Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Hughes, A.V.; Rafferty, P.: Inter-indexer consistency in graphic materials indexing at the National Library of Wales (2011) 0.00
    0.0034533741 = product of:
      0.048347235 = sum of:
        0.048347235 = weight(_text_:media in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048347235 = score(doc=4488,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13212246 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02820796 = queryNorm
            0.36592746 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6838713 = idf(docFreq=1110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to report a project to investigate the degree of inter-indexer consistency in the assignment of controlled vocabulary topical subject index terms to identical graphical images by different indexers at the National Library of Wales (NLW). Design/methodology/approach - An experimental quantitative methodology was devised to investigate inter-indexer consistency. Additionally, the project investigated the relationship, if any, between indexing exhaustivity and consistency, and the relationship, if any, between indexing consistency/exhaustivity and broad category of graphic format. Findings - Inter-indexer consistency in the assignment of topical subject index terms to graphic materials at the NLW was found to be generally low and highly variable. Inter-indexer consistency fell within the range 10.8 per cent to 48.0 per cent. Indexing exhaustivity varied substantially from indexer to indexer, with a mean assignment of 3.8 terms by each indexer to each image, falling within the range 2.5 to 4.7 terms. The broad category of graphic format, whether photographic or non-photographic, was found to have little influence on either inter-indexer consistency or indexing exhaustivity. Indexing exhaustivity and inter-indexer consistency exhibited a tendency toward a direct, positive relationship. The findings are necessarily limited as this is a small-scale study within a single institution. Originality/value - Previous consistency studies have almost exclusively investigated the indexing of print materials, with very little research published for non-print media. With the literature also rich in discussion of the added complexities of subjectively representing the intellectual content of visual media, this study attempts to enrich existing knowledge on indexing consistency for graphic materials and to address a noticeable gap in information theory.
  2. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.00
    0.0016379097 = product of:
      0.022930734 = sum of:
        0.022930734 = product of:
          0.045861468 = sum of:
            0.045861468 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045861468 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  3. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.00
    0.0010919397 = product of:
      0.015287156 = sum of:
        0.015287156 = product of:
          0.030574312 = sum of:
            0.030574312 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030574312 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  4. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.00
    9.554473E-4 = product of:
      0.013376262 = sum of:
        0.013376262 = product of:
          0.026752524 = sum of:
            0.026752524 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026752524 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
  5. Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.00
    9.554473E-4 = product of:
      0.013376262 = sum of:
        0.013376262 = product of:
          0.026752524 = sum of:
            0.026752524 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026752524 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    4. 1.2007 10:22:26
  6. Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.00
    8.1895484E-4 = product of:
      0.011465367 = sum of:
        0.011465367 = product of:
          0.022930734 = sum of:
            0.022930734 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022930734 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    18. 6.2005 13:16:22
  7. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.00
    8.1895484E-4 = product of:
      0.011465367 = sum of:
        0.011465367 = product of:
          0.022930734 = sum of:
            0.022930734 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022930734 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  8. Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.00
    6.8246236E-4 = product of:
      0.009554473 = sum of:
        0.009554473 = product of:
          0.019108946 = sum of:
            0.019108946 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019108946 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014) 0.00
    6.8246236E-4 = product of:
      0.009554473 = sum of:
        0.009554473 = product of:
          0.019108946 = sum of:
            0.019108946 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019108946 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
  10. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    2.7298494E-4 = product of:
      0.003821789 = sum of:
        0.003821789 = product of:
          0.007643578 = sum of:
            0.007643578 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007643578 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09877947 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02820796 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05