-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.03
0.025216393 = product of:
0.050432786 = sum of:
0.026530363 = product of:
0.053060725 = sum of:
0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053060725 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.023902424 = product of:
0.07170727 = sum of:
0.07170727 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07170727 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Hammond, C.C.; Brown, S.W.: Citation searching : search smarter & find more (2008)
0.01
0.010896338 = product of:
0.021792676 = sum of:
0.013265181 = product of:
0.026530363 = sum of:
0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026530363 = score(doc=2206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008527494 = product of:
0.025582481 = sum of:
0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025582481 = score(doc=2206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 17. 8.2008 11:05:29
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 28(2008) no.5, S.10-
-
¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000)
0.01
0.009379899 = product of:
0.037519597 = sum of:
0.037519597 = product of:
0.07503919 = sum of:
0.07503919 = weight(_text_:28 in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07503919 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.5597286 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 4.2002 18:28:13
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002)
0.01
0.00907127 = product of:
0.03628508 = sum of:
0.03628508 = product of:
0.07257016 = sum of:
0.07257016 = weight(_text_:media in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07257016 = score(doc=1263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The accrual of symbolic capital is an important aspect of academic life. Successful capital formation is commonly signified by the trappings of scholarly distinction or acknowledged status as a public intellectual. We consider and compare three potential indices of symbolic capital: citation counts, Web hits, and media mentions. Our Eindings, which are domain specific, suggest that public intellectuals are notable by their absence within the information studies community.
-
Riviera, E.: Scientific communities as autopoietic systems : the reproductive function of citations (2013)
0.01
0.0068034525 = product of:
0.02721381 = sum of:
0.02721381 = product of:
0.05442762 = sum of:
0.05442762 = weight(_text_:media in 970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05442762 = score(doc=970,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 970, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=970)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The increasing employment of bibliometric measures for assessing, describing, and mapping science inevitably leads to the increasing need for a citation theory constituting a theoretical frame for both citation analysis and the description of citers' behavior. In this article a theoretical model, encompassing both normative and constructivist approaches, is suggested. The conceptualization of scientific communities as autopoietic systems, the components of which are communicative events, allows us to observe the reproductive function of citations conceived as codes and media of scientific communication. Citations, thanks to their constraining and enabling properties, constitute the engine of the structuration process ensuring the reproduction of scientific communities. By referring to Giddens' structuration theory, Luhmann's theory about social systems as communicative networks, Merton's "sociology of science" and his conceptualizations about the functions of citations, as well as Small's proposal about citations as concept-symbols, a sociologically integrated approach to scientometrics is proposed.
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.0067606266 = product of:
0.027042506 = sum of:
0.027042506 = product of:
0.08112752 = sum of:
0.08112752 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08112752 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.01
0.0067606266 = product of:
0.027042506 = sum of:
0.027042506 = product of:
0.08112752 = sum of:
0.08112752 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08112752 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Goenner, H.F.: ¬Das kurze Leben des S.B. Preuss (1983)
0.01
0.0066325907 = product of:
0.026530363 = sum of:
0.026530363 = product of:
0.053060725 = sum of:
0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053060725 = score(doc=4031,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 5. 8.2008 21:37:28
-
Wouters, P.; Vries, R. de: Formally citing the Web (2004)
0.01
0.0064143566 = product of:
0.025657427 = sum of:
0.025657427 = product of:
0.051314853 = sum of:
0.051314853 = weight(_text_:media in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051314853 = score(doc=3093,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.29274195 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- How do authors refer to Web-based information sources in their formal scientific publications? It is not yet weIl known how scientists and scholars actually include new types of information sources, available through the new media, in their published work. This article reports an a comparative study of the lists of references in 38 scientific journals in five different scientific and social scientific fields. The fields are sociology, library and information science, biochemistry and biotechnology, neuroscience, and the mathematics of computing. As is weIl known, references, citations, and hyperlinks play different roles in academic publishing and communication. Our study focuses an hyperlinks as attributes of references in formal scholarly publications. The study developed and applied a method to analyze the differential roles of publishing media in the analysis of scientific and scholarly literature references. The present secondary databases that include reference and citation data (the Web of Science) cannot be used for this type of research. By the automated processing and analysis of the full text of scientific and scholarly articles, we were able to extract the references and hyperlinks contained in these references in relation to other features of the scientific and scholarly literature. Our findings show that hyperlinking references are indeed, as expected, abundantly present in the formal literature. They also tend to cite more recent literature than the average reference. The large majority of the references are to Web instances of traditional scientific journals. Other types of Web-based information sources are less weIl represented in the lists of references, except in the case of pure e-journals. We conclude that this can be explained by taking the role of the publisher into account. Indeed, it seems that the shift from print-based to electronic publishing has created new roles for the publisher. By shaping the way scientific references are hyperlinking to other information sources, the publisher may have a large impact an the availability of scientific and scholarly information.
-
Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialities (1983)
0.01
0.005969245 = product of:
0.02387698 = sum of:
0.02387698 = product of:
0.07163094 = sum of:
0.07163094 = weight(_text_:29 in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163094 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Remler, A.: Lässt sich wissenschaftliche Leistung messen? : Wer zitiert wird, liegt vorne - in den USA berechnet man Forschungsleistung nach einem Zitat-Index (2000)
0.01
0.005969245 = product of:
0.02387698 = sum of:
0.02387698 = product of:
0.07163094 = sum of:
0.07163094 = weight(_text_:29 in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07163094 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30.10.2000 17:47:29
-
Howard, D.L.: What the eye sees while predicitng a document's pertinence from its citation (1991)
0.01
0.0053060725 = product of:
0.02122429 = sum of:
0.02122429 = product of:
0.04244858 = sum of:
0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04244858 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- ASIS '91: systems understanding people. proc. of the 54th Annual Meeting of the ASIS, vol.28, Washington, DC, 27.-31.10.1991. Ed.: J.-M. Griffiths
-
Gering, E.: ¬Die Analyse von Online-Datenbanken : ein Instrument für das Beobachten von Forschungsaktivitäten; dargestellt an einem Forschungsfeld der Festkörperphysik (1995)
0.01
0.0053060725 = product of:
0.02122429 = sum of:
0.02122429 = product of:
0.04244858 = sum of:
0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04244858 = score(doc=2660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 1.12.1995 18:54:28
-
Min, C.; Chen, Q.; Yan, E.; Bu, Y.; Sun, J.: Citation cascade and the evolution of topic relevance (2021)
0.00
0.0046899496 = product of:
0.018759798 = sum of:
0.018759798 = product of:
0.037519597 = sum of:
0.037519597 = weight(_text_:28 in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037519597 = score(doc=62,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.2798643 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16.12.2020 18:28:28
-
Maricic, S.: Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories (1998)
0.00
0.0046428135 = product of:
0.018571254 = sum of:
0.018571254 = product of:
0.037142508 = sum of:
0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 3003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037142508 = score(doc=3003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 3003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3003)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Analyzes 200 papers produced by a multidisciplinary natural sciences institute in a 10 years period for the context of the citation they received during the 21 year period since their publication. They were grouped in 28 research topics from physics, chemistry, to biology, and there were some half a dozen papers per topic on the average. 11% of all the citing papers comprised the sample of the context analysis: 1 citing per each cited paper. Sets of citing papers of each research topic were taken as units in the analysis
-
Trkulja, V.: Weltgrößte Abstracts- und Zitationsdatenbank aus dem wissenschaftlichen Web (2005)
0.00
0.0046428135 = product of:
0.018571254 = sum of:
0.018571254 = product of:
0.037142508 = sum of:
0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037142508 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 23. 5.2005 11:38:28
-
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998)
0.00
0.004263747 = product of:
0.017054988 = sum of:
0.017054988 = product of:
0.051164962 = sum of:
0.051164962 = weight(_text_:29 in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051164962 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:19:32
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.00
0.004225392 = product of:
0.016901568 = sum of:
0.016901568 = product of:
0.0507047 = sum of:
0.0507047 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0507047 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000)
0.00
0.0039795544 = product of:
0.015918218 = sum of:
0.015918218 = product of:
0.031836435 = sum of:
0.031836435 = weight(_text_:28 in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031836435 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A citation analysis examined the 28 best articles published in JASIS from 1969-1996. Best articles tend to single-authored works twice as long as the avergae article published in JASIS. They are cited and self-cited much more often than the average article. The greatest source of references made to the best articles is from JASIS itself. The top 5 best papers focus largely on information retrieval and online searching
-
New Web Citation Index (2004)
0.00
0.0039795544 = product of:
0.015918218 = sum of:
0.015918218 = product of:
0.031836435 = sum of:
0.031836435 = weight(_text_:28 in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031836435 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30. 5.2004 14:28:41
