Search (327 results, page 1 of 17)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 2. Report from the 2nd IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2004 (2005) 0.01
    0.014675641 = product of:
      0.14675641 = sum of:
        0.14675641 = weight(_text_:kongress in 3865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14675641 = score(doc=3865,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.8201361 = fieldWeight in 3865, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3865)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Buenos Aires <2004>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Buenos Aires <2004>
  2. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 5. Report from the 5th IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Pretoria, South Africa, 2007 = Rapport de la 5ème Réunion d'Experts de l'IFLA sur un Code International de Catalogage (2008) 0.01
    0.014675641 = product of:
      0.14675641 = sum of:
        0.14675641 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14675641 = score(doc=2311,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.8201361 = fieldWeight in 2311, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2311)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Pretoria <2007>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Pretoria <2007>
  3. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 3. Report from the 3rd IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Cairo, Egypt, 2005 (2006) 0.01
    0.014675641 = product of:
      0.14675641 = sum of:
        0.14675641 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14675641 = score(doc=2313,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.8201361 = fieldWeight in 2313, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2313)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Kairo <2005>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Kairo <2005>
  4. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 4. Report from the 4th IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Seoul, Korea, 2006 (2007) 0.01
    0.014675641 = product of:
      0.14675641 = sum of:
        0.14675641 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14675641 = score(doc=2314,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.8201361 = fieldWeight in 2314, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2314)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Seoul <2006>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Seoul <2006>
  5. Oehlschläger, S.: Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme : Aus der 46. Sitzung am 21. und 22. April 2004 im Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg in Konstanz (2004) 0.01
    0.0099422885 = product of:
      0.04971144 = sum of:
        0.04540045 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04540045 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.25371665 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
        0.004310991 = product of:
          0.012932973 = sum of:
            0.012932973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012932973 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Content
    - Projekt Umstieg auf internationale Formate und Regelwerke (MARC21, AACR2) Das Projekt Umstieg auf internationale Formate und Regelwerke (MARC21, AACR2) stand zum Zeitpunkt der Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft kurz vor seinem Abschluss. Im Rahmen der Veranstaltung des Standardisierungsausschusses beim 2. Leipziger Kongress für Information und Bibliothek wurden die wesentlichen Projektergebnisse vorgestellt. Aufgrund der vorliegenden Informationen gehen die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme davon aus, dass das finanzielle Argument bei der anstehenden Entscheidung nicht mehr im Vordergrund stehen kann. Auch wenn davon ausgegangen wird, dass eine klare Umstiegsentscheidung durch den Standardisierungsausschuss derzeit politisch nicht durchsetzbar sei, sehen die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme die Entwicklung durch die Projektergebnisse positiv. Durch die Diskussion wurden Defizite des deutschen Regelwerks und der Verbundpraxis offen gelegt und verschiedene Neuerungen angestoßen. Zur Verbesserung des Datentausches untereinander sehen die Verbundzentralen unabhängig von einer Entscheidung des Standardisierungsausschusses die Notwendigkeit, ihre Datenbestände zu homogenisieren und Hierarchien abzubauen bzw. die Verknüpfungsstrukturen zu vereinfachen. Auch die Entwicklung der Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) muss in diese Überlegungen einbezogen werden. Die Formate müssen dahingehend entwickelt werden, dass alle relevanten Informationen im Titelsatz transportiert werden können. Es wird eine Konvergenz von Regelwerk und Format angestrebt.
  6. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code. Report from the 1st Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code, Frankfurt 2003 (2004) 0.01
    0.008621541 = product of:
      0.043107703 = sum of:
        0.0064186 = weight(_text_:web in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064186 = score(doc=2312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.07211407 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
        0.036689103 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036689103 = score(doc=2312,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.20503402 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 31(2004) no.4, S.255-257: (P. Riva): "Cataloguing standardization at the international level can be viewed as proceeding in a series of milestone conferences. This meeting, the first in a series which will cover different regions of the world, will take its place in that progression. The first IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code (IME ICC), held July 28-30, 2003 at Die Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt, gathered representatives of almost all European countries as well as three of the four AACR author countries. As explained in the introduction by Barbara Tillett, chair of the IME ICC planning committee, the plan is for five meetings in total. Subsequent meetings are to take place in Buenos Aires, Argentina (held August 17-18, 2004) for Latin America and the Carribean, to be followed by Alexandria, Egypt (2005) for the Middle East, Seoul, South Korea (2006) for Asia, and Durban, South Africa (2007) for Africa. The impetus for planning these meetings was triggered by the 40th anniversary of the Paris Principles, approved at the International Conference an Cataloguing Principles held in 1961. Many will welcome the timely publication of the reports and papers from this important conference in book form. The original conference website (details given an p. 176) which includes most of the same material, is still extant, but the reports and papers gathered into this volume will be referred to by cataloguing rule makers long after the web as we know it has transformed itself into a new (and quite possibly not backwards compatible) environment.
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Frankfurt <Main, 2003>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Frankfurt <Main, 2003>
  7. Ellero, N.P.: Panning for gold : utility of the World Wide Web for metadata and authority control in special collections (2002) 0.01
    0.008148461 = product of:
      0.0407423 = sum of:
        0.03335203 = weight(_text_:web in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03335203 = score(doc=161,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
        0.00739027 = product of:
          0.02217081 = sum of:
            0.02217081 = weight(_text_:22 in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02217081 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the use of the World Wide Web as a valuable name authority resource and tool for special collections analytic-level cataloging and the specific goal of fully discovering the names of people who lived in the past as well as those from the present. Current tools and initiatives such as the Name Authority Component of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (NACO) and the Library of Congress Name Authority File have a specific mission and are partially helpful. Web resources encompassing special collections are often intricate and require global and enhanced resources to continue what have been the guiding principles, tradition, and value of cataloging: to discover works via many points of entry; to find works by or about the same person, topic, or title; and to continue the great cataloging legacies of standards and cooperation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01
    0.007921926 = product of:
      0.03960963 = sum of:
        0.0256744 = weight(_text_:web in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0256744 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
        0.013935229 = product of:
          0.041805685 = sum of:
            0.041805685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041805685 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  9. Oehlschläger, S.: Treffpunkt Standardisierung : Eine Veranstaltung des Standardisierungsausschusses beim 2. Leipziger Kongress für Information und Bibliothek (2004) 0.01
    0.0073378207 = product of:
      0.073378205 = sum of:
        0.073378205 = weight(_text_:kongress in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073378205 = score(doc=2790,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17894155 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.41006804 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Treffpunkt Standardisierung - Projekte, Konzepte und Kooperationen - lautete der Titel der Veranstaltung des Standardisierungsausschusses beim 2. Leipziger Kongress für Information und Bibliothek »Information Macht Bildung«, die vom Vorsitzenden Berndt Dugall moderiert wurde. Den größten Raum innerhalb der Veranstaltung nahm der Themenkomplex »Umstieg auf internationale Formate und Regelwerke (MARC21, AACR2)« ein. Zunächst stellte die Projektbearbeiterin Luise Hoffmann die Ausgangslage des Projektes sowie bisher vorliegende Ergebnisse aus dem von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) geförderten Projekt vor und ging dabei auf einige Projektschwerpunkte ein: Luise Hoffmann stellte einige Punkte aus dem Regelwerks- und Formatabgleich sowie der Untersuchung über die Konsequenzen eines Umstiegs auf die laufende Katalogisierung vor und ging dann ausführlicher auf mögliche Auswirkungen eines Umstiegs auf die Informationsversorgung des Benutzers ein, einen Aspekt, dem im DFG-Antrag eine besondere, hervorgehobene Bedeutung beigemessen wird. In erster Linie wurden die Strategien der Benutzer zur Literatursuche untersucht. Ziel war es, herauszufinden, ob und welche Auswirkungen ein Umstieg auf die Benutzung des örtlichen Bibliothekskatalogs haben würde. Hierzu wurde zunächst die Suchstrategie von Benutzern ermittelt, um anschließend analysieren zu können, ob diese Strategie in einem AACR-MARC-basierten Katalog erfolgreicher oder weniger erfolgreich gewesen wäre. Da die zunehmende Literaturrecherche im Internet möglicherweise das Suchverhalten in einem OPAC beeinflusst, wurde zusätzlich die Suchstrategie im Internet erfragt. Zur Ermittlung der Suchstrategie wurde ein Fragebogen entworfen und in Der Deutschen Bibliothek getestet. Anhand der Deutschen Bibliotheksstatistik wurden Bibliotheken unter den Gesichtspunkten der Nutzerfrequenz und der Bestandsgröße ausgewählt und angefragt, ob sie bereit wären, den Fragebogen in ihrer Bibliothek auszulegen. Nachdem sich zehn Bibliotheken bereit erklärt hatten, wurden für die endgültige Befragung einige spezielle Fragen zu Suchbegriffen an die jeweiligen Bibliotheks-OPACs angepasst, da Formulierungen und Bezeichnungen wie Person, Autor, Verfasser u. dgl. in den Bibliothekskatalogen voneinander abweichen können. Als erstes Ergebnis nach Auswertung der Fragebögen aus drei Universitätsbibliotheken konnte festgestellt werden, dass Benutzer überwiegend unter Titelstichwörtern und Personen suchen und dabei Namensformen verwenden, die ihnen geläufig sind. Ein großer Teil der Benutzer weiß der Umfrage zufolge nicht, wie man den Band eines mehrbändigen Werkes sucht, und fast die Hälfte aller Befragten sucht nach Aufsätzen von Sammelwerken. Benutzer unterscheiden überwiegend bei ihrer Suche nicht, ob sie in einem deutschen oder einem ausländischen Katalog recherchieren. Um zu einheitlichen Suchergebnissen bei der Suche in deutschen und ausländischen Katalogen zu gelangen, sollte eine Annäherung der Standards angestrebt werden.
  10. Martin, G.: Control of electronic resources in Australia (1996) 0.01
    0.0071056187 = product of:
      0.035528094 = sum of:
        0.0256744 = weight(_text_:web in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0256744 = score(doc=5107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
        0.009853695 = product of:
          0.029561082 = sum of:
            0.029561082 = weight(_text_:22 in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029561082 = score(doc=5107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes various ways that electronic resources on the Internet are being controlled in Australia, and in particular how various special networks and projects are linking users of information with documents, often using the World Wide Web. It also examines the implications for libraries and for cataloguers.
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  11. Thomas, A.R.: ¬The Work-Wide Web : a cataloging career for every librarian? (1997) 0.01
    0.0071056187 = product of:
      0.035528094 = sum of:
        0.0256744 = weight(_text_:web in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0256744 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
        0.009853695 = product of:
          0.029561082 = sum of:
            0.029561082 = weight(_text_:22 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029561082 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.5-22
  12. Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004) 0.01
    0.0062174173 = product of:
      0.031087086 = sum of:
        0.022465102 = weight(_text_:web in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022465102 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
        0.008621982 = product of:
          0.025865946 = sum of:
            0.025865946 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025865946 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.01
    0.0062174173 = product of:
      0.031087086 = sum of:
        0.022465102 = weight(_text_:web in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022465102 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.008621982 = product of:
          0.025865946 = sum of:
            0.025865946 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025865946 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.01
    0.0062174173 = product of:
      0.031087086 = sum of:
        0.022465102 = weight(_text_:web in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022465102 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
        0.008621982 = product of:
          0.025865946 = sum of:
            0.025865946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025865946 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Coyle, K.: FRBR, before and after : a look at our bibliographic models (2016) 0.01
    0.0057703475 = product of:
      0.028851738 = sum of:
        0.02269318 = weight(_text_:web in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02269318 = score(doc=2786,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
        0.0061585587 = product of:
          0.018475676 = sum of:
            0.018475676 = weight(_text_:22 in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018475676 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    This book looks at the ways that we define the things of the bibliographic world, and in particular how our bibliographic models reflect our technology and the assumed goals of libraries. There is, of course, a history behind this, as well as a present and a future. The first part of the book begins by looking at the concept of the 'work' in library cataloging theory, and how that concept has evolved since the mid-nineteenth century to date. Next it talks about models and technology, two areas that need to be understood before taking a long look at where we are today. It then examines the new bibliographic model called Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the technical and social goals that the FRBR Study Group was tasked to address. The FRBR entities are analyzed in some detail. Finally, FRBR as an entity-relation model is compared to a small set of Semantic Web vocabularies that can be seen as variants of the multi-entity bibliographic model that FRBR introduced.
    Content
    Part I. Work, model, technologyThe work -- The model -- The technology -- Part II. FRBR and other solutions -- Introduction -- FRBR : standard for international sharing -- The entity-relation model -- What is modeled in FRBR -- Does FRBR meet FRBR's objectives? -- Some issues that arise -- Bibliographic description and the Semantic Web.
    Date
    12. 2.2016 16:22:58
  16. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.01
    0.005329214 = product of:
      0.02664607 = sum of:
        0.0192558 = weight(_text_:web in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0192558 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.00739027 = product of:
          0.02217081 = sum of:
            0.02217081 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02217081 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09550592 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02727315 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
  17. Willer, M.; Dunsire, G.: Bibliographic information organization in the Semantic Web (2013) 0.01
    0.005322023 = product of:
      0.053220227 = sum of:
        0.053220227 = weight(_text_:web in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053220227 = score(doc=2143,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.59793836 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    New technologies will underpin the future generation of library catalogues. To facilitate their role providing information, serving users, and fulfilling their mission as cultural heritage and memory institutions, libraries must take a technological leap; their standards and services must be transformed to those of the Semantic Web. Bibliographic Information Organization in the Semantic Web explores the technologies that may power future library catalogues, and argues the necessity of such a leap. The text introduces international bibliographic standards and models, and fundamental concepts in their representation in the context of the Semantic Web. Subsequent chapters cover bibliographic information organization, linked open data, methodologies for publishing library metadata, discussion of the wider environment (museum, archival and publishing communities) and users, followed by a conclusion.
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    RSWK
    Bibliografische Daten / Informationsmanagement / Semantic Web / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
    Bibliografische Daten / Semantic Web / Metadaten / Linked Data
    Subject
    Bibliografische Daten / Informationsmanagement / Semantic Web / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
    Bibliografische Daten / Semantic Web / Metadaten / Linked Data
    Semantic Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  18. Bianchini, C.; Willer, M.: ISBD resource and Its description in the context of the Semantic Web (2014) 0.01
    0.005023349 = product of:
      0.05023349 = sum of:
        0.05023349 = weight(_text_:web in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05023349 = score(doc=1998,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the question "What is an International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) resource in the context of the Semantic Web, and what is the relationship of its description to the linked data?" This question is discussed against the background of the dichotomy between the description and access using the Semantic Web differentiation of the three logical layers: real-world objects, web of data, and special purpose (bibliographic) data. The representation of bibliographic data as linked data is discussed, distinguishing the description of a resource from the iconic/objective and the informational/subjective viewpoints. In the conclusion, the authors give views on possible directions of future development of the ISBD.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  19. Leroy, S.Y.; Thomas, S.L.: Impact of Web access on cataloging (2004) 0.00
    0.004716689 = product of:
      0.04716689 = sum of:
        0.04716689 = weight(_text_:web in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04716689 = score(doc=5656,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers in larger libraries have web access on their desktops, which puts many resources just a click away. Cataloging tools and documentation are available through web browser interfaces. Many library online catalogs are accessible for searching class numbers and other cataloging information. Web sites of publishers, governmental agencies, and individual authors abound, providing a wealth of information. Having this information readily available has had an impact on cataloging. The ability to have more than one open window on the desktop enables catalogers to copy and paste cataloging information from multiple sources. Web resources provide critical information about the context for the item in hand, resulting in better cataloging records and more accurate access points. This article discusses and gives examples of ways that information found on the web can be used to facilitate cataloging processes.
  20. O'Neill, E.T.; Lavoie, B.F.: Bibliographic control for the Web (2000) 0.00
    0.0044930205 = product of:
      0.044930205 = sum of:
        0.044930205 = weight(_text_:web in 7088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044930205 = score(doc=7088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08900621 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02727315 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 7088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7088)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 262
  • d 50
  • i 5
  • f 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 289
  • m 24
  • s 17
  • b 16
  • el 14
  • x 4
  • r 3
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects