-
Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008)
0.01
0.013582623 = product of:
0.05433049 = sum of:
0.05433049 = product of:
0.08149573 = sum of:
0.04093197 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04093197 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04056376 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 21. 6.2009 9:55:29
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011)
0.01
0.012306288 = product of:
0.04922515 = sum of:
0.04922515 = product of:
0.07383773 = sum of:
0.043414913 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043414913 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.030422818 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030422818 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 5.2012 13:58:08
29. 5.2012 14:15:36
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies & Social Tagging (2023)
0.01
0.011225124 = product of:
0.044900496 = sum of:
0.044900496 = product of:
0.08980099 = sum of:
0.08980099 = weight(_text_:media in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08980099 = score(doc=796,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.5122984 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Die Erforschung und der Einsatz von Folksonomies und Social Tagging als nutzerzentrierte Formen der Inhaltserschließung und Wissensrepräsentation haben in den 10 Jahren ab ca. 2005 ihren Höhenpunkt erfahren. Motiviert wurde dies durch die Entwicklung und Verbreitung des Social Web und der wachsenden Nutzung von Social-Media-Plattformen (s. Kapitel E 8 Social Media und Social Web). Beides führte zu einem rasanten Anstieg der im oder über das World Wide Web auffindbaren Menge an potenzieller Information und generierte eine große Nachfrage nach skalierbaren Methoden der Inhaltserschließung.
-
Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007)
0.01
0.010857983 = product of:
0.021715965 = sum of:
0.013265181 = product of:
0.026530363 = sum of:
0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026530363 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008450784 = product of:
0.02535235 = sum of:
0.02535235 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02535235 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
- Date
- 14. 1.2008 14:38:28
-
Wang, J.; Clements, M.; Yang, J.; Vries, A.P. de; Reinders, M.J.T.: Personalization of tagging systems (2010)
0.01
0.0096215345 = product of:
0.038486138 = sum of:
0.038486138 = product of:
0.076972276 = sum of:
0.076972276 = weight(_text_:media in 4229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076972276 = score(doc=4229,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.43911293 = fieldWeight in 4229, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4229)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Social media systems have encouraged end user participation in the Internet, for the purpose of storing and distributing Internet content, sharing opinions and maintaining relationships. Collaborative tagging allows users to annotate the resulting user-generated content, and enables effective retrieval of otherwise uncategorised data. However, compared to professional web content production, collaborative tagging systems face the challenge that end-users assign tags in an uncontrolled manner, resulting in unsystematic and inconsistent metadata. This paper introduces a framework for the personalization of social media systems. We pinpoint three tasks that would benefit from personalization: collaborative tagging, collaborative browsing and collaborative search. We propose a ranking model for each task that integrates the individual user's tagging history in the recommendation of tags and content, to align its suggestions to the individual user preferences. We demonstrate on two real data sets that for all three tasks, the personalized ranking should take into account both the user's own preference and the opinion of others.
-
Golbeck, J.; Koepfler, J.; Emmerling, B.: ¬An experimental study of social tagging behavior and image content (2011)
0.01
0.0096215345 = product of:
0.038486138 = sum of:
0.038486138 = product of:
0.076972276 = sum of:
0.076972276 = weight(_text_:media in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076972276 = score(doc=4748,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.43911293 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Social tags have become an important tool for improving access to online resources, particularly non-text media. With the dramatic growth of user-generated content, the importance of tags is likely to grow. However, while tagging behavior is well studied, the relationship between tagging behavior and features of the media being tagged is not well understood. In this paper, we examine the relationship between tagging behavior and image type. Through a lab-based study with 51 subjects and an analysis of an online dataset of image tags, we show that there are significant differences in the number, order, and type of tags that users assign based on their past experience with an image, the type of image being tagged, and other image features. We present these results and discuss the significant implications this work has for tag-based search algorithms, tag recommendation systems, and other interface issues.
