Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Universale Facettenklassifikationen"
  1. Aschero, B.; Negrini, G.; Zanola, R.; Zozi, P.: Systematifier : a guide for the systematization of Italian literature (1995) 0.03 
    0.029533584 = product of:
  0.14766791 = sum of:
    0.03955871 = weight(_text_:r in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03955871 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
    0.1081092 = weight(_text_:wissensorganisation in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1081092 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1788074 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4723287 = idf(docFreq=504, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.6046126 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4723287 = idf(docFreq=504, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.3
  2. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.02 
    0.017502446 = product of:
  0.087512225 = sum of:
    0.07644475 = weight(_text_:wissensorganisation in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07644475 = score(doc=3739,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1788074 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4723287 = idf(docFreq=504, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.42752567 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.4723287 = idf(docFreq=504, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
    0.01106747 = product of:
      0.02213494 = sum of:
        0.02213494 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02213494 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11442167 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032674827 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.11
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  3. Satija, M.P.: Colon Classification (CC) (2017) 0.02 
    0.017162662 = product of:
  0.17162661 = sum of:
    0.17162661 = weight(_text_:shiyali in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17162661 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3186115 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.5386705 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan (1892-1972) has been called the father of the Indian library movement. He developed the revolutionary Colon Classification (CC) from 1924 to 1928, which was published in seven editions from 1933 to 1987. In this article, the evolution of CC through its seven editions is discussed. The unique features of CC are described, including the work in idea, verbal, and notational planes. Tools for designing and evaluating a system are enshrined in his fifty-five canons, twenty-two principles, thirteen postulates, and ten devices (Indian Statistical Institute 2012, 34-38). Semantic and syntactic relations are enshrined in his order of main classes, Principles of Helpful Sequence in arrays, the PMEST facet formula fitted with rounds and levels of facets, and other principles, such as the famous wall-picture principle for citation order of facets, and numerous devices for improvising class numbers for non-existent isolates and potential subjects. Briefly explained are facet and phase analyses and number building with its notational base of seventy-four characters and symbols. The entry concludes with a discussion of the extent of application of CC in libraries, its contribution to the science of classification, and a view of its future.
  4. Tennis, J.T.: Never facets alone : the evolving thought and persistent problems in Ranganathan's theories of classification (2017) 0.02 
    0.017162662 = product of:
  0.17162661 = sum of:
    0.17162661 = weight(_text_:shiyali in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17162661 = score(doc=5800,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3186115 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.5386705 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan's theory of classification spans a number of works over a number of decades. And while he was devoted to solving many problems in the practice of librarianship, and is known as the father of library science in India (Garfield, 1984), his work in classification revolves around one central concern. His classification research addressed the problems that arose from introducing new ideas into a scheme for classification, while maintaining a meaningful hierarchical and systematically arranged order of classes. This is because hierarchical and systematically arranged classes are the defining characteristic of useful classification. To lose this order is to through the addition of new classes is to introduce confusion, if not chaos, and to move toward a useless classification - or at least one that requires complete revision. In the following chapter, I outline the stages, and the elements of those stages, in Ranganathan's thought on classification from 1926-1972, as well as posthumous work that continues his agenda. And while facets figure prominently in all of these stages; but for Ranganathan to achieve his goal, he must continually add to this central feature of his theory of classification. I will close this chapter with an outline of persistent problems that represent research fronts for the field. Chief among these are what to do about scheme change and the open question about the rigor of information modeling in light of semantic web developments.
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Ontische Strukturen und Wissensmuster in der Wissensorganisation (2004) 0.01 
    0.012973105 = product of:
  0.12973104 = sum of:
    0.12973104 = weight(_text_:wissensorganisation in 3155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12973104 = score(doc=3155,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1788074 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4723287 = idf(docFreq=504, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.72553515 = fieldWeight in 3155, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.4723287 = idf(docFreq=504, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3155)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.8
    Source
    Wissensorganisation in kooperativen Lern- und Arbeitsumgebungen: Proceedings der 8. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Regensburg, 9.-11. Oktober 2002. Hrsg.: G. Budin u. H.P. Ohly
  6. Dimensions of knowledge : facets for knowledge organization (2017) 0.01 
    0.0076444754 = product of:
  0.07644475 = sum of:
    0.07644475 = weight(_text_:wissensorganisation in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07644475 = score(doc=4154,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1788074 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4723287 = idf(docFreq=504, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.42752567 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.4723287 = idf(docFreq=504, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    RSWK
    Wissensorganisation / Facettentheorie
    Subject
    Wissensorganisation / Facettentheorie
  7. Szostak, R.: Facet analysis without facet indicators (2017) 0.00 
    0.004747045 = product of:
  0.04747045 = sum of:
    0.04747045 = weight(_text_:r in 4159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04747045 = score(doc=4159,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 4159, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4159)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  8. Johnson, E.H.: S R Ranganathan in the Internet age (2019) 0.00 
    0.0033566677 = product of:
  0.033566676 = sum of:
    0.033566676 = weight(_text_:r in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033566676 = score(doc=5406,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    S R Ranganathan's ideas have influenced library classification since the inception of his Colon Classification in 1933. His address at Elsinore, "Library Classification Through a Century", was his grand vision of the century of progress in classification from 1876 to 1975, and looked to the future of faceted classification as the means to provide a cohesive system to organize the world's information. Fifty years later, the internet and its achievements, social ecology, and consequences present a far more complicated picture, with the library as he knew it as a very small part and the problems that he confronted now greatly exacerbated. The systematic nature of Ranganathan's canons, principles, postulates, and devices suggest that modern semantic algorithms could guide automatic subject tagging. The vision presented here is one of internet-wide faceted classification and retrieval, implemented as open, distributed facets providing unified faceted searching across all web sites.
