Search (1349 results, page 1 of 68)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.30
    0.29803976 = product of:
      0.5960795 = sum of:
        0.04540305 = product of:
          0.13620915 = sum of:
            0.13620915 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13620915 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29082868 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.13620915 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13620915 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29082868 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.0058399485 = weight(_text_:information in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058399485 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.13620915 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13620915 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29082868 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.13620915 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13620915 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29082868 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.13620915 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13620915 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29082868 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
    Theme
    Information
  2. Cremers, A.B.; Oechtering, V.; Heege, R.: KONDOR: ein wissensbasiertes Unterstützungssystem zur individuellen Optimierung von Online-Suchstrategien (1988) 0.11
    0.11130196 = product of:
      0.33390588 = sum of:
        0.008175928 = weight(_text_:information in 5127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008175928 = score(doc=5127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5127)
        0.09365552 = weight(_text_:suche in 5127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09365552 = score(doc=5127,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17138755 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.5464546 = fieldWeight in 5127, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5127)
        0.20575696 = weight(_text_:wissensbasiertes in 5127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20575696 = score(doc=5127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30209768 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.68109417 = fieldWeight in 5127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5127)
        0.026317468 = weight(_text_:system in 5127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026317468 = score(doc=5127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5127)
      0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
    
    Abstract
    In dieser Arbeit werden der Entwurf und die Entwicklung eines Vermittlersystems erläutert, das vor allem hochspezialisierte Wissenschaftler und Ingenieure bei der eigenständigen Suche in einer Vielzahl wichtiger Online-Datenbanken unterstützt. Online-Recherchen sind bisher überwiegend den Informationsvermittlern vorbehalten, die die Verbindung herstellen zwischen dem Informationssuchenden und dem Online-Dienst, der die Information möglicherweise anbietet. Üblicherweise schlägt der Informationssuchende Suchbegriffe vor und beurteilt die Relevanz der Ergebnisse, während die Aufgabe des Informationsvermittlers darin besteht, passende Datenbanken und Hosts auszuwählen und dann die Suche durchzuführen, wobei er auf sein Wissen über Strukturen und Inhalte der verschiedenen Datenbanken sowie über Online-Suchtechniken zurückgreift. Teile dieses komplexen Wissens sind in unser System integriert worden und stehen den Selten- bzw. Endnutzern in höchst benutzerfreundlicher Form zur Verfügung. Zukünftige Weiterentwicklungen des Systems werden auch professionelle Online-Rechercheure umfassend unterstützen
  3. Kuhlen, R.; Hammwöhner, R.; Sonnenberger, G.; Thiel, U.: TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC : ein wissensbasiertes System zur situationsgerechten Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textinformation in graphischen Retrievaldialogen (1988) 0.05
    0.046293292 = product of:
      0.18517317 = sum of:
        0.14696926 = weight(_text_:wissensbasiertes in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14696926 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30209768 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.48649582 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
        0.026584659 = weight(_text_:system in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026584659 = score(doc=3113,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
        0.011619256 = product of:
          0.023238512 = sum of:
            0.023238512 = weight(_text_:22 in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023238512 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120126344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von einer Diskussion der Gestaltungskonzeptionen und der Leistungsfähigkeit heutiger Volltext-Retrieval-Systeme wird ein Überblick über den Leistungsumfang des für die Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textinformation zuständigen Systems TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC gegeben. TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC ist Teil eines neuartigen Informationssystems, das sich auf inhaltsorientierte Repräsentation von Volltexten stützt. Die beiden wesentlichsten Leistungsmerkmale von TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC sind die graphische Retrievaldialogführung und die flexible, situationsgerechte Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textwissen: Die Dialogführung erlaubt dem Benutzer die direkte Navigation in den auf dem Bildschirm graphisch dargestellten Wissensstrukturen, die Selektion dargestellter Objekte zur Formulierung einer Query sowie das Wechseln des Abstraktionsniveaus der dargestellten Textinformation. Die Aufbereitung und die Präsentation von Textwissen sind kognitiv-ergonomisch begründet und berücksichtigen sowohl die begrenzte Aufnahmekapazität der Benutzer als auch die Bedeutung der zeitlichen Anordnung von Informationseinheiten für die Wahmehmungs- und Gedächtnisleistung der Rezipienten. Textwissen wird in unterschiedlichen Abstraktionsstufen präsentiert: von einer sehr generischen Ebene über Wissensgraphen, automatisch generierten Abstracts bis zur diskursiven Form der Textpassage. Die Generierungskomponente des Systems leistet einen Beitrag zum situationsgerechten Systemverhalten dadurch, daß sie aus semantischen Text-Repräsentationsstrukturen unter Berücksichtigung textueller Wohlgeformtheitsbedingungen benutzerangepaßte Abstracts mit unterschiedlichem Themenschwerpunkt und variabler Ausführlichkeit produziert. Die Erprobung verschiedener LayoutVerfahren im Projekt TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC wird durch ein flexibles, objektorientiert spezifiziertes User-Interface-Mangagement-System (UIMS) unterstützt, dessen Objektklassen und deren Interaktionsmöglichkeiten vorgestellt werden. Die Darstellung des Systems wird mit einem ausführlichen Dialogbeispiel abgeschlossen, das die Funktion des Interface und die Wirkung der drei zentralen Operatoren (Select, Zoom und Browse) im Retrievaldialog illustriert.
    Date
    15. 1.2005 14:10:22
  4. Rau, L.F.; Jacobs, P.S.; Zernik, U.: Information extraction and text summarization using linguistic knowledge acquisition (1989) 0.04
    0.04311166 = product of:
      0.17244664 = sum of:
        0.022887832 = weight(_text_:information in 6683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022887832 = score(doc=6683,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 6683, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6683)
        0.10702335 = weight(_text_:extraction in 6683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10702335 = score(doc=6683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20380433 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.941145 = idf(docFreq=315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.52512795 = fieldWeight in 6683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.941145 = idf(docFreq=315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6683)
        0.04253545 = weight(_text_:system in 6683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04253545 = score(doc=6683,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 6683, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6683)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Abstract
    Storing and accessing texts in a conceptual format has a number of advantages over traditional document retrieval methods. A conceptual format facilitates natural language access to text information. It can support imprecise and inexact queries, conceptual information summarisation, and, ultimately, document translation. Describes 2 methods which have been implemented in a prototype intelligent information retrieval system calles SCISOR (System for Conceptual Information Summarisation, Organization and Retrieval). Describes the text processing, language acquisition, and summarisation components of SCISOR
    Source
    Information processing and management. 25(1989) no.4, S.419-428
  5. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: ¬Eine Repräsentation der Informationsstruktur von Fachzeitschriften (1987) 0.04
    0.03867907 = product of:
      0.23207442 = sum of:
        0.20575696 = weight(_text_:wissensbasiertes in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20575696 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30209768 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.68109417 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
        0.026317468 = weight(_text_:system in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026317468 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    AUTOCAT soll ein in der Routineproduktion gebrauchstüchtiges wissensbasiertes System zur Formalerfassung von Zeitschriftenaufsätzen nach INIS-Regeln werden. Der AUTOCAT-Prototyp übernimmt eine Zeitschrift vom optischen Leser und liefert Output in der Form eines ausgefüllten INIS-Datenblattes ab. Die Formalerfassung untergliedert sich in die schwierigere Erkennung von Informationselementen und deren leichtere Transformation nach INIS-Regeln. AUTOCAT erkennt die Informationselemente mit seiner Repräsentation des Erwartungswissens über Zeitschriftenstrukturen. Sie wurde anhand von rund 330 Kernzeitschriften des Faches Physik validiert. Ihr Schwerpunkt ist die Darstellung der Zusammensetzungsstruktur des komplexen Informationsobjetkt Zeitschrift. Konkrete Zeitschriften werden abgeleitet, indem man die Beschreibungen der Zeitschriftenkomponenten mit Typangaben spezifiziert. Die Repräsentation ist in PROLOG implementiert
  6. Kuhlen, R.; Hammwöhner, R.; Sonnenberger, G.; Thiel, U.: TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC : ein wissensbasiertes System zur situationsgerechten Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textinformation in graphischen Retrievaldialogen (1989) 0.03
    0.028925654 = product of:
      0.17355391 = sum of:
        0.14696926 = weight(_text_:wissensbasiertes in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14696926 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30209768 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.48649582 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
        0.026584659 = weight(_text_:system in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026584659 = score(doc=3112,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von einer Diskussion der Gestaltungskonzeptionen und der Leistungsfähigkeit heutiger Volltext-Retrieval-Systeme wird ein Überblick über den Leistungsumfang des für die Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textinformation zuständigen Systems TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC gegeben. TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC ist Teil eines neuartigen Informationssystems, das sich auf inhaltsorientierte Repräsentation von Volltexten stützt. Die beiden wesentlichsten Leistungsmerkmale von TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC sind die graphische Retrievaldialogführung und die flexible, situationsgerechte Aufbereitung und Präsentation von Textwissen: Die Dialogführung erlaubt dem Benutzer die direkte Navigation in den auf dem Bildschirm graphisch dargestellten Wissensstrukturen, die Selektion dargestellter Objekte zur Formulierung einer Query sowie das Wechseln des Abstraktionsniveaus der dargestellten Textinformation. Die Aufbereitung und die Präsentation von Textwissen sind kognitiv-ergonomisch begründet und berücksichtigen sowohl die begrenzte Aufnahmekapazität der Benutzer als auch die Bedeutung der zeitlichen Anordnung von Informationseinheiten für die Wahmehmungs- und Gedächtnisleistung der Rezipienten. Textwissen wird in unterschiedlichen Abstraktionsstufen präsentiert: von einer sehr generischen Ebene über Wissensgraphen, automatisch generierten Abstracts bis zur diskursiven Form der Textpassage. Die Generierungskomponente des Systems leistet einen Beitrag zum situationsgerechten Systemverhalten dadurch, daß sie aus semantischen Text-Repräsentationsstrukturen unter Berücksichtigung textueller Wohlgeformtheitsbedingungen benutzerangepaßte Abstracts mit unterschiedlichem Themenschwerpunkt und variabler Ausführlichkeit produziert. Die Erprobung verschiedener LayoutVerfahren im Projekt TWRM-TOPOGRAPHIC wird durch ein flexibles, objektorientiert spezifiziertes User-Interface-Mangagement-System (UIMS) unterstützt, dessen Objektklassen und deren Interaktionsmöglichkeiten vorgestellt werden. Die Darstellung des Systems wird mit einem ausführlichen Dialogbeispiel abgeschlossen, das die Funktion des Interface und die Wirkung der drei zentralen Operatoren (Select, Zoom und Browse) im Retrievaldialog illustriert.
  7. Informationslinguistische Texterschließung (1986) 0.03
    0.02593353 = product of:
      0.15560117 = sum of:
        0.014304894 = weight(_text_:information in 186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014304894 = score(doc=186,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 186, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=186)
        0.14129628 = product of:
          0.28259256 = sum of:
            0.28259256 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28259256 = score(doc=186,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.2250708 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                1.2555718 = fieldWeight in 186, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Linguistics
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval / Aufsatzsammlung (DNB)
    Automatische Sprachanalyse / Morphologie / Aufsatzsammlung (SBB / GBV)
    Automatische Sprachanalyse / Morphologie <Linguistik> / Aufsatzsammlung (DNB)
    Linguistische Datenverarbeitung / Linguistik / Aufsatzsammlung (SWB)
    Linguistik / Information Retrieval / Aufsatzsammlung (SWB / BVB)
    Linguistische Datenverarbeitung / Textanalyse / Aufsatzsammlung (BVB)
    Subject
    Information Retrieval / Aufsatzsammlung (DNB)
    Automatische Sprachanalyse / Morphologie / Aufsatzsammlung (SBB / GBV)
    Automatische Sprachanalyse / Morphologie <Linguistik> / Aufsatzsammlung (DNB)
    Linguistische Datenverarbeitung / Linguistik / Aufsatzsammlung (SWB)
    Linguistik / Information Retrieval / Aufsatzsammlung (SWB / BVB)
    Linguistische Datenverarbeitung / Textanalyse / Aufsatzsammlung (BVB)
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Linguistics
  8. Rau, L.F.: Conceptual information extraction and retrieval from natural language input (198) 0.03
    0.025049508 = product of:
      0.15029705 = sum of:
        0.016517868 = weight(_text_:information in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016517868 = score(doc=1955,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
        0.13377918 = weight(_text_:extraction in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13377918 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20380433 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.941145 = idf(docFreq=315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.6564099 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.941145 = idf(docFreq=315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.527-533
  9. Morrow, B.: IMPACT public access catalogue (1989) 0.02
    0.021754436 = product of:
      0.087017745 = sum of:
        0.014015877 = weight(_text_:information in 4059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014015877 = score(doc=4059,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4059, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4059)
        0.04511566 = weight(_text_:system in 4059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04511566 = score(doc=4059,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 4059, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4059)
        0.027886212 = product of:
          0.055772424 = sum of:
            0.055772424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055772424 = score(doc=4059,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120126344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4059, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4059)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews Auto-Graphics, Inc.'s IMPACT system: designed as a CD-ROM index of a library's data base of holdings and bibliographic information. IMPACT is based in the MARC format.
    Source
    CD-ROM librarian. 4(1989), no.1, S.22-26
  10. Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988) 0.02
    0.01933819 = product of:
      0.07735276 = sum of:
        0.016517868 = weight(_text_:information in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016517868 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
        0.037596382 = weight(_text_:system in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037596382 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
        0.023238512 = product of:
          0.046477024 = sum of:
            0.046477024 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046477024 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120126344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 12:51:22
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.513-517.
    Source
    Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on research and development in information retrieval. Ed.: Y. Chiaramella
  11. Lancaster, F.W.: Trends in subject indexing from 1957 to 2000 (1980) 0.02
    0.016970228 = product of:
      0.10182136 = sum of:
        0.008175928 = weight(_text_:information in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008175928 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
        0.09364543 = weight(_text_:extraction in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09364543 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20380433 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.941145 = idf(docFreq=315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.45948696 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.941145 = idf(docFreq=315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Computer have been used in 2 areas of printed index production: to sort entries and fromat printed indexes, and to derive a series of index entries from a minimum intellectual input. Computer indexing enables more indexing terms to be used as well as weighted terms, links and roles. Interest in automatic indexing peaked in the mid-1960s and has since declined. Interest in machine-aided indexing concentrates on using the computer for on-line display or for indexing by extraction. Computers have also made possible the implementation of retrieval systems without indexing-free text systems. Considers future prospects and needs
    Source
    New trends in documentation and information: proceedings of the 39th FID Congress, University of Edinburgh, 25-28 Sept 1978. Ed.: P.J. Taylor
  12. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.01
    0.014734071 = product of:
      0.058936283 = sum of:
        0.016351856 = weight(_text_:information in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016351856 = score(doc=2509,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.026317468 = weight(_text_:system in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026317468 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.016266957 = product of:
          0.032533914 = sum of:
            0.032533914 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032533914 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120126344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(3/12)
    
    Abstract
    Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
  13. Moore, N.L.: LISA indexing : economic aspects of controlled indexing (1988) 0.01
    0.014545909 = product of:
      0.08727545 = sum of:
        0.0070079383 = weight(_text_:information in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070079383 = score(doc=1335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
        0.08026751 = weight(_text_:extraction in 1335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08026751 = score(doc=1335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20380433 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.941145 = idf(docFreq=315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.39384598 = fieldWeight in 1335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.941145 = idf(docFreq=315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1335)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the accepted principles of controlled indexing, in published abstracting/indexing services and databases from the unusual aspect of the publisher's need to minimize production costs. Detailed information concerning the producution of LISA is presented showing income and costs. Ways in which factors involved in controlled indexing may be seen to manifest themselves in production parameters are shown by plotting graphs of the numbers of abstracts and index pages against numbers of abstracts for 77 individual issues of LISA. The close fit of the data to straight lines, with correlation coefficients approaching unity, provides a means of managing the size of individual issues to yield minimum printing/binding costs. The extended use of the CRG classification notation to provide automatic extraction of chain indexing strings and associated cross-references is described in detail. The gains in staff productivity resulting from this and other procedures are indicated with reference to the expansion in LISA's coverage between 1978 and 1984.
  14. Rau, L.F.: Knowledge organization and access in a conceptual information system (1987) 0.01
    0.014430467 = product of:
      0.0865828 = sum of:
        0.02642859 = weight(_text_:information in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02642859 = score(doc=1096,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
        0.06015421 = weight(_text_:system in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06015421 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 23(1987), S.269-284
  15. Evans, N.: Development of the Carnegie Mellon Library Information System (1989) 0.01
    0.014430467 = product of:
      0.0865828 = sum of:
        0.02642859 = weight(_text_:information in 2155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02642859 = score(doc=2155,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 2155, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2155)
        0.06015421 = weight(_text_:system in 2155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06015421 = score(doc=2155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 2155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2155)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 8(1989) no.2, S.110-120
  16. Ellis, D.: ¬A behavioral model for information retrieval system design (1989) 0.01
    0.014430467 = product of:
      0.0865828 = sum of:
        0.02642859 = weight(_text_:information in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02642859 = score(doc=2707,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
        0.06015421 = weight(_text_:system in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06015421 = score(doc=2707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 15(1989) no.4, S.237-247
  17. Shoval, P.: Principles, procedures and rules in an expert system for information retrieval (1985) 0.01
    0.014430467 = product of:
      0.0865828 = sum of:
        0.02642859 = weight(_text_:information in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02642859 = score(doc=4167,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
        0.06015421 = weight(_text_:system in 4167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06015421 = score(doc=4167,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 4167, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4167)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 21(1985), S.475-487
  18. Borgman, C.L.: Performance effects of a user's mental model of an information retrieval system (1983) 0.01
    0.014430467 = product of:
      0.0865828 = sum of:
        0.02642859 = weight(_text_:information in 6895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02642859 = score(doc=6895,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 6895, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6895)
        0.06015421 = weight(_text_:system in 6895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06015421 = score(doc=6895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 6895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6895)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1983), S.121-124
  19. Chiaramella, Y.; Defude, B.: ¬A prototype of an intelligent system for information retrieval : IOTA (1987) 0.01
    0.014430467 = product of:
      0.0865828 = sum of:
        0.02642859 = weight(_text_:information in 8690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02642859 = score(doc=8690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.060219705 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 8690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8690)
        0.06015421 = weight(_text_:system in 8690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06015421 = score(doc=8690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 8690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8690)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 23(1987), S.285-303
  20. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.01
    0.014194809 = product of:
      0.08516885 = sum of:
        0.052634936 = weight(_text_:system in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052634936 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10804188 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03430388 = queryNorm
            0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
        0.032533914 = product of:
          0.06506783 = sum of:
            0.06506783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06506783 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.120126344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03430388 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22

Languages

  • e 1033
  • d 294
  • m 8
  • f 6
  • nl 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1089
  • m 149
  • s 69
  • r 14
  • x 11
  • d 9
  • n 7
  • b 6
  • ? 4
  • p 4
  • h 3
  • u 3
  • el 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications