-
Tenopir, C.: Choices for electronic reference (1993)
0.00
0.0048838085 = product of:
0.068373315 = sum of:
0.068373315 = weight(_text_:media in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068373315 = score(doc=6569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13212246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.02820796 = queryNorm
0.51749957 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- Gives a brief account of the various kinds of reference sources available to libraries, from remote online sources to locally mountes databases to printed reference works. Also provides a short historical account of electronic reference sources. Sees a role for each medium in the library and gives broad guidelines for choosing to provide a variety of these media
-
Tenopir, C.; Levine, K.; Allard, S.; Christian, L.; Volentine, R.; Boehm, R.; Nichols, F.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Herman, E.; Watkinson, A.: Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age : results of an international questionnaire (2016)
0.00
0.002930285 = product of:
0.04102399 = sum of:
0.04102399 = weight(_text_:media in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04102399 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13212246 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.02820796 = queryNorm
0.31049973 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- An international survey of over 3,600 researchers examined how trustworthiness and quality are determined for making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing and how scholars perceive changes in trust with new forms of scholarly communication. Although differences in determining trustworthiness and authority of scholarly resources exist among age groups and fields of study, traditional methods and criteria remain important across the board. Peer review is considered the most important factor for determining the quality and trustworthiness of research. Researchers continue to read abstracts, check content for sound arguments and credible data, and rely on journal rankings when deciding whether to trust scholarly resources in reading, citing, or publishing. Social media outlets and open access publications are still often not trusted, although many researchers believe that open access has positive implications for research, especially if the open access journals are peer reviewed.
-
Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998)
0.00
0.0013512067 = product of:
0.018916892 = sum of:
0.018916892 = product of:
0.037833784 = sum of:
0.037833784 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037833784 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02820796 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
-
Tenopir, C.: Reference services from RLG (1995)
0.00
0.0010919397 = product of:
0.015287156 = sum of:
0.015287156 = product of:
0.030574312 = sum of:
0.030574312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030574312 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02820796 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 25.11.1995 19:22:01
-
Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995)
0.00
0.0010919397 = product of:
0.015287156 = sum of:
0.015287156 = product of:
0.030574312 = sum of:
0.030574312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030574312 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02820796 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 25.11.1995 19:22:01
-
Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992)
0.00
9.554473E-4 = product of:
0.013376262 = sum of:
0.013376262 = product of:
0.026752524 = sum of:
0.026752524 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026752524 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02820796 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Source
- Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
-
Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009)
0.00
6.8246236E-4 = product of:
0.009554473 = sum of:
0.009554473 = product of:
0.019108946 = sum of:
0.019108946 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019108946 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02820796 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:37