  9. Panigrahi, P.: Ranganathan and Dewey in hierarchical subject classification : some similarities (2015) 0.00 
    0.0031646967 = product of:
  0.031646967 = sum of:
    0.031646967 = weight(_text_:r in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031646967 = score(doc=2789,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    S R Ranganathan and Melvil Dewey devised two types of classification schemes viz., faceted and enumerative. Ranganathan's faceted classification scheme is based on postulates, principles and canons. It has a strong theory. While working with the two schemes, similarities are observed. This paper tries to identify and present some relationships.
  10. Rout, R.; Panigrahi, P.: Revisiting Ranganathan's canons in online cataloguing environment (2015) 0.00 
    0.0031646967 = product of:
  0.031646967 = sum of:
    0.031646967 = weight(_text_:r in 2796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031646967 = score(doc=2796,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 2796, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2796)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  11. Broughton, V.: Meccano, molecules, and the organization of knowledge : the continuing contribution of S.R. Ranganathan (2007) 0.00 
    0.0027691096 = product of:
  0.027691096 = sum of:
    0.027691096 = weight(_text_:r in 1807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027691096 = score(doc=1807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1807)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Vanda, lecturer at SLAIS and ISKOUK Chairperson, provided an account of the origins of faceted classification in the work of the eminent Indian scholar and librarian S. R. Ranganathan in the 1930s and described how its influence persists today. Ranganathan himself derived inspiration for his Colon Classification from Meccano, which he came across in a London toy shop whilst studying at UCL in 1924. Vanda, on the other hand, proposed that the molecular model is perhaps a better representation
  12. Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024) 0.00 
    0.0023735226 = product of:
  0.023735225 = sum of:
    0.023735225 = weight(_text_:r in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023735225 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.
  13. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.00 
    0.002213494 = product of:
  0.02213494 = sum of:
    0.02213494 = product of:
      0.04426988 = sum of:
        0.04426988 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04426988 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11442167 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032674827 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  14. Gnoli, C.; Pullman, T.; Cousson, P.; Merli, G.; Szostak, R.: Representing the structural elements of a freely faceted classification (2011) 0.00 
    0.0019779354 = product of:
  0.019779354 = sum of:
    0.019779354 = weight(_text_:r in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019779354 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  15. Giri, K.; Gokhale, P.: Developing a banking service ontology using Protégé, an open source software (2015) 0.00 
    0.0019779354 = product of:
  0.019779354 = sum of:
    0.019779354 = weight(_text_:r in 2793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019779354 = score(doc=2793,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2793, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2793)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Computers have transformed from single isolated devices to entry points into a worldwide network of information exchange. Consequently, support in the exchange of data, information, and knowledge is becoming the key issue in computer technology today. The increasing volume of data available on the Web makes information retrieval a tedious and difficult task. Researchers are now exploring the possibility of creating a semantic web, in which meaning is made explicit, allowing machines to process and integrate web resources intelligently. The vision of the semantic web introduces the next generation of the Web by establishing a layer of machine-understandable data. The success of the semantic web depends on the easy creation, integration and use of semantic data, which will depend on web ontology. The faceted approach towards analyzing and representing knowledge given by S R Ranganathan would be useful in this regard. Ontology development in different fields is one such area where this approach given by Ranganathan could be applied. This paper presents a case of developing ontology for the field of banking.
  16. Dutta, B.: Ranganathan's elucidation of subject in the light of 'Infinity (8)' (2015) 0.00 
    0.0019779354 = product of:
  0.019779354 = sum of:
    0.019779354 = weight(_text_:r in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019779354 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    This paper reviews Ranganathan's description of subject from mathematical angle. Ranganathan was highly influenced by Nineteenth Century mathematician George Cantor and he used the concept of infinity in developing an axiomatic interpretation of subject. Majority of library scientists interpreted the concept of subject merely as a term or descriptor or heading to include the same in cataloguing and subject indexing. Some library scientists interpreted subject on the basis of document, i.e. from the angle of the concept of aboutness or epistemological potential of the document etc. Some people explained subject from the viewpoint of social, cultural or socio-cultural process. Attempts were made to describe subject from epistemological viewpoint. But S R Ranganathan was the first to develop an axiomatic concept of subject on its own. He built up an independent idea of subject that is ubiquitously pervasive with human cognition process. To develop the basic foundation of subject, he used the mathematical concepts of infinity and infinitesimal and construed the set of subjects or universe of subjects as continuous infinite universe. The subject may also exist in extremely micro-form, which was termed as spot subject and analogized with point, which is dimensionless having only an existence. The influence of Twentieth Century physicist George Gamow on Ranganathan's thought has also been discussed.
  17. Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017) 0.00 
    0.0019779354 = product of:
  0.019779354 = sum of:
    0.019779354 = weight(_text_:r in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019779354 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  18. Szostak, R.: Facet analysis using grammar (2017) 0.00 
    0.0019779354 = product of:
  0.019779354 = sum of:
    0.019779354 = weight(_text_:r in 3866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019779354 = score(doc=3866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3866)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  19. Szostak, R.: Basic Concepts Classification (BCC) (2020) 0.00 
    0.0019779354 = product of:
  0.019779354 = sum of:
    0.019779354 = weight(_text_:r in 5883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019779354 = score(doc=5883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10816212 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032674827 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 5883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5883)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  20. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.00 
    0.0017707952 = product of:
  0.017707951 = sum of:
    0.017707951 = product of:
      0.035415903 = sum of:
        0.035415903 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035415903 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11442167 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032674827 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 23
  • d 2
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 23
  • el 2
  • m 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes