-
Gladun, A.; Rogushina, J.: Development of domain thesaurus as a set of ontology concepts with use of semantic similarity and elements of combinatorial optimization (2021)
0.00
0.0048387814 = product of:
0.03387147 = sum of:
0.03387147 = product of:
0.06774294 = sum of:
0.06774294 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06774294 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.37443897 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008)
0.00
0.0041475273 = product of:
0.029032689 = sum of:
0.029032689 = product of:
0.058065377 = sum of:
0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058065377 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Sigel, A.: Was leisten Topic Maps? (2001)
0.00
0.0041475273 = product of:
0.029032689 = sum of:
0.029032689 = product of:
0.058065377 = sum of:
0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 5855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058065377 = score(doc=5855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 5855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5855)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Dieser Kurzbeitrag skizziert das Potenzial der Topic Map-Technologie (ISO/IEC 13250 und XTM 1.0) für die Wissensorganisation und veranschaulicht dies anhand einer Liste fruchtbarer Anwendungsfälle (Use Cases). Er berichtet auch knapp über erste Erfahrungen bei der experimentellen Anwendung. Am Beispiel von Informationsressourcen zur Thematik sozialwissenschaftlicher Migration werden Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Topic Maps für die inhaltliche Erschließung und semantische Suche aufgezeigt werden. Da es sich um eine terminologisch "weiche" Donnerte handelt, ist von besonderem Interesse, wie sich komplexe Relationen und multiple Indexierungssichten umsetzen lassen und wie sich diese auf das Retrieval-Ergebnis auswirken
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008)
0.00
0.0041475273 = product of:
0.029032689 = sum of:
0.029032689 = product of:
0.058065377 = sum of:
0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058065377 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Fischer, D.H.: From thesauri towards ontologies? (1998)
0.00
0.0041475273 = product of:
0.029032689 = sum of:
0.029032689 = product of:
0.058065377 = sum of:
0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058065377 = score(doc=2176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 2176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Fenske, M.: Modell eines automatisierbaren syntaktischen Metathesaurus und seine Eignung für parlamentarische Thesauri im Internet (2006)
0.00
0.0041475273 = product of:
0.029032689 = sum of:
0.029032689 = product of:
0.058065377 = sum of:
0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058065377 = score(doc=32,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Kless, D.; Milton, S.: Comparison of thesauri and ontologies from a semiotic perspective (2010)
0.00
0.0041475273 = product of:
0.029032689 = sum of:
0.029032689 = product of:
0.058065377 = sum of:
0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058065377 = score(doc=756,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Assem, M. van; Gangemi, A.; Schreiber, G.: Conversion of WordNet to a standard RDF/OWL representation (2006)
0.00
0.0041475273 = product of:
0.029032689 = sum of:
0.029032689 = product of:
0.058065377 = sum of:
0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058065377 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Assem, M. van; Malaisé, V.; Miles, A.; Schreiber, G.: ¬A method to convert thesauri to SKOS (2006)
0.00
0.0041475273 = product of:
0.029032689 = sum of:
0.029032689 = product of:
0.058065377 = sum of:
0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058065377 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Garshol, L.M.: Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! : making sense of it all (2005)
0.00
0.0041475273 = product of:
0.029032689 = sum of:
0.029032689 = product of:
0.058065377 = sum of:
0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058065377 = score(doc=4729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Hannech, A.: Système de recherche d'information étendue basé sur une projection multi-espaces (2018)
0.00
0.0038705731 = product of:
0.02709401 = sum of:
0.02709401 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02709401 = score(doc=4472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.12657608 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- However, this assumption does not hold in all cases, the needs of the user evolve over time and can move away from his previous interests stored in his profile. In other cases, the user's profile may be misused to extract or infer new information needs. This problem is much more accentuated with ambiguous queries. When multiple POIs linked to a search query are identified in the user's profile, the system is unable to select the relevant data from that profile to respond to that request. This has a direct impact on the quality of the results provided to this user. In order to overcome some of these limitations, in this research thesis, we have been interested in the development of techniques aimed mainly at improving the relevance of the results of current SRIs and facilitating the exploration of major collections of documents. To do this, we propose a solution based on a new concept and model of indexing and information retrieval called multi-spaces projection. This proposal is based on the exploitation of different categories of semantic and social information that enrich the universe of document representation and search queries in several dimensions of interpretations. The originality of this representation is to be able to distinguish between the different interpretations used for the description and the search for documents. This gives a better visibility on the results returned and helps to provide a greater flexibility of search and exploration, giving the user the ability to navigate one or more views of data that interest him the most. In addition, the proposed multidimensional representation universes for document description and search query interpretation help to improve the relevance of the user's results by providing a diversity of research / exploration that helps meet his diverse needs and those of other different users. This study exploits different aspects that are related to the personalized search and aims to solve the problems caused by the evolution of the information needs of the user. Thus, when the profile of this user is used by our system, a technique is proposed and used to identify the interests most representative of his current needs in his profile. This technique is based on the combination of three influential factors, including the contextual, frequency and temporal factor of the data. The ability of users to interact, exchange ideas and opinions, and form social networks on the Web, has led systems to focus on the types of interactions these users have at the level of interaction between them as well as their social roles in the system. This social information is discussed and integrated into this research work. The impact and how they are integrated into the IR process are studied to improve the relevance of the results.
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.00
0.003616363 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = product of:
0.05062908 = sum of:
0.05062908 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05062908 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Pages
- S.11-22
-
Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017)
0.00
0.003616363 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = product of:
0.05062908 = sum of:
0.05062908 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05062908 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 13.12.2017 14:17:22
-
Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002)
0.00
0.003616363 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = product of:
0.05062908 = sum of:
0.05062908 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05062908 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 30. 5.2010 16:22:35
-
Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018)
0.00
0.003616363 = product of:
0.02531454 = sum of:
0.02531454 = product of:
0.05062908 = sum of:
0.05062908 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05062908 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
-
Curras, E.: Ontologies, taxonomy and thesauri in information organisation and retrieval (2010)
0.00
0.0034562727 = product of:
0.024193907 = sum of:
0.024193907 = product of:
0.048387814 = sum of:
0.048387814 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048387814 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Amirhosseini, M.: Quantitative evaluation of the movement from complexity toward simplicity in the structure of thesaurus descriptors (2015)
0.00
0.0034562727 = product of:
0.024193907 = sum of:
0.024193907 = product of:
0.048387814 = sum of:
0.048387814 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048387814 = score(doc=3695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Meyer, A.: Begriffsrelationen im Kategoriensystem der Wikipedia : Entwicklung eines Relationeninventars zur kollaborativen Anwendung (2010)
0.00
0.0034562727 = product of:
0.024193907 = sum of:
0.024193907 = product of:
0.048387814 = sum of:
0.048387814 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048387814 = score(doc=4429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Kless, D.; Milton, S.; Kazmierczak, E.; Lindenthal, J.: Thesaurus and ontology structure : formal and pragmatic differences and similarities (2015)
0.00
0.0034562727 = product of:
0.024193907 = sum of:
0.024193907 = product of:
0.048387814 = sum of:
0.048387814 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048387814 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Dietiker, S.: Cognitive Map einer Bibliothek : eine Überprüfung der Methodentauglichkeit im Bereich Bibliothekswissenschaft - am Beispiel der Kantonsbibliothek Graubünden (2016)
0.00
0.0034562727 = product of:
0.024193907 = sum of:
0.024193907 = product of:
0.048387814 = sum of:
0.048387814 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048387814 = score(doc=4570,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2674564 = fieldWeight in 4570, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4570)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Cognitive Maps sind mentale Karten, welche jeder Mensch besitzt. Es handelt sich dabei um eine Reflexion der jeweiligen Umwelt. Cognitive Mapping ist eine Methode, welche diese mentale Karte sichtbar macht. Aufgrund dieser Visualisierung können Erkenntnisse darüber gewonnen werden, was Menschen an einem Ort oder in einem Raum tun und wahrnehmen. Die Methode hat verschiede Anwendungstechniken, welche sich in sechs Kategorien teilen: Aufgabenlösung, Elemente orten, Sketch Map erstellen, Zonen und Gebiete einzeichnen, Weg- und Ortsbeschreibung sowie Kognitive Befragung. Anhand dieser lassen sich Untersuchungen beliebig kombinieren. Die Anwendung von Cognitive Mapping sowie eine einfache Befragung in der Kantonsbibliothek Graubünden hat ergeben, dass die Methode für Bibliotheken sinnvoll ist. Allerdings sollte bei zukünftigen Anwendungen die Punkte Gesamtaufwand, Untersuchungsaufbau, Teilnehmer-Zusammensetzung und Auswertungs-Aufwand angepasst werden.
