Search (98 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Glaesener, L.: Automatisches Indexieren einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank mit Mehrwortgruppen (2012) 0.03 
    0.03497337 = product of:
  0.13989349 = sum of:
    0.13989349 = product of:
      0.20984022 = sum of:
        0.16927646 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16927646 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26771787 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.63229424 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
        0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04056376 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Ein Bericht über die Ergebnisse und die Prozessanalyse einer automatischen Indexierung mit Mehrwortgruppen. Diese Bachelorarbeit beschreibt, inwieweit der Inhalt informationswissenschaftlicher Fachtexte durch informationswissenschaftliches Fachvokabular erschlossen werden kann und sollte und dass in diesen wissenschaftlichen Texten ein Großteil der fachlichen Inhalte in Mehrwortgruppen vorkommt. Die Ergebnisse wurden durch eine automatische Indexierung mit Mehrwortgruppen mithilfe des Programme Lingo an einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank ermittelt.
    Date
    11. 9.2012 19:43:22
  2. Lepsky, K.: Automatisches Indexieren (2023) 0.03 
    0.030655399 = product of:
  0.122621596 = sum of:
    0.122621596 = product of:
      0.1839324 = sum of:
        0.14811692 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14811692 = score(doc=781,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26771787 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 781, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=781)
        0.03581547 = weight(_text_:29 in 781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03581547 = score(doc=781,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 781, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=781)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Unter Indexierung versteht man die Zuordnung von inhaltskennzeichnenden Ausdrücken (Indextermen, Indexaten, Erschließungsmerkmalen) zu Dokumenten. Über die zugeteilten Indexterme soll ein gezieltes Auffinden der Dokumente ermöglicht werden. Indexterme können inhaltsbeschreibende Merkmale wie Notationen, Deskriptoren, kontrollierte oder freie Schlagwörter sein; es kann sich auch um reine Stichwörter handeln, die aus dem Text des Dokuments gewonnen werden. Eine Indexierung kann intellektuell, computerunterstützt oder automatisch erfolgen. Computerunterstützte Indexierungsverfahren kombinieren die intellektuelle Indexierung mit automatischen Vorarbeiten. Bei der automatischen Indexierung werden die Indexterme automatisch aus dem Dokumenttext ermittelt und dem Dokument zugeordnet. Automatische Indexierung bedient sich für die Verarbeitung der Zeichenketten im Dokument linguistischer und statistischer Verfahren.
    Date
    24.11.2022 13:29:16
  3. Spitters, M.J.: Adjust : automatische thesauriele ontsluiting van grote hoeveelheden krantenartikelen (1999) 0.03 
    0.02615121 = product of:
  0.05230242 = sum of:
    0.031836435 = product of:
      0.06367287 = sum of:
        0.06367287 = weight(_text_:28 in 3938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06367287 = score(doc=3938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 3938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3938)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.020465985 = product of:
      0.061397955 = sum of:
        0.061397955 = weight(_text_:29 in 3938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061397955 = score(doc=3938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3938)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    27. 8.2005 12:55:28
    Source
    Informatie professional. 3(1999) no.10, S.29-31
  4. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.02 
    0.021792676 = product of:
  0.043585353 = sum of:
    0.026530363 = product of:
      0.053060725 = sum of:
        0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053060725 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.017054988 = product of:
      0.051164962 = sum of:
        0.051164962 = weight(_text_:29 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051164962 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
    Source
    Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 29(1986), S.648-656
  5. Lepsky, K.; Vorhauer, J.: Lingo - ein open source System für die Automatische Indexierung deutschsprachiger Dokumente (2006) 0.02 
    0.017372772 = product of:
  0.034745544 = sum of:
    0.02122429 = product of:
      0.04244858 = sum of:
        0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04244858 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013521253 = product of:
      0.04056376 = sum of:
        0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04056376 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    24. 3.2006 12:22:02
    Source
    ABI-Technik. 26(2006) H.1, S.18-28
  6. Lichtenstein, A.; Plank, M.; Neumann, J.: TIB's portal for audiovisual media : combining manual and automatic indexing (2014) 0.02 
    0.015874723 = product of:
  0.06349889 = sum of:
    0.06349889 = product of:
      0.12699778 = sum of:
        0.12699778 = weight(_text_:media in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12699778 = score(doc=1981,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.7244994 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The German National Library of Science and Technology (TIB) developed a Web-based platform for audiovisual media. The audiovisual portal optimizes access to scientific videos such as computer animations and lecture and conference recordings. TIB's AV-Portal combines traditional cataloging and automatic indexing of audiovisual media. The article describes metadata standards for audiovisual media and introduces the TIB's metadata schema in comparison to other metadata standards for non-textual materials. Additionally, we give an overview of multimedia retrieval technologies used for the Portal and present the AV-Portal in detail as well as the additional value for libraries and their users.
  7. Bordoni, L.; Pazienza, M.T.: Documents automatic indexing in an environmental domain (1997) 0.02 
    0.015201176 = product of:
  0.030402351 = sum of:
    0.018571254 = product of:
      0.037142508 = sum of:
        0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037142508 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011831096 = product of:
      0.03549329 = sum of:
        0.03549329 = weight(_text_:22 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03549329 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.1, S.17-28
  8. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.01 
    0.013029579 = product of:
  0.026059158 = sum of:
    0.015918218 = product of:
      0.031836435 = sum of:
        0.031836435 = weight(_text_:28 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031836435 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01014094 = product of:
      0.030422818 = sum of:
        0.030422818 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030422818 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.4, S.217-225
  9. Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997) 0.01 
    0.011884794 = product of:
  0.047539175 = sum of:
    0.047539175 = product of:
      0.07130876 = sum of:
        0.03581547 = weight(_text_:29 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03581547 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
        0.03549329 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03549329 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1147-1156
  10. Franke-Maier, M.: Anforderungen an die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung im Spannungsfeld von intellektuell und automatisch erzeugten Metadaten (2018) 0.01 
    0.011884794 = product of:
  0.047539175 = sum of:
    0.047539175 = product of:
      0.07130876 = sum of:
        0.03581547 = weight(_text_:29 in 5344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03581547 = score(doc=5344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5344)
        0.03549329 = weight(_text_:22 in 5344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03549329 = score(doc=5344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5344)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Spätestens seit dem Deutschen Bibliothekartag 2018 hat sich die Diskussion zu den automatischen Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek von einer politisch geführten Diskussion in eine Qualitätsdiskussion verwandelt. Der folgende Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit Fragen der Qualität von Inhaltserschließung in digitalen Zeiten, wo heterogene Erzeugnisse unterschiedlicher Verfahren aufeinandertreffen und versucht, wichtige Anforderungen an Qualität zu definieren. Dieser Tagungsbeitrag fasst die vom Autor als Impulse vorgetragenen Ideen beim Workshop der FAG "Erschließung und Informationsvermittlung" des GBV am 29. August 2018 in Kiel zusammen. Der Workshop fand im Rahmen der 22. Verbundkonferenz des GBV statt.
  11. Thirion, B.; Leroy, J.P.; Baudic, F.; Douyère, M.; Piot, J.; Darmoni, S.J.: SDI selecting, decribing, and indexing : did you mean automatically? (2001) 0.01 
    0.011255879 = product of:
  0.045023516 = sum of:
    0.045023516 = product of:
      0.09004703 = sum of:
        0.09004703 = weight(_text_:28 in 6198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09004703 = score(doc=6198,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.6716744 = fieldWeight in 6198, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6198)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    6. 1.1997 18:30:28
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 28(2001) no.3, S.137-140
  12. Wang, S.; Koopman, R.: Embed first, then predict (2019) 0.01 
    0.010896338 = product of:
  0.021792676 = sum of:
    0.013265181 = product of:
      0.026530363 = sum of:
        0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026530363 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008527494 = product of:
      0.025582481 = sum of:
        0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025582481 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    29. 9.2019 12:18:42
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: Research Information Systems and Science Classifications; including papers from "Trajectories for Research: Fathoming the Promise of the NARCIS Classification," 27-28 September 2018, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  13. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.01 
    0.010857983 = product of:
  0.021715965 = sum of:
    0.013265181 = product of:
      0.026530363 = sum of:
        0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026530363 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008450784 = product of:
      0.02535235 = sum of:
        0.02535235 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02535235 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Pages
    S.28-38
  14. Croft, W.B.: Clustering large files of documents using the single link method (1977) 0.01 
    0.010612145 = product of:
  0.04244858 = sum of:
    0.04244858 = product of:
      0.08489716 = sum of:
        0.08489716 = weight(_text_:28 in 5489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08489716 = score(doc=5489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 5489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 28(1977), S.341-344
  15. Carevic, Z.: Semi-automatische Verschlagwortung zur Integration externer semantischer Inhalte innerhalb einer medizinischen Kooperationsplattform (2012) 0.01 
    0.009974712 = product of:
  0.039898846 = sum of:
    0.039898846 = product of:
      0.119696535 = sum of:
        0.119696535 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119696535 = score(doc=897,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26771787 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.44709954 = fieldWeight in 897, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=897)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Integration externer Inhalte Inwieweit kann die Nutzung einer einheitlichen Terminologie zwischen Anfragesystem und Wissensbasis den Prozess der Informationsbeschaffung unterstützen? Zu diesem Zweck wird in einer ersten Phase ermittelt welche Wissensbasen aus der medizinischen Domäne in der Linked Data Cloud zur Verfügung stehen. Aufbauend auf den Ergebnissen werden Informationen aus verschiedenen dezentralen Wissensbasen exemplarisch integriert. Der Fokus der Betrachtung liegt dabei auf der verwendeten Terminologie sowie der Nutzung von Semantic Web Technologien. Neben Informationen aus der Linked Data Cloud erfolgt eine Suche nach medizinischer Literatur in PubMed. Wie auch in der Linked Data Cloud erfolgt die Integration unter Verwendung einer einheitlichen Terminologie. Eine weitere Fragestellung ist, wie Informationen aus insgesamt 21. Mio Aufsatzzitaten in PubMed sinnvoll integriert werden können. Dabei wird ermittelt welche Mechanismen eingesetzt werden können um die Präzision der Ergebnisse zu optimieren. Eignung medizinischer Begriffssystem Welche medizinischen Begriffssysteme existieren und wie eignen sich diese als zugrungeliegendes Vokabular für die automatische Verschlagwortung und Integration semantischer Inhalte? Der Fokus liegt dabei speziell auf einer Bewertung der Reichhaltigkeit von Begriffssystemen, wobei insbesondere der Detaillierungsgrad von Interesse ist. Handelt es sich um ein spezifisches oder allgemeines Begriffssystem und eignet sich dieses auch dafür bestimmte Teilaspekte der Medizin, wie bspw. die Chirurige oder die Anästhesie, in einer ausreichenden Tiefe zu beschreiben?
  16. Strobel, S.; Marín-Arraiza, P.: Metadata for scientific audiovisual media : current practices and perspectives of the TIB / AV-portal (2015) 0.01 
    0.009819938 = product of:
  0.03927975 = sum of:
    0.03927975 = product of:
      0.0785595 = sum of:
        0.0785595 = weight(_text_:media in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0785595 = score(doc=3667,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.44816777 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Descriptive metadata play a key role in finding relevant search results in large amounts of unstructured data. However, current scientific audiovisual media are provided with little metadata, which makes them hard to find, let alone individual sequences. In this paper, the TIB / AV-Portal is presented as a use case where methods concerning the automatic generation of metadata, a semantic search and cross-lingual retrieval (German/English) have already been applied. These methods result in a better discoverability of the scientific audiovisual media hosted in the portal. Text, speech, and image content of the video are automatically indexed by specialised GND (Gemeinsame Normdatei) subject headings. A semantic search is established based on properties of the GND ontology. The cross-lingual retrieval uses English 'translations' that were derived by an ontology mapping (DBpedia i. a.). Further ways of increasing the discoverability and reuse of the metadata are publishing them as Linked Open Data and interlinking them with other data sets.
  17. Lepsky, K.: Maschinelles Indexieren zur Verbesserung der sachlichen Suche im OPAC : DFG-Projekt an der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf (1994) 0.01 
    0.009285627 = product of:
  0.037142508 = sum of:
    0.037142508 = product of:
      0.074285015 = sum of:
        0.074285015 = weight(_text_:28 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074285015 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 28(1994) H.8, S.1234-1242
  18. Rösch, H.: Automatisches Indexieren - Ende der intellektuellen Sacherschließung? (1997) 0.01 
    0.009285627 = product of:
  0.037142508 = sum of:
    0.037142508 = product of:
      0.074285015 = sum of:
        0.074285015 = weight(_text_:28 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074285015 = score(doc=670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9. 7.1996 20:34:28
  19. Hlava, M.M.: Automatic indexing : a matter of degree (2002) 0.01 
    0.009285627 = product of:
  0.037142508 = sum of:
    0.037142508 = product of:
      0.074285015 = sum of:
        0.074285015 = weight(_text_:28 in 2501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074285015 = score(doc=2501,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 2501, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2501)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 28(2002) no.1, S.12-15
  20. Woltering, H.: Maschinelle Indexierung in der Bibliothek der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (2002) 0.01 
    0.009285627 = product of:
  0.037142508 = sum of:
    0.037142508 = product of:
      0.074285015 = sum of:
        0.074285015 = weight(_text_:28 in 4351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074285015 = score(doc=4351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037424255 = queryNorm
            0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 4351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4351)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    9. 7.1996 20:34:28

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 85
  • el 11
  • x 6
  • m 4
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications