Search (345 results, page 1 of 18)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  1. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.23
    0.229617 = product of:
      0.40182972 = sum of:
        0.026019327 = product of:
          0.07805798 = sum of:
            0.07805798 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07805798 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.016357405 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016357405 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.07805798 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07805798 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.07805798 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07805798 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.010040176 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010040176 = score(doc=701,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.037180886 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037180886 = score(doc=701,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5001983 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.07805798 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07805798 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.07805798 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07805798 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5714286 = coord(8/14)
    
    Abstract
    By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  2. Semantic web & linked data : Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen ; 1. DGI-Konferenz ; 62. Jahrestagung der DGI ; Frankfurt am Main, 7. - 9. Oktober 2010 ; Proceedings / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis (2010) 0.09
    0.086901896 = product of:
      0.17380379 = sum of:
        0.03469929 = weight(_text_:web in 1516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03469929 = score(doc=1516,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 1516, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1516)
        0.033314567 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033314567 = score(doc=1516,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.25208998 = fieldWeight in 1516, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1516)
        0.004347524 = weight(_text_:information in 1516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004347524 = score(doc=1516,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.10078184 = fieldWeight in 1516, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1516)
        0.010539791 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010539791 = score(doc=1516,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.1417929 = fieldWeight in 1516, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1516)
        0.049585808 = weight(_text_:kongress in 1516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049585808 = score(doc=1516,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16122791 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.30755103 = fieldWeight in 1516, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1516)
        0.0281402 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 1516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0281402 = score(doc=1516,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.27552408 = fieldWeight in 1516, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1516)
        0.013176607 = product of:
          0.03952982 = sum of:
            0.03952982 = weight(_text_:2010 in 1516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03952982 = score(doc=1516,freq=9.0), product of:
                0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.3363152 = fieldWeight in 1516, product of:
                  3.0 = tf(freq=9.0), with freq of:
                    9.0 = termFreq=9.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1516)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(7/14)
    
    Abstract
    Informationswissenschaft und Informatik nähern sich auf vielen Gebieten bei ihren Projekten und in ihren Zielsetzungen immer stärker an. Ganz besonders deutlich wird dies vor dem Hintergrund von Semantic Web und Linked Data. Die Textanalyse und Fixierung der Essenz einer Publikation in Form ihrer belastbaren Aussagen und zugrunde liegender Daten sowie deren Speicherung und Aufbereitung für die Nutzung gehören zu den professionellen Aktivitäten der in der DGI organisierten Informationsfachleute. Das Semantic Web versprocht, bei entsprechender intellektueller Vorarbeit, diese Tätigkeiten künftig zu erleichtern. Der Tgaungsband macht an vielen Beispielen anschaulich klar, wie die in Informationswissenschaft und -praxis über Jahrzehnte erarbeiteten Grundlagen und Werkzeuge jetzt für den Aufbau der zukünftigen Informationsinfrastrukturen eingesetzt werden können. Er vereint die Textfassungen der Beiträge, die durch das Programmkomitee für die 1. DGI-Konferenz angenommen worden sind, dazu gehören u.a. wissensbasierte Anwendungen in der Wirtschaft, Aufbau von Ontologien mittels Thesauri, Mehrsprachigkeit und Open Data.
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ONTOLOGIEN UND WISSENSREPRÄSENTATIONEN: DIE VERLINKUNG ZWISCHEN INFORMATIONSSUCHENDEN UND INFORMATIONSRESSOURCEN Die Verwendung von SKOS-Daten zur semantischen Suchfragenerweiterung im Kontext des individualisierbaren Informationsportals RODIN / Fabio Ricci und Rene Schneider - Aufbau einer Testumgebung zur Ermittlung signifikanter Parameter bei der Ontologieabfrage / Sonja Öttl, Daniel Streiff, Niklaus Stettler und Martin Studer - Anforderungen an die Wissensrepräsentation im Social Semantic Web / Katrin Weller SEMANTIC WEB & LINKED DATA: WISSENSBASIERTE ANWENDUNGEN IN DER WIRTSCHAFT Semantic Web & Linked Data für professionelle Informationsangebote. Hoffnungsträger oder "alter Hut" - Eine Praxisbetrachtung für die Wirtschaftsinformationen / Ruth Göbel - Semantische wissensbasierte Suche in den Life Sciences am Beispiel von GoPubMed / Michael R. Alvers Produktion und Distribution für multimedialen Content in Form von Linked Data am Beispiel von PAUX / Michael Dreusicke DAS RÜCKRAT DES WEB DER DATEN: ONTOLOGIEN IN BIBLIOTHEKEN Linked Data aus und für Bibliotheken: Rückgratstärkung im Semantic Web / Reinhard Altenhöner, Jan Hannemann und Jürgen Kett - MODS2FRBRoo: Ein Tool zur Anbindung von bibliografischen Daten an eine Ontologie für Begriffe und Informationen im Bereich des kulturellen Erbes / Hans-Georg Becker - Suchmöglichkeiten für Vokabulare im Semantic Web / Friederike Borchert
    LINKED DATA IM GEOINFORMATIONSBEREICH - CHANCEN ODER GEFAHR? Geodaten - von der Verantwortung des Dealers / Karsten Neumann - Computergestützte Freizeitplanung basierend auf Points Of Interest / Peter Bäcker und Ugur Macit VON LINKED DATA ZU VERLINKTEN DIALOGEN Die globalisierte Semantic Web Informationswissenschaftlerin / Dierk Eichel - Kommunikation und Kontext. Überlegungen zur Entwicklung virtueller Diskursräume für die Wissenschaft / Ben Kaden und Maxi Kindling - Konzeptstudie: Die informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Zukunft / Lambert Heller und Heinz Pampel SEMANTIC WEB & LINKED DATA IM BILDUNGSWESEN Einsatz von Semantic Web-Technologien am Informationszentrum Bildung / Carola Carstens und Marc Rittberger - Bedarfsgerecht, kontextbezogen, qualitätsgesichert: Von der Information zum Wertschöpfungsfaktor Wissen am Beispiel einer Wissenslandkarte als dynamisches System zur Repräsentation des Wissens in der Berufsbildungsforschung / Sandra Dücker und Markus Linten - Virtuelle Forschungsumgebungen und Forschungsdaten für Lehre und Forschung: Informationsinfrastrukturen für die (Natur-)Wissenschaften / Matthias Schulze
    OPEN DATA - OPENS PROBLEMS? Challenges and Opportunities in Social Science Research Data Management / Stefan Kramer - Aktivitäten von GESIS im Kontext von Open Data und Zugang zu sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschungsergebnissen / Anja Wilde, Agnieszka Wenninger, Oliver Hopt, Philipp Schaer und Benjamin Zapilko NUTZER UND NUTZUNG IM ZEITALTER VON SEMANTIC WEB & LINKED DATA Die Erfassung, Nutzung und Weiterverwendung von statistischen Informationen - Erfahrungsbericht / Doris Stärk - Einsatz semantischer Technologien zur Entwicklung eines Lerntrajektoriengenerators in frei zugänglichen, nicht personalisierenden Lernplattformen / Richard Huber, Adrian Paschke, Georges Awad und Kirsten Hantelmann OPEN DATA: KONZEPTE - NUTZUNG - ZUKUNFT Zur Konzeption und Implementierung einer Infrastruktur für freie bibliographische Daten / Adrian Pohl und Felix Ostrowski - Lösung zum multilingualen Wissensmanagement semantischer Informationen / Lars Ludwig - Linked Open Projects: Nachnutzung von Projektergebnissen als Linked Data / Kai Eckert AUSBLICK INFORMATIONSKOMPETENZ GMMIK ['gi-mik] - Ein Modell der Informationskompetenz / Aleksander Knauerhase WORKSHOP Wissensdiagnostik als Instrument für Lernempfehlungen am Beispiel der Facharztprüfung / Werner Povoden, Sabine Povoden und Roland Streule
    Imprint
    Frankfurt. / M. : DGI
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung> / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Frankfurt <Main, 2010>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung> / Information Retrieval / Kongress / Frankfurt <Main, 2010>
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Year
    2010
  3. ¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part 2. (2010) 0.08
    0.08493887 = product of:
      0.29728603 = sum of:
        0.06625506 = weight(_text_:web in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06625506 = score(doc=4706,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.8261705 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
        0.004183407 = weight(_text_:information in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004183407 = score(doc=4706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
        0.18479541 = weight(_text_:kongress in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18479541 = score(doc=4706,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.16122791 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            1.146175 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
        0.042052135 = product of:
          0.1261564 = sum of:
            0.1261564 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1261564 = score(doc=4706,freq=33.0), product of:
                0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                1.0733243 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
                  5.7445626 = tf(freq=33.0), with freq of:
                    33.0 = termFreq=33.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Year
    2010
  4. ¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I. (2010) 0.07
    0.06795109 = product of:
      0.2378288 = sum of:
        0.05300405 = weight(_text_:web in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05300405 = score(doc=4707,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.6609364 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
        0.0033467256 = weight(_text_:information in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033467256 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
        0.14783633 = weight(_text_:kongress in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14783633 = score(doc=4707,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.16122791 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.91694003 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
        0.033641707 = product of:
          0.10092512 = sum of:
            0.10092512 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10092512 = score(doc=4707,freq=33.0), product of:
                0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.85865945 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
                  5.7445626 = tf(freq=33.0), with freq of:
                    33.0 = termFreq=33.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Year
    2010
  5. ¬The Semantic Web : research and applications ; second European Semantic WebConference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29 - June 1, 2005 ; proceedings (2005) 0.07
    0.06633046 = product of:
      0.23215662 = sum of:
        0.054864403 = weight(_text_:web in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054864403 = score(doc=439,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
        0.01122526 = weight(_text_:information in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01122526 = score(doc=439,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
        0.02581711 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02581711 = score(doc=439,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
        0.14024985 = weight(_text_:kongress in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14024985 = score(doc=439,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16122791 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.8698856 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005, heldin Heraklion, Crete, Greece in May/June 2005. The 48 revised full papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 148 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on semantic Web services, languages, ontologies, reasoning and querying, search and information retrieval, user and communities, natural language for the semantic Web, annotation tools, and semantic Web applications.
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information systems
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information systems
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  6. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.05
    0.048415 = product of:
      0.135562 = sum of:
        0.04958075 = weight(_text_:web in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04958075 = score(doc=1026,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
        0.054966226 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054966226 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.4159272 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
        0.00585677 = weight(_text_:information in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00585677 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
        0.017389767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017389767 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
        0.007768482 = product of:
          0.023305446 = sum of:
            0.023305446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023305446 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Abstract
    We have created software applications that allow users to both author and use Semantic Web metadata. To create and use a layer of semantic content on top of the existing Web, we have (1) implemented a user interface that expedites the task of attributing metadata to resources on the Web, and (2) augmented a Web browser to leverage this semantic metadata to provide relevant information and tasks to the user. This project provides a framework for annotating and reorganizing existing files, pages, and sites on the Web that is similar to Vannevar Bushrsquos original concepts of trail blazing and associative indexing.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Semantic Web
  7. Aberer, K. et al.: ¬The Semantic Web : 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, November 11-15, 2007 : proceedings (2007) 0.05
    0.046314653 = product of:
      0.21613504 = sum of:
        0.06010094 = weight(_text_:web in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06010094 = score(doc=2477,freq=54.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.74943143 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
              7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
                54.0 = termFreq=54.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
        0.00819777 = weight(_text_:information in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00819777 = score(doc=2477,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
        0.14783633 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14783633 = score(doc=2477,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.16122791 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.91694003 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the joint 6th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007, and the 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ASWC 2007, held in Busan, Korea, in November 2007. The 50 revised full academic papers and 12 revised application papers presented together with 5 Semantic Web Challenge papers and 12 selected doctoral consortium articles were carefully reviewed and selected from a total of 257 submitted papers to the academic track and 29 to the applications track. The papers address all current issues in the field of the semantic Web, ranging from theoretical and foundational aspects to various applied topics such as management of semantic Web data, ontologies, semantic Web architecture, social semantic Web, as well as applications of the semantic Web. Short descriptions of the top five winning applications submitted to the Semantic Web Challenge competition conclude the volume.
    LCSH
    Semantic Web / Congresses
    Web site development / Congresses
    Information systems
    Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)
    Multimedia Information Systems
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Metadatenmodell / Data Mining / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Congresses
    Web site development / Congresses
    Information systems
    Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)
    Multimedia Information Systems
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Metadatenmodell / Data Mining / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  8. Weller, K.: Knowledge representation in the Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.04
    0.03828911 = product of:
      0.1072095 = sum of:
        0.05450125 = weight(_text_:web in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05450125 = score(doc=4515,freq=58.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.67960584 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
              7.615773 = tf(freq=58.0), with freq of:
                58.0 = termFreq=58.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
        0.027483113 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027483113 = score(doc=4515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.2079636 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
        0.0050721117 = weight(_text_:information in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050721117 = score(doc=4515,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.11757882 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
        0.008694883 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008694883 = score(doc=4515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.11697317 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
        0.01145814 = product of:
          0.03437442 = sum of:
            0.03437442 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03437442 = score(doc=4515,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.29245365 = fieldWeight in 4515, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4515)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Abstract
    The main purpose of this book is to sum up the vital and highly topical research issue of knowledge representation on the Web and to discuss novel solutions by combining benefits of folksonomies and Web 2.0 approaches with ontologies and semantic technologies. This book contains an overview of knowledge representation approaches in past, present and future, introduction to ontologies, Web indexing and in first case the novel approaches of developing ontologies. This title combines aspects of knowledge representation for both the Semantic Web (ontologies) and the Web 2.0 (folksonomies). Currently there is no monographic book which provides a combined overview over these topics. focus on the topic of using knowledge representation methods for document indexing purposes. For this purpose, considerations from classical librarian interests in knowledge representation (thesauri, classification schemes etc.) are included, which are not part of most other books which have a stronger background in computer science.
    Content
    Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2010
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.4, S.205-206 (C. Carstens): "Welche Arten der Wissensrepräsentation existieren im Web, wie ausgeprägt sind semantische Strukturen in diesem Kontext, und wie können soziale Aktivitäten im Sinne des Web 2.0 zur Strukturierung von Wissen im Web beitragen? Diesen Fragen widmet sich Wellers Buch mit dem Titel Knowledge Representation in the Social Semantic Web. Der Begriff Social Semantic Web spielt einerseits auf die semantische Strukturierung von Daten im Sinne des Semantic Web an und deutet andererseits auf die zunehmend kollaborative Inhaltserstellung im Social Web hin. Weller greift die Entwicklungen in diesen beiden Bereichen auf und beleuchtet die Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen, die aus der Kombination der Aktivitäten im Semantic Web und im Social Web entstehen. Der Fokus des Buches liegt dabei primär auf den konzeptuellen Herausforderungen, die sich in diesem Kontext ergeben. So strebt die originäre Vision des Semantic Web die Annotation aller Webinhalte mit ausdrucksstarken, hochformalisierten Ontologien an. Im Social Web hingegen werden große Mengen an Daten von Nutzern erstellt, die häufig mithilfe von unkontrollierten Tags in Folksonomies annotiert werden. Weller sieht in derartigen kollaborativ erstellten Inhalten und Annotationen großes Potenzial für die semantische Indexierung, eine wichtige Voraussetzung für das Retrieval im Web. Das Hauptinteresse des Buches besteht daher darin, eine Brücke zwischen den Wissensrepräsentations-Methoden im Social Web und im Semantic Web zu schlagen. Um dieser Fragestellung nachzugehen, gliedert sich das Buch in drei Teile. . . .
    Insgesamt besticht das Buch insbesondere durch seine breite Sichtweise, die Aktualität und die Fülle an Referenzen. Es ist somit sowohl als Überblickswerk geeignet, das umfassend über aktuelle Entwicklungen und Trends der Wissensrepräsentation im Semantic und Social Web informiert, als auch als Lektüre für Experten, für die es vor allem als kontextualisierte und sehr aktuelle Sammlung von Referenzen eine wertvolle Ressource darstellt." Weitere Rez. in: Journal of Documentation. 67(2011), no.5, S.896-899 (P. Rafferty)
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Object
    Web 2.0
    RSWK
    Semantic Web
    World Wide Web 2.0
    Series
    Knowledge and information; vol.3
    Subject
    Semantic Web
    World Wide Web 2.0
    Semantic Web
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Year
    2010
  9. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.04
    0.035565905 = product of:
      0.124480665 = sum of:
        0.042497784 = weight(_text_:web in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042497784 = score(doc=3197,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
        0.066629134 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066629134 = score(doc=3197,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.50417995 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
        0.008695048 = weight(_text_:information in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008695048 = score(doc=3197,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
        0.006658699 = product of:
          0.019976096 = sum of:
            0.019976096 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019976096 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Indexing consists of both novel and more traditional techniques. Cutting-edge indexing techniques, such as automatic indexing, ontologies, and topic maps, were developed independently of older techniques such as thesauri, but it is now recognized that these older methods also hold expertise. Indexing describes various traditional and novel indexing techniques, giving information professionals and students of library and information sciences a broad and comprehensible introduction to indexing. This title consists of twelve chapters: an Introduction to subject readings and theasauri; Automatic indexing versus manual indexing; Techniques applied in automatic indexing of text material; Automatic indexing of images; The black art of indexing moving images; Automatic indexing of music; Taxonomies and ontologies; Metadata formats and indexing; Tagging; Topic maps; Indexing the web; and The Semantic Web.
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
    RSWK
    Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung>
    Semantic Web
    Series
    Chandos information professional series
    Subject
    Indexierung <Inhaltserschließung>
    Semantic Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  10. Multimedia content and the Semantic Web : methods, standards, and tools (2005) 0.03
    0.031069025 = product of:
      0.08699327 = sum of:
        0.030670132 = weight(_text_:web in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030670132 = score(doc=150,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.38244262 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
        0.027762137 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027762137 = score(doc=150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.21007496 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
        0.0051236064 = weight(_text_:information in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051236064 = score(doc=150,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.11877254 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
        0.018631892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018631892 = score(doc=150,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.25065678 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
        0.0048055025 = product of:
          0.014416507 = sum of:
            0.014416507 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014416507 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Classification
    006.7 22
    Date
    7. 3.2007 19:30:22
    DDC
    006.7 22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.3, S.457-458 (A.M.A. Ahmad): "The concept of the semantic web has emerged because search engines and text-based searching are no longer adequate, as these approaches involve an extensive information retrieval process. The deployed searching and retrieving descriptors arc naturally subjective and their deployment is often restricted to the specific application domain for which the descriptors were configured. The new era of information technology imposes different kinds of requirements and challenges. Automatic extracted audiovisual features are required, as these features are more objective, domain-independent, and more native to audiovisual content. This book is a useful guide for researchers, experts, students, and practitioners; it is a very valuable reference and can lead them through their exploration and research in multimedia content and the semantic web. The book is well organized, and introduces the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis to the reader through a logical sequence from standards and hypotheses through system examples, presenting relevant tools and methods. But in some chapters readers will need a good technical background to understand some of the details. Readers may attain sufficient knowledge here to start projects or research related to the book's theme; recent results and articles related to the active research area of integrating multimedia with semantic web technologies are included. This book includes full descriptions of approaches to specific problem domains such as content search, indexing, and retrieval. This book will be very useful to researchers in the multimedia content analysis field who wish to explore the benefits of emerging semantic web technologies in applying multimedia content approaches. The first part of the book covers the definition of the two basic terms multimedia content and semantic web. The Moving Picture Experts Group standards MPEG7 and MPEG21 are quoted extensively. In addition, the means of multimedia content description are elaborated upon and schematically drawn. This extensive description is introduced by authors who are actively involved in those standards and have been participating in the work of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/MPEG for many years. On the other hand, this results in bias against the ad hoc or nonstandard tools for multimedia description in favor of the standard approaches. This is a general book for multimedia content; more emphasis on the general multimedia description and extraction could be provided.
    Semantic web technologies are explained, and ontology representation is emphasized. There is an excellent summary of the fundamental theory behind applying a knowledge-engineering approach to vision problems. This summary represents the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis. A definition of the fuzzy knowledge representation that can be used for realization in multimedia content applications has been provided, with a comprehensive analysis. The second part of the book introduces the multimedia content analysis approaches and applications. In addition, some examples of methods applicable to multimedia content analysis are presented. Multimedia content analysis is a very diverse field and concerns many other research fields at the same time; this creates strong diversity issues, as everything from low-level features (e.g., colors, DCT coefficients, motion vectors, etc.) up to the very high and semantic level (e.g., Object, Events, Tracks, etc.) are involved. The second part includes topics on structure identification (e.g., shot detection for video sequences), and object-based video indexing. These conventional analysis methods are supplemented by results on semantic multimedia analysis, including three detailed chapters on the development and use of knowledge models for automatic multimedia analysis. Starting from object-based indexing and continuing with machine learning, these three chapters are very logically organized. Because of the diversity of this research field, including several chapters of recent research results is not sufficient to cover the state of the art of multimedia. The editors of the book should write an introductory chapter about multimedia content analysis approaches, basic problems, and technical issues and challenges, and try to survey the state of the art of the field and thus introduce the field to the reader.
    The final part of the book discusses research in multimedia content management systems and the semantic web, and presents examples and applications for semantic multimedia analysis in search and retrieval systems. These chapters describe example systems in which current projects have been implemented, and include extensive results and real demonstrations. For example, real case scenarios such as ECommerce medical applications and Web services have been introduced. Topics in natural language, speech and image processing techniques and their application for multimedia indexing, and content-based retrieval have been elaborated upon with extensive examples and deployment methods. The editors of the book themselves provide the readers with a chapter about their latest research results on knowledge-based multimedia content indexing and retrieval. Some interesting applications for multimedia content and the semantic web are introduced. Applications that have taken advantage of the metadata provided by MPEG7 in order to realize advance-access services for multimedia content have been provided. The applications discussed in the third part of the book provide useful guidance to researchers and practitioners properly planning to implement semantic multimedia analysis techniques in new research and development projects in both academia and industry. A fourth part should be added to this book: performance measurements for integrated approaches of multimedia analysis and the semantic web. Performance of the semantic approach is a very sophisticated issue and requires extensive elaboration and effort. Measuring the semantic search is an ongoing research area; several chapters concerning performance measurement and analysis would be required to adequately cover this area and introduce it to readers."
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Multimedia / Automatische Indexierung / Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Multimedia / Automatische Indexierung / Information Retrieval
    Semantic Web
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  11. Brunetti, J.M.; Roberto García, R.: User-centered design and evaluation of overview components for semantic data exploration (2014) 0.03
    0.03096357 = product of:
      0.086697996 = sum of:
        0.03271481 = weight(_text_:web in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03271481 = score(doc=1626,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.031409275 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031409275 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23767269 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.00819777 = weight(_text_:information in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00819777 = score(doc=1626,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.00993701 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00993701 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.0044391328 = product of:
          0.013317398 = sum of:
            0.013317398 = weight(_text_:22 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013317398 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.35714287 = coord(5/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The growing volumes of semantic data available in the web result in the need for handling the information overload phenomenon. The potential of this amount of data is enormous but in most cases it is very difficult for users to visualize, explore and use this data, especially for lay-users without experience with Semantic Web technologies. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The Visual Information-Seeking Mantra "Overview first, zoom and filter, then details-on-demand" proposed by Shneiderman describes how data should be presented in different stages to achieve an effective exploration. The overview is the first user task when dealing with a data set. The objective is that the user is capable of getting an idea about the overall structure of the data set. Different information architecture (IA) components supporting the overview tasks have been developed, so they are automatically generated from semantic data, and evaluated with end-users. Findings - The chosen IA components are well known to web users, as they are present in most web pages: navigation bars, site maps and site indexes. The authors complement them with Treemaps, a visualization technique for displaying hierarchical data. These components have been developed following an iterative User-Centered Design methodology. Evaluations with end-users have shown that they get easily used to them despite the fact that they are generated automatically from structured data, without requiring knowledge about the underlying semantic technologies, and that the different overview components complement each other as they focus on different information search needs. Originality/value - Obtaining semantic data sets overviews cannot be easily done with the current semantic web browsers. Overviews become difficult to achieve with large heterogeneous data sets, which is typical in the Semantic Web, because traditional IA techniques do not easily scale to large data sets. There is little or no support to obtain overview information quickly and easily at the beginning of the exploration of a new data set. This can be a serious limitation when exploring a data set for the first time, especially for lay-users. The proposal is to reuse and adapt existing IA components to provide this overview to users and show that they can be generated automatically from the thesaurus and ontologies that structure semantic data while providing a comparable user experience to traditional web sites.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.5, S.519-536
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  12. Bergamaschi, S.; Domnori, E.; Guerra, F.; Rota, S.; Lado, R.T.; Velegrakis, Y.: Understanding the semantics of keyword queries on relational data without accessing the instance (2012) 0.03
    0.030857593 = product of:
      0.10800157 = sum of:
        0.047951896 = weight(_text_:web in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047951896 = score(doc=431,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.59793836 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
        0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03926159 = score(doc=431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
        0.008366814 = weight(_text_:information in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008366814 = score(doc=431,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
        0.012421262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012421262 = score(doc=431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    The birth of the Web has brought an exponential growth to the amount of the information that is freely available to the Internet population, overloading users and entangling their efforts to satisfy their information needs. Web search engines such Google, Yahoo, or Bing have become popular mainly due to the fact that they offer an easy-to-use query interface (i.e., based on keywords) and an effective and efficient query execution mechanism. The majority of these search engines do not consider information stored on the deep or hidden Web [9,28], despite the fact that the size of the deep Web is estimated to be much bigger than the surface Web [9,47]. There have been a number of systems that record interactions with the deep Web sources or automatically submit queries them (mainly through their Web form interfaces) in order to index their context. Unfortunately, this technique is only partially indexing the data instance. Moreover, it is not possible to take advantage of the query capabilities of data sources, for example, of the relational query features, because their interface is often restricted from the Web form. Besides, Web search engines focus on retrieving documents and not on querying structured sources, so they are unable to access information based on concepts.
    Source
    Semantic search over the Web. Eds.: R. De Virgilio, et al
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  13. Prasad, A.R.D.; Madalli, D.P.: Faceted infrastructure for semantic digital libraries (2008) 0.03
    0.030460406 = product of:
      0.106611416 = sum of:
        0.03232916 = weight(_text_:web in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03232916 = score(doc=1905,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
        0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03926159 = score(doc=1905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
        0.007245874 = weight(_text_:information in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007245874 = score(doc=1905,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
        0.027774787 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027774787 = score(doc=1905,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper aims to argue that digital library retrieval should be based on semantic representations and propose a semantic infrastructure for digital libraries. Design/methodology/approach - The approach taken is formal model based on subject representation for digital libraries. Findings - Search engines and search techniques have fallen short of user expectations as they do not give context based retrieval. Deploying semantic web technologies would lead to efficient and more precise representation of digital library content and hence better retrieval. Though digital libraries often have metadata of information resources which can be accessed through OAI-PMH, much remains to be accomplished in making digital libraries semantic web compliant. This paper presents a semantic infrastructure for digital libraries, that will go a long way in providing them and web based information services with products highly customised to users needs. Research limitations/implications - Here only a model for semantic infrastructure is proposed. This model is proposed after studying current user-centric, top-down models adopted in digital library service architectures. Originality/value - This paper gives a generic model for building semantic infrastructure for digital libraries. Faceted ontologies for digital libraries is just one approach. But the same may be adopted by groups working with different approaches in building ontologies to realise efficient retrieval in digital libraries.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Digital libraries and the semantic web: context, applications and research".
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Information Gateway
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  14. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.03
    0.029861903 = product of:
      0.104516655 = sum of:
        0.04958075 = weight(_text_:web in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04958075 = score(doc=4330,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
        0.008282723 = weight(_text_:information in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008282723 = score(doc=4330,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
        0.038884703 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038884703 = score(doc=4330,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
        0.007768482 = product of:
          0.023305446 = sum of:
            0.023305446 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023305446 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    One vision of the Semantic Web is that it will be much like the Web we know today, except that documents will be enriched by annotations in machine understandable markup. These annotations will provide metadata about the documents as well as machine interpretable statements capturing some of the meaning of document content. We discuss how the information retrieval paradigm might be recast in such an environment. We suggest that retrieval can be tightly bound to inference. Doing so makes today's Web search engines useful to Semantic Web inference engines, and causes improvements in either retrieval or inference to lead directly to improvements in the other.
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  15. Weller, K.: Anforderungen an die Wissensrepräsentation im Social Semantic Web (2010) 0.03
    0.027871933 = product of:
      0.13006902 = sum of:
        0.060723763 = weight(_text_:web in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060723763 = score(doc=4061,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.75719774 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
        0.046428967 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046428967 = score(doc=4061,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.45459157 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
        0.02291628 = product of:
          0.06874884 = sum of:
            0.06874884 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06874884 = score(doc=4061,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.5849073 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Artikel gibt einen Einblick in die aktuelle Verschmelzung von Web 2.0-und Semantic Web-Ansätzen, die als Social Semantic Web beschrieben werden kann. Die Grundidee des Social Semantic Web wird beschrieben und einzelne erste Anwendungsbeispiele vorgestellt. Ein wesentlicher Schwerpunkt dieser Entwicklung besteht in der Umsetzung neuer Methoden und Herangehensweisen im Bereich der Wissensrepräsentation. Dieser Artikel stellt vier Schwerpunkte vor, in denen sich die Wissensrepräsentationsmethoden im Social Semantic Web weiterentwickeln müssen und geht dabei jeweils auf den aktuellen Stand ein.
    Imprint
    Frankfurt. / M. : DGI
    Object
    Web 2.0
    Source
    Semantic web & linked data: Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen ; 1. DGI-Konferenz ; 62. Jahrestagung der DGI ; Frankfurt am Main, 7. - 9. Oktober 2010 ; Proceedings / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Year
    2010
  16. Linked data and user interaction : the road ahead (2015) 0.03
    0.0268026 = product of:
      0.1250788 = sum of:
        0.038252376 = weight(_text_:web in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038252376 = score(doc=2552,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.47698978 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
        0.004183407 = weight(_text_:information in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004183407 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
        0.08264302 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08264302 = score(doc=2552,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16122791 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.51258504 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    This collection of research papers provides extensive information on deploying services, concepts, and approaches for using open linked data from libraries and other cultural heritage institutions. With a special emphasis on how libraries and other cultural heritage institutions can create effective end user interfaces using open, linked data or other datasets. These papers are essential reading for any one interesting in user interface design or the semantic web.
    Content
    H. Frank Cervone: Linked data and user interaction : an introduction -- Paola Di Maio: Linked Data Beyond Libraries Towards Universal Interfaces and Knowledge Unification -- Emmanuelle Bermes: Following the user's flow in the Digital Pompidou -- Patrick Le Bceuf: Customized OPACs on the Semantic Web : the OpenCat prototype -- Ryan Shaw, Patrick Golden and Michael Buckland: Using linked library data in working research notes -- Timm Heuss, Bernhard Humm.Tilman Deuschel, Torsten Frohlich, Thomas Herth and Oliver Mitesser: Semantically guided, situation-aware literature research -- Niklas Lindstrom and Martin Malmsten: Building interfaces on a networked graph -- Natasha Simons, Arve Solland and Jan Hettenhausen: Griffith Research Hub. Vgl.: http://d-nb.info/1032799889.
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    RSWK
    Linked Data / Online-Katalog / Semantic Web / Benutzeroberfläche / Kongress / Singapur <2013>
    Subject
    Linked Data / Online-Katalog / Semantic Web / Benutzeroberfläche / Kongress / Singapur <2013>
    Semantic Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  17. Narock, T.; Zhou, L.; Yoon, V.: Semantic similarity of ontology instances using polarity mining (2013) 0.03
    0.026469322 = product of:
      0.09264262 = sum of:
        0.017349645 = weight(_text_:web in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017349645 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
        0.04711391 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04711391 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
        0.007099477 = weight(_text_:information in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007099477 = score(doc=620,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
        0.021079581 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021079581 = score(doc=620,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Semantic similarity is vital to many areas, such as information retrieval. Various methods have been proposed with a focus on comparing unstructured text documents. Several of these have been enhanced with ontology; however, they have not been applied to ontology instances. With the growth in ontology instance data published online through, for example, Linked Open Data, there is an increasing need to apply semantic similarity to ontology instances. Drawing on ontology-supported polarity mining (OSPM), we propose an algorithm that enhances the computation of semantic similarity with polarity mining techniques. The algorithm is evaluated with online customer review data. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the baseline algorithm in multiple settings.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.416-427
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  18. Ducker, S.; Linten, M.: Bedarfsgerecht, kontextbezogen, qualitätsgesichert : Von der Information zum Wertschöpfungsfaktor Wissen am Beispiel einer Wissenslandkarte als dynamisches System zur Repräsentation des Wissens in der Berufsbildungsforschung (2010) 0.03
    0.025427138 = product of:
      0.08899498 = sum of:
        0.024536107 = weight(_text_:web in 4273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024536107 = score(doc=4273,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 4273, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4273)
        0.0050200885 = weight(_text_:information in 4273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050200885 = score(doc=4273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4273)
        0.03979626 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 4273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03979626 = score(doc=4273,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.38964993 = fieldWeight in 4273, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4273)
        0.019642524 = product of:
          0.058927573 = sum of:
            0.058927573 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058927573 = score(doc=4273,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.5013491 = fieldWeight in 4273, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4273)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Imprint
    Frankfurt. / M. : DGI
    Source
    Semantic web & linked data: Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen ; 1. DGI-Konferenz ; 62. Jahrestagung der DGI ; Frankfurt am Main, 7. - 9. Oktober 2010 ; Proceedings / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Year
    2010
  19. Smith, D.A.; Shadbolt, N.R.: FacetOntology : expressive descriptions of facets in the Semantic Web (2012) 0.03
    0.025081772 = product of:
      0.0877862 = sum of:
        0.025042059 = weight(_text_:web in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025042059 = score(doc=2208,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
        0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03926159 = score(doc=2208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
        0.005916231 = weight(_text_:information in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005916231 = score(doc=2208,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
        0.017566316 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017566316 = score(doc=2208,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    The formal structure of the information on the Semantic Web lends itself to faceted browsing, an information retrieval method where users can filter results based on the values of properties ("facets"). Numerous faceted browsers have been created to browse RDF and Linked Data, but these systems use their own ontologies for defining how data is queried to populate their facets. Since the source data is the same format across these systems (specifically, RDF), we can unify the different methods of describing how to quer the underlying data, to enable compatibility across systems, and provide an extensible base ontology for future systems. To this end, we present FacetOntology, an ontology that defines how to query data to form a faceted browser, and a number of transformations and filters that can be applied to data before it is shown to users. FacetOntology overcomes limitations in the expressivity of existing work, by enabling the full expressivity of SPARQL when selecting data for facets. By applying a FacetOntology definition to data, a set of facets are specified, each with queries and filters to source RDF data, which enables faceted browsing systems to be created using that RDF data.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Semantic Web
  20. Zenz, G.; Zhou, X.; Minack, E.; Siberski, W.; Nejdl, W.: Interactive query construction for keyword search on the Semantic Web (2012) 0.02
    0.02471862 = product of:
      0.086515166 = sum of:
        0.02891608 = weight(_text_:web in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02891608 = score(doc=430,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
        0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03926159 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
        0.005916231 = weight(_text_:information in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005916231 = score(doc=430,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
        0.012421262 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012421262 = score(doc=430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    With the advance of the semantic Web, increasing amounts of data are available in a structured and machine-understandable form. This opens opportunities for users to employ semantic queries instead of simple keyword-based ones to accurately express the information need. However, constructing semantic queries is a demanding task for human users [11]. To compose a valid semantic query, a user has to (1) master a query language (e.g., SPARQL) and (2) acquire sufficient knowledge about the ontology or the schema of the data source. While there are systems which support this task with visual tools [21, 26] or natural language interfaces [3, 13, 14, 18], the process of query construction can still be complex and time consuming. According to [24], users prefer keyword search, and struggle with the construction of semantic queries although being supported with a natural language interface. Several keyword search approaches have already been proposed to ease information seeking on semantic data [16, 32, 35] or databases [1, 31]. However, keyword queries lack the expressivity to precisely describe the user's intent. As a result, ranking can at best put query intentions of the majority on top, making it impossible to take the intentions of all users into consideration.
    Source
    Semantic search over the Web. Eds.: R. De Virgilio, et al
    Theme
    Semantic Web
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

Years

Languages

  • e 255
  • d 87
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 213
  • el 89
  • m 56
  • s 23
  • x 14
  • n 11
  • r 5
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications