Search (192 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.22 
    0.22048987 = product of:
  0.51447636 = sum of:
    0.03902899 = product of:
      0.11708697 = sum of:
        0.11708697 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11708697 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.11708697 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11708697 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.11708697 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11708697 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.007099477 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007099477 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.11708697 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11708697 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.11708697 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11708697 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.03 
    0.029823812 = product of:
  0.104383335 = sum of:
    0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03926159 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
    0.004183407 = weight(_text_:information in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004183407 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
    0.027774787 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027774787 = score(doc=5863,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
    0.033163548 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033163548 = score(doc=5863,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.32470825 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Imprint
    Frankfurt am Main : DGI
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  3. Informationsmanagement - Chancen ergreifen (1999) 0.03 
    0.02976906 = product of:
  0.20838341 = sum of:
    0.010040177 = weight(_text_:information in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010040177 = score(doc=2329,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
    0.19834323 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19834323 = score(doc=2329,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16122791 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        1.2302041 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    RSWK
    Informationsvermittlung / Informationsmanagement / Kongress / Konstanz <1999>
    Subject
    Informationsvermittlung / Informationsmanagement / Kongress / Konstanz <1999>
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  4. Hofmeister, H.-W.: Gezielte Informationsrecherche durch Konzept-Retrieval (1995) 0.02 
    0.024032904 = product of:
  0.11215355 = sum of:
    0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01171354 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
    0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034779534 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
    0.06566048 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06566048 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.64288956 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Imprint
    Frankfurt : DGD
    Source
    Zukunft durch Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993, Fachhochschule Potsdam, 26.-28.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  5. Hauer, M.: IC Individual News : multimediale Presseschau - Chancen und Grenzen (1998) 0.02 
    0.021329235 = product of:
  0.099536434 = sum of:
    0.008366814 = weight(_text_:information in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008366814 = score(doc=3397,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
    0.024842525 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024842525 = score(doc=3397,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
    0.066327095 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066327095 = score(doc=3397,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.6494165 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Imprint
    Frankfurt am Main : DGD
    Object
    INFORMATION CENTER
    Source
    20. Online-Tagung der DGD: Host Retrieval und Global Research, Frankfurt am Main, 5.-7.5.1998. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld u. R. Schmidt
  6. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.02 
    0.018995337 = product of:
  0.08864491 = sum of:
    0.04711391 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04711391 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
    0.0050200885 = weight(_text_:information in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050200885 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
    0.036510903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036510903 = score(doc=6386,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.5, S.251-262
  7. Wulf, F.: Bilder im Online-Zugriff : Datenbanktechnik für Bildagenturen (1994) 0.01 
    0.014938783 = product of:
  0.10457148 = sum of:
    0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 4832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01171354 = score(doc=4832,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4832, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4832)
    0.092857935 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 4832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.092857935 = score(doc=4832,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.90918314 = fieldWeight in 4832, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4832)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Imprint
    Frankfurt : DGD
    Source
    Information und Medienvielfalt: 16. Online-Tagung der DGD, Frankfurt am Main, 17.-19.5.1994. Proceedings. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. R. Schmidt
  8. Meiss, B.: Information Retrieval und Dokumentmanagement im Multimedia-Zeitalter (1997) 0.01 
    0.0142813455 = product of:
  0.06664628 = sum of:
    0.008695048 = weight(_text_:information in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008695048 = score(doc=710,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
    0.029811028 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029811028 = score(doc=710,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
    0.0281402 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0281402 = score(doc=710,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.27552408 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    "Das Buch ist ein praxisbezogenes VADEMECUM für alle, die in einer Welt der Datennetze Wissen/Informationen sammeln, ordnen und Relevantes aus der stetig anwachsenden Informationsflut wiederfinden müssen (Retrieval). Behandelt werden alle Bedingungen, die für Aufbau und Pflege einer Datenbank notwendig sind. Themen wie der Wert eines Thesaurus als Basis geordneten Wissens werden dabei ebenso erfaßt wie die Indexierungspraxis, die Vor- und Nachteile von Volltextsystemen sowie moderne Verfahren. Hier geht es um Dokument-Management-Systeme, das Prinzip des Data-Warehouse, optische Archivsysteme und Informationsverbünde. Internationale Datenbanken sowie das technische Umfeld in der Medienwelt werden bis hin zum Internet angesprochen. Ein Ausblick in die Zukunft des Dokumentars runden das Werk ab
    Imprint
    Frankfurt : DGD
    RSWK
    Information retrieval / Einführung
    Subject
    Information retrieval / Einführung
  9. Dalipi, B.: Dokumenten-Management und Verwendung von Metadaten bei einem Energieversorgungsunternehmen (2008) 0.01 
    0.012278774 = product of:
  0.08595141 = sum of:
    0.023132863 = weight(_text_:web in 3405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023132863 = score(doc=3405,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 3405, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3405)
    0.06281855 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 3405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06281855 = score(doc=3405,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.47534537 = fieldWeight in 3405, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3405)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Die vorliegende Arbeit befasst sich im ersten Teil mit den theoretischen Grundlagen, Aufgaben und Funktionen eines Dokumentenmanagement-Systems. In diesem Zusammenhang erklärt werden auch Metadaten, Indexierung, Thesaurus und die bekanntesten Klassifikationssysteme. Erwähnt werden auch das Semantic Web und dessen Technologien. Die Schritte der Realisierung einer SQL-Datenbank, in welcher die Metadaten abgebildet werden, werden in den praktischen Teil der Arbeit näher beschrieben.
  10. Milne, C.: Developing information architecture through records management classification techniques (2010) 0.01 
    0.011804162 = product of:
  0.055086087 = sum of:
    0.013874791 = weight(_text_:information in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013874791 = score(doc=3942,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
    0.024842525 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024842525 = score(doc=3942,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
    0.016368773 = product of:
      0.049106315 = sum of:
        0.049106315 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049106315 = score(doc=3942,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This work aims to draw attention to information retrieval philosophies and techniques allied to the records management profession, advocating a wider professional consideration of a functional approach to information management, in this instance in the development of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws from a hypothesis originally presented by the author that advocated a viewpoint whereby the application of records management techniques, traditionally applied to develop business classification schemes, was offered as an additional solution to organising information resources and services (within a university intranet), where earlier approaches, notably subject- and administrative-based arrangements, were found to be lacking. The hypothesis was tested via work-based action learning and is presented here as an extended case study. The paper also draws on evidence submitted to the Joint Information Systems Committee in support of the University of Abertay Dundee's application for consideration for the JISC award for innovation in records and information management. Findings - The original hypothesis has been tested in the workplace. Information retrieval techniques, allied to records management (functional classification), were the main influence in the development of pre- and post-coordinate information retrieval systems to support a wider information architecture, where the subject approach was found to be lacking. Their use within the workplace has since been extended. Originality/value - The paper advocates that the development of information retrieval as a discipline should include a wider consideration of functional classification, as this alternative to the subject approach is largely ignored in mainstream IR works.
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 62(2010) nos.4/5, S.366-386
    Year
    2010
  11. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.01 
    0.011291194 = product of:
  0.05269224 = sum of:
    0.010144223 = weight(_text_:information in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010144223 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034779534 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.007768482 = product of:
      0.023305446 = sum of:
        0.023305446 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023305446 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  12. Pfaff, T.: Hybrides Dokumenten-Management (1995) 0.01 
    0.011053432 = product of:
  0.07737402 = sum of:
    0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01171354 = score(doc=2571,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
    0.06566048 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06566048 = score(doc=2571,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.64288956 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Imprint
    Frankfurt : DGD
    Source
    Zukunft durch Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993, Fachhochschule Potsdam, 26.-28.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  13. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.01 
    0.009108332 = product of:
  0.042505547 = sum of:
    0.010144223 = weight(_text_:information in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010144223 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.024592843 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024592843 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.007768482 = product of:
      0.023305446 = sum of:
        0.023305446 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023305446 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  14. Casey, C.: ¬The cyberarchive : a look at the storage and preservation of Web sites (1998) 0.01 
    0.009015384 = product of:
  0.063107684 = sum of:
    0.057250917 = weight(_text_:web in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057250917 = score(doc=2987,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.71389294 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
    0.00585677 = weight(_text_:information in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00585677 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Although librarians recognize the Internet as a resource for knowledge and information, they have yet to make a formal effort to collect and preserve the Web sites found there. Addresses the need to set up a cyberarchive and some of the issues involved. With Web sites appearing and disappearing constantly from the Internet, there is an immediate need to recognize that they are precious part of cultural and intellectual history and to preserve them for future study. Issues discussed include: Web site authorship vs. Web space ownership; physical media used to hold Web sites (hard drive, mainframe, CD-ROMs); collection development; acquiring Web sites; and adding Web sites to a collection
  15. Rickenbach, J.-P.: ¬Das multimediale Archivsystem der Neuen Zürcher Zeitung (2001) 0.01 
    0.008536447 = product of:
  0.059755128 = sum of:
    0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006693451 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
    0.053061675 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053061675 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.5195332 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Imprint
    Frankfurt am Main : DGI
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  16. Merve, N. v.d.: ¬The integration of document image processing and text retrieval principles (1993) 0.01 
    0.007910666 = product of:
  0.05537466 = sum of:
    0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006693451 = score(doc=6564,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
    0.048681207 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048681207 = score(doc=6564,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Only 10% of information used by an organisation is in electronic form hence the need to examine ways of processing and loading paper documents automatically in an electronic database. Discusses the principles of a document image processing (DIP) system; the difference between text retrieval and DIP; text retrieval systems and concept retrieval. Describes the TOPIC intelligent text retrieval system based on concept retrieval. Covers the TYPO operator developed for mispellings, character transpositions and 'dirty' text retrieved as output form OCR processes. Refers to an electronic news clipping service application
  17. Großmann, K.; Schaaf, T.: Datenbankbasiertes Dokumentenmanagementsystem im Versuchswesen (2001) 0.01 
    0.0073535778 = product of:
  0.034316696 = sum of:
    0.0033467256 = weight(_text_:information in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033467256 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
    0.026530838 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026530838 = score(doc=5868,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.2597666 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
    0.0044391328 = product of:
      0.013317398 = sum of:
        0.013317398 = weight(_text_:22 in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013317398 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    Date
    16. 5.2001 12:22:23
    Imprint
    Frankfurt am Main : DGI
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  18. Medien-Informationsmanagement : Archivarische, dokumentarische, betriebswirtschaftliche, rechtliche und Berufsbild-Aspekte ; [Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar und Folgetagung 2001 in Köln] (2003) 0.01 
    0.006993434 = product of:
  0.024477018 = sum of:
    0.008674823 = weight(_text_:web in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008674823 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.0050200885 = weight(_text_:information in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0050200885 = score(doc=1833,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.007452757 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007452757 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
    0.0033293494 = product of:
      0.009988048 = sum of:
        0.009988048 = weight(_text_:22 in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009988048 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    Abstract
    Als in den siebziger Jahren des vergangenen Jahrhunderts immer häufiger die Bezeichnung Informationsmanager für Leute propagiert wurde, die bis dahin als Dokumentare firmierten, wurde dies in den etablierten Kreisen der Archivare und Bibliothekare gelegentlich belächelt und als Zeichen einer Identitätskrise oder jedenfalls einer Verunsicherung des damit überschriebenen Berufsbilds gewertet. Für den Berufsstand der Medienarchivare/Mediendokumentare, die sich seit 1960 in der Fachgruppe 7 des Vereins, später Verbands deutscher Archivare (VdA) organisieren, gehörte diese Verortung im Zeichen neuer inhaltlicher Herausforderungen (Informationsflut) und Technologien (EDV) allerdings schon früh zu den Selbstverständlichkeiten des Berufsalltags. "Halt, ohne uns geht es nicht!" lautete die Überschrift eines Artikels im Verbandsorgan "Info 7", der sich mit der Einrichtung von immer mächtigeren Leitungsnetzen und immer schnelleren Datenautobahnen beschäftigte. Information, Informationsgesellschaft: diese Begriffe wurden damals fast nur im technischen Sinne verstanden. Die informatisierte, nicht die informierte Gesellschaft stand im Vordergrund - was wiederum Kritiker auf den Plan rief, von Joseph Weizenbaum in den USA bis hin zu den Informations-Ökologen in Bremen. Bei den nationalen, manchmal auch nur regionalen Projekten und Modellversuchen mit Datenautobahnen - auch beim frühen Btx - war nie so recht deutlich geworden, welche Inhalte in welcher Gestalt durch diese Netze und Straßen gejagt werden sollten und wer diese Inhalte eigentlich selektieren, portionieren, positionieren, kurz: managen sollte. Spätestens mit dem World Wide Web sind diese Projekte denn auch obsolet geworden, jedenfalls was die Hardware und Software anging. Geblieben ist das Thema Inhalte (neudeutsch: Content). Und - immer drängender im nicht nur technischen Verständnis - das Thema Informationsmanagement. MedienInformationsManagement war die Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar überschrieben, und auch die Folgetagung 2001 in Köln, die der multimedialen Produktion einen dokumentarischen Pragmatismus gegenüber stellte, handelte vom Geschäftsfeld Content und von Content-Management-Systemen. Die in diesem 6. Band der Reihe Beiträge zur Mediendokumentation versammelten Vorträge und Diskussionsbeiträge auf diesen beiden Tagungen beleuchten das Titel-Thema aus den verschiedensten Blickwinkeln: archivarischen, dokumentarischen, kaufmännischen, berufsständischen und juristischen. Deutlich wird dabei, daß die Berufsbezeichnung Medienarchivarln/Mediendokumentarln ziemlich genau für all das steht, was heute mit sog. alten wie neuen Medien im organisatorischen, d.h. ordnenden und vermittelnden Sinne geschieht. Im besonderen Maße trifft dies auf das Internet und die aus ihm geborenen Intranets zu. Beide bedürfen genauso der ordnenden Hand, die sich an den alten Medien, an Buch, Zeitung, Tonträger, Film etc. geschult hat, denn sie leben zu großen Teilen davon. Daß das Internet gleichwohl ein Medium sui generis ist und die alten Informationsberufe vor ganz neue Herausforderungen stellt - auch das durchzieht die Beiträge von Weimar und Köln.
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge (Dokumentarische Aspekte): Günter Perers/Volker Gaese: Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von Gr+J (Weimar 2000) Thomas Gerick: Finden statt suchen. Knowledge Retrieval in Wissensbanken. Mit organisiertem Wissen zu mehr Erfolg (Weimar 2000) Winfried Gödert: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (Weimar 2000) Elisabeth Damen: Klassifikation als Ordnungssystem im elektronischen Pressearchiv (Köln 2001) Clemens Schlenkrich: Aspekte neuer Regelwerksarbeit - Multimediales Datenmodell für ARD und ZDF (Köln 2001) Josef Wandeler: Comprenez-vous only Bahnhof'? - Mehrsprachigkeit in der Mediendokumentation (Köln 200 1)
    Date
    11. 5.2008 19:49:22
    LCSH
    Information technology / Management / Congresses
    Subject
    Information technology / Management / Congresses
  19. Schardt-Sahelijo, L.P.; Pastowsky, M.: ¬Der iARD-Marktreport : optoelektronische Systeme für Imageverarbeitung, Archivierung, Information Retrieval, Dokumenten-Management (1994) 0.01 
    0.006641868 = product of:
  0.046493076 = sum of:
    0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01171354 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
    0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034779534 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
  20. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.01 
    0.006634499 = product of:
  0.04644149 = sum of:
    0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006693451 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
    0.03974804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03974804 = score(doc=2054,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024573348 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 117
  • d 67
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 157
  • m 16
  • x 10
  • s 6
  • r 3
  • ? 1
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications