Search (85 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001) 0.03
    0.028075512 = product of:
      0.09826429 = sum of:
        0.06281855 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06281855 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.47534537 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
        0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006693451 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
        0.01987402 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01987402 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
        0.0088782655 = product of:
          0.026634796 = sum of:
            0.026634796 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026634796 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    OSIRIS und ELIB sind von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) und dem Niedersächsischen Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur (MWK) geförderte Projekte an der Universität Osnabrück. Sie beschäftigen sich mit intuitiv-natürlichsprachlichen Retrievalsystemen und mit Fragen der Indexierung großer Volltexdatenbanken in dieser Technik. Die Entwicklungen haben dazu geführt, daß an sich aufwendige und komplexe Verfahren der syntaktisch-semantischen Analyse und Bewertung von textuellen Phrasen in relationale Datenbanken für Massendaten eingebettet werden konnten und nun im Produktionsbetrieb eingesetzt werden können
    Date
    14. 6.2001 12:22:31
  2. Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005) 0.02
    0.020005476 = product of:
      0.07001916 = sum of:
        0.031409275 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031409275 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23767269 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
        0.0057966993 = weight(_text_:information in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057966993 = score(doc=548,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
        0.014053053 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014053053 = score(doc=548,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
        0.018760135 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018760135 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.18368272 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Die Möglichkeiten, die der heutigen Informations- und Wissensgesellschaft für die Beschaffung und den Austausch von Information zur Verfügung stehen, haben kurioserweise gleichzeitig ein immer akuter werdendes, neues Problem geschaffen: Es wird für jeden Einzelnen immer schwieriger, aus der gewaltigen Fülle der angebotenen Informationen die tatsächlich relevanten zu selektieren. Diese Arbeit untersucht die Möglichkeit, mit Hilfe von natürlichsprachlichen Schnittstellen den Zugang des Informationssuchenden zu Volltextdatenbanken zu verbessern. Dabei werden zunächst die wissenschaftlichen Fragestellungen ausführlich behandelt. Anschließend beschreibt der Autor verschiedene Lösungsansätze und stellt anhand einer natürlichsprachlichen Schnittstelle für den Brockhaus Multimedial 2004 deren erfolgreiche Implementierung vor
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: 2: Wissensrepräsentation 2.1 Deklarative Wissensrepräsentation 2.2 Klassifikationen des BMM 2.3 Thesauri und Ontologien: existierende kommerzielle Software 2.4 Erstellung eines Thesaurus im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 3: Analysekomponenten 3.1 Sprachliche Phänomene in der maschinellen Textanalyse 3.2 Analysekomponenten: Lösungen und Forschungsansätze 3.3 Die Analysekomponenten im LeWi-Projekt 4: Information Retrieval 4.1 Grundlagen des Information Retrieval 4.2 Automatische Indexierungsmethoden und -verfahren 4.3 Automatische Indexierung des BMM im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 4.4 Suchstrategien und Suchablauf im LeWi-Kontext
    Imprint
    Frankfurt a.M. : Lang
  3. Palos, S.: Indexierung, Volltextrecherche und digital Text-Dossiers (1999) 0.01
    0.013647472 = product of:
      0.0955323 = sum of:
        0.088838845 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088838845 = score(doc=4069,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.6722399 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
        0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006693451 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Der Artikel stellt Ergebnisse einer Studie zur vergleichenden Bewertung von Verfahren der nachfrageorientierten Inhaltserschließung im Volltextarchiv der Stuttgarter Zeitung vor. Im ersten Teil der Arbeit wird empirisch untersucht, ob in der digitalen Pressedokumentation auf eine intellektuelle Indexierung von Artikeln verzichtet werden kann, wenn ausschließlich im Volltext recherchiert wird. Im zweiten Teil der Arbeit werden Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer innovativen Inhaltserschließung von Volltexten in der Textdokumentation der Stuttgarter Zeitung mittels Digitaler Textdossiers diskutiert
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 50(1999) H.7, S.413-419
  4. Magennis, M.: Expert rule-based query expansion (1995) 0.01
    0.012820823 = product of:
      0.08974576 = sum of:
        0.054966226 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054966226 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.4159272 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
        0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034779534 = score(doc=5181,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Examines how, for term based free text retrieval, Interactive Query Expansion (IQE) provides better retrieval performance tahn Automatic Query Expansion (AQE) but the performance of IQE depends on the strategy employed by the user to select expansion terms. The aim is to build an expert query expansion system using term selection rules based on expert users' strategies. It is expected that such a system will achieve better performance for novice or inexperienced users that either AQE or IQE. The procedure is to discover expert IQE users' term selection strategies through observation and interrogation, to construct a rule based query expansion (RQE) system based on these and to compare the resulting retrieval performance with that of comparable AQE and IQE systems
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  5. Albus, W.; Smulders, H.: Doeltreffend zoeken in volledige teksten : 1. full-text retrieval bij de HavenInformatieBank (1998) 0.01
    0.012117351 = product of:
      0.056547638 = sum of:
        0.020241255 = weight(_text_:web in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020241255 = score(doc=1682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
        0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01171354 = score(doc=1682,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
        0.024592843 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024592843 = score(doc=1682,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    At Rotterdam Ports Authority in the Netherlands the Habour information database includes a press cuttings service and various online databases. To enable research staff to have direct access to information the POINT (Point Information Net) was begun in 1993. Using Verity software POINT provides simultaneously full text searching on a range of databases. The software uses current Web indexing technqiues to overcome the problems of excessive recall and low precision. A key element is the system's ability to recognise word combinations
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Effective searching on full texts: 1. full-text-retrieval on the Harbour information database
  6. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.011763101 = product of:
      0.054894473 = sum of:
        0.011593399 = weight(_text_:information in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011593399 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.03442281 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03442281 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.0088782655 = product of:
          0.026634796 = sum of:
            0.026634796 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026634796 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  7. Full-text retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.00939302 = product of:
      0.065751135 = sum of:
        0.016565446 = weight(_text_:information in 3320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016565446 = score(doc=3320,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3320, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3320)
        0.049185686 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049185686 = score(doc=3320,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 3320, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3320)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    A special section devoted to full text information retrieval
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-330
  8. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.01
    0.009130913 = product of:
      0.063916385 = sum of:
        0.008366814 = weight(_text_:information in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008366814 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
        0.055549573 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055549573 = score(doc=1356,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.74731416 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  9. Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985) 0.01
    0.008293124 = product of:
      0.05805186 = sum of:
        0.008366814 = weight(_text_:information in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008366814 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
        0.04968505 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04968505 = score(doc=1345,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
  10. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.01
    0.007602615 = product of:
      0.0532183 = sum of:
        0.028625458 = weight(_text_:web in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028625458 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
        0.024592843 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024592843 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
  11. Frederick, S.C.: SIRE: full-text retrieval with augmented search (1985) 0.01
    0.007590706 = product of:
      0.05313494 = sum of:
        0.013386902 = weight(_text_:information in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013386902 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
        0.03974804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03974804 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Information today. 2(1985), S.7-25
  12. Tauchert, W.; Hospodarsky, J.; Krause, J.; Schneider, C.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Effects of linguistic functions on information retrieval in a German language full-text database : comparison between retrieval in abstract and full text (1991) 0.01
    0.007457049 = product of:
      0.05219934 = sum of:
        0.010040177 = weight(_text_:information in 465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010040177 = score(doc=465,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 465, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=465)
        0.042159162 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042159162 = score(doc=465,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 465, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=465)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  13. Ro, J.S.: ¬An evaluation of the applicability of ranking algorithms to improve the effectiveness of full-text retrieval : 1. On the effectiveness of full-text retrieval (1988) 0.01
    0.007457049 = product of:
      0.05219934 = sum of:
        0.010040177 = weight(_text_:information in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010040177 = score(doc=4030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
        0.042159162 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042159162 = score(doc=4030,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988), S.73-78
  14. Wenzel, F.: Semantische Eingrenzung im Freitext-Retrieval auf der Basis morphologischer Segmentierungen (1980) 0.01
    0.00734219 = product of:
      0.051395327 = sum of:
        0.008366814 = weight(_text_:information in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008366814 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
        0.043028515 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043028515 = score(doc=2037,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The basic problem in freetext retrieval is that the retrieval language is not properly adapted to that of the author. Morphological segmentation, where words with the same root are grouped together in the inverted file, is a good eliminator of noise and information loss, providing high recall but low precision
  15. Ashford, J.H.; Matkin, D.I.: Studies in the application of free text package systems for information storage and retrieval in libraries and related information centres (1982) 0.01
    0.0073349974 = product of:
      0.05134498 = sum of:
        0.016565446 = weight(_text_:information in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016565446 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
        0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034779534 = score(doc=1351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
  16. Sievert, M.E.C.: Full-text information retrieval : an introduction (1996) 0.01
    0.0073349974 = product of:
      0.05134498 = sum of:
        0.016565446 = weight(_text_:information in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016565446 = score(doc=4206,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
        0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034779534 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-262
  17. Sievert, M.C.: Full-text information retrieval : introduction (1996) 0.01
    0.0070891976 = product of:
      0.04962438 = sum of:
        0.014491748 = weight(_text_:information in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014491748 = score(doc=4719,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
        0.03513263 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03513263 = score(doc=4719,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Introduces a special section devoted to full text information retrieval. Gives an overview of full text databases and research into them. There is a lack of a single definition of full text. Articles in the library related literature about full text have appeared with increasing frequnecy
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-262
  18. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.01
    0.0067723696 = product of:
      0.03160439 = sum of:
        0.010040177 = weight(_text_:information in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010040177 = score(doc=3564,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.014905514 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014905514 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.006658699 = product of:
          0.019976096 = sum of:
            0.019976096 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019976096 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
    Imprint
    Medford, New Jersey : Learned Information
    Source
    ASIS'89. Managing information and technology. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington D.C., 30.10.-2.11.1989. Vol.26. Ed.by J. Katzer and G.B. Newby
  19. Bernstein, L.M.; Williamson, R.E.: Testing of a natural language retrieval system for a full text knowledge base (1984) 0.01
    0.006641868 = product of:
      0.046493076 = sum of:
        0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 1803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01171354 = score(doc=1803,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1803, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1803)
        0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034779534 = score(doc=1803,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1803, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1803)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 35(1984), S.235-247
  20. Warner, A.J.: ¬The role of linguistic analysis in full-text retrieval (1994) 0.01
    0.006641868 = product of:
      0.046493076 = sum of:
        0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01171354 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
        0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034779534 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned information

Years

Languages

  • e 66
  • d 15
  • nl 2
  • chi 1
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 77
  • m 3
  • x 3
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…