Search (8742 results, page 1 of 438)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Rohmann, G.: Media on demand : Approaches to web-based media services in libraries (2000) 0.13
    0.1292747 = product of:
      0.17236626 = sum of:
        0.102629706 = product of:
          0.20525941 = sum of:
            0.20525941 = weight(_text_:media in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20525941 = score(doc=4694,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                1.1709678 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04244858 = product of:
          0.08489716 = sum of:
            0.08489716 = weight(_text_:28 in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08489716 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02728798 = product of:
          0.08186394 = sum of:
            0.08186394 = weight(_text_:29 in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08186394 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2000 12:29:28
  2. Meier, F.: Informationsverhalten in Social Media (2015) 0.08
    0.080486774 = product of:
      0.107315704 = sum of:
        0.07257016 = product of:
          0.14514032 = sum of:
            0.14514032 = weight(_text_:media in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14514032 = score(doc=1739,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02122429 = product of:
          0.04244858 = sum of:
            0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04244858 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013521253 = product of:
          0.04056376 = sum of:
            0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 1739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04056376 = score(doc=1739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1739)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag plädiert für Social Media (social media) als Untersuchungsgegenstand der Informationsverhaltensforschung. Dabei wird vorgestellt, welche Charakteristika mit Facebook, Twitter und Co. als Informationsquellen verbunden sind, welche Fragestellungen für die Informationsverhaltensforschung im Kontext von social media relevant sind und welche Herausforderungen bei der Untersuchung solcher Plattformen bestehen. Studien und Forschungsarbeiten zur microblogging-Plattform Twitter, werden im Zuge einer allgemeinen Argumentation als Beispiele für konkrete Forschungsinteressen herangezogen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.1, S.22-28
  3. Stock, M.: Standard-Thesaurus Wirtschaft : Ein neuer Standard der Wirtschaftsinformation? (1999) 0.08
    0.07555478 = product of:
      0.15110956 = sum of:
        0.04244858 = product of:
          0.08489716 = sum of:
            0.08489716 = weight(_text_:28 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08489716 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.10866098 = product of:
          0.16299146 = sum of:
            0.08186394 = weight(_text_:29 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08186394 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
            0.08112752 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08112752 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    28. 1.1999 18:03:45
    Source
    Password. 1999, H.1, S.22-29
  4. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.07
    0.06611043 = product of:
      0.13222086 = sum of:
        0.037142508 = product of:
          0.074285015 = sum of:
            0.074285015 = weight(_text_:28 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074285015 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.09507835 = product of:
          0.14261752 = sum of:
            0.07163094 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07163094 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
            0.07098658 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07098658 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2002 9:29:38
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  5. Du, H.S.: ¬The role of media-embedded heuristics in achieving online readership popularity (2014) 0.06
    0.061345123 = product of:
      0.081793495 = sum of:
        0.060000814 = product of:
          0.12000163 = sum of:
            0.12000163 = weight(_text_:media in 1199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12000163 = score(doc=1199,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.6845876 = fieldWeight in 1199, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013265181 = product of:
          0.026530363 = sum of:
            0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 1199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026530363 = score(doc=1199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 1199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008527494 = product of:
          0.025582481 = sum of:
            0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 1199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025582481 = score(doc=1199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1199)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Readership popularity has been an important proxy for success for many emerging online interactive media sites. Given the exponential growth of new web applications and services, and the intense competition among them, attaining and retaining popularity are difficult. One possible approach to this problem is to enhance the competitiveness of a web presence by using appropriate web design mechanisms. Research in this area has mainly focused on technological issues and usability studies. Few studies have paid attention to the socially constructed meaning (cognition) that is embedded in the context of media. Drawing on the heuristic model from the social cognition perspective, the author posits that source credibility and content freshness are two important media-embedded heuristics potentially influential to the readership popularity of online interactive media sites. The content analysis results of 100 leading weblogs strongly supported this hypotheses. Key quantitative findings were also consistent with the qualitative evidence provided by 28 expert practitioners. This study expands our understanding of the related constructs from a social cognition perspective and calls for design attention to influential media-embedded traits when developing online interactive media and related websites.
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:36:48
  6. Deisseroth, K.: Lichtschalter im Gehirn (2011) 0.06
    0.056666084 = product of:
      0.11333217 = sum of:
        0.031836435 = product of:
          0.06367287 = sum of:
            0.06367287 = weight(_text_:28 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06367287 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.08149573 = product of:
          0.12224359 = sum of:
            0.061397955 = weight(_text_:29 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061397955 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
            0.060845636 = weight(_text_:22 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060845636 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    28. 1.2011 18:35:33
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.2, S.22-29
  7. Borgne, L.I.: INTERNET: vers la bibliothèque virtuel? (1993) 0.06
    0.05663473 = product of:
      0.11326946 = sum of:
        0.045356352 = product of:
          0.090712704 = sum of:
            0.090712704 = weight(_text_:media in 7333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.090712704 = score(doc=7333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.51749957 = fieldWeight in 7333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7333)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06791311 = product of:
          0.10186966 = sum of:
            0.051164962 = weight(_text_:29 in 7333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051164962 = score(doc=7333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 7333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7333)
            0.0507047 = weight(_text_:22 in 7333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0507047 = score(doc=7333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7333)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Defines a virtual library as an environment where information on paper is transferred to magnetic or optical media accessible direct by means of terminals and distributed via networks. Describes such a telecommunication system, the Internet, its capabilities, services offered and principle problems. provides examples of the different INTERNET applications
    Source
    Argus. 22(1993) no.2, S.21-29
  8. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.05
    0.052424937 = product of:
      0.06989992 = sum of:
        0.022678176 = product of:
          0.045356352 = sum of:
            0.045356352 = weight(_text_:media in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045356352 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.25874978 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013265181 = product of:
          0.026530363 = sum of:
            0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026530363 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.033956554 = product of:
          0.05093483 = sum of:
            0.025582481 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025582481 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
            0.02535235 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535235 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    12. 3.2021 18:41:28
  9. Saga, H.: Are we ready enough to learn from interactive multimedia? (1992) 0.05
    0.04992907 = product of:
      0.09985814 = sum of:
        0.07257016 = product of:
          0.14514032 = sum of:
            0.14514032 = weight(_text_:media in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14514032 = score(doc=1720,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02728798 = product of:
          0.08186394 = sum of:
            0.08186394 = weight(_text_:29 in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08186394 = score(doc=1720,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Educational media international. 29(1992) no.3, S.181-188
  10. Wu, M.-H.; Martin, C.D.: ¬An exploratory study of user media preferences in a public setting (1997) 0.05
    0.048170596 = product of:
      0.09634119 = sum of:
        0.07776994 = product of:
          0.15553989 = sum of:
            0.15553989 = weight(_text_:media in 452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15553989 = score(doc=452,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.88732696 = fieldWeight in 452, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=452)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.018571254 = product of:
          0.037142508 = sum of:
            0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037142508 = score(doc=452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=452)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the assumption that people want to be presented with as many different media as are possible in a given application. Reports on an exploratory study designed to assess the media preferences og the 'person on the street' when presented with the choice of 7 different media combinations to find out some unknown thing in a public space. Findings suggests that people do not always prefer to access as many different media as are available. There was a bias toward having some media combination that includes graphics, but there was also some bias against having information presented using sound in a public space
    Date
    1. 8.1996 10:11:28
  11. Brahms, E.: Aufbau und Förderung Virtueller Fachbibliotheken durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft : Lichtbildvortrag (2001) 0.05
    0.047221735 = product of:
      0.09444347 = sum of:
        0.026530363 = product of:
          0.053060725 = sum of:
            0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053060725 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06791311 = product of:
          0.10186966 = sum of:
            0.051164962 = weight(_text_:29 in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051164962 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
            0.0507047 = weight(_text_:22 in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0507047 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2002 18:42:29
    20. 1.2002 19:22:10
    Source
    Spezialbibliotheken heute: Wettbewerb und Kooperation. 28. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB/Sektion 5 im DBV in Zusammenarbeit mit der GBDL, Hannover, 6.-9 März 2001. Bearb.: Margit Brauer
  12. Plomin, R.; DeFries, J.C.: Erblichkeit kognitiver Stärken und Schwächen (1999) 0.05
    0.047221735 = product of:
      0.09444347 = sum of:
        0.026530363 = product of:
          0.053060725 = sum of:
            0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053060725 = score(doc=4209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06791311 = product of:
          0.10186966 = sum of:
            0.051164962 = weight(_text_:29 in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051164962 = score(doc=4209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
            0.0507047 = weight(_text_:22 in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0507047 = score(doc=4209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    22. 7.2000 19:01:54
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1999, H.12, S.28-41
  13. Changeux, J.-P.: ¬Die Revolution in der Gehirnforschung (2003) 0.05
    0.047221735 = product of:
      0.09444347 = sum of:
        0.026530363 = product of:
          0.053060725 = sum of:
            0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053060725 = score(doc=446,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06791311 = product of:
          0.10186966 = sum of:
            0.051164962 = weight(_text_:29 in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051164962 = score(doc=446,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
            0.0507047 = weight(_text_:22 in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0507047 = score(doc=446,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    28. 2.2003 12:05:45
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2003, H.3, S.22-27
  14. Waal, J. d.: genre-indeling van digitale media : Nieuwe media passen niet in SISO (1995) 0.05
    0.046897225 = product of:
      0.09379445 = sum of:
        0.07257016 = product of:
          0.14514032 = sum of:
            0.14514032 = weight(_text_:media in 4659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14514032 = score(doc=4659,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 4659, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02122429 = product of:
          0.04244858 = sum of:
            0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 4659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04244858 = score(doc=4659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 4659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: SISO is unable to accomodate the new media: a catagory subdivision for digital media
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) nos.7/8, S.28-31
  15. Recker, M.M.: Cognitive media types for multimedia information access (1995) 0.05
    0.046897225 = product of:
      0.09379445 = sum of:
        0.07257016 = product of:
          0.14514032 = sum of:
            0.14514032 = weight(_text_:media in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14514032 = score(doc=4792,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02122429 = product of:
          0.04244858 = sum of:
            0.04244858 = weight(_text_:28 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04244858 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a theoretical framework for organizing information and activities in educational hypermedia systems. Focuses on the content that can be represented within a physical media, rather than the physical media itself. Proposes a theory of cognitive media types based on the inferential and learning processes of human users. Presents an implemented computer system, called AlgoNet, that supports hypermedia information access and constructive learning activities for self paced learning in computer and engineering disciplines
    Date
    1. 8.1996 10:11:28
  16. Strutt, S.E.: Cataloguing and the Internet : considerations at the British Library (1997) 0.05
    0.04669439 = product of:
      0.06225919 = sum of:
        0.031749446 = product of:
          0.06349889 = sum of:
            0.06349889 = weight(_text_:media in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06349889 = score(doc=782,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.3622497 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.018571254 = product of:
          0.037142508 = sum of:
            0.037142508 = weight(_text_:28 in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037142508 = score(doc=782,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01193849 = product of:
          0.03581547 = sum of:
            0.03581547 = weight(_text_:29 in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03581547 = score(doc=782,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The vast, uncontrolled, mass of data available on the Internet poses specific problems for librarians, and in particular for cataloguers. In addition to problems of scale, quality and stability of the information available electronically, the British Library has concerns peculiar to a national archive. The Electronic Media Group (EMG) within the Cataloguing Department at the British Library has been addressing some of these issues while investigating the cataloguing of works in new forms. Outlines some of the problems addressed and gives brief overviews of similar work and experiments discivered by the EMG as being conducted by other cataloguers and information scientists in this field
    Date
    28. 1.2007 18:29:10
  17. Gnoli, C.: Classification transcends library business : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.05
    0.04574679 = product of:
      0.060995717 = sum of:
        0.03927975 = product of:
          0.0785595 = sum of:
            0.0785595 = weight(_text_:media in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0785595 = score(doc=3698,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.44816777 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013265181 = product of:
          0.026530363 = sum of:
            0.026530363 = weight(_text_:28 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026530363 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008450784 = product of:
          0.02535235 = sum of:
            0.02535235 = weight(_text_:22 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02535235 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Although bibliographic classifications usually adopt a perspective different from that of object classifications, the two have obvious relationships. These become especially relevant when users are looking for knowledge scattered in a wide variety of forms and media. This is an increasingly common situation, as library catalogues now coexist in the global digital environment with catalogues of archives, of museums, of commercial products, and many other information resources. In order to make the subject content of all these resources searchable, a broader conception of classification is needed, that can be applied to an knowledge item, rather than only bibliographic materials. To illustrate this we take an example of the research on bagpipes in Northern Italian folklore. For this kind of research, the most effective search strategy is a cross-media one, looking for many different knowledge sources such as published documents, police archives, painting details, museum specimens, organizations devoted to related subjects. To provide satisfying results for this kind of search, the traditional disciplinary approach to classification is not sufficient. Tools are needed in which knowledge items dealing with a phenomenon of interest can be retrieved independently from the other topics with which it is combined, the disciplinary context, and the medium where it occurs. This can be made possible if the basic units of classification are taken to be the phenomena treated, as recommended in the León Manifesto, rather than disciplines or other aspect features. The concept of bagpipes should be retrievable and browsable in any combination with other phenomena, disciplines, media etc. Examples are given of information sources that could be managed by this freely-faceted technique of classification.
    Date
    6. 1.1997 18:30:28
    22. 7.2010 20:40:08
  18. Schiffer-Ekhart, A.: Multimedia storage in the audiovisual department of the Landesmuseum Johanneum - Bild und Tonarchiv - in Graz (1995) 0.05
    0.045336965 = product of:
      0.09067393 = sum of:
        0.06414357 = product of:
          0.12828714 = sum of:
            0.12828714 = weight(_text_:media in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12828714 = score(doc=1563,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.7318549 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.026530363 = product of:
          0.053060725 = sum of:
            0.053060725 = weight(_text_:28 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053060725 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Analyses the characteristics of audiovisual media, and describes the photographic collection of the Landesmuseum, which comprises half a million items. Outlines the computerizes cataloguing system which allows the catalogue entries to be integrated with records of other media on a single database
    Date
    28. 1.1996 19:47:56
  19. Johnson, P.: Selecting electronic resources : developing a local decision-making matrix (1996) 0.05
    0.045307785 = product of:
      0.09061557 = sum of:
        0.03628508 = product of:
          0.07257016 = sum of:
            0.07257016 = weight(_text_:media in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07257016 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.41399965 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.05433049 = product of:
          0.08149573 = sum of:
            0.04093197 = weight(_text_:29 in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04093197 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
            0.04056376 = weight(_text_:22 in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04056376 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13105336 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Selecting electronic resources requires both a policy statement to guide collection development and management and procedures to manage the process of selecting and handling these resources. Both policy and procedures must be crafted in response to local priorities, resources, limitations, and organizational structure. This paper examines issues that should be addressed when developing local procedures. Particular emphasis is given to preparing a mechanism to guide selection between various media and modes of information delivery-is explored.
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:29:24
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.9-24
  20. Zins, C.: Models for classifying Internet resources (2002) 0.04
    0.04496892 = product of:
      0.059958562 = sum of:
        0.02721381 = product of:
          0.05442762 = sum of:
            0.05442762 = weight(_text_:media in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05442762 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17529039 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.022511758 = product of:
          0.045023516 = sum of:
            0.045023516 = weight(_text_:28 in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045023516 = score(doc=1160,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13406353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.3358372 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0102329925 = product of:
          0.030698977 = sum of:
            0.030698977 = weight(_text_:29 in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030698977 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13164683 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037424255 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Designing systematic access to Internet resources is a major item an the agenda of researchers and practitioners in the field of information science, and is the focus of this study. A critical analysis of classification schemes used in major portals and Web classified directories exposes inconsistencies in the way they classify Internet resources. The inconsistencies indicate that the developers fall to differentiate the various classificatory models, and are unaware of their different rationales. The study establishes eight classificatory models for resources available to Internet users. Internet resources can be classified by subjects, objects, applications, users, locations, reference sources, media, and languages. The first five models are contentrelated; namely they characterize the content of the resource. The other three models are formst-related; namely they characterize the format of the resource or its technological infrastructure. The study identifies and formulates the eight classificatory models, analyzes their rationales, and discusses alternative ways to combine them in a faceted integrated classification scheme.
    Date
    6. 1.1997 18:30:28
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.1, S.20-28

Authors

Languages

Types

  • el 238
  • b 40
  • p 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications