Search (481 results, page 2 of 25)

0.009676432 = product of:
  0.067735024 = sum of:
    0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 1724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067735024 = score(doc=1724,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037368443 = queryNorm
        0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 1724, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1724)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Many discussions exist regarding the credibility of information on the Internet. Similar discussions happen on the interpretation of social scientific research data, for which information triangulation has been proposed as a useful method. In this article, we explore a design theory-consisting of a kernel theory, meta-requirements, and meta-designs-for software and services that triangulate Internet information. The kernel theory identifies 5 triangulation methods based on Churchman's inquiring systems theory and related meta-requirements. These meta-requirements are used to search for existing software and services that contain design features for Internet information triangulation tools. We discuss a prototyping study of the use of an information triangulator among 72 college students and how their use contributes to their opinion formation. From these findings, we conclude that triangulation tools can contribute to opinion formation by information consumers, especially when the tool is not a mere fact checker but includes the search and delivery of alternative views. Finally, we discuss other empirical propositions and design propositions for an agenda for triangulator developers and researchers. In particular, we propose investment in theory triangulation, that is, tools to automatically detect ethically and theoretically alternative information and views.

0.008423126 = product of:
  0.058961883 = sum of:
    0.058961883 = sum of:
      0.03871025 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03871025 = score(doc=3372,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037368443 = queryNorm
          0.21396513 = fieldWeight in 3372, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3372)
      0.020251632 = weight(_text_:22 in 3372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.020251632 = score(doc=3372,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037368443 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3372, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3372)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Content

"Das World Wide, Web hat, wen wundert es, eine Vorgeschichte. Und zwar, und da staunt der Laie denn doch, im Internet. World Wide Web, Internet - ist denn das nicht dasselbe? Nein. Ist es nicht. Das WWW ist eine Funktion des Internet. Eine von vielen. So wie Email und Chat. Die Geschichte ist die. In den 40er Jahren des 20. Jahrhunderts wurden die ersten EDV-Anlagen gebaut. In den 60er und 70er Jahren gehörten riesige Computer mit Lochkarten, Magnetbändern und Endlos-Ausdrucken zu den Prestige-Objekten von Unis, , Banken und Firmen, ehrfürchtig "Elektronengehir ne" oder ironisch "Blechtrottel" genannt. 1957 hatte das US-Verteidigungsministerium unter dem Eindruck des Sputnik-Schocks die Forschungsinstitution ARPA gegründet. Zwölf jahre später entstand das ARPAnet - ein Projekt zur Entwicklung eines Forschungsnetzes, das Universitäten und zivile wie militärische US-Einrichtungen verband. Dass die treibende Kraft das Bedürfnis gewesen sein soll, das Netz vor Bomben zu schützen, ist wohl ein Gerücht. Nach Larry Roberts, einem der "Väter" des Internet, kam dieses Argument erst später auf. Es erwies sich als nützlich für das Aquirieren von Forschungsgeldern... Die globale elektronische Kommunikation blieb nicht auf die Welt der Akademiker beschränkt. Das Big Business begann die Lunte zu riechen. Fast überall, wanderten die Handelsmärkte vom Parkett und den Wandtafeln auf die Computerbildschirme: Das Internet war mittlerweile zu einem brauchbaren Datenübermittlungsmedium geworden, hatte aber noch einen Nachteil: Man konnte Informationen nur finden, wenn man wusste, wo man suchen muss. In den Folgejahren kam es zu einer Explosion in der Entwicklung neuer Navigationsprotokolle, es entstand als bedeutendste Entwicklung das WWW -übrigens im "alten Europa", am europäischen Forschungszentrum für Teilchenphysik (CERN) in Genf. Erfunden hat es Tim Berners-Lee. Seine Erfindung war eine doppelte. Zunächst die Anwendung des schon lange bekannten Hypertextprinzipes (Ted Nelson, 1972) auf elektronische Dokumente - in der Hypertext Markup Language (HTML). Und dann eine einfache von Herrn und Frau Jedermann bedienbare grafische Oberfläche, die diese Dokumente, austauscht und zur Anzeige bringt (über das Hypertext Transport Protokoll - HTTP). Die allererste Software hieß "Mosaic" und wird heute Browser genannt. Im April 1993 gab das CERN die World-Wide-Web-Software für. die Öffentlichkeit frei, zur unbeschränkten und kostenlosen Nutzung. Heute umfasst das WWW über 32 Millionen registrierte Domain-Namen, davon 5 Millionen .deDomains, und der weltweite Zugang zum Internet erreichte Ende 2002 über 620 Millionen Nutzer."

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22

0.008295055 = product of:
  0.058065377 = sum of:
    0.058065377 = product of:
      0.116130754 = sum of:
        0.116130754 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.116130754 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.008182895 = product of:
  0.057280265 = sum of:
    0.057280265 = product of:
      0.11456053 = sum of:
        0.11456053 = weight(_text_:22 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11456053 = score(doc=6569,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 2.1997 19:50:29

Source

Cogito. 1997, H.1, S.22-23

0.007820653 = product of:
  0.054744564 = sum of:
    0.054744564 = product of:
      0.10948913 = sum of:
        0.10948913 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10948913 = score(doc=3665,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.6051848 = fieldWeight in 3665, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3665)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Seit Anfang März 2010 verfügt die Bayerische Staatsbibliothek über eine mobile Version ihres Opacs, den OPACplus mobil. Anstatt einer eigenständigen Anwendung wurde ein Modul entwickelt, das den bestehenden Opac um die für eine mobile Anwendung benötigten Funktionen erweitert.

0.0077411463 = product of:
  0.05418802 = sum of:
    0.05418802 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05418802 = score(doc=2568,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037368443 = queryNorm
        0.25315216 = fieldWeight in 2568, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2568)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to explore some initial and necessarily broad ideas about the effects of the world wide web on our methods of understanding and trusting, online and off. Design/methodology/approach - The paper considers the idea of trust via some of the revolutionary meanings inherent in the world wide web at its public conception in 1994, and some of its different meanings now. It does so in the context of the collaborative reader-writer Web2.0 (of today), and also through a brief exploration of our relationship to the grand narratives (and some histories) of the post-war West. It uses a variety of formal approaches taken from information science, literary criticism, philosophy, history, and journalism studies - together with some practical analysis based on 15 years as a web practitioner and content creator. It is a starting point. Findings - This paper suggests that a pronounced effect of the world wide web is the further atomising of many once-shared Western post-war narratives, and the global democratising of doubt as a powerful though not necessarily helpful epistemological tool. The world wide web is the place that most actively demonstrates contemporary doubt. Research limitations/implications - This is the starting place for a piece of larger cross-faculty (and cross-platform) research into the arena of trust and doubt. In particular, the relationship of concepts such as news, event, history and myth with the myriad content platforms of new media, the idea of the digital consumer, and the impact of geography on knowledge that is enshrined in the virtual. This paper attempts to frame a few of the initial issues inherent in the idea of "trust" in the digital age and argues that without some kind of shared aesthetics of narrative judgment brought about through a far broader public understanding of (rather than an interpretation of) oral, visual, literary and multi-media narratives, stories and plots, we cannot be said to trust many types of knowledge - not just in philosophical terms but also in our daily actions and behaviours. Originality/value - This paper initiates debate about whether the creation of a new academic "space" in which cross-faculty collaborations into the nature of modern narrative (in terms of production and consumption; producers and consumers) might be able to help us to understand more of the social implications of the collaborative content produced for consumption on the world wide web.

0.0077411463 = product of:
  0.05418802 = sum of:
    0.05418802 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05418802 = score(doc=5679,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037368443 = queryNorm
        0.25315216 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

An original methodological framework for approaching the archived web, both as a source and as an object of study in its own right. As life continues to move online, the web becomes increasingly important as a source for understanding the past. But historians have yet to formulate a methodology for approaching the archived web as a source of study. How should the history of the present be written? In this book, Niels Brügger offers an original methodological framework for approaching the web of the past, both as a source and as an object of study in its own right. While many studies of the web focus solely on its use and users, Brügger approaches the archived web as a semiotic, textual system in order to offer the first book-length treatment of its scholarly use. While the various forms of the archived web can challenge researchers' interactions with it, they also present a range of possibilities for interpretation. The Archived Web identifies characteristics of the online web that are significant now for scholars, investigates how the online web became the archived web, and explores how the particular digitality of the archived web can affect a historian's research process. Brügger offers suggestions for how to translate traditional historiographic methods for the study of the archived web, focusing on provenance, creating an overview of the archived material, evaluating versions, and citing the material. The Archived Web lays the foundations for doing web history in the digital age, offering important and timely guidance for today's media scholars and tomorrow's historians.

0.0073702354 = product of:
  0.051591646 = sum of:
    0.051591646 = sum of:
      0.03387147 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03387147 = score(doc=4846,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037368443 = queryNorm
          0.18721949 = fieldWeight in 4846, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4846)
      0.017720178 = weight(_text_:22 in 4846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017720178 = score(doc=4846,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037368443 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4846, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4846)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Content

Wenn man die Betrachtungsebene bei Google Earth langsam kippt, wird sogar eine dreidimensionale Ansicht - teilweise echt, zum größten Teil aber vom Computer errechnet und künstlich wirkend - sichtbar. Und das schafft Google Earth mit Aufnahmen von einem einzigen Satelliten. Wer World Wind (den Dienst der US-Weltraumagentur Nasa) bemüht, kann je nach Gebiet auf unterschiedlich hoch auflösende Karten zurückgreifen. Das rund 20 Euro teure, leider sehr aufwändig zu installierende Programm NaSat verwendet Aufnahmen von diversen Nasa-Satelliten. Hiermit lassen sich beispielsweise ein Vulkanausbruch in der Südsee oder eine Feuersbrunst in Kalifornien beobachten. NaSat kann nahezu jeden Quadratkilometer der Erde abbilden und ist zudem mit Klicktel kompatibel, was bedeutet, dass in Klicktel gefundene Adressdaten in NaSat eingelesen und bis auf die Straße genau angezeigt werden können. Für Geographen ist interessant, dass man sich zusätzlich über Temperaturen und die Verteilung von Niederschlägen überall auf der Welt visuell informieren kann. Auch die Entdeckung beeindruckender Touristenziele wie den Kreml in Moskau, die Pyramiden von Gizeh oder die Villa von Bill Gates ist blitzschnell möglich. Google Earth hat als Anwendung, die ständig aktualisiert wird, den Vorteil, dass jeden Tag neue Daten den Blick auf die Erde interessanter machen. Und die Möglichkeiten sind noch lange nicht ausgereizt. So hat sich jetzt eine Initiative gefunden, die unter dem Motto "Deutschland muss schärfer werden" dafür sorgen möchte, dass zur Fußball-WM die Bereiche um die zwölf WM-Arenen höher aufgelöst ins Netz gestellt werden. Für Profis hat Google nachgelegt und bietet mit Earth Plus und Earth Pro zwei kostenpflichtige Versionen an. Unter anderem wurde GPS integriert. Daten des Ortungssystems können an Google übergeben werden."

Date

3. 5.1997 8:44:22

0.007232726 = product of:
  0.05062908 = sum of:
    0.05062908 = product of:
      0.10125816 = sum of:
        0.10125816 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10125816 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22

0.007160034 = product of:
  0.050120234 = sum of:
    0.050120234 = product of:
      0.10024047 = sum of:
        0.10024047 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10024047 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

5. 8.2001 12:22:47

Source

Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22

0.007160034 = product of:
  0.050120234 = sum of:
    0.050120234 = product of:
      0.10024047 = sum of:
        0.10024047 = weight(_text_:22 in 7131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10024047 = score(doc=7131,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 7131, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

18. 1.1997 12:15:22

Source

Kölner Stadtanzeiger. Nr.69 vom 22/23.3.1997, S.MZ7

0.007160034 = product of:
  0.050120234 = sum of:
    0.050120234 = product of:
      0.10024047 = sum of:
        0.10024047 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10024047 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

5. 9.1997 19:22:27

Source

Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193

0.0069125453 = product of:
  0.048387814 = sum of:
    0.048387814 = product of:
      0.09677563 = sum of:
        0.09677563 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09677563 = score(doc=2781,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.5349128 = fieldWeight in 2781, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2781)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Ist Internet 'nur' ein Modewort oder die Anwendung der Zukunft? Ist Internet nur für Werbezwecke oder auch für Fachinformationen und für die sog. 'Information Professionals' nutzbar? Unser Artikel möchte einige dieser Aspekte näher beleuchten. Dazu sollen einerseits bereits existente Internet-Anwendungen exemplarisch vorgestellt werden, um anschließend einige technische Möglichkeiten der Hostanbindung im Internet darzustellen

0.00598644 = product of:
  0.04190508 = sum of:
    0.04190508 = product of:
      0.08381016 = sum of:
        0.08381016 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08381016 = score(doc=2231,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.46324813 = fieldWeight in 2231, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Die vorliegende Arbeit befasst sich mit den Möglichkeiten der Informationsextraktion aus den Daten von Webcommunities und der Verwendung der extrahierten Informationen in Case-Based Reasoning- (CBR) Systemen. Im Rahmen der Arbeit wird auf die Entwicklung der Webcommunities im Zeitraum der letzten 30 Jahre eingegangen. Es wird eine Klassifikation der derzeitig anzutreffenden Webcommunities in verschiedene Kategorien von Webcommunities vorgenommen. Diese Klassifikation erfolgt hinsichtlich der Struktur, der technischen Mittel sowie der Interessen der Nutzer dieser Webcommunities. Aufbauend auf die vorgenommene Klassifikation von Webcommunities erfolgt eine Untersuchung der Eignung dieser Kategorien von Webcommunities zur Informationsextraktion im Kontext der Verwendung der extrahierten Informationen in CBR-Systemen. Im selben Kontext werden verschiedene Ansätze und Techniken der Informationsextraktion auf ihre Eignung zur Extraktion von Wissen speziell für die Wissenscontainer von CBR -Systeme geprüft. Aufbauend auf den dadurch gewonnenen Erkenntnissen wird, angelehnt an den Prozess der Knowledge Discovery in Databases, ein eigenes Prozessmodell der Wissensextraktion aus Webcommunities für CBR-Systeme entworfen. Im Zuge der näheren Betrachtung dieses Prozessmodells wird auf verschiedene, durch die beabsichtigte Verwendung der extrahierten Informationen in den vier Wissenscontainern des CBR bedingte, Anforderungen an NLP- sowie IE-Techniken, die zur Extraktion dieser Daten verwendet werden, eingegangen. Die in den theoretischen Betrachtungen erlangten Erkenntnisse werden dann dazu eingesetzt, eine Anwendung zur Informationsextraktion aus einer Webcommunity für ein CBR-System, in Form der Knowledge Extraction Workbench zu implementieren. Diese IEAnwendung arbeitet im Kontext des auf der SEASALT-Architektur aufbauenden Projektes docQuery. Die Realisierung dieser IE-Anwendung wird dokumentiert sowie die Extraktionsergebnisse der Anwendung hinsichtlich ihres Umfanges und ihrer Qualität evaluiert.

0.005786181 = product of:
  0.040503263 = sum of:
    0.040503263 = product of:
      0.08100653 = sum of:
        0.08100653 = weight(_text_:22 in 4122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08100653 = score(doc=4122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 4.1996 20:07:57

0.005786181 = product of:
  0.040503263 = sum of:
    0.040503263 = product of:
      0.08100653 = sum of:
        0.08100653 = weight(_text_:22 in 4514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08100653 = score(doc=4514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4514)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.2, S.108-110

0.005786181 = product of:
  0.040503263 = sum of:
    0.040503263 = product of:
      0.08100653 = sum of:
        0.08100653 = weight(_text_:22 in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08100653 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

23. 8.1996 12:51:22

0.005786181 = product of:
  0.040503263 = sum of:
    0.040503263 = product of:
      0.08100653 = sum of:
        0.08100653 = weight(_text_:22 in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08100653 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

17. 7.1996 9:33:22

0.005786181 = product of:
  0.040503263 = sum of:
    0.040503263 = product of:
      0.08100653 = sum of:
        0.08100653 = weight(_text_:22 in 5280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08100653 = score(doc=5280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

21. 9.1996 16:03:22

0.005786181 = product of:
  0.040503263 = sum of:
    0.040503263 = product of:
      0.08100653 = sum of:
        0.08100653 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08100653 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

30.11.1996 13:22:37