Search (185 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Meadows, J.: Electronic publishing and the humanities (1995) 0.03
    0.028754685 = product of:
      0.05750937 = sum of:
        0.03628508 = product of:
          0.07257016 = sum of:
            0.07257016 = weight(_text_:media in 6667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07257016 = score(doc=6667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 6667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02122429 = product of:
          0.04244858 = sum of:
            0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 6667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04244858 = score(doc=6667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 6667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the issues involved in electronic publishing for the humanities: the transition from old methods of publishing to the new; primary texts; secondary texts; ways in which the new media are used; the transition to electronic publishing; electronic books and electronic periodicals; and the impact of these factors on libraries
    Date
    7. 2.1997 20:00:28
  2. Boeri, R.J.; Hensel, M.: Corporate online/CD-ROM publishing : the desing and tactical issues (1996) 0.03
    0.028419493 = product of:
      0.056838986 = sum of:
        0.044900496 = product of:
          0.08980099 = sum of:
            0.08980099 = weight(_text_:media in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08980099 = score(doc=4553,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.5122984 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01193849 = product of:
          0.03581547 = sum of:
            0.03581547 = weight(_text_:29 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03581547 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although existing document imaging software effectively serves small business needs whenit comes to publishing documents from multiple sources in various formats on CD-ROM and the WWW, the same cannot be said when it comes to large scale corporate publishing. Sets out the requirements of corporate in house document publishing, which typically include: avoiding hand crafting documents for different media, having the flexibility not to be hostage to changing word processors, vendor alliances, operating systems, or output media; reducing exception handling as volumes of published documents increase; and incorporating support for upcoming changes in HTML, if WWW publishing is planned. Focuses on the importance of SGML and DTD in this process
    Date
    23. 7.1996 9:29:36
  3. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.03
    0.027165245 = product of:
      0.10866098 = sum of:
        0.10866098 = product of:
          0.16299146 = sum of:
            0.08186394 = weight(_text_:29 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08186394 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
            0.08112752 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112752 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2000 12:41:29
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  4. Brown, D.J.: Access to scientific research : challenges facing communications in STM (2016) 0.03
    0.026636485 = product of:
      0.035515312 = sum of:
        0.01814254 = product of:
          0.03628508 = sum of:
            0.03628508 = weight(_text_:media in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03628508 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.20699982 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010612145 = product of:
          0.02122429 = sum of:
            0.02122429 = weight(_text_:28 in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02122429 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0067606266 = product of:
          0.02028188 = sum of:
            0.02028188 = weight(_text_:22 in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02028188 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Chapter 1. Background -- Chapter 2. Definitions -- Chapter 3. Aims, Objectives, and Methodology -- Chapter 4. Setting the Scene -- Chapter 5. Information Society -- Chapter 6. Drivers for Change -- Chapter 7 A Dysfunctional STM Scene? -- Chapter 8. Comments on the Dysfunctionality of STM Publishing -- Chapter 9. The Main Stakeholders -- Chapter 10. Search and Discovery -- Chapter 11. Impact of Google -- Chapter 12. Psychological Issues -- Chapter 13. Users of Research Output -- Chapter 14. Underlying Sociological Developments -- Chapter 15. Social Media and Social Networking -- Chapter 16. Forms of Article Delivery -- Chapter 17. Future Communication Trends -- Chapter 18. Academic Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 19. Unaffiliated Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 20. The Professions -- Chapter 21. Small and Medium Enterprises -- Chapter 22. Citizen Scientists -- Chapter 23. Learned Societies -- Chapter 24. Business Models -- Chapter 25. Open Access -- Chapter 26. Political Initiatives -- Chapter 27. Summary and Conclusions -- Chapter 28. Research Questions Addressed
  5. Role, F.: ¬La norme SGML : pur decrire la structure logique des documents (1991) 0.03
    0.02516035 = product of:
      0.0503207 = sum of:
        0.031749446 = product of:
          0.06349889 = sum of:
            0.06349889 = weight(_text_:media in 5949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06349889 = score(doc=5949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 5949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.018571254 = product of:
          0.037142508 = sum of:
