Search (134 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. EndNote X4 : bibliographies made easy (2010) 0.01
    0.013652208 = product of:
      0.09556545 = sum of:
        0.0562804 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0562804 = score(doc=812,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.55104816 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
        0.03928505 = product of:
          0.11785515 = sum of:
            0.11785515 = weight(_text_:2010 in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11785515 = score(doc=812,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                1.0026982 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 63(2010) H.3/4, S.167-173 (O. Oberhauser)
    Imprint
    Carlsbad, CA : Thomson Reuters (Bezug: Adept Scientific GmbH, D-60486 Frankfurt am Main; http://www.adeptscience.de)
    Year
    2010
  2. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.011763101 = product of:
      0.054894473 = sum of:
        0.011593399 = weight(_text_:information in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011593399 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.03442281 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03442281 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.0088782655 = product of:
          0.026634796 = sum of:
            0.026634796 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026634796 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  3. Buxton, A.; Hopkinson, A.: ¬The CDS/ISIS for Windows handbook (2001) 0.01
    0.011620848 = product of:
      0.08134594 = sum of:
        0.020494426 = weight(_text_:information in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020494426 = score(doc=775,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.47509015 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
        0.06085151 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06085151 = score(doc=775,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.81864166 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    COMPASS
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
    LCSH
    ISIS (Information retrieval system) / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Subject
    ISIS (Information retrieval system) / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
  4. EndNote X3 : bibliographies made easy (2009) 0.01
    0.011589494 = product of:
      0.08112645 = sum of:
        0.0562804 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0562804 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.55104816 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
        0.024846047 = product of:
          0.07453814 = sum of:
            0.07453814 = weight(_text_:2010 in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07453814 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.63416207 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.157-160 (O. Oberhauser)
    Imprint
    Carlsbad, CA : Thomson Reuters (Beziehbar von Adept Scientific GmbH, D-60486 Frankfurt am Main)
  5. Hobohm, H.-C.: Persönliche Literaturverwaltung im Umbruch vom Bibliographie-Management zum Social Bookmarking : Anmerkungen zu EndNote, Reference Manager, RefWorks und Connotea (2005) 0.01
    0.011561833 = product of:
      0.05395522 = sum of:
        0.0101206275 = weight(_text_:web in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0101206275 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
        0.002928385 = weight(_text_:information in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002928385 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.06788416 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
        0.040906206 = weight(_text_:kongress in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040906206 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16122791 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.25371665 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Im Sommer 2005 ist die neueste Version des weit verbreiteten persönlichen Literaturverwaltungssystems EndNote erschienen. Noch im Jahre 2000 musste diese Gattung von Software genauer beschrieben und für deutsche Wissenschaftler erklärt werden. Mittlerweile hat sich deren Gebrauch sogar institutionell verbreitet. So bietet der GBV EndNote und Reference Manager Connection Files, der edoc-Server der HU Berlin schreibt die Benutzung eigener Formate zur Ablieferung von Dissertationsliteraturlisten vor und die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft nutzt EndNote und Reference Manager offiziell für ihre Jahres-Berichte um nur einige Beispiele zu nennen. Obwohl viele (Natur-)Wissenschaftler eher von BiB-TeX oder "freien" Bibliographiemanagementsystemen kommen, scheinen sich diese beiden doch immer mehr durchzusetzen. Es erstaunt etwas, dass Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftler sich dieser Systeme offenbar weniger bedienen, obwohl bekannt ist, dass deren Forschungsfront gerade eher auf bibliographische Vollständigkeit angewiesen ist als die der Naturwissenschaftler. Der Wettlauf zwischen EndNote und dem Konkurrenzprodukt aus dem Hause ISI ist jedoch nicht beendet wie ich noch vor Jahren spekulierte. ISI bzw. Thomson als dem Produzenten von Reference Manager hatte die beiden Konkurrenten EndNote und ProCite aufgekauft und man konnte erwarten, dass sich die Systeme angleichen und dem Nutzer der Übergang zu einem zentral gepflegten ISI Angebot erleichtert wird. In gewissen Teilen hat tatsächlich eine Angleichung stattgefunden. Die als herausragend empfundene Eigenschaft von Profite in höherem Maße inhaltliche Erschließung zu unterstützen ist mittlerweile auch bei den beiden anderen implementiert. Die einzigen verbleibenden Unterschiede (marketingtechnisch gesprochen: USPs - unique selling propositions) sind die Fähigkeit ProCites, Webseiten "on-the-fly" zu katalogisieren-sofern diese Metadaten aufweisen, die Web Publisher Funktion und erhöhte Netzwerkfähigkeit von Reference Manager sowie die Palm Version und die leicht größeren technischen Kapazitäten von Endnote und dessen Fähigkeit Abbildungen und Objekte direkt einzufügen. Zumindest ist zwischen EndNote und Reference Manager die Entscheidung nicht gefallen, da beide auf eigene Weise weiterentwickelt werden, während Profite seit sechs Jahren kein Update mehr erfahren hat. EndNote ist in den fünf Jahren seit der letzten Besprechung um 5 Versionsnummern auf Nummer 9 gewachsen. Reference Manager hat es auf elf (von 9.5) geschafft. In anderthalb Jahren wird EndNote also Reference Manager überholt haben. Man fragt sich, was die Unterschiede ausmacht, die solche Sprünge in den Versionsbezeichnungen rechtfertigen. Meist handelt es sich um die Einbindung neuer connection files und Importfilter, die Vorgabe neuer Medienformen und neuer bibliographischer Stile (Formatvorlagen): also neben der Anpassung an weiterentwickelte Betriebssysteme eher um quantitative Verbesserungen. Vielleicht ist der Vergleich gewagt, aber mir drängt sich die Parallele zu Virusprogrammen auf: Was wäre wenn diese bei jedem update des virus defintion files eine neue Versionsnummer erhielten? Andere Neuerungen wie die Unterstützung von XML, WSDL, openURL und teilweise auch Unicode werden von den Kunden sicher als selbstverständlich vorausgesetzt oder aber gar nicht bemerkt. Der Abstand der aktuellen Versionsnummer zur eigenen Version erhöht oft nur den psychologischen Druck, endlich auf die neue Fassung umzusteigen. Die meist um die 200 EUR (120 EUR für das update) dafür sind nicht immer gerechtfertigt.
