Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Liu, X."
  1. Liu, X.; Turtle, H.: Real-time user interest modeling for real-time ranking (2013) 0.02
    0.021566015 = product of:
      0.04313203 = sum of:
        0.02721381 = product of:
          0.05442762 = sum of:
            0.05442762 = weight(_text_:media in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05442762 = score(doc=1035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015918218 = product of:
          0.031836435 = sum of:
            0.031836435 = weight(_text_:28 in 1035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031836435 = score(doc=1035,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 1035, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1035)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    User interest as a very dynamic information need is often ignored in most existing information retrieval systems. In this research, we present the results of experiments designed to evaluate the performance of a real-time interest model (RIM) that attempts to identify the dynamic and changing query level interests regarding social media outputs. Unlike most existing ranking methods, our ranking approach targets calculation of the probability that user interest in the content of the document is subject to very dynamic user interest change. We describe 2 formulations of the model (real-time interest vector space and real-time interest language model) stemming from classical relevance ranking methods and develop a novel methodology for evaluating the performance of RIM using Amazon Mechanical Turk to collect (interest-based) relevance judgments on a daily basis. Our results show that the model usually, although not always, performs better than baseline results obtained from commercial web search engines. We identify factors that affect RIM performance and outline plans for future research.
    Date
    28. 7.2013 12:59:19
  2. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01
    0.008489138 = product of:
      0.033956554 = sum of:
        0.033956554 = product of:
          0.05093483 = sum of:
            0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025582481 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
            0.02535235 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535235 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:07
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  3. Liu, X.; Guo, C.; Zhang, L.: Scholar metadata and knowledge generation with human and artificial intelligence (2014) 0.01
    0.0068034525 = product of:
      0.02721381 = sum of:
        0.02721381 = product of:
          0.05442762 = sum of:
            0.05442762 = weight(_text_:media in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05442762 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Scholar metadata have traditionally centered on descriptive representations, which have been used as a foundation for scholarly publication repositories and academic information retrieval systems. In this article, we propose innovative and economic methods of generating knowledge-based structural metadata (structural keywords) using a combination of natural language processing-based machine-learning techniques and human intelligence. By allowing low-barrier participation through a social media system, scholars (both as authors and users) can participate in the metadata editing and enhancing process and benefit from more accurate and effective information retrieval. Our experimental web system ScholarWiki uses machine learning techniques, which automatically produce increasingly refined metadata by learning from the structural metadata contributed by scholars. The cumulated structural metadata add intelligence and automatically enhance and update recursively the quality of metadata, wiki pages, and the machine-learning model.
  4. Liu, X.; Jia, H.: Answering academic questions for education by recommending cyberlearning resources (2013) 0.00
    0.0039795544 = product of:
      0.015918218 = sum of:
        0.015918218 = product of:
          0.031836435 = sum of:
            0.031836435 = weight(_text_:28 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031836435 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2013 13:52:25
  5. Liu, X.; Bu, Y.; Li, M.; Li, J.: Monodisciplinary collaboration disrupts science more than multidisciplinary collaboration (2024) 0.00
    0.0039795544 = product of:
      0.015918218 = sum of:
        0.015918218 = product of:
          0.031836435 = sum of:
            0.031836435 = weight(_text_:28 in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031836435 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7. 1.2024 18:28:33
  6. Zhang, C.; Liu, X.; Xu, Y.(C.); Wang, Y.: Quality-structure index : a new metric to measure scientific journal influence (2011) 0.00
    0.0033162953 = product of:
      0.013265181 = sum of:
        0.013265181 = product of:
          0.026530363 = sum of:
            0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 4366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026530363 = score(doc=4366,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 4366, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4366)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2011 19:36:28
  7. Liu, X.: ¬The standardization of Chinese library classification (1993) 0.00
    0.0025582481 = product of:
      0.0102329925 = sum of:
        0.0102329925 = product of:
          0.030698977 = sum of:
            0.030698977 = weight(_text_:29 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030698977 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:29:26
  8. Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Janssens, F.; Glänzel, W.; Moreau, Y.; Moor, B.de: Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database (2010) 0.00
    0.0025582481 = product of:
      0.0102329925 = sum of:
        0.0102329925 = product of:
          0.030698977 = sum of:
            0.030698977 = weight(_text_:29 in 3464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030698977 = score(doc=3464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3464)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2010 9:29:57
  9. Clewley, N.; Chen, S.Y.; Liu, X.: Cognitive styles and search engine preferences : field dependence/independence vs holism/serialism (2010) 0.00
    0.0021318735 = product of:
      0.008527494 = sum of:
        0.008527494 = product of:
          0.025582481 = sum of:
            0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025582481 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 13:11:47
  10. Jiang, Z.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.: Recovering uncaptured citations in a scholarly network : a two-step citation analysis to estimate publication importance (2016) 0.00
    0.0021318735 = product of:
      0.008527494 = sum of:
        0.008527494 = product of:
          0.025582481 = sum of:
            0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025582481 = score(doc=3018,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    12. 6.2016 20:31:29