Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Borgman, C.L."
  1. Borgman, C.L.: Big data, little data, no data : scholarship in the networked world (2015) 0.02
    0.0225597 = product of:
      0.1579179 = sum of:
        0.027349325 = weight(_text_:media in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027349325 = score(doc=2785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13212246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02820796 = queryNorm
            0.20699982 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
        0.13056858 = weight(_text_:massendaten in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13056858 = score(doc=2785,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24275331 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.6058445 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02820796 = queryNorm
            0.5378653 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.6058445 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    "Big Data" is on the covers of Science, Nature, the Economist, and Wired magazines, on the front pages of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. But despite the media hyperbole, as Christine Borgman points out in this examination of data and scholarly research, having the right data is usually better than having more data; little data can be just as valuable as big data. In many cases, there are no data -- because relevant data don't exist, cannot be found, or are not available. Moreover, data sharing is difficult, incentives to do so are minimal, and data practices vary widely across disciplines. Borgman, an often-cited authority on scholarly communication, argues that data have no value or meaning in isolation; they exist within a knowledge infrastructure -- an ecology of people, practices, technologies, institutions, material objects, and relationships. After laying out the premises of her investigation -- six "provocations" meant to inspire discussion about the uses of data in scholarship -- Borgman offers case studies of data practices in the sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities, and then considers the implications of her findings for scholarly practice and research policy. To manage and exploit data over the long term, Borgman argues, requires massive investment in knowledge infrastructures; at stake is the future of scholarship.
    RSWK
    Forschung / Datenauswertung / Massendaten / Integrität <Informatik>
    Subject
    Forschung / Datenauswertung / Massendaten / Integrität <Informatik>
  2. Borgman, C.L.: Children's use of an interactive science library : exploratory research (1990) 0.01
    0.0078140935 = product of:
      0.1093973 = sum of:
        0.1093973 = weight(_text_:media in 2432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1093973 = score(doc=2432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13212246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02820796 = queryNorm
            0.8279993 = fieldWeight in 2432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2432)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    School library media quarterly. 18(1990) no.2, S.108-111
  3. Borgman, C.L.: Multi-media, multi-cultural, and multi-lingual digital libraries : or how do we exchange data In 400 languages? (1997) 0.00
    0.00452247 = product of:
      0.06331457 = sum of:
        0.06331457 = weight(_text_:media in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06331457 = score(doc=1263,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.13212246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02820796 = queryNorm
            0.4792113 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet would not be very useful if communication were limited to textual exchanges between speakers of English located in the United States. Rather, its value lies in its ability to enable people from multiple nations, speaking multiple languages, to employ multiple media in interacting with each other. While computer networks broke through national boundaries long ago, they remain much more effective for textual communication than for exchanges of sound, images, or mixed media -- and more effective for communication in English than for exchanges in most other languages, much less interactions involving multiple languages. Supporting searching and display in multiple languages is an increasingly important issue for all digital libraries accessible on the Internet. Even if a digital library contains materials in only one language, the content needs to be searchable and displayable on computers in countries speaking other languages. We need to exchange data between digital libraries, whether in a single language or in multiple languages. Data exchanges may be large batch updates or interactive hyperlinks. In any of these cases, character sets must be represented in a consistent manner if exchanges are to succeed. Issues of interoperability, portability, and data exchange related to multi-lingual character sets have received surprisingly little attention in the digital library community or in discussions of standards for information infrastructure, except in Europe. The landmark collection of papers on Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure, for example, contains no discussion of multi-lingual issues except for a passing reference to the Unicode standard. The goal of this short essay is to draw attention to the multi-lingual issues involved in designing digital libraries accessible on the Internet. Many of the multi-lingual design issues parallel those of multi-media digital libraries, a topic more familiar to most readers of D-Lib Magazine. This essay draws examples from multi-media DLs to illustrate some of the urgent design challenges in creating a globally distributed network serving people who speak many languages other than English. First we introduce some general issues of medium, culture, and language, then discuss the design challenges in the transition from local to global systems, lastly addressing technical matters. The technical issues involve the choice of character sets to represent languages, similar to the choices made in representing images or sound. However, the scale of the language problem is far greater. Standards for multi-media representation are being adopted fairly rapidly, in parallel with the availability of multi-media content in electronic form. By contrast, we have hundreds (and sometimes thousands) of years worth of textual materials in hundreds of languages, created long before data encoding standards existed. Textual content from past and present is being encoded in language and application-specific representations that are difficult to exchange without losing data -- if they exchange at all. We illustrate the multi-language DL challenge with examples drawn from the research library community, which typically handles collections of materials in 400 or so languages. These are problems faced not only by developers of digital libraries, but by those who develop and manage any communication technology that crosses national or linguistic boundaries.
  4. Borgman, C.L.: Will the global information infrastructure be the library of the future? : Central and Eastern Europe as a case example (1996) 0.00
    8.1895484E-4 = product of:
      0.011465367 = sum of:
        0.011465367 = product of:
          0.022930734 = sum of:
            0.022930734 = weight(_text_:22 in 5507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022930734 = score(doc=5507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.2, S.121-127
  5. Borgman, C.L.: ¬The conundrum of sharing research data (2012) 0.00
    6.8246236E-4 = product of:
      0.009554473 = sum of:
        0.009554473 = product of:
          0.019108946 = sum of:
            0.019108946 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019108946 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    11. 6.2012 15:22:29
  6. Borgman, C.L.; Scharnhorst, A.; Golshan, M.S.: Digital data archives as knowledge infrastructures : mediating data sharing and reuse (2019) 0.00
    6.8246236E-4 = product of:
      0.009554473 = sum of:
        0.009554473 = product of:
          0.019108946 = sum of:
            0.019108946 = weight(_text_:22 in 5325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019108946 = score(doc=5325,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5325, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5325)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    7. 7.2019 11:58:22
  7. Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005) 0.00
    5.459699E-4 = product of:
      0.007643578 = sum of:
        0.007643578 = product of:
          0.015287156 = sum of:
            0.015287156 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015287156 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    3. 6.2005 20:40:22