            0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 5949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037142508 = score(doc=5949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 5949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Increasingly texts are produced as electronic documents but each document production system uses its own markup reproduce documentation in different media as they are linked only to the physical structure of the document in question. To overcome these drawbacks, information processing specialists have tried to create general languages which, by taking into account the logical structure of a document, would facilitate its exchange and dissemination in different forms. This is why the ISO has sponsored the development of the SGML which become an official standard in 1986. Explains the logic of this language and its use and summarises its many benefits to librarians and information workers
    Source
    Documentaliste. 28(1991) nos.4/5, S.187-192
  6. Bainbrifge, D.I.: Copyright in relation to electronic publishing in the humanities (1995) 0.03
    0.02516035 = product of:
      0.0503207 = sum of:
        0.031749446 = product of:
          0.06349889 = sum of:
            0.06349889 = weight(_text_:media in 6669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06349889 = score(doc=6669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 6669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6669)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.018571254 = product of:
          0.037142508 = sum of:
            0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 6669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037142508 = score(doc=6669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 6669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6669)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the basic principles of copyright law with particular reference to electronic media or any materials that are transmitted electronically. Considers the European Community (EC) directives and proposals affecting electronic publishing. Discusses copyright problems relating to electronic works and the legal liability of facilitators. Comments on the opinion, held by some commentators, that the mass transposition of all manner of published works to electronic storage will create insuperable problems for intellectual property rights and that copyright law will collapse
    Date
    7. 2.1997 20:00:28
  7. Brown, D.J.: Electronic publishing and libraries : Planning for the impact and growth to 2003 (1996) 0.02
    0.021843968 = product of:
      0.043687936 = sum of:
        0.031749446 = product of:
          0.06349889 = sum of:
            0.06349889 = weight(_text_:media in 3256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06349889 = score(doc=3256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 3256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01193849 = product of:
          0.03581547 = sum of:
            0.03581547 = weight(_text_:29 in 3256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03581547 = score(doc=3256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3256)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study, conducted by DJB Associates on behalf of the British Library, to forecast the future trends in electronic publishing during the period 1995 to 2003. The emphasis is on scholarly publishing and the project, initiated by the BL, Corporate Research Group, aimed to help in the BL's assessment of the acqusition policy for electronic media
    Date
    6. 9.1996 19:29:56
  8. Swiaczny, F.: Elektronisches Publizieren bei MATEO (1998) 0.02
    0.020373933 = product of:
      0.08149573 = sum of:
        0.08149573 = product of:
          0.12224359 = sum of:
            0.061397955 = weight(_text_:29 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061397955 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
            0.060845636 = weight(_text_:22 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060845636 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23.10.1996 17:26:29
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.35-38
  9. Zheng, H.; Aung, H.H.; Erdt, M.; Peng, T.-Q.; Raamkumar, A.S.; Theng, Y.-L.: Social media presence of scholarly journals (2019) 0.02
    0.017928671 = product of:
      0.071714684 = sum of:
        0.071714684 = product of:
          0.14342937 = sum of:
            0.14342937 = weight(_text_:media in 4987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14342937 = score(doc=4987,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.8182386 = fieldWeight in 4987, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4987)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Recently, social media has become a potentially new way for scholarly journals to disseminate and evaluate research outputs. Scholarly journals have started promoting their research articles to a wide range of audiences via social media platforms. This article aims to investigate the social media presence of scholarly journals across disciplines. We extracted journals from Web of Science and searched for the social media presence of these journals on Facebook and Twitter. Relevant metrics and content relating to the journals' social media accounts were also crawled for data analysis. From our results, the social media presence of scholarly journals lies between 7.1% and 14.2% across disciplines; and it has shown a steady increase in the last decade. The popularity of scholarly journals on social media is distinct across disciplines. Further, we investigated whether social media metrics of journals can predict the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). We found that the number of followers and disciplines have significant effects on the JIF. In addition, a word co-occurrence network analysis was also conducted to identify popular topics discussed by scholarly journals on social media platforms. Finally, we highlight challenges and issues faced in this study and discuss future research directions.
  10. Weibel, S.: ¬An architecture for scholarly publishing on the World Wide Web (1995) 0.02
    0.017372772 = product of:
      0.034745544 = sum of:
        0.02122429 = product of:
          0.04244858 = sum of:
            0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04244858 = score(doc=4555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013521253 = product of:
          0.04056376 = sum of:
            0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04056376 = score(doc=4555,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    23. 7.1996 10:22:20
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 28(1995) nos.1/2, S.239-245
  11. Jensen, M.: Digital structure, digital design : issues in designing electronic publications (1996) 0.02
    0.017372772 = product of:
      0.034745544 = sum of:
        0.02122429 = product of:
          0.04244858 = sum of:
            0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04244858 = score(doc=7481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013521253 = product of:
          0.04056376 = sum of:
            0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 7481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04056376 = score(doc=7481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7481)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of scholarly publishing. 28(1996) no.1, S.13-22
  12. Andermann, H.; Degkwitz, A.: Neue Ansätze in der wissenschaftlichen Informationsversorgung : Ein Überblick über Initiativen und Unternehmungen auf dem Gebiet des elektronischen Publizierens (2004) 0.02
    0.017372772 = product of:
      0.034745544 = sum of:
        0.02122429 = product of:
          0.04244858 = sum of:
            0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 1765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04244858 = score(doc=1765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 1765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013521253 = product of:
          0.04056376 = sum of:
            0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 1765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04056376 = score(doc=1765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1765)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:37:50
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 28(2004) H.1, S.35-59
  13. Ritchie, I.: New media publishing (1996) 0.02
    0.015874723 = product of:
      0.06349889 = sum of:
        0.06349889 = product of:
          0.12699778 = sum of:
            0.12699778 = weight(_text_:media in 7032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12699778 = score(doc=7032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.7244994 = fieldWeight in 7032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Siegle, J.: Programmabsturz : Immer mehr Internet-Zeitschriften stehen vor dem Aus - jüngstes Opfer ist das US-Magazin 'The Industry Standard' (2000) 0.01
    0.014319161 = product of:
      0.028638322 = sum of:
        0.023567852 = product of:
          0.047135703 = sum of:
            0.047135703 = weight(_text_:media in 6494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047135703 = score(doc=6494,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.26890066 = fieldWeight in 6494, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.00507047 = product of:
          0.015211409 = sum of:
            0.015211409 = weight(_text_:22 in 6494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015211409 = score(doc=6494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 6494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6494)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die Web-Revolution frisst ihre Kinder. Reihenweise sind in den vergangenen Monaten viel versprechende Dotcom-Unternehmen eingegangen. Zahllose hoch dotierte Mitarbeiter haben ihren Job verloren. Und auch in der Internet-Presse sind im Zuge stark rückläufiger Anzeigenumsätze zahlreiche Pleiten zu beklagen. Jüngstes Opfer ist das US-Magazin "The Industry Standard". Diese Woche erschien die vorerst letzte Ausgabe des renommiertesten amerikanischen New-Economy-Blattes. Der San Franciscoer Verlag Standard Media International steht vor der Zahlungsunfähigkeit und wird voraussichtlich Gläubigerschutz beantragen - was in etwa dem deutschen Insolvenzverfahren entspricht. Zuvor waren Finanzierungsgespräche mit dem Hauptanteilseigner, der Bostoner Verlagsgruppe International Data Group (IDG), gescheitert. Bis auf eine Minimannschaft von sechs bis 20 Mitarbeitern, die weiterhin die Online-Ausgabe des Magazins produzieren sollen, verlieren alle 180, Angestellten ihren Job. Das Gros der Mitarbeiter war vergangene Woche vorsichtshalber schon mal in den Zwangsurlaub geschickt worden. Die Standard-Pleite kommt nicht ganz überraschend: Bereits im Februar hatte das Flaggschiff der amerikanischen New-Economy-Medien im Zuge des rückläufigen Anzeigenaufkommens 69 Angestellte entlassen müssen. Im Januar war eine erste Massenkündigungswelle erfolgt. In den vergangenen Monaten hat sich die Situation nun nochmals deutlich zugespitzt. Seit Jahresbeginn ist die Zahl der gebuchten Anzeigen um 75 Prozent gefallen. Den drastischen Werberückgang dokumentierte der beständig schwindende Umfang des Wochenmagazins: Im Februar 2000 zählte der Standard noch stolze 228 Seiten. Dieses Frühjahr kam das Heft gerade noch auf 120 Seiten, Mitte Mai nur noch auf 80. Kein anderes Internet-Magazin hat den dramatischen Aufstieg und Niedergang der Online-Ökonomie so durchlitten wie der Industry Standard.
    "Wir sind sehr enttäuscht, dass unsere finanzielle Situation diese Maßnahmen erfordert. Wir hoffen dennoch weiter, dass wir unsere Aktiva verkaufen können", ließ Standard Media International in einer Pressemitteilung verlauten. IDG kommentierte den Rückzug bislang nicht. Der Standard ist kein Einzelfall. Seit Monaten leiden auch amerikanische Konkurrenzblätter wie Red Herring oder Wired unter der Werbeflaute. Red Herring verschlankte sich binnen eines Jahres etwa von 350 Seiten Umfang auf 120 Seiten und musste bereits Ende vergangenen Jahres mehr als 20 Angestellte entlassen. Die Kult-IT-Bibel Wired konnte zu ihren besten Zeiten allein dem Inhaltsverzeichnis 72 Anzeigenseiten vorschalten. Ein Stapel der sechs wichtigsten amerikanischen Internet-Magazine - die alle aus San Francisco stammen - hatte im Juni vergangenen Jahres rund, fünf Kilogramm gewogen. Aktuelle Ausgaben von Wired, eCompany, Red Herring, Business 2.0, Upside und eben The Industry Standard bringen nun zusammen nicht mal mehr die Hälfte auf die Waage. In Deutschland ist die Situation der Web-Medien nicht besser: In den vergangenen Wochen mussten neben dem Milchstraßen-Titel Net-Business die zwei Münchner Objekte Business 2.0 und NetInvestor sowie die Handelsblatt-Publikation E-Business aufgeben. Die Zeitschriften eMarket und Tomorrow haben jüngst ihren Veröffentlichungsrhythmus halbiert: eMarket erscheint nur noch zweiwöchentlieh, Tomorrow nur noch monatlich. Bei Standard Media International in San Francisco sucht man derweil nach einem Käufer für den jetzt höchst defizitären Industry Standard. Die Online-Ausgabe der einstigen Cash-Cow", TheStandard.com, soll bis auf weiteres in einer abgespeckten Version weitergeführt werden. Amerikanischen Medienberichten zufolge sollen im Verlag sogar Pläne für die Wiederbelebung eines völlig neukonzipierten Magazins geschmiedet werden
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22
  15. Saltzis, K.; Dickinson, R.: Inside the changing newsroom : journalists' responses to media convergence (2008) 0.01
    0.013887489 = product of:
      0.055549957 = sum of:
        0.055549957 = product of:
          0.11109991 = sum of:
            0.11109991 = weight(_text_:media in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11109991 = score(doc=2015,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.6338049 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to report on research conducted inside British national media organisations. The research was designed to investigate the impact on the working practices of journalists of the process of production convergence - the trend towards news reporting in more than one medium in formerly single-medium organisations. The article describes the changes that are taking place and the ways journalists are reacting to them. Design/methodology/approach - Interviews were conducted with 20 journalists during 2002 and 2003. The interviews were with journalists working in newsrooms at the BBC, Sky News, The Guardian and the Financial Times. Findings - The data show that while multimedia news is becoming well established, the multimedia journalist has been slow to arrive. This is because of the pressures that multi-media working adds to the journalist's daily routine and a concern over the impact on the quality of output. Research limitations/implications - The media environment is evolving rapidly and research findings on this topic quickly go out of date, but the findings presented here offer valuable insights into the news production processes operating in British national media organisations and the ways journalists are adapting to, and are likely to continue to adapt to, changes in production technologies and changed systems of working. Originality/value - The paper is the first to focus on journalistic practice in a converging media environment.
  16. Feibel, T.; Fleissner, M.: Nichts unter 8 MB Arbeitsspeicher : Multimedia-Unternehmer Michael Fleissner über die Konzeption von CD-ROM Titeln (1995) 0.01
    0.013606905 = product of:
      0.05442762 = sum of:
        0.05442762 = product of:
          0.10885524 = sum of:
            0.10885524 = weight(_text_:media in 1749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10885524 = score(doc=1749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.62099946 = fieldWeight in 1749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Interview zur Publikation von CD-ROMs bei Ullstein Soft Media; behandelt werden u.a.: Guiness Buch der Rekorde, Lexikon der Musik
  17. Mizzaro, S.: Quality control in scholarly publishing : a new proposal (2003) 0.01
    0.013075605 = product of:
      0.02615121 = sum of:
        0.015918218 = product of:
          0.031836435 = sum of:
            0.031836435 = weight(_text_:28 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031836435 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0102329925 = product of:
          0.030698977 = sum of:
            0.030698977 = weight(_text_:29 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030698977 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    28. 9.2003 11:29:47
  18. Rao, S.S.: Publishing of electronic databases (1998) 0.01
    0.012828713 = product of:
      0.051314853 = sum of:
        0.051314853 = product of:
          0.102629706 = sum of:
            0.102629706 = weight(_text_:media in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102629706 = score(doc=1679,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.5854839 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents briefly the impact of information technology on information management. Discuses the publication of electronic databases on CD-ROM and the Internet by considering factors such as media of choice, cost factors, basic infrastructure, steps in publishing and their scenario in India, with products. Also, lists the differences between the two technologies. Concludes that India could use these media for publishing its databases not only for its own use but also to earn foreign exchange.
  19. Oßwald, A.: Significant properties digitaler Objekte : Ergebnisse aus Fallstudien (2010) 0.01
    0.012343077 = product of:
      0.049372308 = sum of:
        0.049372308 = product of:
          0.14811692 = sum of:
            0.14811692 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 4675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14811692 = score(doc=4675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26771787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.55325747 = fieldWeight in 4675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4675)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen von 30 Fallstudien wurden von Praktikern aus dem Bibliotheks- und Informationsbereich - unter Bezugnahme auf den Bedarf zukünftiger Nutzergruppen aus ihrem Arbeitsumfeld - wesentliche Eigenschaften digitaler Objekte für die Langzeitarchivierung ermittelt. Diese Ergebnisse wurden mit den im Rahmen des InSPECT-Projektes ermittelten Objekttypen und den für sie als wesentlich erachteten Eigenschaften verglichen. Die Ergebnisse der Fallstudien zeigen, dass für die Langzeitarchivierung solcher Objekte, die von InSPECT in Betracht gezogenen Objekttypen erweitert bzw. differenziert werden sollten. Die Definition der wesentlichen Eigenschaften dieser Objekttypen kann nach den vorliegenden Ergebnissen noch nicht als stabil bezeichnet werden.
  20. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.01
    0.012179783 = product of:
      0.024359565 = sum of:
        0.019243069 = product of:
          0.038486138 = sum of:
            0.038486138 = weight(_text_:media in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038486138 = score(doc=1195,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.21955647 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0051164962 = product of:
          0.015349489 = sum of:
            0.015349489 = weight(_text_:29 in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015349489 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.

Years

Languages

  • e 96
  • d 87
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 163
  • el 17
  • m 15
  • s 5
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Classifications