-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.05
0.04789285 = product of:
0.13409998 = sum of:
0.035058882 = weight(_text_:web in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035058882 = score(doc=1319,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.054966226 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054966226 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.4159272 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01171354 = score(doc=1319,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.024592843 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024592843 = score(doc=1319,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.007768482 = product of:
0.023305446 = sum of:
0.023305446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023305446 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- Keyword based querying has been an immediate and efficient way to specify and retrieve related information that the user inquired. However, conventional document ranking based on an automatic assessment of document relevance to the query may not be the best approach when little information is given. Proposes an idea to integrate 2 existing techniques, query expansion and relevance feedback to achieve a concept-based information search for the Web
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.04
0.039794855 = product of:
0.18570933 = sum of:
0.10993245 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10993245 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.8318544 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.06023992 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06023992 = score(doc=2134,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.015536964 = product of:
0.04661089 = sum of:
0.04661089 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04661089 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Jindal, V.; Bawa, S.; Batra, S.: ¬A review of ranking approaches for semantic search on Web (2014)
0.03
0.031054968 = product of:
0.108692385 = sum of:
0.024536107 = weight(_text_:web in 2799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024536107 = score(doc=2799,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2799, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2799)
0.04711391 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 2799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04711391 = score(doc=2799,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 2799, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2799)
0.01122526 = weight(_text_:information in 2799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01122526 = score(doc=2799,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 2799, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2799)
0.02581711 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02581711 = score(doc=2799,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 2799, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2799)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- With ever increasing information being available to the end users, search engines have become the most powerful tools for obtaining useful information scattered on the Web. However, it is very common that even most renowned search engines return result sets with not so useful pages to the user. Research on semantic search aims to improve traditional information search and retrieval methods where the basic relevance criteria rely primarily on the presence of query keywords within the returned pages. This work is an attempt to explore different relevancy ranking approaches based on semantics which are considered appropriate for the retrieval of relevant information. In this paper, various pilot projects and their corresponding outcomes have been investigated based on methodologies adopted and their most distinctive characteristics towards ranking. An overview of selected approaches and their comparison by means of the classification criteria has been presented. With the help of this comparison, some common concepts and outstanding features have been identified.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.2, S.416-425
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Chen, H.; Lally, A.M.; Zhu, B.; Chau, M.: HelpfulMed : Intelligent searching for medical information over the Internet (2003)
0.03
0.027696516 = product of:
0.096937805 = sum of:
0.02891608 = weight(_text_:web in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02891608 = score(doc=1615,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03926159 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
0.007245874 = weight(_text_:information in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007245874 = score(doc=1615,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
0.021514257 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021514257 = score(doc=1615,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- The Medical professionals and researchers need information from reputable sources to accomplish their work. Unfortunately, the Web has a large number of documents that are irrelevant to their work, even those documents that purport to be "medically-related." This paper describes an architecture designed to integrate advanced searching and indexing algorithms, an automatic thesaurus, or "concept space," and Kohonen-based Self-Organizing Map (SOM) technologies to provide searchers with finegrained results. Initial results indicate that these systems provide complementary retrieval functionalities. HelpfulMed not only allows users to search Web pages and other online databases, but also allows them to build searches through the use of an automatic thesaurus and browse a graphical display of medical-related topics. Evaluation results for each of the different components are included. Our spidering algorithm outperformed both breadth-first search and PageRank spiders an a test collection of 100,000 Web pages. The automatically generated thesaurus performed as well as both MeSH and UMLS-systems which require human mediation for currency. Lastly, a variant of the Kohonen SOM was comparable to MeSH terms in perceived cluster precision and significantly better at perceived cluster recall.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes: "Web retrieval and mining: A machine learning perspective"
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.7, S.683-694
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006)
0.03
0.02709758 = product of:
0.07587322 = sum of:
0.01445804 = weight(_text_:web in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01445804 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03926159 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.004183407 = weight(_text_:information in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004183407 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.012421262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012421262 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.0055489163 = product of:
0.016646748 = sum of:
0.016646748 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016646748 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
- Abstract
- The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:32:43
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.4, S.462-478
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Symonds, M.; Bruza, P.; Zuccon, G.; Koopman, B.; Sitbon, L.; Turner, I.: Automatic query expansion : a structural linguistic perspective (2014)
0.03
0.026714223 = product of:
0.09349977 = sum of:
0.01445804 = weight(_text_:web in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01445804 = score(doc=1338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03926159 = score(doc=1338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.009354382 = weight(_text_:information in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009354382 = score(doc=1338,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.030425755 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030425755 = score(doc=1338,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.40932083 = fieldWeight in 1338, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1338)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- A user's query is considered to be an imprecise description of their information need. Automatic query expansion is the process of reformulating the original query with the goal of improving retrieval effectiveness. Many successful query expansion techniques model syntagmatic associations that infer two terms co-occur more often than by chance in natural language. However, structural linguistics relies on both syntagmatic and paradigmatic associations to deduce the meaning of a word. Given the success of dependency-based approaches to query expansion and the reliance on word meanings in the query formulation process, we argue that modeling both syntagmatic and paradigmatic information in the query expansion process improves retrieval effectiveness. This article develops and evaluates a new query expansion technique that is based on a formal, corpus-based model of word meaning that models syntagmatic and paradigmatic associations. We demonstrate that when sufficient statistical information exists, as in the case of longer queries, including paradigmatic information alone provides significant improvements in retrieval effectiveness across a wide variety of data sets. More generally, when our new query expansion approach is applied to large-scale web retrieval it demonstrates significant improvements in retrieval effectiveness over a strong baseline system, based on a commercial search engine.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.8, S.1577-1596
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.03
0.025217827 = product of:
0.17652479 = sum of:
0.1632074 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1632074 = score(doc=2051,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
1.2349837 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.013317398 = product of:
0.039952192 = sum of:
0.039952192 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039952192 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- Der Beitrag enthält eine Darstellung zur Frage der Konzeption von Rankingalgorithmen auf Grundlage gewichteter Indexierung mittels statistischer Verfahren.
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
- Source
- Automatische Indexierung zwischen Forschung und Anwendung, Hrsg.: G. Lustig
-
Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004)
0.02
0.024899669 = product of:
0.08714884 = sum of:
0.04711391 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04711391 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.012296655 = weight(_text_:information in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012296655 = score(doc=2419,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.021079581 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021079581 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.006658699 = product of:
0.019976096 = sum of:
0.019976096 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019976096 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
- Date
- 16.11.2008 16:22:48
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Srinivasan, P.: Query expansion and MEDLINE (1996)
0.02
0.024418212 = product of:
0.11395166 = sum of:
0.06281855 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 8453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06281855 = score(doc=8453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.47534537 = fieldWeight in 8453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8453)
0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 8453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006693451 = score(doc=8453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8453)
0.04443966 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04443966 = score(doc=8453,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 8453, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8453)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Evaluates the retrieval effectiveness of query expansion strategies on a test collection of the medical database MEDLINE using Cornell University's SMART retrieval system. Tests 3 expansion strategies for their ability to identify appropriate MeSH terms for user queries. Compares retrieval effectiveness using the original unexpanded and the alternative expanded user queries on a collection of 75 queries and 2.334 Medline citations. Recommends query expansions using retrieval feedback for adding MeSH search terms to a user's initial query
- Source
- Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.4, S.431-443
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Song, D.; Bruza, P.D.: Towards context sensitive information inference (2003)
0.02
0.02291416 = product of:
0.080199555 = sum of:
0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03926159 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.013874791 = weight(_text_:information in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013874791 = score(doc=1428,freq=22.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.021514257 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021514257 = score(doc=1428,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.0055489163 = product of:
0.016646748 = sum of:
0.016646748 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016646748 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Humans can make hasty, but generally robust judgements about what a text fragment is, or is not, about. Such judgements are termed information inference. This article furnishes an account of information inference from a psychologistic stance. By drawing an theories from nonclassical logic and applied cognition, an information inference mechanism is proposed that makes inferences via computations of information flow through an approximation of a conceptual space. Within a conceptual space information is represented geometrically. In this article, geometric representations of words are realized as vectors in a high dimensional semantic space, which is automatically constructed from a text corpus. Two approaches were presented for priming vector representations according to context. The first approach uses a concept combination heuristic to adjust the vector representation of a concept in the light of the representation of another concept. The second approach computes a prototypical concept an the basis of exemplar trace texts and moves it in the dimensional space according to the context. Information inference is evaluated by measuring the effectiveness of query models derived by information flow computations. Results show that information flow contributes significantly to query model effectiveness, particularly with respect to precision. Moreover, retrieval effectiveness compares favorably with two probabilistic query models, and another based an semantic association. More generally, this article can be seen as a contribution towards realizing operational systems that mimic text-based human reasoning.
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:35:46
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Mathematical, logical, and formal methods in information retrieval
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.4, S.321-334
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Kulyukin, V.A.; Settle, A.: Ranked retrieval with semantic networks and vector spaces (2001)
0.02
0.022271745 = product of:
0.10393481 = sum of:
0.06281855 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06281855 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.47534537 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006693451 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
0.03442281 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03442281 = score(doc=6934,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- The equivalence of semantic networks with spreading activation and vector spaces with dot product is investigated under ranked retrieval. Semantic networks are viewed as networks of concepts organized in terms of abstraction and packaging relations. It is shown that the two models can be effectively constructed from each other. A formal method is suggested to analyze the models in terms of their relative performance in the same universe of objects
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1224-1233
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Beaulieu, M.; Jones, S.: Interactive searching and interface issues in the Okapi best match probabilistic retrieval system (1998)
0.02
0.021885782 = product of:
0.10213365 = sum of:
0.054966226 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054966226 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.4159272 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.008282723 = weight(_text_:information in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008282723 = score(doc=430,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.038884703 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038884703 = score(doc=430,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Explores interface design raised by the development and evaluation of Okapi, a highly interactive information retrieval system based on a probabilistic retrieval model with relevance feedback. It uses terms frequency weighting functions to display retrieved items in a best match ranked order; it can also find additional items similar to those marked as relevant by the searcher. Compares the effectiveness of automatic and interactive query expansion in different user interface environments. focuses on the nature of interaction in information retrieval and the interrelationship between functional visibility, the user's cognitive loading and the balance of control between user and system
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004)
0.02
0.020323604 = product of:
0.071132615 = sum of:
0.03469929 = weight(_text_:web in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03469929 = score(doc=2239,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
0.008695048 = weight(_text_:information in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008695048 = score(doc=2239,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
0.021079581 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021079581 = score(doc=2239,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
0.006658699 = product of:
0.019976096 = sum of:
0.019976096 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019976096 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- Genetic-based evolutionary learning algorithms, such as genetic algorithms (GAs) and genetic programming (GP), have been applied to information retrieval (IR) since the 1980s. Recently, GP has been applied to a new IR taskdiscovery of ranking functions for Web search-and has achieved very promising results. However, in our prior research, only one fitness function has been used for GP-based learning. It is unclear how other fitness functions may affect ranking function discovery for Web search, especially since it is weIl known that choosing a proper fitness function is very important for the effectiveness and efficiency of evolutionary algorithms. In this article, we report our experience in contrasting different fitness function designs an GP-based learning using a very large Web corpus. Our results indicate that the design of fitness functions is instrumental in performance improvement. We also give recommendations an the design of fitness functions for genetic-based information retrieval experiments.
- Date
- 31. 5.2004 19:22:06
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.7, S.628-636
-
Robertson, S.E.: OKAPI at TREC-3 (1995)
0.02
0.019487776 = product of:
0.09094296 = sum of:
0.054966226 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054966226 = score(doc=5694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.4159272 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
0.00585677 = weight(_text_:information in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00585677 = score(doc=5694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
0.03011996 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03011996 = score(doc=5694,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5694, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5694)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Reports text information retrieval experiments performed as part of the 3 rd round of Text Retrieval Conferences (TREC) using the Okapi online catalogue system at City University, UK. The emphasis in TREC-3 was: further refinement of term weighting functions; an investigation of run time passage determination and searching; expansion of ad hoc queries by terms extracted from the top documents retrieved by a trial search; new methods for choosing query expansion terms after relevance feedback, now split into methods of ranking terms prior to selection and subsequent selection procedures; and the development of a user interface procedure within the new TREC interactive search framework
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: Interactive query expansion : a user-based evaluation in a relevance feedback environment (2000)
0.02
0.018913273 = product of:
0.06619645 = sum of:
0.011566431 = weight(_text_:web in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011566431 = score(doc=5701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
0.031409275 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031409275 = score(doc=5701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.23767269 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
0.0033467256 = weight(_text_:information in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033467256 = score(doc=5701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
0.01987402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01987402 = score(doc=5701,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Abstract
- A user-centered investigation of interactive query expansion within the context of a relevance feedback system is presented in this article. Data were collected from 25 searches using the INSPEC database. The data collection mechanisms included questionnaires, transaction logs, and relevance evaluations. The results discuss issues that relate to query expansion, retrieval effectiveness, the correspondence of the on-line-to-off-line relevance judgments, and the selection of terms for query expansion by users (interactive query expansion). The main conclusions drawn from the results of the study are that: (1) one-third of the terms presented to users in a list of candidate terms for query expansion was identified by the users as potentially useful for query expansion. (2) These terms were mainly judged as either variant expressions (synonyms) or alternative (related) terms to the initial query terms. However, a substantial portion of the selected terms were identified as representing new ideas. (3) The relationships identified between the five best terms selected by the users for query expansion and the initial query terms were that: (a) 34% of the query expansion terms have no relationship or other type of correspondence with a query term; (b) 66% of the remaining query expansion terms have a relationship to the query terms. These relationships were: narrower term (46%), broader term (3%), related term (17%). (4) The results provide evidence for the effectiveness of interactive query expansion. The initial search produced on average three highly relevant documents; the query expansion search produced on average nine further highly relevant documents. The conclusions highlight the need for more research on: interactive query expansion, the comparative evaluation of automatic vs. interactive query expansion, the study of weighted Webbased or Web-accessible retrieval systems in operational environments, and for user studies in searching ranked retrieval systems in general
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.11, S.989-1003
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Meghabghab, G.: Google's Web page ranking applied to different topological Web graph structures (2001)
0.02
0.018787675 = product of:
0.08767582 = sum of:
0.06933832 = weight(_text_:web in 6028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06933832 = score(doc=6028,freq=46.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.86461735 = fieldWeight in 6028, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6028)
0.005916231 = weight(_text_:information in 6028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005916231 = score(doc=6028,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 6028, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6028)
0.012421262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012421262 = score(doc=6028,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 6028, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6028)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This research is part of the ongoing study to better understand web page ranking on the web. It looks at a web page as a graph structure or a web graph, and tries to classify different web graphs in the new coordinate space: (out-degree, in-degree). The out-degree coordinate od is defined as the number of outgoing web pages from a given web page. The in-degree id coordinate is the number of web pages that point to a given web page. In this new coordinate space a metric is built to classify how close or far different web graphs are. Google's web ranking algorithm (Brin & Page, 1998) on ranking web pages is applied in this new coordinate space. The results of the algorithm has been modified to fit different topological web graph structures. Also the algorithm was not successful in the case of general web graphs and new ranking web algorithms have to be considered. This study does not look at enhancing web ranking by adding any contextual information. It only considers web links as a source to web page ranking. The author believes that understanding the underlying web page as a graph will help design better ranking web algorithms, enhance retrieval and web performance, and recommends using graphs as a part of visual aid for browsing engine designers
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.9, S.736-747
-
Kwok, K.L.: ¬A network approach to probabilistic information retrieval (1995)
0.02
0.018635381 = product of:
0.086965114 = sum of:
0.04711391 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04711391 = score(doc=5696,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 5696, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5696)
0.010040177 = weight(_text_:information in 5696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010040177 = score(doc=5696,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5696, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5696)
0.029811028 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029811028 = score(doc=5696,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5696, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5696)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Shows how probabilistic information retrieval based on document components may be implemented as a feedforward (feedbackward) artificial neural network. The network supports adaptation of connection weights as well as the growing of new edges between queries and terms based on user relevance feedback data for training, and it reflects query modification and expansion in information retrieval. A learning rule is applied that can also be viewed as supporting sequential learning using a harmonic sequence learning rate. Experimental results with 4 standard small collections and a large Wall Street Journal collection show that small query expansion levels of about 30 terms can achieve most of the gains at the low-recall high-precision region, while larger expansion levels continue to provide gains at the high-recall low-precision region of a precision recall curve
- Source
- ACM transactions on information systems. 13(1995) no.3, S.324-353
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Berry, M.W.; Browne, M.: Understanding search engines : mathematical modeling and text retrieval (1999)
0.02
0.018521193 = product of:
0.08643223 = sum of:
0.03469929 = weight(_text_:web in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03469929 = score(doc=5777,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.012296655 = weight(_text_:information in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012296655 = score(doc=5777,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.039436284 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039436284 = score(doc=5777,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.5305404 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- This book discusses many of the key design issues for building search engines and emphazises the important role that applied mathematics can play in improving information retrieval. The authors discuss not only important data structures, algorithms, and software but also user-centered issues such as interfaces, manual indexing, and document preparation. They also present some of the current problems in information retrieval that many not be familiar to applied mathematicians and computer scientists and some of the driving computational methods (SVD, SDD) for automated conceptual indexing
- LCSH
- Web search engines
- RSWK
- Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval
World Wide Web / Suchmaschine / Mathematisches Modell (BVB)
Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval / Mathematisches Modell (HEBIS)
- Subject
- Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval
World Wide Web / Suchmaschine / Mathematisches Modell (BVB)
Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval / Mathematisches Modell (HEBIS)
Web search engines
-
Mandl, T.: Web- und Multimedia-Dokumente : Neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen (2003)
0.02
0.017687041 = product of:
0.08253953 = sum of:
0.023132863 = weight(_text_:web in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023132863 = score(doc=1734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.014967012 = weight(_text_:information in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014967012 = score(doc=1734,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.04443966 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04443966 = score(doc=1734,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
- Abstract
- Die Menge an Daten im Internet steigt weiter rapide an. Damit wächst auch der Bedarf an qualitativ hochwertigen Information Retrieval Diensten zur Orientierung und problemorientierten Suche. Die Entscheidung für die Benutzung oder Beschaffung von Information Retrieval Software erfordert aussagekräftige Evaluierungsergebnisse. Dieser Beitrag stellt neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen vor und zeigt den Trend zu Spezialisierung und Diversifizierung von Evaluierungsstudien, die den Realitätsgrad derErgebnisse erhöhen. DerSchwerpunkt liegt auf dem Retrieval von Fachtexten, Internet-Seiten und Multimedia-Objekten.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 54(2003) H.4, S.203-210
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995)
0.02
0.017547194 = product of:
0.061415177 = sum of:
0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03926159 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.004183407 = weight(_text_:information in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004183407 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.012421262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012421262 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.0055489163 = product of:
0.016646748 = sum of:
0.016646748 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016646748 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.024573348 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 13:14:10
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.4, S.605-620
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
