-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.47
0.4655805 = product of:
0.8147658 = sum of:
0.059350993 = product of:
0.17805298 = sum of:
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25180492 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25180492 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.25180492 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25180492 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.25180492 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25180492 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.45
0.4521981 = product of:
0.7913466 = sum of:
0.07913466 = product of:
0.23740397 = sum of:
0.23740397 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23740397 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.23740397 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23740397 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.23740397 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23740397 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.23740397 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23740397 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.43
0.43478474 = product of:
0.6086986 = sum of:
0.059350993 = product of:
0.17805298 = sum of:
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.015188723 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030377446 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.40
0.3956733 = product of:
0.69242823 = sum of:
0.06924283 = product of:
0.20772848 = sum of:
0.20772848 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20772848 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.20772848 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20772848 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.20772848 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20772848 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.20772848 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20772848 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.34
0.33914855 = product of:
0.5935099 = sum of:
0.059350993 = product of:
0.17805298 = sum of:
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.34
0.33914855 = product of:
0.5935099 = sum of:
0.059350993 = product of:
0.17805298 = sum of:
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.34
0.33914855 = product of:
0.5935099 = sum of:
0.059350993 = product of:
0.17805298 = sum of:
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.17805298 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17805298 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.28
0.28262377 = product of:
0.4945916 = sum of:
0.04945916 = product of:
0.14837748 = sum of:
0.14837748 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14837748 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14837748 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14837748 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.14837748 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14837748 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.14837748 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14837748 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31681007 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.10
0.09698563 = product of:
0.3394497 = sum of:
0.16256407 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16256407 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.7594565 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.17688565 = sum of:
0.116130754 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.116130754 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.6418954 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.06075489 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06075489 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Budd, J.M.: ¬The complexity of information retrieval : a hypothetical example (1996)
0.05
0.045938455 = product of:
0.16078459 = sum of:
0.13547005 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 4928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13547005 = score(doc=4928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.6328804 = fieldWeight in 4928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4928)
0.02531454 = product of:
0.05062908 = sum of:
0.05062908 = weight(_text_:22 in 4928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05062908 = score(doc=4928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4928)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Inquiries made by academic library users are more complex than they may appear. Successful information retrieval based on complex queries is a function of cataloguing, classification, and the librarian's interpretation. Explores aspects of complexitiy using a proposed query as an example
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.2, S.111-117
-
Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994)
0.04
0.042024657 = product of:
0.14708629 = sum of:
0.10837604 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10837604 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5063043 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
0.03871025 = product of:
0.0774205 = sum of:
0.0774205 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0774205 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- A central consideration in the study of whole language semantic space as encoded in thesauri is word sense comparability. Shows how word sense comparability can be adequately expressed by the logical implications and rules from Formal Concept Analysis. Formal concept analysis, a new approach to formal logic initiated by Rudolf Wille, has been used for data modelling, analysis and interpretation, and also for knowledge representation and knowledge discovery
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Singh, S.: Ranganathan and reference services (1992)
0.04
0.036750764 = product of:
0.12862767 = sum of:
0.10837604 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10837604 = score(doc=2517,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.5063043 = fieldWeight in 2517, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2517)
0.020251632 = product of:
0.040503263 = sum of:
0.040503263 = weight(_text_:22 in 2517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040503263 = score(doc=2517,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2517, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2517)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Defines reference service and discusses Ranganathan's interpretation of and contribution to reference service under the following headings; development of reference service; 4 categories and holistic view of reference service; analyses of reference work and service; reference service and humanism; flair of the reference librarian; symbiosis of reference service and classification; and relevance of Ranganathan's contribution
- Source
- CLIS observer. 9(1992) nos.1/2, S.16-22
-
Dervin, B.: Information as a user construct : the relevance of perceived information needs to synthesis and interpretation (1983)
0.03
0.0328429 = product of:
0.22990029 = sum of:
0.22990029 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22990029 = score(doc=2730,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
1.0740336 = fieldWeight in 2730, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2730)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Knowledge structure and use: implications for synthesis and interpretation. Ed.: S.A. Ward u. L.J. Reed
-
Grivel, L.; Mutschke, P.; Polanco, X.: Thematic mapping on bibliographic databases by cluster analysis : a description of the SDOC environment with SOLIS (1995)
0.03
0.032156922 = product of:
0.112549216 = sum of:
0.09482904 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 1900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09482904 = score(doc=1900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.4430163 = fieldWeight in 1900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1900)
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 1900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=1900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The paper presents a coword-analysis-based system called SDOC which is able to pupport the intellectual work of an end-user who is searching for information in a bibliographic database. This is done by presenting its thematical structure as a map of keyword clusters (themes) on a graphical user interface. These mapping facilities are demonstrated on the basis of the research field Social History given by a set of documents from the social science literature database SOLIS. Besides the traditional way of analysing a coword map as a strategic diagram, the notion of cluster relationships analysis is introduced which provides an adequate interpretation of links between themes
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.70-77
-
Capps, M.; Ladd, B.; Stotts, D.: Enhanced graph models in the Web : multi-client, multi-head, multi-tail browsing (1996)
0.03
0.032156922 = product of:
0.112549216 = sum of:
0.09482904 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09482904 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.4430163 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Richer graph models permit authors to 'program' the browsing behaviour they want WWW readers to see by turning the hypertext into a hyperprogram with specific semantics. Multiple browsing streams can be started under the author's control and then kept in step through the synchronization mechanisms provided by the graph model. Adds a Semantic Web Graph Layer (SWGL) which allows dynamic interpretation of link and node structures according to graph models. Details the SWGL and its architecture, some sample protocol implementations, and the latest extensions to MHTML
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Levinson, R.: Symmetry and the computation of conceptual structures (2000)
0.03
0.032156922 = product of:
0.112549216 = sum of:
0.09482904 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 5081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09482904 = score(doc=5081,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.4430163 = fieldWeight in 5081, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5081)
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 5081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=5081,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5081, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5081)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The discovery and exploitation of symmetry plays a major role in sciences such as crystallography, quantum theory, condensedmatter physics, thermodynamics, chemistry, biology and others. It then should not be surprising then, since Conceptual Structures are proposed as a universal knowledge representation scheme, that symmetry should play a role in their interpretation and their application. In this tutorial style paper, we illustrate the role of symmetry in Conceptual Structures and how algorithms may be constructed that exploit this symmetry in order to achieve computational efficiency
- Date
- 3. 9.2000 19:22:45
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.03
0.032156922 = product of:
0.112549216 = sum of:
0.09482904 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09482904 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.4430163 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.017720178 = product of:
0.035440356 = sum of:
0.035440356 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035440356 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Jones, S.: ¬A thesaurus data model for an intelligent retrieval system (1993)
0.03
0.031518497 = product of:
0.11031473 = sum of:
0.081282035 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081282035 = score(doc=5279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.37972826 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
0.029032689 = product of:
0.058065377 = sum of:
0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058065377 = score(doc=5279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper demonstrates the application of conventional database design techniques to thesaurus representation. The thesaurus is considered as a printed document, as a semantic net, and as a relational database to be used in conjunction with an intelligent information retrieval system. Some issues raised by analysis of two standard thesauri include: the prevalence of compound terms and the representation of term structure; thesaurus redundancy and the extent to which it can be eliminated in machine-readable versions; the difficulty of exploiting thesaurus knowledge originally designed for human rather than automatic interpretation; deriving 'strength of association' measures between terms in a thesaurus considered as a semantic net; facet representation and the need for variations in the data model to cater for structural differences between thesauri. A complete schema of database tables is presented, with an outline suggestion for using the stored information when matching one or more thesaurus terms with a user's query
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Sparck Jones, K.: ¬A statistical interpretation of term specifity and its application in retrieval (1972)
0.03
0.030964585 = product of:
0.21675208 = sum of:
0.21675208 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21675208 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
1.0126086 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995)
0.03
0.027563075 = product of:
0.09647076 = sum of:
0.081282035 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081282035 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.37972826 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.015188723 = product of:
0.030377446 = sum of:
0.030377446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030377446 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037368443 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
