Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Lewandowski, D.: ¬Die Informationswissenschaft hat ein strukturelles, kein inhaltliches Problem : Ein Sechs-Punkte-Programm, um aus dem Status eines kleinen Faches herauszukommen (2019) 0.01
```
0.009242578 = product of:
  0.027727734 = sum of:
    0.027727734 = product of:
      0.05545547 = sum of:
        0.05545547 = weight(_text_:theorie in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05545547 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24234782 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.17774 = idf(docFreq=677, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046805713 = queryNorm
            0.22882594 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.17774 = idf(docFreq=677, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Content

Vgl. auch die Stellungnahme von W. Bredemeier in: Open Password. Nr.676 vom 10.12.2019 u.d.T.: Fehlende Theorie und fehlender Bezugsrahmen auch bei "Human Recorded Information": Fahrlässige Aufgabe des einzigen Alleinstellungsmerkmals, den die Disziplin von vornherein hatte, Die Informationswissenschaft als Hügellandschaft mit "Stand-alone-USPs" [https://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=833&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045]. Vgl. auch den Bericht über die Berliner Tagung von Stefan Hauff-Hartwig in: Bibliotheksdienst 54(2020) H.1, S.27- . Vgl. auch die Erwiderung: Jörs, B.: Wider eine Überschätzung der gegenwärtigen Leistungen der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft: Keine fehlende Fundierung? Doch mit gesellschaftlicher Relevanz ausgestattet?. Bernd Jörs antwortet Dirk Lewandowski. In: Open Password. Nr. 691 vom 21.01.2020, [https://www.password- online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzksMCw2MjY0LCIxMjF0dWVibnVuczBra2dnY2d3d2c0ODB3ODgwazRzYyIsOCwwXQ].

Lewandowski, D.: Alles nur noch Google? : Entwicklungen im Bereich der WWW-Suchmaschinen (2002) 0.01

0.0084553715 = product of:
  0.025366113 = sum of:
    0.025366113 = product of:
      0.050732225 = sum of:
        0.050732225 = weight(_text_:22 in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050732225 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16390564 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046805713 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 29. 9.2002 18:49:22

Lewandowski, D.: Abfragesprachen und erweiterte Funktionen von WWW-Suchmaschinen (2004) 0.01

0.0084553715 = product of:
  0.025366113 = sum of:
    0.025366113 = product of:
      0.050732225 = sum of:
        0.050732225 = weight(_text_:22 in 2314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050732225 = score(doc=2314,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16390564 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046805713 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2314, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2314)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 28.11.2004 13:11:22

Lewandowski, D.: Query understanding (2011) 0.01

0.0084553715 = product of:
  0.025366113 = sum of:
    0.025366113 = product of:
      0.050732225 = sum of:
        0.050732225 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050732225 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16390564 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046805713 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 18. 9.2018 18:22:18

Lewandowski, D.: ¬Die Macht der Suchmaschinen und ihr Einfluss auf unsere Entscheidungen (2014) 0.01

0.006341528 = product of:
  0.019024584 = sum of:
    0.019024584 = product of:
      0.03804917 = sum of:
        0.03804917 = weight(_text_:22 in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03804917 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16390564 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046805713 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 22. 9.2014 18:54:11

Lewandowski, D.; Spree, U.: Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited : fair ranking for reasonable quality? (2011) 0.01

0.005284607 = product of:
  0.01585382 = sum of:
    0.01585382 = product of:
      0.03170764 = sum of:
        0.03170764 = weight(_text_:22 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03170764 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16390564 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046805713 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 30. 9.2012 19:27:22

Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019) 0.01

0.005284607 = product of:
  0.01585382 = sum of:
    0.01585382 = product of:
      0.03170764 = sum of:
        0.03170764 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03170764 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16390564 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046805713 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types