-
Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008)
0.01
0.008686386 = product of:
0.017372772 = sum of:
0.010612145 = product of:
0.02122429 = sum of:
0.02122429 = weight(_text_:28 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02122429 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0067606266 = product of:
0.02028188 = sum of:
0.02028188 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02028188 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 2.2009 20:28:36
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008)
0.01
0.008489138 = product of:
0.033956554 = sum of:
0.033956554 = product of:
0.05093483 = sum of:
0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025582481 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.02535235 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02535235 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 2.2009 10:29:07
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Social tagging in a linked data environment. Edited by Diane Rasmussen Pennington and Louise F. Spiteri. London, UK: Facet Publishing, 2018. 240 pp. £74.95 (paperback). (ISBN 9781783303380) (2019)
0.01
0.008017946 = product of:
0.032071784 = sum of:
0.032071784 = product of:
0.06414357 = sum of:
0.06414357 = weight(_text_:media in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06414357 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.36592746 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- LCSH
- Social media
- Subject
- Social media
-
Seehaus, S.: Können Suchmaschinen von Sozialer Software profitieren? (2008)
0.01
0.0053060725 = product of:
0.02122429 = sum of:
0.02122429 = product of:
0.04244858 = sum of:
0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04244858 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 24.10.2008 12:28:45
-
Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Benz, D.; Grahl, M.; Krause, B.; Schmitz, C.; Stumme, G.: Social Bookmarking am Beispiel BibSonomy (2009)
0.01
0.0053060725 = product of:
0.02122429 = sum of:
0.02122429 = product of:
0.04244858 = sum of:
0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04244858 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 3. 1.2012 19:00:28
-
Abbas, J.: In the margins : reflections on scribbles (2007)
0.00
0.0046428135 = product of:
0.018571254 = sum of:
0.018571254 = product of:
0.037142508 = sum of:
0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037142508 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Feinberg, M.: Expressive bibliography : personal collections in public space (2011)
0.00
0.0046428135 = product of:
0.018571254 = sum of:
0.018571254 = product of:
0.037142508 = sum of:
0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037142508 = score(doc=4561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Fox, M.J.; Reece, A.: ¬The impossible decision : social tagging and Derrida's deconstructed hospitality (2013)
0.00
0.0046428135 = product of:
0.018571254 = sum of:
0.018571254 = product of:
0.037142508 = sum of:
0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037142508 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Hänger, C.; Krätzsch, C.; Niemann, C.: Was vom Tagging übrig blieb : Erkenntnisse und Einsichten aus zwei Jahren Projektarbeit (2011)
0.00
0.0044082412 = product of:
0.017632965 = sum of:
0.017632965 = product of:
0.052898895 = sum of:
0.052898895 = weight(_text_:ermittelt in 4519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052898895 = score(doc=4519,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26771787 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.19759195 = fieldWeight in 4519, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4519)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Das DFG-Projekt "Collaborative Tagging als neue Form der Sacherschließung" Im Oktober 2008 startete an der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim das DFG-Projekt "Collaborative Tagging als neue Form der Sacherschließung". Über zwei Jahre hinweg wurde untersucht, welchen Beitrag das Web-2.0-Phänomen Tagging für die inhaltliche Erschließung von bisher nicht erschlossenen und somit der Nutzung kaum zugänglichen Dokumenten leisten kann. Die freie Vergabe von Schlagwörtern in Datenbanken durch die Nutzer selbst hatte sich bereits auf vielen Plattformen als äußerst effizient herausgestellt, insbesondere bei Inhalten, die einer automatischen Erschließung nicht zugänglich sind. So wurden riesige Mengen von Bildern (FlickR), Filmen (YouTube) oder Musik (LastFM) durch das Tagging recherchierbar und identifizierbar gemacht. Die Fragestellung des Projektes war entsprechend, ob und in welcher Qualität sich durch das gleiche Verfahren beispielsweise Dokumente auf Volltextservern oder in elektronischen Zeitschriften erschließen lassen. Für die Beantwortung dieser Frage, die ggf. weitreichende Konsequenzen für die Sacherschließung durch Fachreferenten haben konnte, wurde ein ganzer Komplex von Teilfragen und Teilschritten ermittelt bzw. konzipiert. Im Kern ging es aber in allen Untersuchungsschritten immer um zwei zentrale Dimensionen, nämlich um die "Akzeptanz" und um die "Qualität" des Taggings. Die Akzeptanz des Taggings wurde zunächst bei den Studierenden und Wissenschaftlern der Universität Mannheim evaluiert. Für bestimmte Zeiträume wurden Tagging-Systeme in unterschiedlichen Ausprägungen an die Recherchedienste der Universitätsbibliothek angebunden. Die Akzeptanz der einzelnen Systemausprägungen konnte dann durch die Analyse von Logfiles und durch Datenbankabfragen ausgewertet werden. Für die Qualität der Erschließung wurde auf einen Methodenmix zurückgegriffen, der im Verlauf des Projektes immer wieder an aktuelle Entwicklungen und an die Ergebnisse aus den vorangegangenen Analysen angepaßt wurde. Die Tags wurden hinsichtlich ihres Beitrags zum Information Retrieval mit Verfahren der automatischen Indexierung von Volltexten sowie mit der Erschließung durch Fachreferenten verglichen. Am Schluss sollte eine gut begründete Empfehlung stehen, wie bisher nicht erschlossene Dokumente am besten indexiert werden können: automatisch, mit Tags oder durch eine Kombination von beiden Verfahren.
