Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Kognitive Modellierung des Abstracting (1991) 0.01
    0.0093203485 = product of:
      0.17708662 = sum of:
        0.17708662 = weight(_text_:modellierung in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17708662 = score(doc=23,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18558519 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.9542067 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1970778 = idf(docFreq=89, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
  2. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Ziegert, C.: SummIt-BMT : (Summarize It in BMT) in Diagnose und Therapie, Abschlussbericht (2002) 0.01
    0.0063565187 = product of:
      0.12077385 = sum of:
        0.12077385 = weight(_text_:ontologie in 4497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12077385 = score(doc=4497,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18041065 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.6694386 = fieldWeight in 4497, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4497)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    SummIt-BMT (Summarize It in Bone Marrow Transplantation) - das Zielsystem des Projektes - soll Ärzten in der Knochenmarktransplantation durch kognitiv fundiertes Zusammenfassen (Endres-Niggemeyer, 1998) aus dem WWW eine schnelle Informationsaufnahme ermöglichen. Im bmbffinanzierten Teilprojekt, über das hier zu berichten ist, liegt der Schwerpunkt auf den klinischen Fragestellungen. SummIt-BMT hat als zentrale Komponente eine KMT-Ontologie. Den Systemablauf veranschaulicht Abb. 1: Benutzer geben ihren Informationsbedarf in ein strukturiertes Szenario ein. Sie ziehen dazu Begriffe aus der Ontologie heran. Aus dem Szenario werden Fragen an Suchmaschinen abgeleitet. Die Summit-BMT-Metasuchmaschine stößt Google an und sucht in Medline, der zentralen Literaturdatenbank der Medizin. Das Suchergebnis wird aufbereitet. Dabei werden Links zu Volltexten verfolgt und die Volltexte besorgt. Die beschafften Dokumente werden mit einem Schlüsselwortretrieval auf Passagen untersucht, in denen sich Suchkonzepte aus der Frage / Ontologie häufen. Diese Passagen werden zum Zusammenfassen vorgeschlagen. In ihnen werden die Aussagen syntaktisch analysiert. Die Systemagenten untersuchen sie. Lassen Aussagen sich mit einer semantischen Relation an die Frage anbinden, tragen also zur deren Beantwortung bei, werden sie in die Zusammenfassung aufgenommen, es sei denn, andere Agenten machen Hinderungsgründe geltend, z.B. Redundanz. Das Ergebnis der Zusammenfassung wird in das Frage/Antwort-Szenario integriert. Präsentiert werden Exzerpte aus den Quelldokumenten. Mit einem Link vermitteln sie einen sofortigen Rückgriff auf die Quelle. SummIt-BMT ist zum nächsten Durchgang von Informationssuche und Zusammenfassung bereit, sobald der Benutzer dies wünscht.
  3. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.00
    0.004471638 = product of:
      0.04248056 = sum of:
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.02124028 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02124028 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    
  4. Ruda, S.: Abstracting: eine Auswahlbibliographie (1992) 0.00
    0.0030604713 = product of:
      0.058148954 = sum of:
        0.058148954 = weight(_text_:semantische in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058148954 = score(doc=6603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.41761774 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    Die vorliegende Auswahlbibliographie ist in 9 Themenbereiche unterteilt. Der erste Abschnitt enthält Literatur, in der auf Abstracts und Abstracting-Verfahren allgemein eingegangen und ein Überblick über den Stand der Forschung gegeben wird. Im nächsten Abschnitt werden solche Aufsätze referiert, die die historische Entwicklung des Abstracting beschreiben. Im dritten Teil sind Abstracting-Richtlinien verschiedener Institutionen aufgelistet. Lexikalische, syntaktische und semantische Textkondensierungsverfahren sind das Thema der in Abschnitt 4 präsentierten Arbeiten. Textstrukturen von Abstracts werden unter Punkt 5 betrachtet, und die Arbeiten des nächsten Themenbereiches befassen sich mit dem Problem des Schreibens von Abstracts. Der siebte Abschnitt listet sog. 'maschinelle' und maschinen-unterstützte Abstracting-Methoden auf. Anschließend werden 'maschinelle' und maschinenunterstützte Abstracting-Verfahren, Abstracts im Vergleich zu ihren Primärtexten sowie Abstracts im allgemeien bewertet. Den Abschluß bilden Bibliographien
  5. Abstracting and indexing services in perspective : Miles Conrad memorial lectures 1969-1983. Commemorating the twenty-fifth anniversary of the National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services (1983) 0.00
    0.002800565 = product of:
      0.053210735 = sum of:
        0.053210735 = weight(_text_:services in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053210735 = score(doc=689,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.5620616 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: BAKER, D.B.: Abstracting and indexing services: past, present, and future; KENNEDY, H.E.: A perspective on fifteen years in the abstracting and indexing field; WEIL, B.H.: Will abstracts survive technological developments? and will "cheaper is better" win out?; KILGOUR, F.G.: Comparative development of abstracting and indexing, and monograph cataloging; ROWLETT, R.J.: Abstracts, who needs them?
  6. Wellisch, H.H.: Indexing and abstracting 1977-1981 : an international bibliography (1984) 0.00
    0.0024253603 = product of:
      0.046081845 = sum of:
        0.046081845 = weight(_text_:services in 1453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046081845 = score(doc=1453,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.4867596 = fieldWeight in 1453, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1453)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Imprint
    Santa Barbara : ABC-Clio Information Services
  7. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003) 0.00
    0.0017149887 = product of:
      0.032584786 = sum of:
        0.032584786 = weight(_text_:services in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032584786 = score(doc=4913,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.344191 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Content
    Covers: indexing principles and practice; precoordinate indexes; consistency and quality of indexing; types and functions of abstracts; writing an abstract; evaluation theory and practice; approaches used in indexing and abstracting services; indexing enhancement; natural language in information retrieval; indexing and abstracting of imaginative works; databases of images and sound; automatic indexing and abstracting; the future of indexing and abstracting services
  8. Bakewell, K.G.B.; Rowland, G.: Indexing and abstracting (1993) 0.00
    0.0016169068 = product of:
      0.03072123 = sum of:
        0.03072123 = weight(_text_:services in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03072123 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of UK developments in indexing and abstracting druing the period 1986-1990 covering: bibliographies of indexing and abstracting; British standards (including the revised British Standard on indexing, BS 3700); Wheatley Medal and Carey Award; a list of indexes published during this period; the role of the computer and automatic indexing; hypermedia; PRECIS; POPSI, relational indexing; thesauri; education and training; the indexing process, newspaper indexing; fiction indexes; the indexing profession; and a review of abstracting and indexing services
  9. Armstrong, C.J.; Wheatley, A.: Writing abstracts for online databases : results of database producers' guidelines (1998) 0.00
    0.0014147937 = product of:
      0.026881078 = sum of:
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on one area of research in an Electronic Libraries Programme (eLib) MODELS (MOving to Distributed Environments for Library Services) supporting study in 3 investigative areas: examination of current database producers' guidelines for their abstract writers; a brief survey of abstracts in some traditional online databases; and a detailed survey of abstracts from 3 types of electronic database (print sourced online databases, Internet subject trees or directories, and Internet gateways). Examination of database producers' guidelines, reported here, gave a clear view of the intentions behind professionally produced traditional (printed index based) database abstracts and provided a benchmark against which to judge the conclusions of the larger investigations into abstract style, readability and content
  10. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.00
    0.0012126801 = product of:
      0.023040922 = sum of:
        0.023040922 = weight(_text_:services in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023040922 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Indexing principles, Indexing practice, Precoordinate indexes, Consistency of indexing, Quality of indexing, Abstracts: types and functions, Writing the Abstract, Evaluation aspects, Approaches used in indexing and abstracting services, Enhancing the indexing, On the indexing and abstracting of imaginative works, Indexing multimedia sources, Texte searching, Automatic indexing, automatic abstracting, and related procedures, Indexing and the Internet, The future of indexing and abstracting, exercises in indexing and abstracting
  11. Parekh, R.L.: Advanced indexing and abstracting practices (2000) 0.00
    0.0012126801 = product of:
      0.023040922 = sum of:
        0.023040922 = weight(_text_:services in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023040922 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Indexing and Abstracting 2. Automatic Indexing and Automatic Abstracting 3. Principles of Indexing 4.Periodicals Listing and Accessioning 5. Online Computer Service 6. Dialog, Searching and Bibliographic Display 7. Books 8. Bibliographic Control 9. Abstracting Functions 10. Acquisition System 11. Future of Indexing and Abstracting Services
  12. Cross, C.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬A genre analysis of scientific abstracts (2006) 0.00
    0.0011433258 = product of:
      0.02172319 = sum of:
        0.02172319 = weight(_text_:services in 5603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02172319 = score(doc=5603,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.22946067 = fieldWeight in 5603, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5603)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to analyse the structure of a small number of abstracts that have appeared in the CABI database over a number of years, during which time the authorship of the abstracts changed from CABI editorial staff to journal article authors themselves. This paper reports a study of the semantic organisation and thematic structure of 12 abstracts from the field of protozoology in an effort to discover whether these abstracts followed generally agreed abstracting guidelines. Design/methodology/approach - The method adopted was a move analysis of the text of the abstracts. This move analysis revealed a five-move pattern: move 1 situates the research within the scientific community; move 2 introduces the research by either describing the main features of the research or presenting its purpose; move 3 describes the methodology; move 4 states the results; and move 5 draws conclusions or suggests practical applications. Findings - Thematic analysis shows that scientific abstract authors thematise their subject by referring to the discourse domain or the "real" world. Not all of the abstracts succeeded in following the guideline advice. However, there was general consistency regarding semantic organisation and thematic structure. Research limitations/implications - The research limitations were the small number of abstracts examined, from just one subject domain. Practical limitations - The practical implications are the need for abstracting services to be clearer and more prescriptive regarding how they want abstracts to be structured as the lack of formal training in abstract writing increases the risk of subjectivity and verbosity and reduces clarity in scientific abstracts. Another implication of the research are that abstracting and indexing services must ensure that they maintain abstract quality if they introduce policies of accepting author abstracts. This is important as there is probably little formal training in abstract writing for science students at present. Recommendations for further research are made. Originality/value - This paper reports a study of the semantic organisation and thematic structure of 12 abstracts from the field of protozoology.
  13. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.00
    9.1938744E-4 = product of:
      0.017468361 = sum of:
        0.017468361 = product of:
          0.034936722 = sum of:
            0.034936722 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034936722 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  14. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.00
    7.3550997E-4 = product of:
      0.013974689 = sum of:
        0.013974689 = product of:
          0.027949378 = sum of:
            0.027949378 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027949378 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  15. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    5.516325E-4 = product of:
      0.010481017 = sum of:
        0.010481017 = product of:
          0.020962033 = sum of:
            0.020962033 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020962033 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  16. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00
    5.516325E-4 = product of:
      0.010481017 = sum of:
        0.010481017 = product of:
          0.020962033 = sum of:
            0.020962033 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020962033 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  17. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.00
    5.516325E-4 = product of:
      0.010481017 = sum of:
        0.010481017 = product of:
          0.020962033 = sum of:
            0.020962033 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020962033 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  18. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    4.5969372E-4 = product of:
      0.008734181 = sum of:
        0.008734181 = product of:
          0.017468361 = sum of:
            0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017468361 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356