Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Visualisierung"
  1. Christoforidis, A.; Heuwing, B.; Mandl, T.: Visualising topics in document collections : an analysis of the interpretation process of historians (2017) 0.02
    0.0154822925 = product of:
      0.10837604 = sum of:
        0.10837604 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10837604 = score(doc=3555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.5063043 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  2. Xiaoyue M.; Cahier, J.-P.: Iconic categorization with knowledge-based "icon systems" can improve collaborative KM (2011) 0.01
    0.009676432 = product of:
      0.067735024 = sum of:
        0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 4837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067735024 = score(doc=4837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 4837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4837)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Icon system could represent an efficient solution for collective iconic categorization of knowledge by providing graphical interpretation. Their pictorial characters assist visualizing the structure of text to become more understandable beyond vocabulary obstacle. In this paper we are proposing a Knowledge Engineering (KM) based iconic representation approach. We assume that these systematic icons improve collective knowledge management. Meanwhile, text (constructed under our knowledge management model - Hypertopic) helps to reduce the diversity of graphical understanding belonging to different users. This "position paper" also prepares to demonstrate our hypothesis by an "iconic social tagging" experiment which is to be accomplished in 2011 with UTT students. We describe the "socio semantic web" information portal involved in this project, and a part of the icons already designed for this experiment in Sustainability field. We have reviewed existing theoretical works on icons from various origins, which can be used to lay the foundation of robust "icons systems".
  3. Choi, I.: Visualizations of cross-cultural bibliographic classification : comparative studies of the Korean Decimal Classification and the Dewey Decimal Classification (2017) 0.01
    0.009676432 = product of:
      0.067735024 = sum of:
        0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 3869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067735024 = score(doc=3869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 3869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3869)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The changes in KO systems induced by sociocultural influences may include those in both classificatory principles and cultural features. The proposed study will examine the Korean Decimal Classification (KDC)'s adaptation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) by comparing the two systems. This case manifests the sociocultural influences on KOSs in a cross-cultural context. Therefore, the study aims at an in-depth investigation of sociocultural influences by situating a KOS in a cross-cultural environment and examining the dynamics between two classification systems designed to organize information resources in two distinct sociocultural contexts. As a preceding stage of the comparison, the analysis was conducted on the changes that result from the meeting of different sociocultural feature in a descriptive method. The analysis aims to identify variations between the two schemes in comparison of the knowledge structures of the two classifications, in terms of the quantity of class numbers that represent concepts and their relationships in each of the individual main classes. The most effective analytic strategy to show the patterns of the comparison was visualizations of similarities and differences between the two systems. Increasing or decreasing tendencies in the class through various editions were analyzed. Comparing the compositions of the main classes and distributions of concepts in the KDC and DDC discloses the differences in their knowledge structures empirically. This phase of quantitative analysis and visualizing techniques generates empirical evidence leading to interpretation.
  4. Eckert, K: ¬The ICE-map visualization (2011) 0.01
    0.005530036 = product of:
      0.03871025 = sum of:
        0.03871025 = product of:
          0.0774205 = sum of:
            0.0774205 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 4743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0774205 = score(doc=4743,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.42793027 = fieldWeight in 4743, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Brockelmann, M.; Wolff, C.: 3D-Visualisierungen : Potenziale in Forschung und Lehre im Kontext von Informationswissenschaft und Medieninformatik (2013) 0.00
    0.0041475273 = product of:
      0.029032689 = sum of:
        0.029032689 = product of:
          0.058065377 = sum of:
            0.058065377 = weight(_text_:anwendung in 1022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058065377 = score(doc=1022,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1809185 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.3209477 = fieldWeight in 1022, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8414783 = idf(docFreq=948, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1022)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Artikel beschäftigt sich mit den Möglichkeiten der Informationsaufbereitung durch computergenerierte dreidimensionale Elemente. Visualisierungen durch 3DGrafiken und Animationen können im Vergleich zum Informationsgehalt andersartiger Darstellungen einen kommunikativen Mehrwert aufweisen, der den höheren Aufwand der Erzeugung rechtfertigt. Es wird die Frage aufgeworfen, in welchen Forschungsgebieten der Informationswissenschaft und Medieninformatik der Einsatz von räumlichen Repräsentationen angebracht ist und inwieweit sich die Fokussierung auf eine Informationsübermittlung durch eine virtuelle 3D-Umgebung mit den gesteigerten Anforderungen an das Kommunikationssystem in Einklang bringen lässt. Durch die menschliche Ausrichtung auf möglichst natürliche und realistische Erscheinungen bei der Informationsaufnahme ist die Verwendung der dritten Dimension im Kommunikationsprozess ausgenommen hilfreich, es bedarf zuvor allerdings einer Konzeption geeigneter Einsatzprinzipien, die der großflächigen Anwendung im Bedarfsfall gerecht werden.
  6. Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016) 0.00
    0.003616363 = product of:
      0.02531454 = sum of:
        0.02531454 = product of:
          0.05062908 = sum of:
            0.05062908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05062908 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  7. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.00
    0.0030685859 = product of:
      0.0214801 = sum of:
        0.0214801 = product of:
          0.0429602 = sum of:
            0.0429602 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0429602 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
  8. Osinska, V.; Bala, P.: New methods for visualization and improvement of classification schemes : the case of computer science (2010) 0.00
    0.0021698177 = product of:
      0.015188723 = sum of:
        0.015188723 = product of:
          0.030377446 = sum of:
            0.030377446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030377446 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:36:46
  9. Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013) 0.00
    0.0021698177 = product of:
      0.015188723 = sum of:
        0.015188723 = product of:
          0.030377446 = sum of:
            0.030377446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030377446 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    4. 2.2015 9:22:39
  10. Wu, K.-C.; Hsieh, T.-Y.: Affective choosing of clustering and categorization representations in e-book interfaces (2016) 0.00
    0.0018081815 = product of:
      0.01265727 = sum of:
        0.01265727 = product of:
          0.02531454 = sum of:
            0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02531454 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  11. Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018) 0.00
    0.0018081815 = product of:
      0.01265727 = sum of:
        0.01265727 = product of:
          0.02531454 = sum of:
            0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02531454 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    9.12.2018 16:22:25
  12. Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018) 0.00
    0.0018081815 = product of:
      0.01265727 = sum of:
        0.01265727 = product of:
          0.02531454 = sum of:
            0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02531454 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    21.12.2018 17:22:13
  13. Batorowska, H.; Kaminska-Czubala, B.: Information retrieval support : visualisation of the information space of a document (2014) 0.00
    0.0014465452 = product of:
      0.010125816 = sum of:
        0.010125816 = product of:
          0.020251632 = sum of:
            0.020251632 = weight(_text_:22 in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020251632 = score(doc=1444,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  14. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00
    0.0010849088 = product of:
      0.0075943614 = sum of:
        0.0075943614 = product of:
          0.015188723 = sum of:
            0.015188723 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015188723 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Content
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.