-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.01
0.008154635 = product of:
0.051646024 = sum of:
0.021455921 = weight(_text_:web in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021455921 = score(doc=1781,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.021455921 = weight(_text_:web in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021455921 = score(doc=1781,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.008734181 = product of:
0.017468361 = sum of:
0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017468361 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
-
Bonn, G.S.: Relative usefulness of indexing and abstracting services (1950)
0.00
0.0032338137 = product of:
0.06144246 = sum of:
0.06144246 = weight(_text_:services in 6213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06144246 = score(doc=6213,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.6490128 = fieldWeight in 6213, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6213)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
-
Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006)
0.00
0.002940521 = product of:
0.02793495 = sum of:
0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019200768 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
0.008734181 = product of:
0.017468361 = sum of:
0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017468361 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.2, S.111-119
-
Chen, X.: Indexing consistency between online catalogues (2008)
0.00
0.0021860509 = product of:
0.041534968 = sum of:
0.041534968 = weight(_text_:semantische in 2209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041534968 = score(doc=2209,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.2982984 = fieldWeight in 2209, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2209)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Abstract
- In der globalen Online-Umgebung stellen viele bibliographische Dienstleistungen integrierten Zugang zu unterschiedlichen internetbasierten OPACs zur Verfügung. In solch einer Umgebung erwarten Benutzer mehr Übereinstimmungen innerhalb und zwischen den Systemen zu sehen. Zweck dieser Studie ist, die Indexierungskonsistenz zwischen Systemen zu untersuchen. Währenddessen werden einige Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen können, untersucht. Wichtigstes Ziel dieser Studie ist, die Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen herauszufinden, damit sinnvolle Vorschläge gemacht werden können, um die Indexierungskonsistenz zu verbessern. Eine Auswahl von 3307 Monographien wurde aus zwei chinesischen bibliographischen Katalogen gewählt. Nach Hooper's Formel war die durchschnittliche Indexierungskonsistenz für Indexterme 64,2% und für Klassennummern 61,6%. Nach Rolling's Formel war sie für Indexterme 70,7% und für Klassennummern 63,4%. Mehrere Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen, wurden untersucht: (1) Indexierungsbereite; (2) Indexierungsspezifizität; (3) Länge der Monographien; (4) Kategorie der Indexierungssprache; (5) Sachgebiet der Monographien; (6) Entwicklung von Disziplinen; (7) Struktur des Thesaurus oder der Klassifikation; (8) Erscheinungsjahr. Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen wurden ebenfalls analysiert. Die Analyse ergab: (1) den Indexieren mangelt es an Fachwissen, Vertrautheit mit den Indexierungssprachen und den Indexierungsregeln, so dass viele Inkonsistenzen verursacht wurden; (2) der Mangel an vereinheitlichten oder präzisen Regeln brachte ebenfalls Inkonsistenzen hervor; (3) verzögerte Überarbeitungen der Indexierungssprachen, Mangel an terminologischer Kontrolle, zu wenige Erläuterungen und "siehe auch" Referenzen, sowie die hohe semantische Freiheit bei der Auswahl von Deskriptoren oder Klassen, verursachten Inkonsistenzen.
-
Broxis, P.F.: ASSIA social science information service (1989)
0.00
0.0020211334 = product of:
0.038401537 = sum of:
0.038401537 = weight(_text_:services in 1511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038401537 = score(doc=1511,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.405633 = fieldWeight in 1511, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1511)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Abstract
- ASSIA (Applied Social Science Index and Abtracts) started in 1987 as a bimonthly indexing and abstracting service in the society field, aimed at practitioners as well as sociologists. Considers the following aspects of the service: arrangement of ASSIA; journal coverage; indexing approach; services for subscribers; and who are the users?
-
Chan, L.M.: Alphabetical arrangement and subject collocation in Library of Congress Subject Headings (1977)
0.00
0.0016169068 = product of:
0.03072123 = sum of:
0.03072123 = weight(_text_:services in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03072123 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 21(1977), S.156-169
-
Wilson, P.: ¬The end of specifity (1979)
0.00
0.0016169068 = product of:
0.03072123 = sum of:
0.03072123 = weight(_text_:services in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03072123 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 23(1979), S.116-122
-
Tonta, Y.: ¬A study of indexing consistency between Library of Congress and British Library catalogers (1991)
0.00
0.0016169068 = product of:
0.03072123 = sum of:
0.03072123 = weight(_text_:services in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03072123 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 35(1991), S.177-185
-
Edwards, S.: Indexing practices at the National Agricultural Library (1993)
0.00
0.0016169068 = product of:
0.03072123 = sum of:
0.03072123 = weight(_text_:services in 555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03072123 = score(doc=555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=555)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Abstract
- This article discusses indexing practices at the National Agriculture Library. Indexers at NAL scan over 2,200 incoming journals for input into its bibliographic database, AGRICOLA. The National Agriculture Library's coverage extends worldwide covering a broad range of agriculture subjects. Access to AGRICOLA occurs in several ways: onsite search, commercial vendors, Dialog Information Services, Inc. and BRS Information Technologies. The National Agricultural Library uses CAB THESAURUS to describe the subject content of articles in AGRICOLA.
-
Morris, L.R.: ¬The frequency of use of Library of Congress Classification numbers and Dewey Decimal Classification numbers in the MARC file in the field of library science (1991)
0.00
0.0014147937 = product of:
0.026881078 = sum of:
0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 2308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026881078 = score(doc=2308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2308)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Source
- Technical services quarterly. 8(1991) no.1, S.37-49
-
Iivonen, M.: Interindexer consistency and the indexing environment (1990)
0.00
0.0014147937 = product of:
0.026881078 = sum of:
0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026881078 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Abstract
- Considers the interindexer consistency between indexers working in various organisations and reports on the result of an empirical study. The interindexer consistency was low, but there were clear differences depending on whether the consistency was calculated on the basis to terms or concepts or aspects. The fact that the consistency figures remained low can be explained. The low indexing consistency caused by indexing errors also seems to be difficult to control. Indexing consistency and its control have a clear impact on how feasible and useful centralised services and union catalogues are and can be from the point of view of subject description.
-
Bellamy, L.M.; Bickham, L.: Thesaurus development for subject cataloging (1989)
0.00
0.0012126801 = product of:
0.023040922 = sum of:
0.023040922 = weight(_text_:services in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023040922 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Abstract
- The biomedical book collection in the Genetech Library and Information Services was first inventoried and cataloged in 1983 when it totaled about 2000 titles. Cataloging records were retrieved from the OCLC system and used as a basis for cataloging. A year of cataloging produced a list of 1900 subject terms. More than one term describing the same concept often appears on the list, and no hierarchical structure related the terms to one another. As the collection grew, the subject catalog became increasingly inconsistent. To bring consistency to subject cataloging, a thesaurus of biomedical terms was constructed using the list of subject headings as a basis. This thesaurus follows the broad categories of the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings and, with some exceptions, the Guidelines for the Establishment and Development of Monolingual Thesauri. It has enabled the cataloger in providing greater in-depth subject analysis of materials added to the collection and in consistently assigning subject headings to cataloging record.
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.00
0.001103265 = product of:
0.020962033 = sum of:
0.020962033 = product of:
0.041924067 = sum of:
0.041924067 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041924067 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Ansari, M.: Matching between assigned descriptors and title keywords in medical theses (2005)
0.00
0.0010105667 = product of:
0.019200768 = sum of:
0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019200768 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Abstract
- Purpose - To examine the degree of exact and partial match between the assigned descriptors and title keywords of medical theses written in Farsi and submitted for a PhD degree.Design/methodology/approach - A sample population of 506 theses in Pediatrics, Gynecology, Cardiology and Psychiatry was randomly picked out of a total of 909 indexed in the Indexing Department of the Central Library of the Iran University of Medical Science and Health Care Services. The results obtained are compared with those reported for other documents written in Farsi and English. Where applicable, the influence of the foreign language and its structure is commented on.Findings - It is shown that the degree of match between the assigned descriptors and the title keywords is greater than 70 per cent, equaling those reported for Farsi books and Michigan University Library catalogue in USA. It is also shown that the frequency of the match has increased since 1982, indicating that the authors have become more attentive in their choice of title.Research limitations/implications - Detailed analysis of results, however, shows significant differences between the degree of exact match amongst the four categories, with psychiatry theses that use more common terms showing highest exact match findings (50 per cent).Originality/value - This paper highlights the need for a closer collaboration with medical institutions for definition of approved terms and their incorporation in indexation in order to improve findings in various medical categories.
-
Ballard, R.M.: Indexing and its relevance to technical processing (1993)
0.00
0.0010105667 = product of:
0.019200768 = sum of:
0.019200768 = weight(_text_:services in 554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019200768 = score(doc=554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=554)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Abstract
- The development of regional on-line catalogs and in-house information systems for retrieval of references provide examples of the impact of indexing theory and applications on technical processing. More emphasis must be given to understanding the techniques for evaluating the effectiveness of a file, irrespective of whether that file was created as a library catalog or an index to information sources. The most significant advances in classification theory in recent decades has been as a result of efforts to improve effectiveness of indexing systems. Library classification systems are indexing languages or systems. Courses offered for the preparation of indexers in the United States and the United Kingdom are reviewed. A point of congruence for both the indexer and the library classifier would appear to be the need for a thorough preparation in the techniques of subject analysis. Any subject heading list will suffer from omissions as well as the inclusion of terms which the patron will never use. Indexing theory has provided the technical services department with methods for evaluation of effectiveness. The writer does not believe that these techniques are used, nor do current courses, workshops, and continuing education programs stress them. When theory is totally subjugated to practice, critical thinking and maximum effectiveness will suffer.
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.00
7.3550997E-4 = product of:
0.013974689 = sum of:
0.013974689 = product of:
0.027949378 = sum of:
0.027949378 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027949378 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.00
6.435712E-4 = product of:
0.012227853 = sum of:
0.012227853 = product of:
0.024455706 = sum of:
0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024455706 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.00
6.435712E-4 = product of:
0.012227853 = sum of:
0.012227853 = product of:
0.024455706 = sum of:
0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024455706 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.00
5.516325E-4 = product of:
0.010481017 = sum of:
0.010481017 = product of:
0.020962033 = sum of:
0.020962033 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020962033 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000)
0.00
5.516325E-4 = product of:
0.010481017 = sum of:
0.010481017 = product of:
0.020962033 = sum of:
0.020962033 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020962033 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.025786186 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