-
Panke, S.; Gaiser, B.: "With my head up in the clouds" : Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht (2008)
0.00
0.0039795544 = product of:
0.015918218 = sum of:
0.015918218 = product of:
0.031836435 = sum of:
0.031836435 = weight(_text_:28 in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031836435 = score(doc=2883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- 28 Prozent der amerikanischen Internetnutzer/innen haben es bereits getan: Das freie Verschlagworten von Inhalten aller Art per Social Tagging gehört zu den Anwendungen aus dem Kontext von Web 2.0, die sich zunehmender Beliebtheit erfreuen (Rainie, 2007). Während sich die bisherige Forschung überwiegend inhaltsanalytisch mit dem Phänomen befasst, kommen im vorliegenden Beitrag so genannte "Power User" zu Wort. Um zu einer fundierteren Interpretation der in den Inhaltsanalysen gewonnenen Erkenntnisse beizutragen, wurden Interviews mit Personen durchgeführt, die mehrere Tagging Systeme parallel einsetzen, sich auch mit den technischen Grundlagen auskennen und als "Early Adopter" bereits seit geraumer Zeit aktiv sind. Entsprechend leitet der Beitrag von einer Synopse der aktuellen Literatur in die beschriebene Studie über und schließt mit einem Ausblick auf zukünftige Forschungsvorhaben im Kontext von Social Tagging.
-
Kipp, M.E.I.: Tagging of biomedical articles on CiteULike : a comparison of user, author and professional indexing (2011)
0.00
0.0039795544 = product of:
0.015918218 = sum of:
0.015918218 = product of:
0.031836435 = sum of:
0.031836435 = weight(_text_:28 in 4557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031836435 = score(doc=4557,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 4557, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4557)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Beuth, P.: ¬Ein Freund weckt Vertrauen : Experten sehen im Online-Portal Twitter ein neues Massenmedium heranwachsen (2008)
0.00
0.0039686807 = product of:
0.015874723 = sum of:
0.015874723 = product of:
0.031749446 = sum of:
0.031749446 = weight(_text_:media in 4273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031749446 = score(doc=4273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.18112485 = fieldWeight in 4273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4273)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Die Spielzeuge des Web 2.0 werden in solchen Situationen trotzdem zu Nachrichtenkanälen, ungefiltert und schneller als etablierte Medien. Ihr Reiz ist gerade die Subjektivität, die Emotionalität und die Vernetzung von Tausenden Personen rund um den Erdball. Die reinen Fakten gibt es woanders. "Social Media" heißen solche Dienste schließlich. Trotzdem werden sie ernstgenommen. Nach Untersuchungen der Harvard-Soziologin Shoshana Zuboff glauben die Menschen heutzutage in erster Linie ihren Freunden, während das Vertrauen in Unternehmen und Institutionen abnimmt. Übertragen auf das Internet bedeutet das: Wenn Informationen von Freunden aus der jeweiligen Online-Community stammen, vertraut man ihnen schneller, als wenn sie von einem unbekannten Redakteur irgendeiner Zeitung verbreitet werden. Im Fall Bombay zeigten die Reaktionen vieler sogenannter "Follower", also Leser von Twitter-Einträgen einer Person: Hier wird nicht viel hinterfragt. Hier wird kopiert und weitergeschickt, an die eigenen Follower. Für manche markiert der 24-stündige Sturm von 140-Zeichen-Meldungen nicht weniger als eine "epochale Veränderung des Nachrichtenflusses". So diktierte es etwa der New Yorker Journalismus-Professor Jeff Jarvis dem Handelsblatt-Blogger Thomas Knüwer. Der legt sich, wie auch der prominenteste TechBlogger der USA, Michael Arrington von TechCrunch, fest: "Der heutige Tag wird ein Durchbruch werden auf dem Weg Twitters zum Massenmedium.""
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011)
0.00
0.0034109976 = product of:
0.01364399 = sum of:
0.01364399 = product of:
0.04093197 = sum of:
0.04093197 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04093197 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.29-53
-
Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016)
0.00
0.0034109976 = product of:
0.01364399 = sum of:
0.01364399 = product of:
0.04093197 = sum of:
0.04093197 = weight(_text_:29 in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04093197 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.037424255 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