    Issue
    Bericht vom PATLIB-Kongress des Europäischen Patentamts vom 17. bis 19. Mai 2005 in Sinaia, Rumänien.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.7, S.365-370
  6. Schoonbaert, D.; Rosenberg, V.: Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) (2009) 0.01
    0.011113243 = product of:
      0.0518618 = sum of:
        0.017349645 = weight(_text_:web in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017349645 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
        0.008695048 = weight(_text_:information in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008695048 = score(doc=3860,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
        0.02581711 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02581711 = score(doc=3860,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) manage the input, storage, retrieval, and output of bibliographic references. The software allows for references to a number of different document types such as journal articles, books, book chapters, dissertations, reports, unpublished papers, electronic documents, etc. Unlike general-purpose database management packages, PBS are made for bibliographic information, featuring a variety of import profiles for records downloaded from the major international databases, and the automatic generation of dozens of different output styles, including those used by the world's leading scientific journals. Modern PBS are thoroughly integrated with word processors. The software provides for the import, storage, retrieval, and output of World Wide Web-based information. This survey focuses on the various options and characteristics of PBS. Special attention is paid to structural flexibility, retrieval options, input, display, and output formats.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  7. Endnote X2 für Mac OS X : bibliographies made easy ; search online bibliographic database, organize references, images, and PDFs easily, cite while you write (patent pending) in 3,000+styles, collaborate with others using EndNote Web (2008) 0.01
    0.010830917 = product of:
      0.075816415 = sum of:
        0.02891608 = weight(_text_:web in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02891608 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
        0.046900336 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046900336 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.45920682 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Imprint
    New York : Thomson Reuters (Beziehbar von Adept Scientific GmbH, D-60486 Frankfurt am Main; www.adeptscience.de)
  8. Müller, H. u. D. Strauch (Red.): Mikro- und minicomputer : Programme für Datenbankaufbau und Retrieval, Auswahl und Anwendung. KTK-Workshop am 18. u. 19.6.1985 in Frankfurt (1985) 0.01
    0.0102489805 = product of:
      0.07174286 = sum of:
        0.024842525 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024842525 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
        0.046900336 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046900336 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.45920682 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  9. EndNote X7 : bibliographies made easy [= Version 17] (2013) 0.01
    0.009942543 = product of:
      0.069597796 = sum of:
        0.0562804 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0562804 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.55104816 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
        0.013317398 = product of:
          0.039952192 = sum of:
            0.039952192 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039952192 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Date
    17. 9.2018 18:19:22
    Imprint
    Carlsbad, CA : Thomson Reuters (Bezug: Adept Scientific GmbH, D-60486 Frankfurt am Main; http://www.adeptscience.de)
  10. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.01
    0.009359533 = product of:
      0.04367782 = sum of:
        0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006693451 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
        0.028106106 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028106106 = score(doc=1974,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
        0.0088782655 = product of:
          0.026634796 = sum of:
            0.026634796 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026634796 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    A comparison was made between CDS/ISIS, ist Windows version WINISIS, and InMagic's INMAGIC and DB/TextWorks software. Packages were evaluated for their database creation, information retrieval and report production capabilities. Windows versions were found to provide significant enhancements over DOS versions of software. The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages to a developing country of creating bibliographic databases using commercial software
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49
  11. Griffith, C.: Creating full-text databases with ISYS (1997) 0.01
    0.009318813 = product of:
      0.04348779 = sum of:
        0.020241255 = weight(_text_:web in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020241255 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
        0.00585677 = weight(_text_:information in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00585677 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
        0.017389767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017389767 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews ISYS for Windows from Odyssey Development / The Denver Technological Center of Greenwood Village, CO. Explains how it can help users identify documents and create a full text index of the words in each document. This allows the user to create a full text database of the documents, for both personal and Web based use. The database can be created either manually or by using a wizard, which prompts the user with questions that moves them through the creation process. It provides a number of retrieval options, including Boolean searching and proximity options. It is easy to update, using built-in reindexing utilities. Reports no significant complaints
    Source
    Information today. 14(1997) no.8, S.23,63
  12. Buxton, A.; Hopkinson, A.: ¬The CDS/ISIS handbook (1994) 0.01
    0.009296678 = product of:
      0.065076746 = sum of:
        0.01639554 = weight(_text_:information in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01639554 = score(doc=4482,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
        0.048681207 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048681207 = score(doc=4482,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    COMPASS
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
    LCSH
    ISIS (Information retrieval system) / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Subject
    ISIS (Information retrieval system) / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Handbooks, manuals, etc.
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
  13. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.01
    0.007877713 = product of:
      0.05514399 = sum of:
        0.046265725 = weight(_text_:web in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046265725 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
        0.0088782655 = product of:
          0.026634796 = sum of:
            0.026634796 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026634796 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  14. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.01
    0.007602615 = product of:
      0.0532183 = sum of:
        0.028625458 = weight(_text_:web in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028625458 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
        0.024592843 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024592843 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
  15. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : Pt.1: General introduction (1991) 0.01
    0.007590706 = product of:
      0.05313494 = sum of:
        0.013386902 = weight(_text_:information in 5046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013386902 = score(doc=5046,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5046, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5046)
        0.03974804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03974804 = score(doc=5046,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5046, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5046)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  16. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.; Haak, P.H.; Nieuwenhuysen, P.; Scheepsma, G.M.A.; Veeger, L.; Vis, G.C.: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : Pt. 2: Classical retrieval systems (1991) 0.01
    0.007457049 = product of:
      0.05219934 = sum of:
        0.010040177 = weight(_text_:information in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010040177 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.042159162 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042159162 = score(doc=5047,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  17. Hopkinson, A.: CDS/ISIS : UNECSO's information retrieval package for microcomputers and the VAX minicomputer (1996) 0.01
    0.0073349974 = product of:
      0.05134498 = sum of:
        0.016565446 = weight(_text_:information in 7789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016565446 = score(doc=7789,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7789, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7789)
        0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034779534 = score(doc=7789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7789)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.57, [=Suppl.20]
  18. McMahon, T.E.: Procite 4: a look at the latest release in bibliographic management software (1998) 0.01
    0.006665962 = product of:
      0.031107822 = sum of:
        0.017349645 = weight(_text_:web in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017349645 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
        0.007099477 = weight(_text_:information in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007099477 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
        0.006658699 = product of:
          0.019976096 = sum of:
            0.019976096 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019976096 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    On Nov 26, 1997, Research Information Systems released its newest version of the ProCite bibliographic management software. The most notable change to the programme is the retooling for compatibility with Windows 95 and NT. In addition to the Windows 95 upgrade, ProCite added 2 new workforms. These forms allow users to capture information about Web pages and e-mail messages. This latest release builds on the Cite While You Write feature that allows users to link citations in a single manuscript to records in multiple databases. The program simplifies the generation of bibliographies and endnotes while allowing users to create bibliographic databases using 28 distinct workforms. Workforms cover a wide range of materials to patents. While there are a few idiosyncrasies users should be aware of, this product is a solid addition to the librarian's toolkit and should be considered by those libraries that have a need for a small but powerful programme to catalogue resources and create bibliographies
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  19. Sieverts, E.G.; Figdor, J.; Bakker, S.; Hofstede, M.: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : Pt.3: End-user software (1992) 0.01
    0.006641868 = product of:
      0.046493076 = sum of:
        0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 5048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01171354 = score(doc=5048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5048)
        0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034779534 = score(doc=5048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5048)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  20. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.; Groeniger, B.O.: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : pt.4: indexing and full-text retrieval programs (1992) 0.01
    0.0062300544 = product of:
      0.04361038 = sum of:
        0.007099477 = weight(_text_:information in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007099477 = score(doc=2051,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
        0.036510903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036510903 = score(doc=2051,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the fourth in a series on microcomputer software for information storage and retrieval, test results of six indexing and full-text retrieval programs are presented and various properties and qualities of these programs are discussed. The common faeture of programs in these categories is that they are primarily meant to retrieve words (or combination of them) in large text files. To do this they either simply index existing text files in one or more formats (indexing programs), or they store and index them in their own database format (full-text retrieval programs). The programs reviewed in this issue are the indexing programs Ask-it, Texplore and ZYindex and the full-text retrieval programs KAware, textMaster and WordCruncher. All programs run under MS-DOS. In addition ZYindex has a Windows and a Unix version and TextMaster is also available for for Unix. For each of the six programs almost 100 facts and test results are tabulated. The programs are also discussed individually

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 101
  • d 18
  • i 3
  • f 2
  • nl 2
  • ru 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 108
  • m 17
  • s 5
  • el 3
  • ? 1
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications