Search (95 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Nix, M.: ¬Die praktische Einsetzbarkeit des CIDOC CRM in Informationssystemen im Bereich des Kulturerbes (2004) 0.02
    0.02030862 = product of:
      0.10154309 = sum of:
        0.027793355 = weight(_text_:web in 3742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027793355 = score(doc=3742,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 3742, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3742)
        0.073749736 = weight(_text_:ontologie in 3742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073749736 = score(doc=3742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19081406 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.38650054 = fieldWeight in 3742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3742)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Es steht uns eine praktisch unbegrenzte Menge an Informationen über das World Wide Web zur Verfügung. Das Problem, das daraus erwächst, ist, diese Menge zu bewältigen und an die Information zu gelangen, die im Augenblick benötigt wird. Das überwältigende Angebot zwingt sowohl professionelle Anwender als auch Laien zu suchen, ungeachtet ihrer Ansprüche an die gewünschten Informationen. Um dieses Suchen effizienter zu gestalten, gibt es einerseits die Möglichkeit, leistungsstärkere Suchmaschinen zu entwickeln. Eine andere Möglichkeit ist, Daten besser zu strukturieren, um an die darin enthaltenen Informationen zu gelangen. Hoch strukturierte Daten sind maschinell verarbeitbar, sodass ein Teil der Sucharbeit automatisiert werden kann. Das Semantic Web ist die Vision eines weiterentwickelten World Wide Web, in dem derart strukturierten Daten von so genannten Softwareagenten verarbeitet werden. Die fortschreitende inhaltliche Strukturierung von Daten wird Semantisierung genannt. Im ersten Teil der Arbeit sollen einige wichtige Methoden der inhaltlichen Strukturierung von Daten skizziert werden, um die Stellung von Ontologien innerhalb der Semantisierung zu klären. Im dritten Kapitel wird der Aufbau und die Aufgabe des CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM), einer Domain Ontologie im Bereich des Kulturerbes dargestellt. Im darauf folgenden praktischen Teil werden verschiedene Ansätze zur Verwendung des CRM diskutiert und umgesetzt. Es wird ein Vorschlag zur Implementierung des Modells in XML erarbeitet. Das ist eine Möglichkeit, die dem Datentransport dient. Außerdem wird der Entwurf einer Klassenbibliothek in Java dargelegt, auf die die Verarbeitung und Nutzung des Modells innerhalb eines Informationssystems aufbauen kann.
  2. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 2. Report from the 2nd IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2004 (2005) 0.01
    0.014675641 = product of:
      0.14675641 = sum of:
        0.14675641 = weight(_text_:kongress in 3865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14675641 = score(doc=3865,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.8201361 = fieldWeight in 3865, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3865)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Buenos Aires <2004>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Buenos Aires <2004>
  3. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 5. Report from the 5th IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Pretoria, South Africa, 2007 = Rapport de la 5ème Réunion d'Experts de l'IFLA sur un Code International de Catalogage (2008) 0.01
    0.014675641 = product of:
      0.14675641 = sum of:
        0.14675641 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14675641 = score(doc=2311,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.8201361 = fieldWeight in 2311, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2311)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Pretoria <2007>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Pretoria <2007>
  4. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 3. Report from the 3rd IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Cairo, Egypt, 2005 (2006) 0.01
    0.014675641 = product of:
      0.14675641 = sum of:
        0.14675641 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14675641 = score(doc=2313,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.8201361 = fieldWeight in 2313, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2313)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Kairo <2005>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Kairo <2005>
  5. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 4. Report from the 4th IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Seoul, Korea, 2006 (2007) 0.01
    0.014675641 = product of:
      0.14675641 = sum of:
        0.14675641 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14675641 = score(doc=2314,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.8201361 = fieldWeight in 2314, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2314)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Seoul <2006>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Seoul <2006>
  6. Oehlschläger, S.: Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme : Aus der 46. Sitzung am 21. und 22. April 2004 im Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg in Konstanz (2004) 0.01
    0.0099422885 = product of:
      0.04971144 = sum of:
        0.04540045 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04540045 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.25371665 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
        0.004310991 = product of:
          0.012932973 = sum of:
            0.012932973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012932973 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Content
    - Projekt Umstieg auf internationale Formate und Regelwerke (MARC21, AACR2) Das Projekt Umstieg auf internationale Formate und Regelwerke (MARC21, AACR2) stand zum Zeitpunkt der Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft kurz vor seinem Abschluss. Im Rahmen der Veranstaltung des Standardisierungsausschusses beim 2. Leipziger Kongress für Information und Bibliothek wurden die wesentlichen Projektergebnisse vorgestellt. Aufgrund der vorliegenden Informationen gehen die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme davon aus, dass das finanzielle Argument bei der anstehenden Entscheidung nicht mehr im Vordergrund stehen kann. Auch wenn davon ausgegangen wird, dass eine klare Umstiegsentscheidung durch den Standardisierungsausschuss derzeit politisch nicht durchsetzbar sei, sehen die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme die Entwicklung durch die Projektergebnisse positiv. Durch die Diskussion wurden Defizite des deutschen Regelwerks und der Verbundpraxis offen gelegt und verschiedene Neuerungen angestoßen. Zur Verbesserung des Datentausches untereinander sehen die Verbundzentralen unabhängig von einer Entscheidung des Standardisierungsausschusses die Notwendigkeit, ihre Datenbestände zu homogenisieren und Hierarchien abzubauen bzw. die Verknüpfungsstrukturen zu vereinfachen. Auch die Entwicklung der Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) muss in diese Überlegungen einbezogen werden. Die Formate müssen dahingehend entwickelt werden, dass alle relevanten Informationen im Titelsatz transportiert werden können. Es wird eine Konvergenz von Regelwerk und Format angestrebt.
  7. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code. Report from the 1st Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code, Frankfurt 2003 (2004) 0.01
    0.008621541 = product of:
      0.043107703 = sum of:
        0.0064186 = weight(_text_:web in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064186 = score(doc=2312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.07211407 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
        0.036689103 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036689103 = score(doc=2312,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.20503402 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 31(2004) no.4, S.255-257: (P. Riva): "Cataloguing standardization at the international level can be viewed as proceeding in a series of milestone conferences. This meeting, the first in a series which will cover different regions of the world, will take its place in that progression. The first IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code (IME ICC), held July 28-30, 2003 at Die Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt, gathered representatives of almost all European countries as well as three of the four AACR author countries. As explained in the introduction by Barbara Tillett, chair of the IME ICC planning committee, the plan is for five meetings in total. Subsequent meetings are to take place in Buenos Aires, Argentina (held August 17-18, 2004) for Latin America and the Carribean, to be followed by Alexandria, Egypt (2005) for the Middle East, Seoul, South Korea (2006) for Asia, and Durban, South Africa (2007) for Africa. The impetus for planning these meetings was triggered by the 40th anniversary of the Paris Principles, approved at the International Conference an Cataloguing Principles held in 1961. Many will welcome the timely publication of the reports and papers from this important conference in book form. The original conference website (details given an p. 176) which includes most of the same material, is still extant, but the reports and papers gathered into this volume will be referred to by cataloguing rule makers long after the web as we know it has transformed itself into a new (and quite possibly not backwards compatible) environment.
