Search (474 results, page 1 of 24)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Schreur, P.E.: ¬The use of Linked Data and artificial intelligence as key elements in the transformation of technical services (2020) 0.03
    0.029188441 = product of:
      0.1386451 = sum of:
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.03801558 = weight(_text_:services in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801558 = score(doc=125,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.058148954 = weight(_text_:semantische in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058148954 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.41761774 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    Library Technical Services have benefited from numerous stimuli. Although initially looked at with suspicion, transitions such as the move from catalog cards to the MARC formats have proven enormously helpful to libraries and their patrons. Linked data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the same promise. Through the conversion of metadata surrogates (cataloging) to linked open data, libraries can represent their resources on the Semantic Web. But in order to provide some form of controlled access to unstructured data, libraries must reach beyond traditional cataloging to new tools such as AI to provide consistent access to a growing world of full-text resources.
    Theme
    Semantische Interoperabilität
  2. AG KIM Gruppe Titeldaten DINI: Empfehlungen zur RDF-Repräsentation bibliografischer Daten (2014) 0.02
    0.024227692 = product of:
      0.115081534 = sum of:
        0.017164737 = weight(_text_:web in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017164737 = score(doc=4668,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
        0.017164737 = weight(_text_:web in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017164737 = score(doc=4668,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
        0.02172319 = weight(_text_:services in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02172319 = score(doc=4668,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.22946067 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
        0.059028875 = weight(_text_:modellierung in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059028875 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18558519 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.3180689 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    In den letzten Jahren wurde eine Vielzahl an Datensets aus Kultur- und Wissenschaftseinrichtungen als Linked Open Data veröffentlicht. Auch das deutsche Bibliothekswesen hat sich aktiv an den Entwicklungen im Bereich Linked Data beteiligt. Die zuvor lediglich in den Bibliothekskatalogen vorliegenden Daten können weiteren Sparten geöffnet und so auf vielfältige Weise in externe Anwendungen eingebunden werden. Gemeinsames Ziel bei der Veröffentlichung der Bibliotheksdaten als Linked Data ist außerdem, Interoperabilität und Nachnutzbarkeit zu ermöglichen und sich auf diese Weise stärker mit anderen Domänen außerhalb der Bibliothekswelt zu vernetzen. Es bestehen sowohl Linked-Data-Services einzelner Bibliotheken als auch der deutschen Bibliotheksverbünde. Trotz ihres gemeinsamen Ziels sprechen die bestehenden Services nicht die gleiche Sprache, da sie auf unterschiedlichen Modellierungen basieren. Um die Interoperabilität dieser Datenquellen zu gewährleisten, sollten die Dienste künftig einer einheitlichen Modellierung folgen. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurde im Januar 2012 eine Arbeitsgruppe gegründet, in der alle deutschen Bibliotheksverbünde, die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek sowie einige weitere interessierte und engagierte Kolleginnen und Kollegen mit entsprechender Expertise vertreten sind. Die Gruppe Titeldaten agiert seit April 2012 als Untergruppe des Kompetenzzentrums Interoperable Metadaten (DINI-AG KIM). Die Moderation und Koordination liegt bei der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Im Dezember 2012 schloss sich auch der OBVSG der Arbeitsgruppe an. Die Schweizerische Nationalbibliothek folgte im Mai 2013. Vorliegende Empfehlungen sollen zu einer Harmonisierung der RDFRepräsentationen von Titeldaten im deutschsprachigen Raum beitragen und so möglichst einen Quasi-Standard etablieren. Auch international wird an der Herausforderung gearbeitet, die bestehenden bibliothekarischen Strukturen in die heute zur Verfügung stehenden Konzepte des Semantic Web zu überführen und ihren Mehrwert auszuschöpfen. Die neuesten internationalen Entwicklungen im Bereich der Bereitstellung bibliografischer Daten im Semantic Web wie die Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative der Library of Congress (BIBFRAME) haben ebenfalls das Ziel, ein Modell zur RDF-Repräsentation bibliothekarischer Daten bereitzustellen. Die Gruppe Titeldaten beobachtet diese Entwicklungen und beabsichtigt, die Erfahrungen und Anforderungen der deutschsprachigen Bibliothekswelt mit einzubringen. Dabei werden einerseits international erarbeitete Empfehlungen aufgegriffen und andererseits Impulse aus der nationalen Kooperation dort eingebracht. Die hier verwendeten Properties könnten z. B. als Grundlage für ein Mapping zu BIBFRAME dienen.
  3. Thomas, A.R.: ¬The Work-Wide Web : a cataloging career for every librarian? (1997) 0.02
    0.02230953 = product of:
      0.10597027 = sum of:
        0.024274603 = weight(_text_:web in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024274603 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
        0.024274603 = weight(_text_:web in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024274603 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
        0.04344638 = weight(_text_:services in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04344638 = score(doc=5118,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
        0.013974689 = product of:
          0.027949378 = sum of:
            0.027949378 = weight(_text_:22 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027949378 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the consequences of the traditional division of library staff into Technical Services and Reader Services and if decreased interest in cataloguing by library managers. Notes ways in which non cataloguers have had limited involvement in cataloguing. Describes different forms of a holistic approach to library practice and suggests advantages of a holistic work plan. Considers problems of a holistic work plan, advances some solutions and identifies implications for education in cataloguing in library schools
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.5-22
  4. Grenci, M.: ¬The impact of Web publishing on the organization of cataloging functions (2000) 0.02
    0.021903673 = product of:
      0.13872327 = sum of:
        0.04248056 = weight(_text_:web in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04248056 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
        0.04248056 = weight(_text_:web in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04248056 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
        0.053762157 = weight(_text_:services in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053762157 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.56788623 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Source
    Library collections, acquisitions and technical services. 24(2000) no.x, S.153-170
  5. Catalogue 2.0 : the future of the library catalogue (2013) 0.02
    0.02045796 = product of:
      0.12956709 = sum of:
        0.040254876 = weight(_text_:web in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040254876 = score(doc=1339,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.47835067 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
        0.040254876 = weight(_text_:web in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040254876 = score(doc=1339,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.47835067 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
        0.049057327 = product of:
          0.098114654 = sum of:
            0.098114654 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098114654 = score(doc=1339,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16918544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.57992375 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    Will there be a library catalogue in the future and, if so, what will it look like? In the last 25 years, the library catalogue has undergone an evolution, from card catalogues to OPACs, discovery systems and even linked data applications making library bibliographic data accessible on the web. At the same time, users expectations of what catalogues will be able to offer in the way of discovery have never been higher. This groundbreaking edited collection brings together some of the foremost international cataloguing practitioners and thought leaders, including Lorcan Dempsey, Emmanuelle Bermès, Marshall Breeding and Karen Calhoun, to provide an overview of the current state of the art of the library catalogue and look ahead to see what the library catalogue might become. Practical projects and cutting edge concepts are showcased in discussions of linked data and the Semantic Web, user expectations and needs, bibliographic control, the FRBRization of the catalogue, innovations in search and retrieval, next-generation discovery products and mobile catalogues.
    Content
    Foreword - Marshall Breeding Introduction - Sally Chambers 1. Next generation catalogues: what do users think? - Anne Christensen 2. Making search work for the library user - Till Kinstler 3. Next-generation discovery: an overview of the European Scene - Marshall Breeding 4. The mobile library catalogue - Lukas Koster and Driek Heesakkers 5. FRBRizing your catalogue - Rosemie Callewaert 6. Enabling your catalogue for the semantic web - Emmanuelle Bermes 7. Supporting digital scholarship: bibliographic control, library co-operatives and open access repositories - Karen Calhoun 8. Thirteen ways of look at the libraries, discovery and the catalogue: scale, workflow, attention - Lorcan Dempsey.
    LCSH
    Online library catalogs / Web 2.0 / Semantic Web
    RSWK
    Bibliothekskatalog / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online-Katalog / Zukunft / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Bibliothekskatalog / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online-Katalog / Zukunft / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online library catalogs / Web 2.0 / Semantic Web
  6. Ellero, N.P.: Panning for gold : utility of the World Wide Web for metadata and authority control in special collections (2002) 0.02
    0.02033457 = product of:
      0.09658921 = sum of:
        0.031533636 = weight(_text_:web in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031533636 = score(doc=161,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
        0.031533636 = weight(_text_:web in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031533636 = score(doc=161,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
        0.023040922 = weight(_text_:services in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023040922 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
        0.010481017 = product of:
          0.020962033 = sum of:
            0.020962033 = weight(_text_:22 in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020962033 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the use of the World Wide Web as a valuable name authority resource and tool for special collections analytic-level cataloging and the specific goal of fully discovering the names of people who lived in the past as well as those from the present. Current tools and initiatives such as the Name Authority Component of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (NACO) and the Library of Congress Name Authority File have a specific mission and are partially helpful. Web resources encompassing special collections are often intricate and require global and enhanced resources to continue what have been the guiding principles, tradition, and value of cataloging: to discover works via many points of entry; to find works by or about the same person, topic, or title; and to continue the great cataloging legacies of standards and cooperation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 46(2002) no.3, S.xx-xx
  7. Willer, M.; Dunsire, G.: Bibliographic information organization in the Semantic Web (2013) 0.02
    0.018921783 = product of:
      0.11983797 = sum of:
        0.0503186 = weight(_text_:web in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0503186 = score(doc=2143,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.59793836 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
        0.0503186 = weight(_text_:web in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0503186 = score(doc=2143,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.59793836 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
        0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 2143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019200768 = score(doc=2143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 2143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2143)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    New technologies will underpin the future generation of library catalogues. To facilitate their role providing information, serving users, and fulfilling their mission as cultural heritage and memory institutions, libraries must take a technological leap; their standards and services must be transformed to those of the Semantic Web. Bibliographic Information Organization in the Semantic Web explores the technologies that may power future library catalogues, and argues the necessity of such a leap. The text introduces international bibliographic standards and models, and fundamental concepts in their representation in the context of the Semantic Web. Subsequent chapters cover bibliographic information organization, linked open data, methodologies for publishing library metadata, discussion of the wider environment (museum, archival and publishing communities) and users, followed by a conclusion.
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    RSWK
    Bibliografische Daten / Informationsmanagement / Semantic Web / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
    Bibliografische Daten / Semantic Web / Metadaten / Linked Data
    Subject
    Bibliografische Daten / Informationsmanagement / Semantic Web / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
    Bibliografische Daten / Semantic Web / Metadaten / Linked Data
    Semantic Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  8. Woitas, K.: Bibliografische Daten, Normdaten und Metadaten im Semantic Web : Konzepte der bibliografischen Kontrolle im Wandel (2010) 0.02
    0.017271245 = product of:
      0.10938455 = sum of:
        0.033924792 = weight(_text_:web in 115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033924792 = score(doc=115,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 115, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=115)
        0.033924792 = weight(_text_:web in 115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033924792 = score(doc=115,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 115, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=115)
        0.041534968 = weight(_text_:semantische in 115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041534968 = score(doc=115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2982984 = fieldWeight in 115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=115)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliografische Daten, Normdaten und Metadaten im Semantic Web - Konzepte der Bibliografischen Kontrolle im Wandel. Der Titel dieser Arbeit zielt in ein essentielles Feld der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, die Bibliografische Kontrolle. Als zweites zentrales Konzept wird der in der Weiterentwicklung des World Wide Webs (WWW) bedeutsame Begriff des Semantic Webs genannt. Auf den ersten Blick handelt es sich hier um einen ungleichen Wettstreit. Auf der einen Seite die Bibliografische Kontrolle, welche die Methoden und Mittel zur Erschließung von bibliothekarischen Objekten umfasst und traditionell in Form von formal-inhaltlichen Surrogaten in Katalogen daherkommt. Auf der anderen Seite das Buzzword Semantic Web mit seinen hochtrabenden Konnotationen eines durch Selbstreferenzialität "bedeutungstragenden", wenn nicht sogar "intelligenten" Webs. Wie kamen also eine wissenschaftliche Bibliothekarin und ein Mitglied des World Wide Web Consortiums 2007 dazu, gemeinsam einen Aufsatz zu publizieren und darin zu behaupten, das semantische Netz würde ein "bibliothekarischeres" Netz sein? Um sich dieser Frage zu nähern, soll zunächst kurz die historische Entwicklung der beiden Informationssphären Bibliothek und WWW gemeinsam betrachtet werden. Denn so oft - und völlig zurecht - die informationelle Revolution durch das Internet beschworen wird, so taucht auch immer wieder das Analogon einer weltweiten, virtuellen Bibliothek auf. Genauer gesagt, nahmen die theoretischen Überlegungen, die später zur Entwicklung des Internets führen sollten, ihren Ausgangspunkt (neben Kybernetik und entstehender Computertechnik) beim Konzept des Informationsspeichers Bibliothek.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  9. Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004) 0.02
    0.017176734 = product of:
      0.08158949 = sum of:
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
        0.012227853 = product of:
          0.024455706 = sum of:
            0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024455706 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 48(2004) no.1, S.12-19
  10. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.02
    0.017176734 = product of:
      0.08158949 = sum of:
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.012227853 = product of:
          0.024455706 = sum of:
            0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024455706 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 54(2010) no.2, S.90-114
  11. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.02
    0.017176734 = product of:
      0.08158949 = sum of:
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
        0.012227853 = product of:
          0.024455706 = sum of:
            0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024455706 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.3, S.187-208
  12. Poulter, A.: ¬The Internet as a tool for descriptive cataloging (1997) 0.02
    0.016067358 = product of:
      0.10175994 = sum of:
        0.024274603 = weight(_text_:web in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024274603 = score(doc=5111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
        0.024274603 = weight(_text_:web in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024274603 = score(doc=5111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
        0.053210735 = weight(_text_:services in 5111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053210735 = score(doc=5111,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.5620616 = fieldWeight in 5111, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5111)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the effects of the Internet on the work of descriptive cataloguer. Most of the effects stem from services available via the WWW and Web sites. These services either put the desriptive cataloguer in closer contact with suppliers, publishers, or vendors,or offer access to a vast range of reference or cataloguing information. Such services provided by the WWW will have a profound influence on the practice of descriptove cataloguing
  13. E-Serials cataloging : access to continuing and integrating resources via the catalog and the Web (2002) 0.02
    0.015862035 = product of:
      0.10045956 = sum of:
        0.036789242 = weight(_text_:web in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036789242 = score(doc=1443,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
        0.036789242 = weight(_text_:web in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036789242 = score(doc=1443,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    This unique collection examines the state of electronic serials cataloging with an emphasis an online accessibility. It presents a review of e-serials cataloging in the 1990s and discusses standards (ISSN, ISBD[ER], AACR2) that are applicable in current electronic library science. E-Serials Cataloging: Access to Continuing and Integrating Resources via the Catalog and the Web is a comprehensive reference for practicing librarians, catalogers, and administrators of technical services, cataloging and Service departments, and Web managers.
  14. Rees, L.B.; Clancy, B.A.: Cataloging electronic journals : learning to weave the Web (1998) 0.02
    0.01564548 = product of:
      0.09908804 = sum of:
        0.030343255 = weight(_text_:web in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030343255 = score(doc=3407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
        0.030343255 = weight(_text_:web in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030343255 = score(doc=3407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
        0.038401537 = weight(_text_:services in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038401537 = score(doc=3407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.405633 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Source
    Internet reference services quarterly. 3(1998) no.3, S.29-43
  15. Menzel, S.; Schnaitter, H.; Zinck, J.; Petras, V.; Neudecker, C.; Labusch, K.; Leitner, E.; Rehm, G.: Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND : das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten (2021) 0.01
    0.014055632 = product of:
      0.1335285 = sum of:
        0.07194068 = weight(_text_:semantische in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07194068 = score(doc=373,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.516668 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
        0.061587818 = weight(_text_:suche in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061587818 = score(doc=373,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12883182 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.4780482 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
    Abstract
    Named Entities (benannte Entitäten) - wie Personen, Organisationen, Orte, Ereignisse und Werke - sind wichtige inhaltstragende Komponenten eines Dokuments und sind daher maßgeblich für eine gute inhaltliche Erschließung. Die Erkennung von Named Entities, deren Auszeichnung (Annotation) und Verfügbarmachung für die Suche sind wichtige Instrumente, um Anwendungen wie z. B. die inhaltliche oder semantische Suche in Texten, dokumentübergreifende Kontextualisierung oder das automatische Textzusammenfassen zu verbessern. Inhaltlich präzise und nachhaltig erschlossen werden die erkannten Named Entities eines Dokuments allerdings erst, wenn sie mit einer oder mehreren Quellen verknüpft werden (Grundprinzip von Linked Data, Berners-Lee 2006), die die Entität eindeutig identifizieren und gegenüber gleichlautenden Entitäten disambiguieren (vergleiche z. B. Berlin als Hauptstadt Deutschlands mit dem Komponisten Irving Berlin). Dazu wird die im Dokument erkannte Entität mit dem Entitätseintrag einer Normdatei oder einer anderen zuvor festgelegten Wissensbasis (z. B. Gazetteer für geografische Entitäten) verknüpft, gewöhnlich über den persistenten Identifikator der jeweiligen Wissensbasis oder Normdatei. Durch die Verknüpfung mit einer Normdatei erfolgt nicht nur die Disambiguierung und Identifikation der Entität, sondern es wird dadurch auch Interoperabilität zu anderen Systemen hergestellt, in denen die gleiche Normdatei benutzt wird, z. B. die Suche nach der Hauptstadt Berlin in verschiedenen Datenbanken bzw. Portalen. Die Entitätenverknüpfung (Named Entity Linking, NEL) hat zudem den Vorteil, dass die Normdateien oftmals Relationen zwischen Entitäten enthalten, sodass Dokumente, in denen Named Entities erkannt wurden, zusätzlich auch im Kontext einer größeren Netzwerkstruktur von Entitäten verortet und suchbar gemacht werden können
    Theme
    Semantische Interoperabilität
  16. Yee, M.M.: Cataloging compared to descriptive bibliography, abstracting and indexing services, and metadata (2007) 0.01
    0.012709917 = product of:
      0.08049614 = sum of:
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
        0.03801558 = weight(_text_:services in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801558 = score(doc=267,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging is compared to descriptive bibliography, to enumerative bibliography and abstracting and indexing services, as well as to metadata created by Web search engines or nonprofessionals at sites such as Amazon.com. These four types of metadata are compared with regard to object of the description, functions, scope, number of copies examined, collective vs. individual creation, standardization, authority control, evidence, amount of descriptive detail, degression, time span the data is intended to last, and degree of evaluation.
  17. Ahmed, S.S.: ¬A study of cataloging department Websites of the Arabian Gulf Libraries (2004/05) 0.01
    0.012709917 = product of:
      0.08049614 = sum of:
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
        0.03801558 = weight(_text_:services in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03801558 = score(doc=730,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    Many libraries in the US provide information about their cataloging department homepages as segments of their technical services homepages. However, in case of the Arabian Gulf university libraries, all the library Websites focus on general collections and services available to their patrons and there is a lack of information on various departments within the library. Very few library Websites have information about the cataloging departments. Only the King Fand University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) library Website provides a separate Website for its Cataloging Operations Division. The study also found that the exploitation of Web-based cataloging resources by catalogers of the KFUPM library has resulted in enhancing the quality and efficiency of cataloging work.
  18. Bourdenet, P.: ¬The catalog resisting the Web : an historical perspective (2012) 0.01
    0.01261378 = product of:
      0.07988728 = sum of:
        0.030343255 = weight(_text_:web in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030343255 = score(doc=324,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
        0.030343255 = weight(_text_:web in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030343255 = score(doc=324,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
        0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019200768 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
      0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries are currently seeking to restructure their services and develop new cataloguing standards to position themselves on the web, which has become the main source of information and documents. The current upheaval within the profession is accompanied by the belief that libraries have a major role to play in identifying and supplying content due to their extensive high quality databases, which remain untapped despite efforts to increase catalog performance. They continue to rely on a strategy that has been proven successful since the mid-nineteenth century while seeking other models for their data. Today, they aim to exploit changes brought about by the web to improve content identification. The current intense debate on RDA implementation mirrors this desire for change. The debate is rooted in past efforts and yet tries to incite radical changes as it provides for interoperability from the creation of records through an object modeling in line with web standards and innovations. These innovations are presented through an historical perspective inspired by writings by librarians who are entrusted with helping in the development of bibliographic description standards.
  19. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.01
    0.0122690955 = product of:
      0.058278203 = sum of:
        0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0151716275 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
        0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0151716275 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
        0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019200768 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
        0.008734181 = product of:
          0.017468361 = sum of:
            0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017468361 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 48(2004) no.1, S.59-68
  20. Manning, R.W.: ¬The Anglo American Cataloguing Rules and their future (2000) 0.01
    0.0122690955 = product of:
      0.058278203 = sum of:
        0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0151716275 = score(doc=189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
        0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0151716275 = score(doc=189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
        0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019200768 = score(doc=189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
        0.008734181 = product of:
          0.017468361 = sum of:
            0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017468361 = score(doc=189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.21052632 = coord(4/19)
    
    Abstract
    The past, present, and future development of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is outlined with particular emphasis on the directions provided by the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR held in Toronto in October 1997. International cooperation as a significant element in the development and future of the code was highlighted. The Toronto conference, an invitational meeting attended by 65 cataloging experts, was undertaken by the Joint Steering Committee (JSC) as part of its ongoing mandate to respond to changing needs. Among the actions and recommendations resulting from the conference, the following were approved by JSC for immediate action: develop a mission statement for JSC; create a list of the principles of AACR2; pursue the recommendation that a logical analysis of the principles and structure on which AACR2 is based be undertaken; establish an AACR Web site; determine whether there are surveys on the use of AACR2 outside the Anglo-American community, and if no such survey exists, conduct such a survey; formulate the recommendations on serials endorsed during the conference and introduce them into the revision process; publicize and reaffirm JSC policies, procedures, activities, and the current process for submitting rule revision proposals; and solicit a proposal to revise rule 0.24. The international conference has helped JSC to develop a plan of action, which will test the applicability of AACR in current and future environments and balance the need for a sound and workable cataloging code with the cost of cataloging and change.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.129-134

Years

Languages

  • e 393
  • d 63
  • i 6
  • f 3
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • s 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 421
  • m 33
  • el 24
  • b 16
  • s 15
  • x 4
  • r 3
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects