Search (157 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.22
    0.22048987 = product of:
      0.51447636 = sum of:
        0.03902899 = product of:
          0.11708697 = sum of:
            0.11708697 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11708697 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.11708697 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11708697 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.11708697 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11708697 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.007099477 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007099477 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.11708697 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11708697 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.11708697 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11708697 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20833312 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.42857143 = coord(6/14)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.03
    0.029823812 = product of:
      0.104383335 = sum of:
        0.03926159 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03926159 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.29709086 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
        0.004183407 = weight(_text_:information in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004183407 = score(doc=5863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
        0.027774787 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027774787 = score(doc=5863,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
        0.033163548 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033163548 = score(doc=5863,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.32470825 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Abstract
    Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Imprint
    Frankfurt am Main : DGI
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  3. Hofmeister, H.-W.: Gezielte Informationsrecherche durch Konzept-Retrieval (1995) 0.02
    0.024032904 = product of:
      0.11215355 = sum of:
        0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01171354 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
        0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034779534 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
        0.06566048 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06566048 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.64288956 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Imprint
    Frankfurt : DGD
    Source
    Zukunft durch Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993, Fachhochschule Potsdam, 26.-28.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  4. Hauer, M.: IC Individual News : multimediale Presseschau - Chancen und Grenzen (1998) 0.02
    0.021329235 = product of:
      0.099536434 = sum of:
        0.008366814 = weight(_text_:information in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008366814 = score(doc=3397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
        0.024842525 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024842525 = score(doc=3397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
        0.066327095 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 3397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066327095 = score(doc=3397,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.6494165 = fieldWeight in 3397, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3397)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Imprint
    Frankfurt am Main : DGD
    Object
    INFORMATION CENTER
    Source
    20. Online-Tagung der DGD: Host Retrieval und Global Research, Frankfurt am Main, 5.-7.5.1998. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld u. R. Schmidt
  5. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.02
    0.018995337 = product of:
      0.08864491 = sum of:
        0.04711391 = weight(_text_:indexierung in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04711391 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13215348 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.35650903 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.377919 = idf(docFreq=554, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
        0.0050200885 = weight(_text_:information in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050200885 = score(doc=6386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
        0.036510903 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036510903 = score(doc=6386,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.5, S.251-262
  6. Wulf, F.: Bilder im Online-Zugriff : Datenbanktechnik für Bildagenturen (1994) 0.01
    0.014938783 = product of:
      0.10457148 = sum of:
        0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 4832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01171354 = score(doc=4832,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4832, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4832)
        0.092857935 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 4832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092857935 = score(doc=4832,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.90918314 = fieldWeight in 4832, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4832)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Imprint
    Frankfurt : DGD
    Source
    Information und Medienvielfalt: 16. Online-Tagung der DGD, Frankfurt am Main, 17.-19.5.1994. Proceedings. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. R. Schmidt
  7. Milne, C.: Developing information architecture through records management classification techniques (2010) 0.01
    0.011804162 = product of:
      0.055086087 = sum of:
        0.013874791 = weight(_text_:information in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013874791 = score(doc=3942,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.024842525 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024842525 = score(doc=3942,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.016368773 = product of:
          0.049106315 = sum of:
            0.049106315 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049106315 = score(doc=3942,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.117538005 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This work aims to draw attention to information retrieval philosophies and techniques allied to the records management profession, advocating a wider professional consideration of a functional approach to information management, in this instance in the development of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws from a hypothesis originally presented by the author that advocated a viewpoint whereby the application of records management techniques, traditionally applied to develop business classification schemes, was offered as an additional solution to organising information resources and services (within a university intranet), where earlier approaches, notably subject- and administrative-based arrangements, were found to be lacking. The hypothesis was tested via work-based action learning and is presented here as an extended case study. The paper also draws on evidence submitted to the Joint Information Systems Committee in support of the University of Abertay Dundee's application for consideration for the JISC award for innovation in records and information management. Findings - The original hypothesis has been tested in the workplace. Information retrieval techniques, allied to records management (functional classification), were the main influence in the development of pre- and post-coordinate information retrieval systems to support a wider information architecture, where the subject approach was found to be lacking. Their use within the workplace has since been extended. Originality/value - The paper advocates that the development of information retrieval as a discipline should include a wider consideration of functional classification, as this alternative to the subject approach is largely ignored in mainstream IR works.
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 62(2010) nos.4/5, S.366-386
    Year
    2010
  8. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.01
    0.011291194 = product of:
      0.05269224 = sum of:
        0.010144223 = weight(_text_:information in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010144223 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.034779534 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034779534 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.007768482 = product of:
          0.023305446 = sum of:
            0.023305446 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023305446 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  9. Pfaff, T.: Hybrides Dokumenten-Management (1995) 0.01
    0.011053432 = product of:
      0.07737402 = sum of:
        0.01171354 = weight(_text_:information in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01171354 = score(doc=2571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
        0.06566048 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06566048 = score(doc=2571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.64288956 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Imprint
    Frankfurt : DGD
    Source
    Zukunft durch Information: Deutscher Dokumentartag 1993, Fachhochschule Potsdam, 26.-28.9.1993. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer
  10. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.01
    0.009108332 = product of:
      0.042505547 = sum of:
        0.010144223 = weight(_text_:information in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010144223 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.024592843 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024592843 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.007768482 = product of:
          0.023305446 = sum of:
            0.023305446 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023305446 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  11. Casey, C.: ¬The cyberarchive : a look at the storage and preservation of Web sites (1998) 0.01
    0.009015384 = product of:
      0.063107684 = sum of:
        0.057250917 = weight(_text_:web in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057250917 = score(doc=2987,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.71389294 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
        0.00585677 = weight(_text_:information in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00585677 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Although librarians recognize the Internet as a resource for knowledge and information, they have yet to make a formal effort to collect and preserve the Web sites found there. Addresses the need to set up a cyberarchive and some of the issues involved. With Web sites appearing and disappearing constantly from the Internet, there is an immediate need to recognize that they are precious part of cultural and intellectual history and to preserve them for future study. Issues discussed include: Web site authorship vs. Web space ownership; physical media used to hold Web sites (hard drive, mainframe, CD-ROMs); collection development; acquiring Web sites; and adding Web sites to a collection
  12. Rickenbach, J.-P.: ¬Das multimediale Archivsystem der Neuen Zürcher Zeitung (2001) 0.01
    0.008536447 = product of:
      0.059755128 = sum of:
        0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006693451 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
        0.053061675 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053061675 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5195332 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Imprint
    Frankfurt am Main : DGI
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  13. Merve, N. v.d.: ¬The integration of document image processing and text retrieval principles (1993) 0.01
    0.007910666 = product of:
      0.05537466 = sum of:
        0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006693451 = score(doc=6564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
        0.048681207 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048681207 = score(doc=6564,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Only 10% of information used by an organisation is in electronic form hence the need to examine ways of processing and loading paper documents automatically in an electronic database. Discusses the principles of a document image processing (DIP) system; the difference between text retrieval and DIP; text retrieval systems and concept retrieval. Describes the TOPIC intelligent text retrieval system based on concept retrieval. Covers the TYPO operator developed for mispellings, character transpositions and 'dirty' text retrieved as output form OCR processes. Refers to an electronic news clipping service application
  14. Großmann, K.; Schaaf, T.: Datenbankbasiertes Dokumentenmanagementsystem im Versuchswesen (2001) 0.01
    0.0073535778 = product of:
      0.034316696 = sum of:
        0.0033467256 = weight(_text_:information in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033467256 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
        0.026530838 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026530838 = score(doc=5868,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.2597666 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
        0.0044391328 = product of:
          0.013317398 = sum of:
            0.013317398 = weight(_text_:22 in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013317398 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08605168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024573348 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Date
    16. 5.2001 12:22:23
    Imprint
    Frankfurt am Main : DGI
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  15. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.01
    0.006634499 = product of:
      0.04644149 = sum of:
        0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006693451 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
        0.03974804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03974804 = score(doc=2054,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32
  16. Celentano, A.; Fugini, M.G.; Pozzi, S.: Knowledge-based document retrieval in office environments : the Kabiria system (1995) 0.01
    0.006634499 = product of:
      0.04644149 = sum of:
        0.006693451 = weight(_text_:information in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006693451 = score(doc=3224,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
        0.03974804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03974804 = score(doc=3224,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a document retrieval model and system on the representation of knowledge describing the semantic contents of dicuments, the way in which the documents are managed by producers and by people in the office, and the application domain where the office operates. Discusses the knowledge representation issues needed for the document retrieval system and presents a document retrieval model that captures these issues. Describes such a system named Kabiria. Covers the querying and browsing environments and the architecture of the system
    Source
    ACM transactions on information systems. 13(1995) no.3, S.237-268
  17. Murthy, S.S.: ¬The National Tuberculosis Institute, Bangalore : recent development in library and information services (2006) 0.01
    0.006585959 = product of:
      0.04610171 = sum of:
        0.03271481 = weight(_text_:web in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03271481 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08019538 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
        0.013386902 = weight(_text_:information in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013386902 = score(doc=1502,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the information products and services, the related databases, development of digital library and web-resources and web-based services, vocabulary control tools, networking, and other projects of the Library of the National Tuberculosis Institute (NTI), Bangalore. Acknowledges the involvement of and advice and assistance provided by Prof. A. Neelameghan to these programmes and projects.
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  18. Behling, U.: Vom Medienarchiv zur Researchabteilung (2001) 0.01
    0.0064023356 = product of:
      0.04481635 = sum of:
        0.0050200885 = weight(_text_:information in 5864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050200885 = score(doc=5864,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5864, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5864)
        0.03979626 = weight(_text_:frankfurt in 5864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03979626 = score(doc=5864,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10213336 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.38964993 = fieldWeight in 5864, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1562657 = idf(docFreq=1882, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5864)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Imprint
    Frankfurt am Main : DGI
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  19. Koulopoulos, T.M.; Frappaolo, C.: Electronic document management systems : where are they today? (1993) 0.01
    0.0063916394 = product of:
      0.044741474 = sum of:
        0.00585677 = weight(_text_:information in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00585677 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
        0.038884703 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038884703 = score(doc=982,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a market study to determine the changes that have taken place in text retrieval and imaging systems: the 2 dominant components of electronic document management systems (EDMS). Organizations are focusing on integrated technologies, a sign that imaging and text retrieval are making their way towards the mainstream of information management. Reports data for: text retrieval market revenue by customer segment (industry, government and library); components of an integrated image based EDMS; component platforms of the text retreival system (PC, Macintosh atc.); areas of improvement for current imaging systems; importance of key benefits to implementing text retrieval within the organization; and areas of improvement for current text retrieval systems
  20. Boeri, R.J.; Hensel, M.: Set up a winning text retrieval system : carefully (1995) 0.01
    0.006269826 = product of:
      0.04388878 = sum of:
        0.009465969 = weight(_text_:information in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009465969 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04313797 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
        0.03442281 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03442281 = score(doc=2809,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07433229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024573348 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Considers some of the practical issues involved when a company plans to develop an in house computerized document management system: conversion of paper to electronic form via optical character recognition (OCR) or rekeying; coding of document elements using SGML; indexing for information searching and retrieval (including proximity searching); and hybrid CD-ROM and online information retrieval systems

Years

Languages

  • e 102
  • d 47
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…