Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994) 0.04
    0.042024657 = product of:
      0.14708629 = sum of:
        0.10837604 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10837604 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.5063043 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
        0.03871025 = product of:
          0.0774205 = sum of:
            0.0774205 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0774205 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    A central consideration in the study of whole language semantic space as encoded in thesauri is word sense comparability. Shows how word sense comparability can be adequately expressed by the logical implications and rules from Formal Concept Analysis. Formal concept analysis, a new approach to formal logic initiated by Rudolf Wille, has been used for data modelling, analysis and interpretation, and also for knowledge representation and knowledge discovery
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.03
    0.032156922 = product of:
      0.112549216 = sum of:
        0.09482904 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09482904 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.4430163 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.017720178 = product of:
          0.035440356 = sum of:
            0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035440356 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  3. Skorsky, M.: Graphische Darstellung eines Thesaurus (1997) 0.01
    0.008295055 = product of:
      0.058065377 = sum of:
        0.058065377 = product of:
          0.116130754 = sum of:
            0.116130754 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.116130754 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Kollewe, W.; Sander, C.; Schmiede, R.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA als Instrument der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (1995) 0.01
    0.005530036 = product of:
      0.03871025 = sum of:
        0.03871025 = product of:
          0.0774205 = sum of:
            0.0774205 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0774205 = score(doc=585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    TOSCANA ist ein Computerprogramm, mit dem begriffliche Erkundungssysteme auf der Grundlage der Formalen Begriffsanalyse erstellt werden können.In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird diskutiert, wie TOSCANA zur bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung und thematischen Literatursuche eingesetzt werden kann. Berichtet wird dabei von dem Forschungsprojekt 'Anwendung eines Modells begrifflicher Wissenssysteme im Bereich der Literatur zur interdisziplinären Technikforschung', das vom Darmstädter Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Technikforschung gefördert worden ist
  5. Prediger, S.: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen : Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik (1998) 0.00
    0.003616363 = product of:
      0.02531454 = sum of:
        0.02531454 = product of:
          0.05062908 = sum of:
            0.05062908 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05062908 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 15:58:22
  6. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.00
    0.0028930905 = product of:
      0.020251632 = sum of:
        0.020251632 = product of:
          0.040503263 = sum of:
            0.040503263 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040503263 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81