Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.02 
    0.016396767 = product of:
  0.15576929 = sum of:
    0.058148954 = weight(_text_:semantische in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058148954 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.41761774 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
    0.09762034 = weight(_text_:ontologie in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09762034 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18041065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.54110074 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
  0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
  2. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008) 0.01 
    0.014054374 = product of:
  0.13351655 = sum of:
    0.049841963 = weight(_text_:semantische in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049841963 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.35795808 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
    0.08367458 = weight(_text_:ontologie in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08367458 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18041065 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.46380067 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
  0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
  3. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01 
    0.009943464 = product of:
  0.09446291 = sum of:
    0.08223505 = weight(_text_:semantische in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08223505 = score(doc=4792,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.5906007 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
    0.012227853 = product of:
      0.024455706 = sum of:
        0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024455706 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  4. Panzer, M.: Semantische Integration heterogener und unterschiedlichsprachiger Wissensorganisationssysteme : CrissCross und jenseits (2008) 0.01 
    0.009926007 = product of:
  0.09429707 = sum of:
    0.05873932 = weight(_text_:semantische in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05873932 = score(doc=4335,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.42185766 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
    0.035557743 = weight(_text_:suche in 4335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035557743 = score(doc=4335,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12883182 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.27600124 = fieldWeight in 4335, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4335)
  0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    Abstract
    Klassische bibliothekarische Indexierungswerkzeuge werden bis heute nur selten fürs Retrieval nutzbar gemacht; die Wichtigkeit, verschiedene dieser Vokabularien zu harmonisieren und integriert zu verwenden, ist noch immer keine Selbstverständlichkeit. Im Rahmen des DFG-Projektes "CrissCross" wird, ausgehend von der deutschen Ausgabe der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation, eine Verknüpfung zwischen der DDC und der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) aufgebaut, um eine verbale Suche über klassifikatorisch erschlossene Bestände zu ermöglichen. Als Verbreiterung der Basis des verbalen Zugriffs wird außerdem das Mapping der amerikanischen LCSH und des französischen RAMEAU angestrebt. Nach einer kurzen Vorstellung von CrissCross und der Abgrenzung gegenüber ähnlichen Unterfangen werden Rückwirkungen semantischer Integration auf die verknüpften Vokabulare diskutiert. Wie müssen und können sich z.B. Thesauri verändern, wenn sie mit anderen (strukturheterologen) Systemen verknüpft sind? Dabei liegt ein Schwerpunkt der Analyse auf dem semantischen Verhältnis üblicher Mappingrelationen zu den verknüpften Begriffen (besonders im Hinblick auf Polysemie). Außerdem wird der Mehrwert fürs Retrieval auf der Basis solcher Wissensorganisationssysteme, z.B. durch automatisierten Zugriff über Ontologien, diskutiert.
    Theme
    Semantische Interoperabilität
  5. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.01 
    0.006170121 = product of:
  0.039077435 = sum of:
    0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0151716275 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
    0.0151716275 = weight(_text_:web in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0151716275 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
    0.008734181 = product of:
      0.017468361 = sum of:
        0.017468361 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017468361 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.15789473 = coord(3/19)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the concepts, component parts and relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (KGs) from the perspectives of data and knowledge transitions. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses conceptual analysis methods. This study focuses on distinguishing concepts and analyzing composition and intercorrelations to explore data and knowledge transitions. Findings Vocabularies are the cornerstone for accurately building understanding of the meaning of data. Vocabularies provide for a data-sharing model and play an important role in supporting the semantic expression of linked data and defining the schema layer; they are also used for entity recognition, alignment and linkage for KGs. KGs, which consist of a schema layer and a data layer, are presented as cubes that organically combine vocabularies, linked data and big data. Originality/value This paper first describes the composition of vocabularies, linked data and KGs. More importantly, this paper innovatively analyzes and summarizes the interrelatedness of these factors, which comes from frequent interactions between data and knowledge. The three factors empower each other and can ultimately empower the Semantic Web.
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  6. Dietze, J.: ¬Die semantische Struktur der Thesauruslexik (1988) 0.01 
    0.0061209425 = product of:
  0.11629791 = sum of:
    0.11629791 = weight(_text_:semantische in 6051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11629791 = score(doc=6051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13923967 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.8352355 = fieldWeight in 6051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.399778 = idf(docFreq=542, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6051)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
  7. Körner, H.G.: Syntax und Gewichtung in Informationssprachen : Ein Fortschrittsbericht über präzisere Indexierung und Computer-Suche (1985) 0.01 
    0.0052400883 = product of:
  0.09956168 = sum of:
    0.09956168 = weight(_text_:suche in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09956168 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12883182 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.7728035 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.996156 = idf(docFreq=812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
  8. Khoo, S.G.; Na, J.-C.: Semantic relations in information science (2006) 0.00 
    0.001916416 = product of:
  0.018205952 = sum of:
    0.009102976 = weight(_text_:web in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009102976 = score(doc=1978,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
    0.009102976 = weight(_text_:web in 1978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009102976 = score(doc=1978,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08415349 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.025786186 = queryNorm
        0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 1978, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1978)
  0.10526316 = coord(2/19)
    Abstract
    This chapter examines the nature of semantic relations and their main applications in information science. The nature and types of semantic relations are discussed from the perspectives of linguistics and psychology. An overview of the semantic relations used in knowledge structures such as thesauri and ontologies is provided, as well as the main techniques used in the automatic extraction of semantic relations from text. The chapter then reviews the use of semantic relations in information extraction, information retrieval, question-answering, and automatic text summarization applications. Concepts and relations are the foundation of knowledge and thought. When we look at the world, we perceive not a mass of colors but objects to which we automatically assign category labels. Our perceptual system automatically segments the world into concepts and categories. Concepts are the building blocks of knowledge; relations act as the cement that links concepts into knowledge structures. We spend much of our lives identifying regular associations and relations between objects, events, and processes so that the world has an understandable structure and predictability. Our lives and work depend on the accuracy and richness of this knowledge structure and its web of relations. Relations are needed for reasoning and inferencing. Chaffin and Herrmann (1988b, p. 290) noted that "relations between ideas have long been viewed as basic to thought, language, comprehension, and memory." Aristotle's Metaphysics (Aristotle, 1961; McKeon, expounded on several types of relations. The majority of the 30 entries in a section of the Metaphysics known today as the Philosophical Lexicon referred to relations and attributes, including cause, part-whole, same and opposite, quality (i.e., attribute) and kind-of, and defined different types of each relation. Hume (1955) pointed out that there is a connection between successive ideas in our minds, even in our dreams, and that the introduction of an idea in our mind automatically recalls an associated idea. He argued that all the objects of human reasoning are divided into relations of ideas and matters of fact and that factual reasoning is founded on the cause-effect relation. His Treatise of Human Nature identified seven kinds of relations: resemblance, identity, relations of time and place, proportion in quantity or number, degrees in quality, contrariety, and causation. Mill (1974, pp. 989-1004) discoursed on several types of relations, claiming that all things are either feelings, substances, or attributes, and that attributes can be a quality (which belongs to one object) or a relation to other objects.
  9. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.00 
    0.0012871424 = product of:
  0.024455706 = sum of:
    0.024455706 = product of:
      0.04891141 = sum of:
        0.04891141 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04891141 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  10. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.00 
    0.0010401682 = product of:
  0.019763196 = sum of:
    0.019763196 = product of:
      0.03952639 = sum of:
        0.03952639 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03952639 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  11. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.00 
    9.1938744E-4 = product of:
  0.017468361 = sum of:
    0.017468361 = product of:
      0.034936722 = sum of:
        0.034936722 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034936722 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  12. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.00 
    6.435712E-4 = product of:
  0.012227853 = sum of:
    0.012227853 = product of:
      0.024455706 = sum of:
        0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024455706 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  13. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.00 
    6.435712E-4 = product of:
  0.012227853 = sum of:
    0.012227853 = product of:
      0.024455706 = sum of:
        0.024455706 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024455706 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  14. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.00 
    5.516325E-4 = product of:
  0.010481017 = sum of:
    0.010481017 = product of:
      0.020962033 = sum of:
        0.020962033 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020962033 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  15. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.00 
    3.217856E-4 = product of:
  0.0061139264 = sum of:
    0.0061139264 = product of:
      0.012227853 = sum of:
        0.012227853 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012227853 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes