-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarizing information (1998)
0.01
0.014703268 = product of:
0.10292287 = sum of:
0.09422782 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09422782 = score(doc=688,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.71301806 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
0.008695048 = weight(_text_:information in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008695048 = score(doc=688,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Summarizing is the process of reducing the large information size of something like a novel or a scientific paper to a short summary or abstract comprising only the most essential points. Summarizing is frequent in everyday communication, but it is also a professional skill for journalists and others. Automated summarizing functions are urgently needed by Internet users who wish to avoid being overwhelmed by information. This book presents the state of the art and surveys related research; it deals with everyday and professional summarizing as well as computerized approaches. The author focuses in detail on the cognitive pro-cess involved in summarizing and supports this with a multimedia simulation systems on the accompanying CD-ROM
- RSWK
- Zusammenfassung / Referieren <Dokumentation> / Indexierung <Inhaltserschliessung> / Kognitiver Prozess (2314) (3214) (4231)
Zusammenfassung / Referieren <Dokumentation> / Indexierung <Inhaltserschliessung> / Computersimulation / CD-ROM (23145) (32145) (41235)
- Subject
- Zusammenfassung / Referieren <Dokumentation> / Indexierung <Inhaltserschliessung> / Kognitiver Prozess (2314) (3214) (4231)
Zusammenfassung / Referieren <Dokumentation> / Indexierung <Inhaltserschliessung> / Computersimulation / CD-ROM (23145) (32145) (41235)
-
Cleveland, D.B.; Cleveland, A.D.: Introduction to abstracting and indexing (1990)
0.01
0.013647472 = product of:
0.0955323 = sum of:
0.088838845 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088838845 = score(doc=317,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.6722399 = fieldWeight in 317, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=317)
0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006693451 = score(doc=317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=317)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of the American Society for information Science. 42(1991) S.532-539 (B.H. Weinberg)
- RSWK
- Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung> (GBV)
- Subject
- Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung> (GBV)
-
Cleveland, D.B.; Cleveland, A.D.: Introduction to abstracting and indexing (2001)
0.01
0.00793204 = product of:
0.11104855 = sum of:
0.11104855 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11104855 = score(doc=316,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.84029984 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- RSWK
- Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung> (GBV)
- Subject
- Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung> (GBV)
-
Fraenkel, A.S.; Klein, S.T.: Information retrieval from annotated texts (1999)
0.01
0.0073349974 = product of:
0.05134498 = sum of:
0.016565446 = weight(_text_:information in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016565446 = score(doc=4308,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034779534 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.10, S.845-854
-
Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996)
0.01
0.005239284 = product of:
0.036674988 = sum of:
0.011832462 = weight(_text_:information in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011832462 = score(doc=282,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
0.024842525 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024842525 = score(doc=282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Reviews, enlarges upon and refines the author's three-stage analytical reading method (retrieval reading, creative reading and critical reading) for the preparation of informative and indicative literature abstracts
- Content
- 1st ed.: Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information 1982
- Imprint
- Arlington, VA : Information resources Press
-
Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996)
0.00
0.0047515607 = product of:
0.033260923 = sum of:
0.013386902 = weight(_text_:information in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013386902 = score(doc=1007,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
0.01987402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01987402 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Reviews, enlarges upon and refines the author's three-stage analytical reading method (retrieval reading, creative reading and critical reading) for the preparation of informative and indicative literature abstracts
- Content
- 1st ed.: Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information 1982
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of chemical information and computer sciences 36(1996) no.5, S.1050 (V.K. Raman); Information processing and management 33(1997) no.4, S.573 (H.R. Tibbo)
- Imprint
- Arlington, VA : Information resources Press
-
O'Rourke, A.J.: Structured abstracts in information retrieval from biomedical databases : a literature survey (1997)
0.00
0.00469651 = product of:
0.032875568 = sum of:
0.008282723 = weight(_text_:information in 85) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008282723 = score(doc=85,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 85, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=85)
0.024592843 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 85) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024592843 = score(doc=85,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 85, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=85)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Clear guidelines have been provided for structuring the abstracts of original research and review articles and, in the past 10 years, several major medical periodicals have adopted the policy of including such abstracts with all their articles. A review of the literature reveals that proponents claim that structured abstracts enhance peer review, improve information retrieval, and ease critical appraisal. However, some periodicals have not adopted structured abstracts and their opponents claim that they make articles longer and harder to read and restrict author originality. Concludes that previous research on structured abstracts focused on how closely they followed prescribed structure and include salient points of the full text, rather than their role in increasing the usefulness of the article
-
Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997)
0.00
0.0043407828 = product of:
0.03038548 = sum of:
0.020241255 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020241255 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.010144223 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010144223 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
-
Tibbo, H.R.: Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts for the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval (1992)
0.00
0.004191427 = product of:
0.029339988 = sum of:
0.009465969 = weight(_text_:information in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009465969 = score(doc=2536,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
0.01987402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01987402 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Library and information science research. 14(1992) no.1, S.31-56
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991)
0.00
0.0041576154 = product of:
0.029103307 = sum of:
0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01171354 = score(doc=752,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.017389767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017389767 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Content
- Enthält folgende Kapitel: Pre-coordinate indexes; consistency of indexing: quality of indexing; abstracts: types and functions, writing the abstract, natural language in information retrieval, automatic indexing. There are exercises in both indexing and abstracting procedures
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Library and information science resaerch 14(1992) no.1, S.117-118 (C. Tenopir); International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.227-228 (R. Fugmann); Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(1992) no.6, S.456 (B.R. Boyce); Cataloging & classification quarterly 15(1992) no.1, S.245-247 (E.M. Rasmussen) Journal of academic librarianship 18(1992) no.1, S.39 (G.A. Crawford) // Winner of the 1992 ASIS best information science book award
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003)
0.00
0.0040267743 = product of:
0.02818742 = sum of:
0.013281905 = weight(_text_:information in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013281905 = score(doc=4913,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
0.014905514 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014905514 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Content
- Covers: indexing principles and practice; precoordinate indexes; consistency and quality of indexing; types and functions of abstracts; writing an abstract; evaluation theory and practice; approaches used in indexing and abstracting services; indexing enhancement; natural language in information retrieval; indexing and abstracting of imaginative works; databases of images and sound; automatic indexing and abstracting; the future of indexing and abstracting services
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.1, S.144-145 (H. Saggion): "... This volume is a very valuable source of information for not only students and professionals in library and information science but also for individuals and institutions involved in knowledge management and organization activities. Because of its broad coverage of the information science topic, teachers will find the contents of this book useful for courses in the areas of information technology, digital as well as traditional libraries, and information science in general."
- Imprint
- Champaign, IL : Graduate School of Library and Information Science
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Kognitive Modellierung des Abstracting (1991)
0.00
0.0040200287 = product of:
0.0562804 = sum of:
0.0562804 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0562804 = score(doc=23,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.55104816 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Imprint
- DGD : Frankfurt
-
Koltay, T.: Abstracts and abstracting : a genre and set of skills for the twenty-first century (2010)
0.00
0.0039620865 = product of:
0.027734606 = sum of:
0.008366814 = weight(_text_:information in 4125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008366814 = score(doc=4125,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4125, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4125)
0.019367792 = product of:
0.058103375 = sum of:
0.058103375 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058103375 = score(doc=4125,freq=7.0), product of:
0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.4943369 = fieldWeight in 4125, product of:
2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
7.0 = termFreq=7.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4125)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Despite their changing role, abstracts remain useful in the digital world. Aimed at both information professionals and researchers who work and publish in different fields, this book summarizes the most important and up-to-date theory of abstracting, as well as giving advice and examples for the practice of writing different kinds of abstracts. The book discusses the length, the functions and basic structure of abstracts. A new approach is outlined on the questions of informative and indicative abstracts. The abstractors' personality, their linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge and skills are also discussed with special attention. The process of abstracting, its steps and models, as well as recipient's role are treated with special distinction. Abstracting is presented as an aimed (purported) understanding of the original text, its interpretation and then a special projection of the information deemed to be worth of abstracting into a new text.Despite the relatively large number of textbooks on the topic there is no up-to-date book on abstracting in the English language. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of the topic, the proposed book contains novel views - especially on informative and indicative abstracts. The discussion is based on an interdisciplinary approach, blending the methods of library and information science and linguistics. The book strives to a synthesis of theory and practice. The synthesis is based on a large and existing body of knowledge which, however, is often characterised by misleading terminology and flawed beliefs.
- Classification
- Z695.9 .K65 2010
- LCC
- Z695.9 .K65 2010
- Series
- Chandos information professional series
- Year
- 2010
-
Reischer, J.; Lottes, D.; Meier, F.; Stirner, M.: Evaluation von Summarizing-Systemen : Kommerzielle und freie Systeme im Vergleich (2010)
0.00
0.0038543092 = product of:
0.026980164 = sum of:
0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006693451 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
0.020286713 = product of:
0.06086014 = sum of:
0.06086014 = weight(_text_:2010 in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06086014 = score(doc=492,freq=3.0), product of:
0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.51779115 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
3.0 = termFreq=3.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Source
- Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
- Year
- 2010
-
Neumann-Duscha, I.: Über die Qualität von Referaten (1990)
0.00
0.003795353 = product of:
0.02656747 = sum of:
0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 8593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006693451 = score(doc=8593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8593)
0.01987402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01987402 = score(doc=8593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 8593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8593)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Die Qualität der Dokumentenanlyse entscheidet über die Wirksamkeit eines Dokumentationsvorhabens, denn Auswahl und Darstellung von Informationselementen bilden die Grundlage zum Wiederfinden des dokumentierten Wissens. Kurzreferate informieren über den Inhalt einer Veröffentlichung. Verschiedene Typen von Inhaltsangaben werden entsprechend der DIN 1426 vorgestellt, Vorschriften und Anweisungen an Referate werden analysiert und die Bewertung der Qualität von Kurzreferaten diskutiert. Das zunehmende Wissen über den Aufbau und das Information Retrieval von Faktendatenbanken führt zu der Schlußfolgerung, daß über die verbale Kurzdarstellung des Dokumenteninhalts hinaus Fakten extrahiert und in speziellen Datenbanken gespeichert werden sollten
-
Booth, A.; O'Rouke, A.J.: ¬The value of structured abstracts in information retrieval from MEDLINE (1997)
0.00
0.003795353 = product of:
0.02656747 = sum of:
0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006693451 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
0.01987402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01987402 = score(doc=764,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
-
Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences (2009)
0.00
0.0033783265 = product of:
0.023648284 = sum of:
0.01122526 = weight(_text_:information in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01122526 = score(doc=3115,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
0.012423024 = product of:
0.03726907 = sum of:
0.03726907 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03726907 = score(doc=3115,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.31708103 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Detailed checklists and questionnaires have been used in the past to assess the quality of structured abstracts in the medical sciences. The aim of this article is to report the findings when a simpler checklist was used to evaluate the quality of 100 traditional abstracts published in 53 different social science journals. Most of these abstracts contained information about the aims, methods, and results of the studies. However, many did not report details about the sample sizes, ages, or sexes of the participants, or where the research was carried out. The correlation between the lengths of the abstracts and the amount of information present was 0.37 (p < .001), suggesting that word limits for abstracts may restrict the presence of key information to some extent. We conclude that authors can improve the quality of information in traditional abstracts in the social sciences by using the simple checklist provided in this article.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.10, S.2010-2018
-
Parekh, R.L.: Advanced indexing and abstracting practices (2000)
0.00
0.0033715093 = product of:
0.023600563 = sum of:
0.008695048 = weight(_text_:information in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008695048 = score(doc=119,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.014905514 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014905514 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Indexing and abstracting are not activities that should be looked upon as ends in themselves. It is the results of these activities that should be evaluated and this can only be done within the context of a particular database, whether in printed or machine-readable form. In this context, the indexing can be judged successful if it allows searchers to locate items they want without having to look at many they do not want. This book intended primarily as a text to be used in teaching indexing and abstracting of Library and information science. It is an immense value to all individuals and institutions involved in information retrieval and related activities, including librarians, managers of information centres and database producers.
-
Wang, F.L.; Yang, C.C.: ¬The impact analysis of language differences on an automatic multilingual text summarization system (2006)
0.00
0.0029697255 = product of:
0.020788077 = sum of:
0.008366814 = weight(_text_:information in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008366814 = score(doc=5049,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
0.012421262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012421262 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Based on the salient features of the documents, automatic text summarization systems extract the key sentences from source documents. This process supports the users in evaluating the relevance of the extracted documents returned by information retrieval systems. Because of this tool, efficient filtering can be achieved. Indirectly, these systems help to resolve the problem of information overloading. Many automatic text summarization systems have been implemented for use with different languages. It has been established that the grammatical and lexical differences between languages have a significant effect on text processing. However, the impact of the language differences on the automatic text summarization systems has not yet been investigated. The authors provide an impact analysis of language difference on automatic text summarization. It includes the effect on the extraction processes, the scoring mechanisms, the performance, and the matching of the extracted sentences, using the parallel corpus in English and Chinese as the tested object. The analysis results provide a greater understanding of language differences and promote the future development of more advanced text summarization techniques.
- Footnote
- Beitrag einer special topic section on multilingual information systems
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.5, S.684-696
-
Wheatley, A.; Armstrong, C.J.: Metadata, recall, and abstracts : can abstracts ever be reliable indicators of document value? (1997)
0.00
0.0028465146 = product of:
0.019925602 = sum of:
0.0050200885 = weight(_text_:information in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050200885 = score(doc=824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
0.014905514 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014905514 = score(doc=824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Abstracts from 7 Internet subject trees (Euroferret, Excite, Infoseek, Lycos Top 5%, Magellan, WebCrawler, Yahoo!), 5 Internet subject gateways (ADAM, EEVL, NetFirst, OMNI, SOSIG), and 3 online databases (ERIC, ISI, LISA) were examined for their subject content, treatment of various enriching features, physical properties such as overall length, anf their readability. Considerable differences were measured, and consistent similarities among abstracts from each type of source were demonstrated. Internet subject tree abstracts were generally the shortest, and online database abstracts the longest. Subject tree and online database abstracts were the most informative, but the level of coverage of document features such as tables, bibliographies, and geographical constraints were disappointingly poor. On balance, the Internet gateways appeared to be providing the most satisfactory abstracts. The authors discuss the continuing role in networked information retrieval of abstracts and their functional analoques such as metadata
