which could benefit from argument mining techniques. However, While various argument mining studies have addressed student essays and news articles, those that target scientific discourse are still scarce. This paper surveys existing work in argument mining of scholarly discourse, and provides an overview of current models, data, tasks, and applications. We identify a number of key challenges confronting argument mining in the scientific domain, and suggest some possible solutions and future directions.
-
Semantik, Lexikographie und Computeranwendungen : Workshop ... (Bonn) : 1995.01.27-28 (1996)
0.01
0.013392177 = product of:
0.09374524 = sum of:
0.09374524 = sum of:
0.0684307 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0684307 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3782405 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02531454 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 14. 4.2007 10:04:22
- RSWK
- Computer / Anwendung / Computerunterstützte Lexikographie / Aufsatzsammlung
- Subject
- Computer / Anwendung / Computerunterstützte Lexikographie / Aufsatzsammlung
-
Niemi, T.; Jämsen, J.: ¬A query language for discovering semantic associations, part II : sample queries and query evaluation (2007)
0.01
0.009676432 = product of:
0.067735024 = sum of:
0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067735024 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- In our query language introduced in Part I (Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.11, S.1559-1568) the user can formulate queries to find out (possibly complex) semantic relationships among entities. In this article we demonstrate the usage of our query language and discuss the new applications that it supports. We categorize several query types and give sample queries. The query types are categorized based on whether the entities specified in a query are known or unknown to the user in advance, and whether text information in documents is utilized. Natural language is used to represent the results of queries in order to facilitate correct interpretation by the user. We discuss briefly the issues related to the prototype implementation of the query language and show that an independent operation like Rho (Sheth et al., 2005; Anyanwu & Sheth, 2002, 2003), which presupposes entities of interest to be known in advance, is exceedingly inefficient in emulating the behavior of our query language. The discussion also covers potential problems, and challenges for future work.
-
Pimenov, E.N.: Normativnost' i nekotorye problem razrabotki tezauruzov i drugikh lingvistiicheskikh sredstv IPS (2000)
0.01
0.0069125453 = product of:
0.048387814 = sum of:
0.048387814 = product of:
0.09677563 = sum of:
0.09677563 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09677563 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5349128 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987)
0.01
0.005786181 = product of:
0.040503263 = sum of:
0.040503263 = product of:
0.08100653 = sum of:
0.08100653 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08100653 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
-
Sparck Jones, K.; Kay, M.: Linguistik und Informationswissenschaft (1976)
0.01
0.005530036 = product of:
0.03871025 = sum of:
0.03871025 = product of:
0.0774205 = sum of:
0.0774205 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0774205 = score(doc=3,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 3, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Diese Arbeit befaßt sich mit den sprachlichen Aspekten der Informationswissenschaft, insbesondere mit den sprachlichen Komponenten der Analyse, der beschreibung und dem Retrieval von Dokumenten. Dabei wird erforscht, welche linguistischen Verfahren und Theorien von der Informationswissenschaft genützt werden können. Unter anderem werden untersucht die Anwendung der Sprachtheorie auf die Struktur der Erkenntnis, die Verwertung der Phonologie, Morphologie, Syntax und Semantik in der Organisation, der Speicherung und in der Überbringung von Informationen
-
Stock, W.G.: Textwortmethode : Norbert Henrichs zum 65. (3) (2000)
0.01
0.005530036 = product of:
0.03871025 = sum of:
0.03871025 = product of:
0.0774205 = sum of:
0.0774205 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0774205 = score(doc=4891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Nur wenige Dokumentationsmethoden werden mit dem Namen ihrer Entwickler assoziiert. Ausnahmen sind Melvil Dewey (DDC), S.R. Ranganathan (Colon Classification) - und Norbert Henrichs. Seine Textwortmethode ermöglicht die Indexierung und das Retrieval von Literatur aus Fachgebieten, die keine allseits akzeptierte Fachterminologie vorweisen, also viele Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, vorneweg die Philosophie. Für den Einsatz in der elektronischen Philosophie-Dokumentation hat Henrichs in den späten sechziger Jahren die Textwortmethode entworfen. Er ist damit nicht nur einer der Pioniere der Anwendung der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung in der Informationspraxis, sondern auch der Pionier bei der Dokumentation terminologisch nicht starrer Fachsprachen
-
Baierer, K.; Zumstein, P.: Verbesserung der OCR in digitalen Sammlungen von Bibliotheken (2016)
0.01
0.005530036 = product of:
0.03871025 = sum of:
0.03871025 = product of:
0.0774205 = sum of:
0.0774205 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0774205 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Möglichkeiten zur Verbesserung der automatischen Texterkennung (OCR) in digitalen Sammlungen insbesondere durch computerlinguistische Methoden werden beschrieben und bisherige PostOCR-Verfahren analysiert. Im Gegensatz zu diesen Möglichkeiten aus der Forschung oder aus einzelnen Projekten unterscheidet sich die momentane Anwendung von OCR in der Bibliothekspraxis wesentlich und nutzt das Potential nur teilweise aus.
