Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Research"
  1. Pang, B.; Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.007845803 = product of:
      0.04969009 = sum of:
        0.017164737 = weight(_text_:web in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017164737 = score(doc=1171,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.017164737 = weight(_text_:web in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017164737 = score(doc=1171,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.015360615 = weight(_text_:services in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015360615 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    An important part of our information-gathering behavior has always been to find out what other people think. With the growing availability and popularity of opinion-rich resources such as online review sites and personal blogs, new opportunities and challenges arise as people can, and do, actively use information technologies to seek out and understand the opinions of others. The sudden eruption of activity in the area of opinion mining and sentiment analysis, which deals with the computational treatment of opinion, sentiment, and subjectivity in text, has thus occurred at least in part as a direct response to the surge of interest in new systems that deal directly with opinions as a first-class object. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis covers techniques and approaches that promise to directly enable opinion-oriented information-seeking systems. The focus is on methods that seek to address the new challenges raised by sentiment-aware applications, as compared to those that are already present in more traditional fact-based analysis. The survey includes an enumeration of the various applications, a look at general challenges and discusses categorization, extraction and summarization. Finally, it moves beyond just the technical issues, devoting significant attention to the broader implications that the development of opinion-oriented information-access services have: questions of privacy, vulnerability to manipulation, and whether or not reviews can have measurable economic impact. To facilitate future work, a discussion of available resources, benchmark datasets, and evaluation campaigns is also provided. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis is the first such comprehensive survey of this vibrant and important research area and will be of interest to anyone with an interest in opinion-oriented information-seeking systems.
    RSWK
    World Wide Web / Meinungsäußerung / Data Mining
    Subject
    World Wide Web / Meinungsäußerung / Data Mining
  2. Collins, H.; Pinch, T.: ¬Der Golem der Forschung : Wie unsere Wissenschaft die Natur erfindet (1999) 0.01
    0.005274799 = product of:
      0.05011059 = sum of:
        0.040228993 = weight(_text_:suche in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040228993 = score(doc=4866,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12883182 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.31225976 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
        0.009881598 = product of:
          0.019763196 = sum of:
            0.019763196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019763196 = score(doc=4866,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    Anhand von 7 konkreten Fallbeispielen (u.a. Relativitätstheorie, Sexualverhalten von Eidechsen, Gedächtnis von Würmern) wird über Forschungsmethoden, Experimente und deren Auswirkung auf der Suche nach der Wahrheit kritisch berichtet. "Nicht der experimentelle "Beweis" gibt den Ausschlag für das, was "wahr" sein wird, sondern die innerhalb der Gesellschaft ablaufende Einigung über einen neuen Konsens". Das ist einer der Kernsätze dieses Werkes über Forschungsmethoden, über Experimente und ihre Auswertung in den Naturwissenschaften. Die Autoren, ein Wissenschaftssoziologe und ein Wissenschaftshistoriker, beschreiben 7 Fallgeschichten (u.a. Relativitätstheorie, kalte Kernfusion, Sexualverhalten von Eidechsen, Gedächtnis von Würmern) und erörtern dabei vor allem die Kontroversen um die Interpretation der Ergebnisse, um die Suche nach "Wahrheit". Diese wird, so zeigen sie, öfter von Eitelkeit und Rechthaberei bestimmt, als die Naturwissenschaftler selbst zugeben wollen. Das - natürlich - kontrovers diskutierte Buch (in den USA liegt bereits die 2. Auflage vor) kann nicht nur Studenten und Wissenschaftlern sehr empfohlen werden.
    Classification
    Nat 22
    SFB
    Nat 22
  3. Mittelstraß, J.: Leonardo-Welt : Über Wissenschaft, Forschung und Verantwortung (1996) 0.00
    0.004564312 = product of:
      0.08672193 = sum of:
        0.08672193 = product of:
          0.17344385 = sum of:
            0.17344385 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 1707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17344385 = score(doc=1707,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.16918544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                1.0251701 = fieldWeight in 1707, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1707)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    RSWK
    Technisches Zeitalter / Aufsatzsammlung
    Wissenschaft / Aufsatzsammlung
    Wissenschaftsethik / Aufsatzsammlung
    Verantwortung / Technischer Fortschritt / Aufsatzsammlung (BVB)
    Subject
    Technisches Zeitalter / Aufsatzsammlung
    Wissenschaft / Aufsatzsammlung
    Wissenschaftsethik / Aufsatzsammlung
    Verantwortung / Technischer Fortschritt / Aufsatzsammlung (BVB)

Languages