Search (6521 results, page 1 of 327)

0.1292747 = product of:
  0.17236626 = sum of:
    0.102629706 = product of:
      0.20525941 = sum of:
        0.20525941 = weight(_text_:media in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20525941 = score(doc=4694,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            1.1709678 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.04244858 = product of:
      0.08489716 = sum of:
        0.08489716 = weight(_text_:28 in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08489716 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02728798 = product of:
      0.08186394 = sum of:
        0.08186394 = weight(_text_:29 in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08186394 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Date

21. 4.2000 12:29:28

0.06611043 = product of:
  0.13222086 = sum of:
    0.037142508 = product of:
      0.074285015 = sum of:
        0.074285015 = weight(_text_:28 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074285015 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.09507835 = product of:
      0.14261752 = sum of:
        0.07163094 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07163094 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
        0.07098658 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07098658 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

21. 4.2002 9:29:38

Source

Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28

0.061345123 = product of:
  0.081793495 = sum of:
    0.060000814 = product of:
      0.12000163 = sum of:
        0.12000163 = weight(_text_:media in 1199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12000163 = score(doc=1199,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.6845876 = fieldWeight in 1199, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013265181 = product of:
      0.026530363 = sum of:
        0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 1199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026530363 = score(doc=1199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 1199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008527494 = product of:
      0.025582481 = sum of:
        0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 1199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025582481 = score(doc=1199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1199)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Readership popularity has been an important proxy for success for many emerging online interactive media sites. Given the exponential growth of new web applications and services, and the intense competition among them, attaining and retaining popularity are difficult. One possible approach to this problem is to enhance the competitiveness of a web presence by using appropriate web design mechanisms. Research in this area has mainly focused on technological issues and usability studies. Few studies have paid attention to the socially constructed meaning (cognition) that is embedded in the context of media. Drawing on the heuristic model from the social cognition perspective, the author posits that source credibility and content freshness are two important media-embedded heuristics potentially influential to the readership popularity of online interactive media sites. The content analysis results of 100 leading weblogs strongly supported this hypotheses. Key quantitative findings were also consistent with the qualitative evidence provided by 28 expert practitioners. This study expands our understanding of the related constructs from a social cognition perspective and calls for design attention to influential media-embedded traits when developing online interactive media and related websites.

Date

29. 1.2014 16:36:48

0.052424937 = product of:
  0.06989992 = sum of:
    0.022678176 = product of:
      0.045356352 = sum of:
        0.045356352 = weight(_text_:media in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045356352 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013265181 = product of:
      0.026530363 = sum of:
        0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026530363 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.033956554 = product of:
      0.05093483 = sum of:
        0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025582481 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.02535235 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02535235 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22
12. 3.2021 18:41:28

0.04992907 = product of:
  0.09985814 = sum of:
    0.07257016 = product of:
      0.14514032 = sum of:
        0.14514032 = weight(_text_:media in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14514032 = score(doc=1720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02728798 = product of:
      0.08186394 = sum of:
        0.08186394 = weight(_text_:29 in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08186394 = score(doc=1720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Educational media international. 29(1992) no.3, S.181-188

0.04871913 = product of:
  0.09743826 = sum of:
    0.076972276 = product of:
      0.15394455 = sum of:
        0.15394455 = weight(_text_:media in 5416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15394455 = score(doc=5416,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.87822586 = fieldWeight in 5416, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.020465985 = product of:
      0.061397955 = sum of:
        0.061397955 = weight(_text_:29 in 5416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061397955 = score(doc=5416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5416)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

COMPASS

Multi-media / Trades

Date

29. 7.2002 11:50:42

Subject

Multi-media / Trades

0.048170596 = product of:
  0.09634119 = sum of:
    0.07776994 = product of:
      0.15553989 = sum of:
        0.15553989 = weight(_text_:media in 452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15553989 = score(doc=452,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.88732696 = fieldWeight in 452, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=452)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.018571254 = product of:
      0.037142508 = sum of:
        0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037142508 = score(doc=452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=452)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Examines the assumption that people want to be presented with as many different media as are possible in a given application. Reports on an exploratory study designed to assess the media preferences og the 'person on the street' when presented with the choice of 7 different media combinations to find out some unknown thing in a public space. Findings suggests that people do not always prefer to access as many different media as are available. There was a bias toward having some media combination that includes graphics, but there was also some bias against having information presented using sound in a public space

Date

1. 8.1996 10:11:28

0.047221735 = product of:
  0.09444347 = sum of:
    0.026530363 = product of:
      0.053060725 = sum of:
        0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053060725 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.06791311 = product of:
      0.10186966 = sum of:
        0.051164962 = weight(_text_:29 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051164962 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
        0.0507047 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0507047 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

29. 8.2005 12:54:22

0.046897225 = product of:
  0.09379445 = sum of:
    0.07257016 = product of:
      0.14514032 = sum of:
        0.14514032 = weight(_text_:media in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14514032 = score(doc=4792,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02122429 = product of:
      0.04244858 = sum of:
        0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04244858 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Proposes a theoretical framework for organizing information and activities in educational hypermedia systems. Focuses on the content that can be represented within a physical media, rather than the physical media itself. Proposes a theory of cognitive media types based on the inferential and learning processes of human users. Presents an implemented computer system, called AlgoNet, that supports hypermedia information access and constructive learning activities for self paced learning in computer and engineering disciplines

Date

1. 8.1996 10:11:28

0.04669439 = product of:
  0.06225919 = sum of:
    0.031749446 = product of:
      0.06349889 = sum of:
        0.06349889 = weight(_text_:media in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06349889 = score(doc=782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.018571254 = product of:
      0.037142508 = sum of:
        0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037142508 = score(doc=782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01193849 = product of:
      0.03581547 = sum of:
        0.03581547 = weight(_text_:29 in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03581547 = score(doc=782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

The vast, uncontrolled, mass of data available on the Internet poses specific problems for librarians, and in particular for cataloguers. In addition to problems of scale, quality and stability of the information available electronically, the British Library has concerns peculiar to a national archive. The Electronic Media Group (EMG) within the Cataloguing Department at the British Library has been addressing some of these issues while investigating the cataloguing of works in new forms. Outlines some of the problems addressed and gives brief overviews of similar work and experiments discivered by the EMG as being conducted by other cataloguers and information scientists in this field

Date

28. 1.2007 18:29:10

0.04574679 = product of:
  0.060995717 = sum of:
    0.03927975 = product of:
      0.0785595 = sum of:
        0.0785595 = weight(_text_:media in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0785595 = score(doc=3698,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.44816777 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013265181 = product of:
      0.026530363 = sum of:
        0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026530363 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008450784 = product of:
      0.02535235 = sum of:
        0.02535235 = weight(_text_:22 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02535235 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Although bibliographic classifications usually adopt a perspective different from that of object classifications, the two have obvious relationships. These become especially relevant when users are looking for knowledge scattered in a wide variety of forms and media. This is an increasingly common situation, as library catalogues now coexist in the global digital environment with catalogues of archives, of museums, of commercial products, and many other information resources. In order to make the subject content of all these resources searchable, a broader conception of classification is needed, that can be applied to an knowledge item, rather than only bibliographic materials. To illustrate this we take an example of the research on bagpipes in Northern Italian folklore. For this kind of research, the most effective search strategy is a cross-media one, looking for many different knowledge sources such as published documents, police archives, painting details, museum specimens, organizations devoted to related subjects. To provide satisfying results for this kind of search, the traditional disciplinary approach to classification is not sufficient. Tools are needed in which knowledge items dealing with a phenomenon of interest can be retrieved independently from the other topics with which it is combined, the disciplinary context, and the medium where it occurs. This can be made possible if the basic units of classification are taken to be the phenomena treated, as recommended in the León Manifesto, rather than disciplines or other aspect features. The concept of bagpipes should be retrievable and browsable in any combination with other phenomena, disciplines, media etc. Examples are given of information sources that could be managed by this freely-faceted technique of classification.

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28
22. 7.2010 20:40:08

0.045336965 = product of:
  0.09067393 = sum of:
    0.06414357 = product of:
      0.12828714 = sum of:
        0.12828714 = weight(_text_:media in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12828714 = score(doc=1563,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.7318549 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.026530363 = product of:
      0.053060725 = sum of:
        0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053060725 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Analyses the characteristics of audiovisual media, and describes the photographic collection of the Landesmuseum, which comprises half a million items. Outlines the computerizes cataloguing system which allows the catalogue entries to be integrated with records of other media on a single database

Date

28. 1.1996 19:47:56

0.045307785 = product of:
  0.09061557 = sum of:
    0.03628508 = product of:
      0.07257016 = sum of:
        0.07257016 = weight(_text_:media in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07257016 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.05433049 = product of:
      0.08149573 = sum of:
        0.04093197 = weight(_text_:29 in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04093197 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
        0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04056376 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Selecting electronic resources requires both a policy statement to guide collection development and management and procedures to manage the process of selecting and handling these resources. Both policy and procedures must be crafted in response to local priorities, resources, limitations, and organizational structure. This paper examines issues that should be addressed when developing local procedures. Particular emphasis is given to preparing a mechanism to guide selection between various media and modes of information delivery-is explored.

Date

13. 1.2007 18:29:24

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.9-24

0.04496892 = product of:
  0.059958562 = sum of:
    0.02721381 = product of:
      0.05442762 = sum of:
        0.05442762 = weight(_text_:media in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05442762 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.022511758 = product of:
      0.045023516 = sum of:
        0.045023516 = weight(_text_:28 in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045023516 = score(doc=1160,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.3358372 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0102329925 = product of:
      0.030698977 = sum of:
        0.030698977 = weight(_text_:29 in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030698977 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

Designing systematic access to Internet resources is a major item an the agenda of researchers and practitioners in the field of information science, and is the focus of this study. A critical analysis of classification schemes used in major portals and Web classified directories exposes inconsistencies in the way they classify Internet resources. The inconsistencies indicate that the developers fall to differentiate the various classificatory models, and are unaware of their different rationales. The study establishes eight classificatory models for resources available to Internet users. Internet resources can be classified by subjects, objects, applications, users, locations, reference sources, media, and languages. The first five models are contentrelated; namely they characterize the content of the resource. The other three models are formst-related; namely they characterize the format of the resource or its technological infrastructure. The study identifies and formulates the eight classificatory models, analyzes their rationales, and discusses alternative ways to combine them in a faceted integrated classification scheme.

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28

Source

Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.1, S.20-28

0.043687936 = product of:
  0.08737587 = sum of:
    0.06349889 = product of:
      0.12699778 = sum of:
        0.12699778 = weight(_text_:media in 1719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12699778 = score(doc=1719,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.7244994 = fieldWeight in 1719, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1719)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02387698 = product of:
      0.07163094 = sum of:
        0.07163094 = weight(_text_:29 in 1719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07163094 = score(doc=1719,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 1719, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1719)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Educational technology and training international. 29(1992) no.4, S.342-349

0.043687936 = product of:
  0.08737587 = sum of:
    0.06349889 = product of:
      0.12699778 = sum of:
        0.12699778 = weight(_text_:media in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12699778 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.7244994 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02387698 = product of:
      0.07163094 = sum of:
        0.07163094 = weight(_text_:29 in 5406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07163094 = score(doc=5406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5406)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Pages

S.3-29

Source

Information society: new media, ethics and postmodernism. Ed. K.S. Gill

0.043687936 = product of:
  0.08737587 = sum of:
    0.06349889 = product of:
      0.12699778 = sum of:
        0.12699778 = weight(_text_:media in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12699778 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.7244994 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02387698 = product of:
      0.07163094 = sum of:
        0.07163094 = weight(_text_:29 in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07163094 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Journal of educational media and library sciences. 36(1998) no.1, S.20-29

0.043585353 = product of:
  0.087170705 = sum of:
    0.053060725 = product of:
      0.10612145 = sum of:
        0.10612145 = weight(_text_:28 in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10612145 = score(doc=2863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.79157585 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.034109976 = product of:
      0.102329925 = sum of:
        0.102329925 = weight(_text_:29 in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102329925 = score(doc=2863,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.77730644 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

RTSD newsletter. 12(1987) Summer, S.28-29

0.04313203 = product of:
  0.08626406 = sum of:
    0.05442762 = product of:
      0.10885524 = sum of:
        0.10885524 = weight(_text_:media in 711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10885524 = score(doc=711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.62099946 = fieldWeight in 711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=711)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.031836435 = product of:
      0.06367287 = sum of:
        0.06367287 = weight(_text_:28 in 711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06367287 = score(doc=711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=711)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Examines the value of compact discs comparing them with other storage media in terms of costs, currency, impact on the workplace, utility and longevity

Source

Inspel. 28(1994) no.3, S.382-389

0.042173084 = product of:
  0.08434617 = sum of:
    0.030015677 = product of:
      0.060031354 = sum of:
        0.060031354 = weight(_text_:28 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060031354 = score(doc=1628,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.4477829 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.05433049 = product of:
      0.08149573 = sum of:
        0.04093197 = weight(_text_:29 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04093197 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
        0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04056376 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

28. 1.1996 18:28:54
29. 7.1998 10:57:22