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Frankfurt <Main, 2003>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Frankfurt <Main, 2003>
  8. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01
    0.007921926 = product of:
      0.03960963 = sum of:
        0.0256744 = weight(_text_:web in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0256744 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
        0.013935229 = product of:
          0.041805685 = sum of:
            0.041805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041805685 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  9. Oehlschläger, S.: Treffpunkt Standardisierung : Eine Veranstaltung des Standardisierungsausschusses beim 2. Leipziger Kongress für Information und Bibliothek (2004) 0.01
    0.0073378207 = product of:
      0.073378205 = sum of:
        0.073378205 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073378205 = score(doc=2790,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.41006804 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Treffpunkt Standardisierung - Projekte, Konzepte und Kooperationen - lautete der Titel der Veranstaltung des Standardisierungsausschusses beim 2. Leipziger Kongress für Information und Bibliothek »Information Macht Bildung«, die vom Vorsitzenden Berndt Dugall moderiert wurde. Den größten Raum innerhalb der Veranstaltung nahm der Themenkomplex »Umstieg auf internationale Formate und Regelwerke (MARC21, AACR2)« ein. Zunächst stellte die Projektbearbeiterin Luise Hoffmann die Ausgangslage des Projektes sowie bisher vorliegende Ergebnisse aus dem von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) geförderten Projekt vor und ging dabei auf einige Projektschwerpunkte ein: Luise Hoffmann stellte einige Punkte aus dem Regelwerks- und Formatabgleich sowie der Untersuchung über die Konsequenzen eines Umstiegs auf die laufende Katalogisierung vor und ging dann ausführlicher auf mögliche Auswirkungen eines Umstiegs auf die Informationsversorgung des Benutzers ein, einen Aspekt, dem im DFG-Antrag eine besondere, hervorgehobene Bedeutung beigemessen wird. In erster Linie wurden die Strategien der Benutzer zur Literatursuche untersucht. Ziel war es, herauszufinden, ob und welche Auswirkungen ein Umstieg auf die Benutzung des örtlichen Bibliothekskatalogs haben würde. Hierzu wurde zunächst die Suchstrategie von Benutzern ermittelt, um anschließend analysieren zu können, ob diese Strategie in einem AACR-MARC-basierten Katalog erfolgreicher oder weniger erfolgreich gewesen wäre. Da die zunehmende Literaturrecherche im Internet möglicherweise das Suchverhalten in einem OPAC beeinflusst, wurde zusätzlich die Suchstrategie im Internet erfragt. Zur Ermittlung der Suchstrategie wurde ein Fragebogen entworfen und in Der Deutschen Bibliothek getestet. Anhand der Deutschen Bibliotheksstatistik wurden Bibliotheken unter den Gesichtspunkten der Nutzerfrequenz und der Bestandsgröße ausgewählt und angefragt, ob sie bereit wären, den Fragebogen in ihrer Bibliothek auszulegen. Nachdem sich zehn Bibliotheken bereit erklärt hatten, wurden für die endgültige Befragung einige spezielle Fragen zu Suchbegriffen an die jeweiligen Bibliotheks-OPACs angepasst, da Formulierungen und Bezeichnungen wie Person, Autor, Verfasser u. dgl. in den Bibliothekskatalogen voneinander abweichen können. Als erstes Ergebnis nach Auswertung der Fragebögen aus drei Universitätsbibliotheken konnte festgestellt werden, dass Benutzer überwiegend unter Titelstichwörtern und Personen suchen und dabei Namensformen verwenden, die ihnen geläufig sind. Ein großer Teil der Benutzer weiß der Umfrage zufolge nicht, wie man den Band eines mehrbändigen Werkes sucht, und fast die Hälfte aller Befragten sucht nach Aufsätzen von Sammelwerken. Benutzer unterscheiden überwiegend bei ihrer Suche nicht, ob sie in einem deutschen oder einem ausländischen Katalog recherchieren. Um zu einheitlichen Suchergebnissen bei der Suche in deutschen und ausländischen Katalogen zu gelangen, sollte eine Annäherung der Standards angestrebt werden.
  10. Guenther, R.S.: Using the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) for resource description : guidelines and applications (2004) 0.01
    0.0062174173 = product of:
      0.031087086 = sum of:
        0.022465102 = weight(_text_:web in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022465102 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
        0.008621982 = product of:
          0.025865946 = sum of:
            0.025865946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025865946 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS), its accompanying documentation and some of its applications. It reviews the MODS user guidelines provided by the Library of Congress and how they enable a user of the schema to consistently apply MODS as a metadata scheme. Because the schema itself could not fully document appropriate usage, the guidelines provide element definitions, history, relationships with other elements, usage conventions, and examples. Short descriptions of some MODS applications are given and a more detailed discussion of its use in the Library of Congress's Minerva project for Web archiving is given.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.89-98
  11. McCallum, S.H.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1975-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.005329214 = product of:
      0.02664607 = sum of:
        0.0192558 = weight(_text_:web in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0192558 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
        0.00739027 = product of:
          0.02217081 = sum of:
            0.02217081 = weight(_text_:22 in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02217081 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    This entry describes the development of the MARC Communications format. After a brief overview of the initial 10 years it describes the succeeding phases of development up to the present. This takes the reader through the expansion of the format for all types of bibliographic data and for a multiple character scripts. At the same time a large business community was developing that offered products based on the format to the library community. The introduction of the Internet in the 1990s and the Web technology brought new opportunities and challenges and the format was adapted to this new environment. There has been a great deal of international adoption of the format that has continued into the 2000s. More recently new syntaxes for MARC 21 and models are being explored.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:38
  12. Miller, D.R.: XML: Libraries' strategic opportunity (2001) 0.00
    0.003930574 = product of:
      0.03930574 = sum of:
        0.03930574 = weight(_text_:web in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03930574 = score(doc=1467,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    XML (eXtensible Markup Language) is fast gaining favor as the universal format for data and document exchange -- in effect becoming the lingua franca of the Information Age. Currently, "library information" is at a particular disadvantage on the rapidly evolving World Wide Web. Why? Despite libraries'explorations of web catalogs, scanning projects, digital data repositories, and creation of web pages galore, there remains a digital divide. The core of libraries' data troves are stored in proprietary formats of integrated library systems (ILS) and in the complex and arcane MARC formats -- both restricted chiefly to the province of technical services and systems librarians. Even they are hard-pressed to extract and integrate this wealth of data with resources from outside this rarefied environment. Segregation of library information underlies many difficulties: producing standard bibliographic citations from MARC data, automatically creating new materials lists (including new web resources) on a particular topic, exchanging data with our vendors, and even migrating from one ILS to another. Why do we continue to hobble our potential by embracing these self-imposed limitations? Most ILSs began in libraries, which soon recognized the pitfalls of do-it-yourself solutions. Thus, we wisely anticipated the necessity for standards. However, with the advent of the web, we soon found "our" collections and a flood of new resources appearing in digital format on opposite sides of the divide. If we do not act quickly to integrate library resources with mainstream web resources, we are in grave danger of becoming marginalized
  13. Holt, B.: Presentation of UNIMARC on the Web : new fields, including the one for electronic resources (1999) 0.00
    0.0038511602 = product of:
      0.0385116 = sum of:
        0.0385116 = weight(_text_:web in 6020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0385116 = score(doc=6020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 6020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6020)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
  14. Qin, J.: Representation and organization of information in the Web space : from MARC to XML (2000) 0.00
    0.0038511602 = product of:
      0.0385116 = sum of:
        0.0385116 = weight(_text_:web in 3918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0385116 = score(doc=3918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3918)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
  15. Michard, A.; Pham Dac, D.: Description of collections and encyclopedias on the Web using XML (1998) 0.00
    0.0036309087 = product of:
      0.036309086 = sum of:
        0.036309086 = weight(_text_:web in 3493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036309086 = score(doc=3493,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 3493, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3493)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloguing artworks relies on the availability of classification schemes, often represented by hierarchical thesauri. Comments on the limitations of current practices and tools and proposes a new approach for the cooperative production of multilingual and multicultural classification schemes exploiting some features of the oncoming Extensible Markup Language based Web
  16. Scholz, M.: Wie können Daten im Web mit JSON nachgenutzt werden? (2023) 0.00
    0.0036309087 = product of:
      0.036309086 = sum of:
        0.036309086 = weight(_text_:web in 5345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036309086 = score(doc=5345,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 5345, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5345)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Martin Scholz ist Informatiker an der Universitätsbibliothek Erlangen-Nürnberg. Als Leiter der dortigen Gruppe Digitale Entwicklung und Datenmanagement beschäftigt er sich viel mit Webtechniken und Datentransformation. Er setzt sich mit der aktuellen ABI-Techik-Frage auseinander: Wie können Daten im Web mit JSON nachgenutzt werden?
  17. Manguinhas, H.; Freire, N.; Machado, J.; Borbinha, J.: Supporting multilingual bibliographic resource discovery with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2012) 0.00
    0.003588107 = product of:
      0.03588107 = sum of:
        0.03588107 = weight(_text_:web in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03588107 = score(doc=133,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes an experiment exploring the hypothesis that innovative application of the Functional Require-ments for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) principles can complement traditional bibliographic resource discovery systems in order to improve the user experience. A specialized service was implemented that, when given a plain list of results from a regular online catalogue, was able to process, enrich and present that list in a more relevant way for the user. This service pre-processes the records of a traditional online catalogue in order to build a semantic structure following the FRBR model. The service also explores web search features that have been revolutionizing the way users conceptualize resource discovery, such as relevance ranking and metasearching. This work was developed in the context of the TELPlus project. We processed nearly one hundred thousand bibliographic and authority records, in multiple languages, and originating from twelve European na-tional libraries. This paper describes the architecture of the service and the main challenges faced, especially concerning the extraction and linking of the relevant FRBR entities from the bibliographic metadata produced by the libraries. The service was evaluated by end users, who filled out a questionnaire after using a traditional online catalogue and the new service, both with the same bibliographic collection. The analysis of the results supports the hypothesis that FRBR can be implemented for re-source discovery in a non-intrusive way, reusing the data of any existing traditional bibliographic system.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Schwerpunktthemas: Semantic Web and Reasoning for Cultural Heritage and Digital Libraries: Vgl.: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/supporting-multilingual-bibliographic-resource-discovery-functional-requirements-bibliograph http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj145_2.pdf.
    Source
    Semantic Web journal. 3(2012) no.1, S.3-21
  18. Eversberg, B.: Was sind und was sollen bibliothekarische Datenformate (1994) 0.00
    0.0032093 = product of:
      0.032093 = sum of:
        0.032093 = weight(_text_:web in 1742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032093 = score(doc=1742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1742)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Footnote
    Neuere Ausgaben nur über die Web-Seite: http://www.allegro-c.de/allegro/formate/formate.htm
  19. Cranefield, S.: Networked knowledge representation and exchange using UML and RDF (2001) 0.00
    0.0031770454 = product of:
      0.031770453 = sum of:
        0.031770453 = weight(_text_:web in 5896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031770453 = score(doc=5896,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 5896, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5896)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes the use of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a language for modelling ontologies for Web resources and the knowledge contained within them. To provide a mechanism for serialising and processing object diagrams representing knowledge, a pair of XSI-T stylesheets have been developed to map from XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) encodings of class diagrams to corresponding RDF schemas and to Java classes representing the concepts in the ontologies. The Java code includes methods for marshalling and unmarshalling object-oriented information between in-memory data structures and RDF serialisations of that information. This provides a convenient mechanism for Java applications to share knowledge on the Web
  20. Johnson, B.C.: XML and MARC : which is "right"? (2001) 0.00
    0.0031770454 = product of:
      0.031770453 = sum of:
        0.031770453 = weight(_text_:web in 5423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031770453 = score(doc=5423,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 5423, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5423)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores recent discussions about appropriate mark-up conventions for library information intended for use on the World Wide Web. In particular, the question of whether the MARC 21 format will continue to be useful and whether the time is right for a full-fledged conversion effort to XML is explored. The author concludes that the MARC format will be relevant well into the future, and its use will not hamper access to bibliographic information via the web. Early XML exploratory efforts carried out at the Stanford University's Lane Medical Library are reported on. Although these efforts are a promising start, much more consultation and investigation is needed to arrive at broadly acceptable standards for XML library information encoding and retrieval.

Years

Languages

  • e 62
  • d 24
  • f 2
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 78
  • s 9
  • m 8
  • el 7
  • b 2
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…